Published in:
Open Access 01-12-2018 | Original Research
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing 20 Gauge and 23 Gauge Vitrectomy for Patients with Macular Hole or Macular Pucker
Published in: Advances in Therapy | Issue 12/2018
Login to get accessAbstract
Introduction
To compare the transconjunctival sutureless 23 gauge (G) pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with 20 G PPV regarding inflammation, safety, visual outcome and patient comfort.
Methods
We included 103 patients with symptomatic macular hole or macular pucker, scheduled for vitrectomy in this prospective, randomized, controlled, mono-center clinical trial. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either 20G PPV (n = 51) or 23G PPV (n = 52). All eyes underwent standard 20G or 23G PPV with membrane peeling. Primary outcome measure was change in aqueous humor flare 3 weeks after surgery compared with baseline. Secondary outcome measures were flare values 2 days and 26 weeks after surgery, subjective discomforts measured with a visual analog scale, best-corrected visual acuity, duration of surgery, intraocular pressure (IOP) and adverse events.
Results
There was no significant difference in change of flare 3 weeks after PPV [− 1.7, 95% CI (− 6.3 to 2.9), p = 0.466]. Both groups showed a significant increase in flare 2 days after surgery (20G: p < 0.001, 23G: p = 0.002), but only the 20G group after 3 weeks (p = 0.011). The gain in visual acuity after 3 weeks was higher after 23G PPV (4.2 95% CI (0.4–8.0, p = 0.029), but without a difference after 6 months. The duration of surgery was shorter in the 23G group (p < 0.001). Patient comfort 3 weeks after surgery was greater after 23G PPV (foreign body sensation p = 0.002; itching: p = 0.021). However, the rate of complications did not differ between the groups.
Conclusion
The primary aim, showing the superiority of the 23G group regarding the change of flare value from baseline to 3 weeks after surgery, was not met, but the level of inflammation decreased faster after 23G PPV. Clear advantages of the 23G PPV were a lower risk of postoperative IOP elevation, a shorter surgery time, faster visual recovery and greater patient comfort in the early postoperative phase.
Clinical Trial Registration Number
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01969929.