Published in:
Open Access
01-12-2022 | Research
A quantitative accuracy assessment of the use of a rigid robotic arm in navigated placement of 726 pedicle screws
Authors:
Carlo Alberto Benech, Rosa Perez, Franco Benech, Torrey Shirk, Brandon S. Bucklen
Published in:
BMC Surgery
|
Issue 1/2022
Login to get access
Abstract
Background
Traditional minimally invasive fluoroscopy-based techniques for pedicle screw placement utilize guidance, which may require fluoroscopic shots. Computerized tomography (CT) navigation results in more accurate screw placement. Robotic surgery seeks to establish access and trajectory with greater accuracy.
Objective
This study evaluated the screw placement accuracy of a robotic platform.
Methods
Demographic data, preoperative/postoperative CT scans, and complication rates of 127 patients who underwent lumbosacral pedicle screw placement with minimally invasive navigated robotic guidance using preoperative CT were analyzed.
Results
On the GRS scale, 97.9% (711/726) of screws were graded A or B, 1.7% (12/726) of screws graded C, 0.4% (3/726) of screws graded D, and 0% graded E. Average offset from preoperative plan to final screw placement was 1.9 ± 1.5 mm from tip, 2.2 ± 1.4 mm from tail and 2.9 ± 2.3° of angulation.
Conclusions
Robotic-assisted surgery utilizing preoperative CT workflow with intraoperative fluoroscopy-based registration improves pedicle screw placement accuracy within a patient’s pedicles.