Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Surgery 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Mastectomy | Research

Prepectoral breast reconstruction with complete anterior implant coverage using a single, large, square-shaped acellular dermal matrix

Authors: Hyun Ki Hong, Yun Hyun Kim, Joon seok Lee, Jeeyeon Lee, Ho Yong Park, Jung Dug Yang

Published in: BMC Surgery | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Several studies have discussed various methods of prepectoral direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction using an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) prosthesis to achieve full coverage. However, methods for anterior coverage have rarely been reported. In this study, prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction with complete anterior implant coverage was performed using a square piece of ADM. This study aimed to introduce our prepectoral DTI technique and determine its functional and cosmetic outcomes as well as compare them with those of existing subpectoral DTI techniques.

Methods

This prospective comparative study focused on 29 patients (35 breasts) and 34 patients (35 breasts) who underwent breast reconstruction via subpectoral implant insertion (control group) and anterior coverage prepectoral implant insertion (anterior coverage group), respectively. Postoperative complications were noted, and breast symmetry was evaluated using the Vectra H2 three-dimensional scanner. The modified Kyungpook National University Hospital Breast-Q (KNUH Breast-Q) scale was used to assess the patient’s subjective satisfaction with the reconstruction and postoperative quality of life.

Results

No remarkable differences in terms of complications (seroma, skin necrosis, nipple–areola complex necrosis, hematoma, capsular contracture, and infection) were noted in both groups. Compared with controls, considerably better results were observed among those in the anterior coverage group in terms of the mean drain removal period. Furthermore, those in the anterior coverage group showed greater symmetry on three-dimensional scans than the controls; however, this was not statistically significant. Subjective satisfaction and postoperative quality of life measured using the KNUH Breast-Q scale were not significantly different between both groups.

Conclusions

Considering its stability, faster recovery time, and cosmetic benefit, prepectoral breast reconstruction with anterior implant coverage using a single, large ADM is a good choice to perform breast reconstruction with implant insertion in patients who have undergone mastectomy.
Level of evidence: II.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Rhiem K, Schmutzler R. Impact of prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Breast Care. 2014;9:385–9.CrossRef Rhiem K, Schmutzler R. Impact of prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Breast Care. 2014;9:385–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(1):15–23.CrossRef Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(1):15–23.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Reitsamer R, Peintinger F. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68(2):162–7.CrossRef Reitsamer R, Peintinger F. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68(2):162–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ibrahim AM, Koolen PG, Ashraf AA, et al. Acellular dermal matrix in reconstructive breast surgery: survey of current practice among plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3(4): e381.CrossRef Ibrahim AM, Koolen PG, Ashraf AA, et al. Acellular dermal matrix in reconstructive breast surgery: survey of current practice among plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3(4): e381.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gandhi A, Barr L, Johnson R. Bioprosthetics: changing the landscape for breast reconstruction? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39(1):24–5.CrossRef Gandhi A, Barr L, Johnson R. Bioprosthetics: changing the landscape for breast reconstruction? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39(1):24–5.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Macadam SA, Lennox PA. Acellular dermal matrices: use in reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery. Can J Plast Surg. 2012;20(2):75–89.CrossRef Macadam SA, Lennox PA. Acellular dermal matrices: use in reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery. Can J Plast Surg. 2012;20(2):75–89.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Downs RK, Hedges K. An alternative technique for immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction—a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016;4(7): e821.CrossRef Downs RK, Hedges K. An alternative technique for immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction—a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016;4(7): e821.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lee JS, Kim JS, Lee JH, et al. Prepectoral breast reconstruction with complete implant coverage using double-crossed acellular dermal matrixs. Gland Surg. 2019;8(6):748–57.CrossRef Lee JS, Kim JS, Lee JH, et al. Prepectoral breast reconstruction with complete implant coverage using double-crossed acellular dermal matrixs. Gland Surg. 2019;8(6):748–57.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Salzberg CA, Ashikari AY, Koch RM, Chabner-Thompson E. An 8-year experience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(2):514–24.CrossRef Salzberg CA, Ashikari AY, Koch RM, Chabner-Thompson E. An 8-year experience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(2):514–24.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Manrique OJ, Banuelos J, Abu-Ghname A, et al. Surgical outcomes of prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction in young women. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(3): e2119.CrossRef Manrique OJ, Banuelos J, Abu-Ghname A, et al. Surgical outcomes of prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction in young women. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(3): e2119.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Thangarajah F, Treeter T, Krug B, et al. Comparison of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant reconstruction after skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer patients: a retrospective hospital-based cohort study. Breast Care (Basel). 2019;14(6):382–7.CrossRef Thangarajah F, Treeter T, Krug B, et al. Comparison of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant reconstruction after skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer patients: a retrospective hospital-based cohort study. Breast Care (Basel). 2019;14(6):382–7.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yang JY, Kim CW, Lee JW, Kim SK, Lee SA, Hwang E. Considerations for patient selection: prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg. 2019;46(6):550–7.CrossRef Yang JY, Kim CW, Lee JW, Kim SK, Lee SA, Hwang E. Considerations for patient selection: prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg. 2019;46(6):550–7.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ching AH, Lim K, Sze PW, Ooi A. Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022;S1748–6815(22):00099–107. Ching AH, Lim K, Sze PW, Ooi A. Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022;S1748–6815(22):00099–107.
15.
go back to reference Vidya R, Iqbal FM. A guide to prepectoral breast reconstruction: a new dimension to implant-based breast reconstruction. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017;17(4):266–71.CrossRef Vidya R, Iqbal FM. A guide to prepectoral breast reconstruction: a new dimension to implant-based breast reconstruction. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017;17(4):266–71.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Cattelani L, Polotto S, Arcuri MF, Pedrazzi G, Linguadoca C, Bonati E. One-step prepectoral breast reconstruction with dermal matrix-covered implant compared to submuscular implantation: functional and cost evaluation. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018;18(4):e703–11.CrossRef Cattelani L, Polotto S, Arcuri MF, Pedrazzi G, Linguadoca C, Bonati E. One-step prepectoral breast reconstruction with dermal matrix-covered implant compared to submuscular implantation: functional and cost evaluation. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018;18(4):e703–11.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sigalove S, Maxwell GP, Sigalove NM, et al. Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: rationale, indications, and preliminary results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(2):287–94.CrossRef Sigalove S, Maxwell GP, Sigalove NM, et al. Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: rationale, indications, and preliminary results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(2):287–94.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bernini M, Calabrese C, Cecconi L, et al. Subcutaneous direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: surgical, functional, and aesthetic results after long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3(12): e574.CrossRef Bernini M, Calabrese C, Cecconi L, et al. Subcutaneous direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: surgical, functional, and aesthetic results after long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3(12): e574.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Vidya R, Masià J, Cawthorn S, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the prepectoral breast reconstruction with Braxon dermal matrix: First multicenter European report on 100 cases. Breast J. 2017;23(6):670–6.CrossRef Vidya R, Masià J, Cawthorn S, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the prepectoral breast reconstruction with Braxon dermal matrix: First multicenter European report on 100 cases. Breast J. 2017;23(6):670–6.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chepla KJ, Dagget JR, Soltanian HT. The partial AlloDerm sling: reducing allograft costs associated with breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(7):924–30.CrossRef Chepla KJ, Dagget JR, Soltanian HT. The partial AlloDerm sling: reducing allograft costs associated with breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(7):924–30.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Khan A, Tasoulis MK, Teoh V, Tanska A, Edmonds R, Gui G. Pre-pectoral one-stage breast reconstruction with anterior biological acellular dermal matrix coverage. Gland Surg. 2021;10(3):1002–9.CrossRef Khan A, Tasoulis MK, Teoh V, Tanska A, Edmonds R, Gui G. Pre-pectoral one-stage breast reconstruction with anterior biological acellular dermal matrix coverage. Gland Surg. 2021;10(3):1002–9.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Yeo H, Lee D, Kim JS, et al. Strategy for salvaging infected breast implants: lessons from the recovery of seven consecutive patients. Arch Plast Surg. 2021;48(2):165–74.CrossRef Yeo H, Lee D, Kim JS, et al. Strategy for salvaging infected breast implants: lessons from the recovery of seven consecutive patients. Arch Plast Surg. 2021;48(2):165–74.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Yang Y, Mu D, Xu B, et al. An intraoperative measurement method of breast symmetry using three-dimensional scanning technique in reduction mammaplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021;45(5):2135–45.CrossRef Yang Y, Mu D, Xu B, et al. An intraoperative measurement method of breast symmetry using three-dimensional scanning technique in reduction mammaplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021;45(5):2135–45.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Schlenker JD, Bueno RA, Ricketson G, Lynch JB. Loss of silicone implants after subcutaneous mastectomy and reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978;62(6):853–61.CrossRef Schlenker JD, Bueno RA, Ricketson G, Lynch JB. Loss of silicone implants after subcutaneous mastectomy and reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978;62(6):853–61.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prepectoral breast reconstruction with complete anterior implant coverage using a single, large, square-shaped acellular dermal matrix
Authors
Hyun Ki Hong
Yun Hyun Kim
Joon seok Lee
Jeeyeon Lee
Ho Yong Park
Jung Dug Yang
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Mastectomy
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01683-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Surgery 1/2022 Go to the issue