Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

A qualitative approach to guide choices for designing a diary study

Authors: Karin A. M. Janssens, Elisabeth H. Bos, Judith G. M. Rosmalen, Marieke C. Wichers, Harriëtte Riese

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Electronic diaries are increasingly used in diverse disciplines to collect momentary data on experienced feelings, cognitions, behavior and social context in real life situations. Choices to be made for an effective and feasible design are however a challenge. Careful and detailed documentation of argumentation of choosing a particular design, as well as general guidelines on how to design such studies are largely lacking in scientific papers. This qualitative study provides a systematic overview of arguments for choosing a specific diary study design (e.g. time frame) in order to optimize future design decisions.

Methods

During the first data assessment round, 47 researchers experienced in diary research from twelve different countries participated. They gave a description of and arguments for choosing their diary design (i.e., study duration, measurement frequency, random or fixed assessment, momentary or retrospective assessment, allowed delay to respond to the beep). During the second round, 38 participants (81%) rated the importance of the different themes identified during the first assessment round for the different diary design topics.

Results

The rationales for diary design choices reported during the first round were mostly strongly related to the research question. The rationales were categorized into four overarching themes: nature of the variables, reliability, feasibility, and statistics. During the second round, all overarching themes were considered important for all diary design topics.

Conclusions

We conclude that no golden standard for the optimal design of a diary study exists since the design depends heavily upon the research question of the study. The findings of the current study are helpful to explicate and guide the specific choices that have to be made when designing a diary study.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Kimhy D, Myin-Germeys I, Palmier-Claus J, Swendsen J. Mobile assessment guide for research in schizophrenia and severe mental disorders. Schizophr Bull. 2012;38:386–95.CrossRef
2.
Wichers M, Groot PC, Psychosystems EWS Group ESMG. Critical slowing down as a personalized early warning signal for depression. Psychother Psychosom. 2016;85:114–6.CrossRef
3.
Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR. Ecological momentary assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008;4:1–32.CrossRef
4.
Conner TS, Lehman BJ. Getting started. Launching a study in daily life. In: Mehl MR, Conner TS, editors. Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. vol. 2 first. New York: The Guiloford Press; 2012. p. 89–1067.
5.
Delespaul PEAG. Technical note: devices and sampling procedures. In: Delespaul PEAG, editor. Assessing schizophrenia in daily life; vol. 4 first. Maastricht: IPSER Foundation; 1995. p. 83–102.
6.
Palmier-Claus JE, Myin-Germeys I, Barkus E, Bentley L, Udachina A, Delespaul PA, et al. Experience sampling research in individuals with mental illness: reflections and guidance. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2011;123:12–20.CrossRef
7.
Smyth J, Wonderlich S, Crosby R, Miltenberg R, Mitchell J, Rorty M. The use of ecological momentary assessment approaches in eating disorder research. Int J Eat Disord. 2001;30:83–95.CrossRef
8.
Stone AA, Shiffman S. Capturing momentary, self-report data: a proposal for reporting guidelines. Ann Behav Med. 2002;24:236–43.CrossRef
9.
Liao Y, Skelton K, Dunton G, Bruening M. A systematic review of methods and procedures used in ecological momentary assessments of diet and physical activity research in youth: an adapted STROBE checklist for reporting EMA studies (CREMAS). J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e151.CrossRef
10.
11.
Powell C. The Delphi technique: myths and realities. J Adv Nurs. 2003;41:376–82.CrossRef
12.
Csikszentmihalyi M, Larson R. Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1987;175:526–36.CrossRef
13.
Hektner JM, Schmidt JA, Csikszentmihalyi M. Experience sampling method: measuring the quality of everyday life. Vol. first. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2006.
14.
Jacobs N, van Os J, Derom C, Thiery E, Delespaul P, Wichers M. Neuroticism explained? From a non-informative vulnerability marker to informative person-context interactions in the realm of daily life. Br J Clin Psychol. 2011;50:19–32.CrossRef
15.
Lütkepohl H. New introduction to multiple time series analysis. New York: Springer; 2007.
16.
Tudor-Locke C, Burkett L, Reis JP, Ainsworth BE, Macera CA, Wilson DK. How many days of pedometer monitoring predict weekly physical activity in adults? Prev Med (Baltim). 2005;40:293–8.CrossRef
17.
Wichers MC, Myin-Germeys I, Jacobs N, Peeters F, Kenis G, Derom C, et al. Evidence that moment-to-moment variation in positive emotions buffer genetic risk for depression: a momentary assessment twin study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007;115:451–7.CrossRef
18.
Ebner-Priemer UW, Sawitzki G. Ambulatory assessment of affective instability in borderline personality disorder. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2007;23:238–47.CrossRef
19.
Lightman SL, Conway-Campbell BL. The crucial role of pulsatile activity of the HPA axis for continuous dynamic equilibration. Nat Rev. 2010;11:710–8.CrossRef
20.
Stone AA, Broderick JE, Shiffman SS, Schwartz JE. Understanding recall of weekly pain from a momentary assessment perspective: absolute agreement, between- and within-person consistency, and judged change in weekly pain. Pain. 2004;107:61–9.CrossRef
21.
van den Brink M, Bandell-Hoekstra EN, Abu-Saad HH. The occurrence of recall bias in pediatric headache: a comparison of questionnaire and diary data. Headache. 2001;41:11–20.CrossRef
22.
Houtveen JH, Oei NY. Recall bias in reporting medically unexplained symptoms comes from semantic memory. J Psychosom Res. 2007;62:277–82.CrossRef
23.
24.
Chan SW, Goodwin GM, Harmer CJ. Highly neurotic never-depressed students have negative biases in information processing. Psychol Med. 2007;37:1281–91.CrossRef
25.
Ben-Zeev D, Young MA. Accuracy of hospitalized depressed patients’ and healthy controls’ retrospective symptom reports: an experience sampling study. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2010;198:280–5.CrossRef
26.
Broderick JE, Schwartz JE, Vikingstad G, Pribbernow M, Grossman S, Stone AA. The accuracy of pain and fatigue items across different reporting periods. Pain. 2008;139:146–57.CrossRef
27.
Johnson EI, Grondin O, Barrault M, Faytout M, Helbig S, Husky M, et al. Computerized ambulatory monitoring in psychiatry: a multi-site collaborative study of acceptability, compliance, and reactivity. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2009;18:48–57.CrossRef
28.
Bolger N, Davis A, Rafaeli E. Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived. Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:579–616.CrossRef
29.
Santangelo P, Reinhard I, Mussgay L, Steil R, Sawitzki G, Klein C, et al. Specificity of affective instability in patients with borderline personality disorder compared to posttraumatic stress disorder, bulimia nervosa, and healthy controls. J Abnorm Psychol. 2014;123:258–72.CrossRef
30.
31.
Metadata
Title
A qualitative approach to guide choices for designing a diary study
Authors
Karin A. M. Janssens
Elisabeth H. Bos
Judith G. M. Rosmalen
Marieke C. Wichers
Harriëtte Riese
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0579-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research article

Reference effect measures for quantifying, comparing and visualizing variation from random and fixed effects in non-normal multilevel models, with applications to site variation in medical procedure use and outcomes

Research article

Engaging military couples in marital research: does requesting referrals from service members to recruit their spouses introduce sample bias?

Research article

A randomized comparison of three data collection models for the measurement of parent experiences with diabetes outpatient care

Research article

Heckman imputation models for binary or continuous MNAR outcomes and MAR predictors

Study protocol

Exploring the impact of public health teams on alcohol premises licensing in England and Scotland (ExILEnS): procotol for a mixed methods natural experiment evaluation

Research article

Outlier classification performance of risk adjustment methods when profiling multiple providers