Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Research

A practical guide to implementing a successful social media recruitment strategy: lessons from the Eczema Monitoring Online trial

Authors: Arabella Baker, Eleanor J. Mitchell, Kim S. Thomas

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Participant recruitment into clinical trials remains challenging. The global increase in the number of social media users has accelerated the use of social media as a modality of recruitment, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic when traditional recruitment methods were reduced. However, there is limited evidence on the performance of social media recruitment strategies into eczema clinical trials.

Methods

From September 2021 to January 2022, we recruited participants with eczema into an online randomised controlled trial using free advertising on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and Reddit (unpaid methods), followed by paid Facebook advertisements (paid method). Unpaid methods were used periodically for 63 days, whilst the paid method for 16 days. Interested individuals who clicked on the advertisement link were directed to the study website, where they could sign up to participate. Consenting, randomisation and data collection occurred exclusively online, using a database management web platform. Evaluation of the social media recruitment methods was performed, including the number of expression of interests, enrolment yield, cost, baseline characteristics and retention.

Results

Our multi-platform based social media recruitment strategy resulted in 400 expressions of interests, leading to 296 participants. Unpaid methods accounted for 136 (45.9%) of participants, incurring no financial cost. Paid Facebook adverts reached 154,370 individuals, resulting in 123 (41.6%) trial participants for a total cost of £259.93 (£2.11 per participant) and other recruitment methods resulted in 37 (12.5%) enrolments. Paid advertisements predominantly attracted younger participants below the age of 20, whereas unpaid methods mainly drew in participants between 20–29 years of age. The social media platforms recruited an ethnically diverse participant population. Completion rate of follow-up was slightly higher for the paid method (n = 103, 83.7%) compared with the unpaid methods (n = 111, 81.6%).

Conclusions

Unpaid social media posts recruited the most participants; however, it was time consuming for the researcher. Paid Facebook adverts rapidly recruited a large number of participants for a low cost and provided flexibility to target specific audiences. Our findings indicate that social media is an efficient tool that can potentially support recruitment to clinical trials.

Trial registration

ISRCTN45167024. Registered on 29 June 2021.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Healy P, Galvin S, Williamson PR, Treweek S, Whiting C, Maeso B, et al. Identifying trial recruitment uncertainties using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership – the PRioRiTy (Prioritising Recruitment in Randomised Trials) study. Trials. 2018;19(1):147.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Healy P, Galvin S, Williamson PR, Treweek S, Whiting C, Maeso B, et al. Identifying trial recruitment uncertainties using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership – the PRioRiTy (Prioritising Recruitment in Randomised Trials) study. Trials. 2018;19(1):147.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Treweek S, Pitkethly M, Cook J, Fraser C, Mitchell E, Sullivan F, et al. Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2018;2(2):MR000013. Treweek S, Pitkethly M, Cook J, Fraser C, Mitchell E, Sullivan F, et al. Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2018;2(2):MR000013.
3.
go back to reference Fletcher B, Gheorghe A, Moore D, Wilson S, Damery S. Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2012;2(1):e000496.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fletcher B, Gheorghe A, Moore D, Wilson S, Damery S. Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2012;2(1):e000496.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference McDonald AM, Knight RC, Campbell MK, Entwistle VA, Grant AM, Cook JA, et al. What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2006;7:9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McDonald AM, Knight RC, Campbell MK, Entwistle VA, Grant AM, Cook JA, et al. What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2006;7:9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Sully BGO, Julious SA, Nicholl J. A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2013;14(1):166.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sully BGO, Julious SA, Nicholl J. A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2013;14(1):166.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Carlisle B, Kimmelman J, Ramsay T, MacKinnon N. Unsuccessful trial accrual and human subjects protections: an empirical analysis of recently closed trials. Clin Trials. 2014;12(1):77–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carlisle B, Kimmelman J, Ramsay T, MacKinnon N. Unsuccessful trial accrual and human subjects protections: an empirical analysis of recently closed trials. Clin Trials. 2014;12(1):77–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Kasenda B, von Elm E, You J, Blümle A, Tomonaga Y, Saccilotto R, et al. Prevalence, characteristics, and publication of discontinued randomized trials. JAMA. 2014;311(10):1045–52.CrossRefPubMed Kasenda B, von Elm E, You J, Blümle A, Tomonaga Y, Saccilotto R, et al. Prevalence, characteristics, and publication of discontinued randomized trials. JAMA. 2014;311(10):1045–52.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Friedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets D. Fundamentals of clinical trials. 4th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.CrossRef Friedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets D. Fundamentals of clinical trials. 4th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gillies K, Chalmers I, Glasziou P, Elbourne D, Elliott J, Treweek S. Reducing research waste by promoting informed responses to invitations to participate in clinical trials. Trials. 2019;20(1):613.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gillies K, Chalmers I, Glasziou P, Elbourne D, Elliott J, Treweek S. Reducing research waste by promoting informed responses to invitations to participate in clinical trials. Trials. 2019;20(1):613.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Kakumanu S, Manns BJ, Tran S, Saunders-Smith T, Hemmelgarn BR, Tonelli M, et al. Cost analysis and efficacy of recruitment strategies used in a large pragmatic community-based clinical trial targeting low-income seniors: a comparative descriptive analysis. Trials. 2019;20(1):577.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kakumanu S, Manns BJ, Tran S, Saunders-Smith T, Hemmelgarn BR, Tonelli M, et al. Cost analysis and efficacy of recruitment strategies used in a large pragmatic community-based clinical trial targeting low-income seniors: a comparative descriptive analysis. Trials. 2019;20(1):577.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Ali SH, Foreman J, Capasso A, Jones AM, Tozan Y, DiClemente RJ. Social media as a recruitment platform for a nationwide online survey of COVID-19 knowledge, beliefs, and practices in the United States: methodology and feasibility analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1):116.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ali SH, Foreman J, Capasso A, Jones AM, Tozan Y, DiClemente RJ. Social media as a recruitment platform for a nationwide online survey of COVID-19 knowledge, beliefs, and practices in the United States: methodology and feasibility analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1):116.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Treweek S, Briel M. Digital tools for trial recruitment and retention—plenty of tools but rigorous evaluation is in short supply. Trials. 2020;21(1):476.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Treweek S, Briel M. Digital tools for trial recruitment and retention—plenty of tools but rigorous evaluation is in short supply. Trials. 2020;21(1):476.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Admon L, Haefner JK, Kolenic GE, Chang T, Davis MM, Moniz MH. Recruiting pregnant patients for survey research: a head to head comparison of social media-based versus clinic-based approaches. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(12):e326.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Admon L, Haefner JK, Kolenic GE, Chang T, Davis MM, Moniz MH. Recruiting pregnant patients for survey research: a head to head comparison of social media-based versus clinic-based approaches. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(12):e326.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Frandsen M, Thow M, Ferguson SG. The effectiveness of social media (Facebook) compared with more traditional advertising methods for recruiting eligible participants to health research studies: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016;5(3):e161.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Frandsen M, Thow M, Ferguson SG. The effectiveness of social media (Facebook) compared with more traditional advertising methods for recruiting eligible participants to health research studies: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016;5(3):e161.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Moreno MA, Waite A, Pumper M, Colburn T, Holm M, Mendoza J. Recruiting adolescent research participants: in-person compared to social media approaches. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016;20(1):64–7.CrossRefPubMed Moreno MA, Waite A, Pumper M, Colburn T, Holm M, Mendoza J. Recruiting adolescent research participants: in-person compared to social media approaches. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016;20(1):64–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Tudur Smith C, Hickey H, Clarke M, Blazeby J, Williamson P. The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise. Trials. 2014;15(1):32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tudur Smith C, Hickey H, Clarke M, Blazeby J, Williamson P. The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise. Trials. 2014;15(1):32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Ali Z, Joergensen KM, Vestergaard C, Andersen AD, Alexaki M, Eiken AL, et al. Effective clinical study recruitment of patients with atopic dermatitis through social media. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35(12):e922–3.CrossRefPubMed Ali Z, Joergensen KM, Vestergaard C, Andersen AD, Alexaki M, Eiken AL, et al. Effective clinical study recruitment of patients with atopic dermatitis through social media. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35(12):e922–3.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Spada F, Harrison IP, Barnes TM, Greive KA, Daniels D, Townley JP, et al. Recruitment of adults with moderate eczema for a randomised trial: comparison of traditional versus modern methods. Australas J Dermatol. 2021;62(4):e510–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Spada F, Harrison IP, Barnes TM, Greive KA, Daniels D, Townley JP, et al. Recruitment of adults with moderate eczema for a randomised trial: comparison of traditional versus modern methods. Australas J Dermatol. 2021;62(4):e510–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Shatz I. The negative impact of goal-oriented instructions. Educ Stud. 2015;41(5):476–80.CrossRef Shatz I. The negative impact of goal-oriented instructions. Educ Stud. 2015;41(5):476–80.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Nutten S. Atopic dermatitis: global epidemiology and risk factors. Ann Nutr Metab. 2015;66(Suppl. 1):8–16.CrossRefPubMed Nutten S. Atopic dermatitis: global epidemiology and risk factors. Ann Nutr Metab. 2015;66(Suppl. 1):8–16.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Santer M, Muller I, Yardley L, Burgess H, Ersser SJ, Lewis-Jones S, et al. ‘You don’t know which bits to believe’: qualitative study exploring carers’ experiences of seeking information on the internet about childhood eczema. BMJ Open. 2015;5(4):e006339.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Santer M, Muller I, Yardley L, Burgess H, Ersser SJ, Lewis-Jones S, et al. ‘You don’t know which bits to believe’: qualitative study exploring carers’ experiences of seeking information on the internet about childhood eczema. BMJ Open. 2015;5(4):e006339.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Bhanot A, Peters TJ, Ridd MJ. Assessing the validity, responsiveness and reliability of the Recap measure of eczema control. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184(5):955–7.CrossRefPubMed Bhanot A, Peters TJ, Ridd MJ. Assessing the validity, responsiveness and reliability of the Recap measure of eczema control. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184(5):955–7.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Howells LM, Chalmers JR, Gran S, Ahmed A, Apfelbacher C, Burton T, et al. Development and initial testing of a new instrument to measure the experience of eczema control in adults and children: Recap of atopic eczema (RECAP). Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(3):524–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Howells LM, Chalmers JR, Gran S, Ahmed A, Apfelbacher C, Burton T, et al. Development and initial testing of a new instrument to measure the experience of eczema control in adults and children: Recap of atopic eczema (RECAP). Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(3):524–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Ali Z, Anderson K, Chiriac A, Andersen AD, Isberg AP, Moreno FG, et al. High adherence and low dropout rate in a virtual clinical study of atopic dermatitis through weekly reward-based personalized genetic lifestyle reports. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(7):e0235500.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ali Z, Anderson K, Chiriac A, Andersen AD, Isberg AP, Moreno FG, et al. High adherence and low dropout rate in a virtual clinical study of atopic dermatitis through weekly reward-based personalized genetic lifestyle reports. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(7):e0235500.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Jackson LA, Ervin KS, Gardner PD, Schmitt N. Gender and the internet: women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles. 2001;44(5):363–79.CrossRef Jackson LA, Ervin KS, Gardner PD, Schmitt N. Gender and the internet: women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles. 2001;44(5):363–79.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Katz BE, Eiken A, Misev V, Zibert JR. Digital recruitment for clinical studies. Dermatol Times. 2019;40(1): 26–28. Katz BE, Eiken A, Misev V, Zibert JR. Digital recruitment for clinical studies. Dermatol Times. 2019;40(1): 26–28.
37.
go back to reference Topolovec-Vranic J, Natarajan K. The use of social media in recruitment for medical research studies: a scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(11):e286.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Topolovec-Vranic J, Natarajan K. The use of social media in recruitment for medical research studies: a scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(11):e286.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Kayrouz R, Dear BF, Karin E, Titov N. Facebook as an effective recruitment strategy for mental health research of hard to reach populations. Internet Interv. 2016;4:1–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kayrouz R, Dear BF, Karin E, Titov N. Facebook as an effective recruitment strategy for mental health research of hard to reach populations. Internet Interv. 2016;4:1–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
A practical guide to implementing a successful social media recruitment strategy: lessons from the Eczema Monitoring Online trial
Authors
Arabella Baker
Eleanor J. Mitchell
Kim S. Thomas
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06839-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Trials 1/2022 Go to the issue