Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 1/2007

01-01-2007 | Clinical Trial Report

A phase I study of the safety and pharmacokinetics of edotecarin (J-107088), a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors

Authors: Herbert I. Hurwitz, Roger B. Cohen, J. Patrick McGovren, Samit Hirawat, William P. Petros, Yutaka Natsumeda, Tomoko Yoshinari

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 1/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the maximum tolerated dose, safety, and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of escalating doses of the novel topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitor edotecarin (J-107088) given as a 2-h intravenous (IV) infusion once every 21 days in patients with advanced solid tumors who had not responded to standard therapy.

Patients and methods

Twenty-nine patients (18M:11F) received a 2-h IV infusion of edotecarin in doses of 6, 8, 11, 13, or 15 mg/m2 every 21 days (with an additional 1–2 weeks permitted for recovery) and were evaluated for safety, PK, and tumor response.

Results

The most common non-hematologic toxicities were grade 1–2 nausea, fatigue, anorexia, vomiting, and fever. The most common hematologic toxicities were grade 1–2 thrombocytopenia and grade 3–4 neutropenia, leukopenia, and anemia. No grade 3–4 diarrhea was reported. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in four patients at the 15 mg/m2 dose and one patient at the 13 mg/m2 dose. These toxicities included grade 3 nausea, vomiting, headache, and fatigue, as well as grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. The maximum tolerated dose was declared at 15 mg/m2. One patient with bladder cancer had a confirmed partial response at a dose of 13 mg/m2. There was a trend to dose-proportional increases in edotecarin peak plasma concentrations and area under the curve values. Renal excretion of edotecarin was minimal (3–8% of the dose).

Conclusion

The recommended Phase II dose of edotecarin is 13 mg/m2 once every 21 days. The toxicities in this study were those typical of cytotoxic chemotherapy and less severe than those associated with other topo I inhibitors. The observed safety profile and preliminary evidence of clinical benefit warrant further investigation of this drug as monotherapy or part of combination therapy in patients with solid tumors.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rougier P, Van Cutsem E, Bajetta E, et al. (1998) Randomised trial of irinotecan versus fluorouracil by continuous infusion after fluorouracil failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet 352:1407–1412PubMedCrossRef Rougier P, Van Cutsem E, Bajetta E, et al. (1998) Randomised trial of irinotecan versus fluorouracil by continuous infusion after fluorouracil failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet 352:1407–1412PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Pyrhonen S, James RD, et al. (1998) Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet 352:1413–1418PubMedCrossRef Cunningham D, Pyrhonen S, James RD, et al. (1998) Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet 352:1413–1418PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Saltz LB, Cox JV, Blanke C, et al. (2000) Irinotecan Study Group: Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 343:905–914PubMedCrossRef Saltz LB, Cox JV, Blanke C, et al. (2000) Irinotecan Study Group: Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 343:905–914PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD, et al. (2000) Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomized trial. Lancet 355:1041–1047PubMedCrossRef Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD, et al. (2000) Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomized trial. Lancet 355:1041–1047PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Huinink WTB, Gore M, et al. (1997) Topotecan versus paclitaxel for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:2183–2193 Huinink WTB, Gore M, et al. (1997) Topotecan versus paclitaxel for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:2183–2193
6.
go back to reference Scheller JH, Kim K, Hutson P, et al. (1996) Phase II study of topotecan in patients with extensive-stage small-cell carcinoma of the lung: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial. J Clin Oncol 14:2345–2352 Scheller JH, Kim K, Hutson P, et al. (1996) Phase II study of topotecan in patients with extensive-stage small-cell carcinoma of the lung: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial. J Clin Oncol 14:2345–2352
7.
go back to reference Ardizzoni A, Hansen H, Bombemoswky P, et al. (1997) Topotecan, a new active drug in the second-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer: a Phase II study in patients with refractory and sensitive disease. J Clin Oncol 15:2090–2096PubMed Ardizzoni A, Hansen H, Bombemoswky P, et al. (1997) Topotecan, a new active drug in the second-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer: a Phase II study in patients with refractory and sensitive disease. J Clin Oncol 15:2090–2096PubMed
8.
go back to reference Bailly C (2000) Topoisomerase I poisons and suppressors as anticancer drugs. Current Med Chem 7:39–58 Bailly C (2000) Topoisomerase I poisons and suppressors as anticancer drugs. Current Med Chem 7:39–58
9.
go back to reference Long BH, Balasubramanian BN (2000) Non-camptothecin topoisomerase I compounds as potential anticancer agents. Exp Opin Ther Patents 10:635–666CrossRef Long BH, Balasubramanian BN (2000) Non-camptothecin topoisomerase I compounds as potential anticancer agents. Exp Opin Ther Patents 10:635–666CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Yoshinari T, Ohkubo M, Fukasawa K, et al. (1999) Mode of action of a new indolocarbazole anticancer agent, J-107088, targeting topoisomerase I. Cancer Res 59:4271–4275PubMed Yoshinari T, Ohkubo M, Fukasawa K, et al. (1999) Mode of action of a new indolocarbazole anticancer agent, J-107088, targeting topoisomerase I. Cancer Res 59:4271–4275PubMed
11.
go back to reference Arakawa H, Morita M, Kodera T, et al. (1999) In vivo anti-tumor activity of a novel indolocarbazole compound, J-107088, on murine and human tumors transplanted into mice. Jpn J Canc Res 90:1163–1170 Arakawa H, Morita M, Kodera T, et al. (1999) In vivo anti-tumor activity of a novel indolocarbazole compound, J-107088, on murine and human tumors transplanted into mice. Jpn J Canc Res 90:1163–1170
12.
go back to reference Arakawa H, Iguchi T, Morita M, et al. (1995) Novel antitumor indolocarbazole compound 6-N-formylamino-12,13-dihydro-1,11-dihydroxy-13-(β-D-glucopyranosyl) 5H-indolo[2,3-a]pyrrolo[3,4-c]carbazole-5,7-(6H)-dione(NB-506): Its potent antitumor activity in mice. Cancer Res 55:1316–1320PubMed Arakawa H, Iguchi T, Morita M, et al. (1995) Novel antitumor indolocarbazole compound 6-N-formylamino-12,13-dihydro-1,11-dihydroxy-13-(β-D-glucopyranosyl) 5H-indolo[2,3-a]pyrrolo[3,4-c]carbazole-5,7-(6H)-dione(NB-506): Its potent antitumor activity in mice. Cancer Res 55:1316–1320PubMed
13.
go back to reference Komatani H, Kotani H, Hara Y, et al. (2001) Identification of breast cancer resistance protein/mitoxantrone resistance/placenta-specific, ATP-binding cassette transporter as a transporter of NB-506 and J-107088, topoisomerase I inhibitors with an indolocarbazole structure. Cancer Res 61:2827–2832PubMed Komatani H, Kotani H, Hara Y, et al. (2001) Identification of breast cancer resistance protein/mitoxantrone resistance/placenta-specific, ATP-binding cassette transporter as a transporter of NB-506 and J-107088, topoisomerase I inhibitors with an indolocarbazole structure. Cancer Res 61:2827–2832PubMed
14.
go back to reference Declaration of Helsinki (2001) Recommendations guiding medical physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. Republic of South Africa Revision Declaration of Helsinki (2001) Recommendations guiding medical physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. Republic of South Africa Revision
15.
go back to reference International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) (1996) Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. As part of the ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline (European Union, Japan and USA) International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) (1996) Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. As part of the ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline (European Union, Japan and USA)
16.
go back to reference Gibaldi M, Perrier D (1982) Pharmacokinetics. 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York Gibaldi M, Perrier D (1982) Pharmacokinetics. 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York
17.
go back to reference Yamada Y, Tamura T, Yamamoto N, et al. (2006) Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of edotecarin, a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor, administered once every 3 weeks in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 58:173–182PubMedCrossRef Yamada Y, Tamura T, Yamamoto N, et al. (2006) Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of edotecarin, a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor, administered once every 3 weeks in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 58:173–182PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A phase I study of the safety and pharmacokinetics of edotecarin (J-107088), a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors
Authors
Herbert I. Hurwitz
Roger B. Cohen
J. Patrick McGovren
Samit Hirawat
William P. Petros
Yutaka Natsumeda
Tomoko Yoshinari
Publication date
01-01-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 1/2007
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-006-0267-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2007

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 1/2007 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine