Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 2/2011

Open Access 01-04-2011 | Laboratory Investigation

A Novel Mechanical Thrombectomy Device for Retrieval of Intravascular Thrombus

Authors: Wayne L. Monsky, Stephanos Finitsis, Dino De Cicco, John M. Brock, John Kucharczyk, Richard E. Latchaw

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Thrombotic and embolic vascular occlusion represents a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Currently available thrombectomy devices have limitations, including difficulty removing organized thrombus and clot fragmentation with distal embolization. A novel mechanical thrombectomy device (MTD), designed to remove both hard and soft thrombus without trauma to the blood vessel, was tested in preclinical porcine models evaluating efficacy, safety, and ease of use.

Materials and Methods

A total of 26 vessels in 14 pigs underwent mechanical thrombectomy with MTD. Thrombectomy was performed in nine superficial femoral arteries, eight subclavian arteries, five primary branches of the subclavian artery, lateral thoracic artery or the thyrocervical trunk, and four external carotids. Subacute organized fibrin-laden thrombus was injected into the arteries producing vascular occlusion. The MTD was then used for thrombectomy to restore patency and blood flow.

Results

Intact thrombus was retrieved from 24 of 26 of the vessels with a single pass of the MTD, resulting in complete restoration of patency in 21 vessels and partial patency in 4 vessels. In 8 cases that used an early design, the embolic material fragmented during withdrawal from the access sheath. In 4 procedures that used an early design, the MTD failed to deploy fully and the embolus was not completely captured. No intraprocedural complications or vascular damage occurred.

Conclusions

The present pilot studies demonstrate basic safety and efficacy of a novel MTD with design attributes suitable for retrieval of intact acute and organized chronic thrombus. The device has potential intracranial and peripheral utility.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Smith WS (2006) Safety of mechanical thrombectomy and intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute stroke: results of the Multi Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia (MERCI) trial, part 1. Am J Neuroradiol 27:1177–1182PubMed Smith WS (2006) Safety of mechanical thrombectomy and intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute stroke: results of the Multi Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia (MERCI) trial, part 1. Am J Neuroradiol 27:1177–1182PubMed
2.
go back to reference Kasirajan K, Marek JM, Langsfeld M (2001) Mechanical thrombectomy as a first-line treatment for arterial occlusion. Semin Vasc Surg 14:123–131CrossRefPubMed Kasirajan K, Marek JM, Langsfeld M (2001) Mechanical thrombectomy as a first-line treatment for arterial occlusion. Semin Vasc Surg 14:123–131CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Liebig T, Reinartz J, Hannes R et al (2008) Comparative in vitro study of five mechanical embolectomy systems: effectiveness of clot removal and risk of distal embolization. Neuroradiology 50:43–52CrossRefPubMed Liebig T, Reinartz J, Hannes R et al (2008) Comparative in vitro study of five mechanical embolectomy systems: effectiveness of clot removal and risk of distal embolization. Neuroradiology 50:43–52CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Brekenfeld C, Schroth G, El-Koussy M et al (2008) Mechanical thromboembolectomy for acute ischemic stroke: comparison of the catch thrombectomy device and the Merci Retriever in vivo. Stroke 39:1213–1219CrossRefPubMed Brekenfeld C, Schroth G, El-Koussy M et al (2008) Mechanical thromboembolectomy for acute ischemic stroke: comparison of the catch thrombectomy device and the Merci Retriever in vivo. Stroke 39:1213–1219CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Gralla J, Schroth G, Remonda L et al (2006) A dedicated animal model for mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke. Am J Neuroradiol 27:1357–1361PubMed Gralla J, Schroth G, Remonda L et al (2006) A dedicated animal model for mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke. Am J Neuroradiol 27:1357–1361PubMed
6.
go back to reference Schumacher HC, Meyers PM, Yavagal DR et al (2003) Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy of an occluded superior division of the left MCA for acute cardioembolic stroke. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 26:305–308CrossRefPubMed Schumacher HC, Meyers PM, Yavagal DR et al (2003) Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy of an occluded superior division of the left MCA for acute cardioembolic stroke. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 26:305–308CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Latchaw R (2007) Mechanical thrombectomy devices for treating acute ischemic stroke. Endovasc Today (May):68–74 Latchaw R (2007) Mechanical thrombectomy devices for treating acute ischemic stroke. Endovasc Today (May):68–74
8.
go back to reference Gobin YP, Starkman S, Duckwiler GR et al (2004) MERCI I: a phase 1 study of mechanical embolus removal in cerebral ischemia. Stroke 35:2848–2854CrossRefPubMed Gobin YP, Starkman S, Duckwiler GR et al (2004) MERCI I: a phase 1 study of mechanical embolus removal in cerebral ischemia. Stroke 35:2848–2854CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Finitsis S (2006) Thrombus removal system and process. US patent 356321. February 16, 2006 Finitsis S (2006) Thrombus removal system and process. US patent 356321. February 16, 2006
10.
go back to reference Chapot R, Houdart E, Rogopoulos A et al (2002) Thromboaspiration in the basilar artery: report of two cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23:282–284PubMed Chapot R, Houdart E, Rogopoulos A et al (2002) Thromboaspiration in the basilar artery: report of two cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23:282–284PubMed
11.
go back to reference Stead LG, Gilmore RM, Bellolio MF et al (2008) Percutaneous clot removal devices in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Neurol 65:1024–1030CrossRefPubMed Stead LG, Gilmore RM, Bellolio MF et al (2008) Percutaneous clot removal devices in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Neurol 65:1024–1030CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kasirajan K, Haskal Z, Ouriel K (2001) The use of mechanical thrombectomy devices in the management of acute peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:405–411CrossRefPubMed Kasirajan K, Haskal Z, Ouriel K (2001) The use of mechanical thrombectomy devices in the management of acute peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:405–411CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Müller-Hülsbeck S, Grimm J, Leidt J et al (2001) Comparison of in vitro effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:1185–1191CrossRefPubMed Müller-Hülsbeck S, Grimm J, Leidt J et al (2001) Comparison of in vitro effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:1185–1191CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Penumbra Pivotal Stroke Trial Investigators (2009) The penumbra pivotal stroke trial: safety and effectiveness of a new generation of mechanical devices for clot removal in intracranial large vessel occlusive disease. Stroke 40:2761–2768CrossRef Penumbra Pivotal Stroke Trial Investigators (2009) The penumbra pivotal stroke trial: safety and effectiveness of a new generation of mechanical devices for clot removal in intracranial large vessel occlusive disease. Stroke 40:2761–2768CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lang EV, Kulis AM, Villani M et al (2008) Hemolysis comparison between the OmniSonics OmniWave Endovascular System and the Possis AngioJet in a porcine model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:1215–1221CrossRefPubMed Lang EV, Kulis AM, Villani M et al (2008) Hemolysis comparison between the OmniSonics OmniWave Endovascular System and the Possis AngioJet in a porcine model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:1215–1221CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Saracv TP, Hilleman D, Arko FR et al (2004) Clinical and economic evaluation of the trellis thrombectomy device for arterial occlusions: preliminary analysis. J Vasc Surg 39:556–559CrossRef Saracv TP, Hilleman D, Arko FR et al (2004) Clinical and economic evaluation of the trellis thrombectomy device for arterial occlusions: preliminary analysis. J Vasc Surg 39:556–559CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rha JH, Saver JL (2007) The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: a meta-analysis. Stroke 38:967–973CrossRefPubMed Rha JH, Saver JL (2007) The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: a meta-analysis. Stroke 38:967–973CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Smith WS, Sung G, Saver J et al (2008) Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: final results of the Multi MERCI trial. Stroke 39:1205–1212CrossRefPubMed Smith WS, Sung G, Saver J et al (2008) Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: final results of the Multi MERCI trial. Stroke 39:1205–1212CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Bose A, Henkes H, Alfke K et al (2008) The Penumbra System: a mechanical device for the treatment of acute stroke due to thromboembolism. Am J Neuroradiol 29:1409–1413CrossRefPubMed Bose A, Henkes H, Alfke K et al (2008) The Penumbra System: a mechanical device for the treatment of acute stroke due to thromboembolism. Am J Neuroradiol 29:1409–1413CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A Novel Mechanical Thrombectomy Device for Retrieval of Intravascular Thrombus
Authors
Wayne L. Monsky
Stephanos Finitsis
Dino De Cicco
John M. Brock
John Kucharczyk
Richard E. Latchaw
Publication date
01-04-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-0024-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 2/2011 Go to the issue