Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 6/2012

Open Access 01-08-2012 | Original paper

A novel iterative reconstruction algorithm allows reduced dose multidetector-row CT imaging of mechanical prosthetic heart valves

Authors: Jesse Habets, Petr Symersky, Bas A. J. M. de Mol, Willem P. Th. M. Mali, Tim Leiner, Ricardo P. J. Budde

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 6/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Multidetector-row CT is promising for prosthetic heart valve (PHV) assessment but retrospectively ECG-gated scanning has a considerable radiation dose. Recently introduced iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms may enable radiation dose reduction with retained image quality. Furthermore, PHV image quality on the CT scan mainly depends on extent of PHV artifacts. IR may decrease streak artifacts. We compared image noise and artifact volumes in scans of mechanical PHVs reconstructed with conventional filtered back projection (FBP) to lower dose scans reconstructed with IR. Four different PHVs (St. Jude, Carbomedics, ON-X and Medtronic Hall) were scanned in a pulsatile in vitro model. Ten retrospectively ECG-gated CT scans were performed of each PHV at 120 kV, 600 mAs (high-dose CTDIvol 35.3 mGy) and 120 kV, 300 mAs (low-dose CTDIvol 17.7 mGy) on a 64 detector-row scanner. Diastolic and systolic images were reconstructed with FBP (high and low-dose) and the IR algorithm (low-dose only). Hypo- and hyperdense artifact volumes were determined using two threshold filters. Image noise was measured. Mean hypo- and hyperdense artifact volumes (mm3) were 1,235/5,346 (high-dose FBP); 2,405/6,877 (low-dose FBP) and 1,218/5,333 (low-dose IR). Low-dose IR reconstructions had similar image noise compared to high-dose FBP (16.5 ± 1.7 vs. 16.3 ± 1.6, mean ± SD, respectively, P = 1.0). IR allows ECG-gated PHV imaging with similar image noise and PHV artifacts at 50% less dose compared to conventional FBP in an pulsatile in vitro model.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tsai IC, Lin YK, Chang Y et al (2009) Correctness of multi-detector-row computed tomography for diagnosing mechanical prosthetic heart valve disorders using operative findings as a gold standard. Eur Radiol 19:857–867PubMedCrossRef Tsai IC, Lin YK, Chang Y et al (2009) Correctness of multi-detector-row computed tomography for diagnosing mechanical prosthetic heart valve disorders using operative findings as a gold standard. Eur Radiol 19:857–867PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Symersky P, Budde RP, de Mol BA et al (2009) Comparison of multidetector-row computed tomography to echocardiography and fluoroscopy for evaluation of patients with mechanical prosthetic valve obstruction. Am J Cardiol 104:1128–1134PubMedCrossRef Symersky P, Budde RP, de Mol BA et al (2009) Comparison of multidetector-row computed tomography to echocardiography and fluoroscopy for evaluation of patients with mechanical prosthetic valve obstruction. Am J Cardiol 104:1128–1134PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Konen E, Goitein O, Feinberg MS et al (2008) The role of ECG-gated MDCT in the evaluation of aortic and mitral mechanical valves: initial experience. Am J Roentgenol 191:26–31CrossRef Konen E, Goitein O, Feinberg MS et al (2008) The role of ECG-gated MDCT in the evaluation of aortic and mitral mechanical valves: initial experience. Am J Roentgenol 191:26–31CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Feuchtner GM, Stolzmann P, Dichtl W et al (2009) Multislice computed tomography in infective endocarditis: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography and intraoperative findings. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:436–444PubMedCrossRef Feuchtner GM, Stolzmann P, Dichtl W et al (2009) Multislice computed tomography in infective endocarditis: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography and intraoperative findings. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:436–444PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Habets J, Budde RP, Symersky P et al (2011) Diagnostic evaluation of left-sided prosthetic heart valve dysfunction. Nat Rev Cardiol 8:466–478PubMedCrossRef Habets J, Budde RP, Symersky P et al (2011) Diagnostic evaluation of left-sided prosthetic heart valve dysfunction. Nat Rev Cardiol 8:466–478PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Habets J, Symersky P, van Herwerden LA et al (2011) Prosthetic heart valve assessment with multidetector-row CT: imaging characteristics of 91 valves in 83 patients. Eur Radiol 21:1390–1396PubMedCrossRef Habets J, Symersky P, van Herwerden LA et al (2011) Prosthetic heart valve assessment with multidetector-row CT: imaging characteristics of 91 valves in 83 patients. Eur Radiol 21:1390–1396PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Chenot F, Montant P, Goffinet C et al (2010) Evaluation of anatomic valve opening and leaflet morphology in aortic valve bioprosthesis by using multidetector CT: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography. Radiology 255:377–385PubMedCrossRef Chenot F, Montant P, Goffinet C et al (2010) Evaluation of anatomic valve opening and leaflet morphology in aortic valve bioprosthesis by using multidetector CT: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography. Radiology 255:377–385PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fleischmann D, Boas FE (2011) Computed tomography—old ideas and new technology. Eur Radiol 21:510–517PubMedCrossRef Fleischmann D, Boas FE (2011) Computed tomography—old ideas and new technology. Eur Radiol 21:510–517PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lange K, Carson R (1984) EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 8:306–316PubMed Lange K, Carson R (1984) EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 8:306–316PubMed
10.
go back to reference Shepp LA, Vardi Y (1982) Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1:113–122PubMedCrossRef Shepp LA, Vardi Y (1982) Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1:113–122PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Leipsic J, LaBounty TM, Heilbron B et al (2010) Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study. Am J Roentgenol 195:655–660CrossRef Leipsic J, LaBounty TM, Heilbron B et al (2010) Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study. Am J Roentgenol 195:655–660CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Leipsic J, LaBounty TM, Heilbron B et al (2010) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. Am J Roentgenol 195:649–654CrossRef Leipsic J, LaBounty TM, Heilbron B et al (2010) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. Am J Roentgenol 195:649–654CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Symersky P, Budde RPJ, Prokop M et al (2011) Multidetector-row computed tomography imaging characteristics of mechanical prosthetic valves. J Heart Valve Dis 20:216–222PubMed Symersky P, Budde RPJ, Prokop M et al (2011) Multidetector-row computed tomography imaging characteristics of mechanical prosthetic valves. J Heart Valve Dis 20:216–222PubMed
14.
go back to reference Prokop M (2003) Radiation dose and image quality. In: Prokop M, Galanski M (eds) Spiral and multislide computed tomography of the body. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 143–144 Prokop M (2003) Radiation dose and image quality. In: Prokop M, Galanski M (eds) Spiral and multislide computed tomography of the body. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 143–144
15.
go back to reference van der Schaaf I, van Leeuwen M, Vlassenbroek A et al (2006) Minimizing clip artifacts in multi CT angiography of clipped patients. Am J Neuroradiol 27:60–66PubMed van der Schaaf I, van Leeuwen M, Vlassenbroek A et al (2006) Minimizing clip artifacts in multi CT angiography of clipped patients. Am J Neuroradiol 27:60–66PubMed
16.
go back to reference Boas FE, Fleischmann D (2011) Evaluation of two iterative techniques for reducing metal artifacts in computed tomography. Radiology 259:894–902PubMedCrossRef Boas FE, Fleischmann D (2011) Evaluation of two iterative techniques for reducing metal artifacts in computed tomography. Radiology 259:894–902PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML et al (2008) Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:535–546PubMedCrossRef Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML et al (2008) Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:535–546PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Weigold WG, Olsezewski ME, Walker MJ (2009) Low-dose prospectively gated 256-slice coronary computed tomographic angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25:217–230CrossRef Weigold WG, Olsezewski ME, Walker MJ (2009) Low-dose prospectively gated 256-slice coronary computed tomographic angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25:217–230CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D et al (2010) Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart 31:340–346CrossRef Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D et al (2010) Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart 31:340–346CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Achenbach S, Marwan M, Schepis T et al (2009) High-pitch spiral acquisition: a new scan mode for coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:117–121PubMedCrossRef Achenbach S, Marwan M, Schepis T et al (2009) High-pitch spiral acquisition: a new scan mode for coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:117–121PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A novel iterative reconstruction algorithm allows reduced dose multidetector-row CT imaging of mechanical prosthetic heart valves
Authors
Jesse Habets
Petr Symersky
Bas A. J. M. de Mol
Willem P. Th. M. Mali
Tim Leiner
Ricardo P. J. Budde
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 6/2012
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9954-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2012

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 6/2012 Go to the issue