Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Internal and Emergency Medicine 6/2018

01-09-2018 | CE - COCHRANE'S CORNER

A novel flash glucose monitoring system in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 and 2: which are the pieces of evidence for payer decision-makers?

Authors: Salvatore Corrao, Biagio Nativo, Giuseppe Natoli, Marika Lo Monaco, Francesco Perticone

Published in: Internal and Emergency Medicine | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

A rigorous health technology assessment is necessary to evaluate a new technology. However, healthcare regulatory agencies have less restrictive rules about medical devices, despite some recent warnings about this relevant matter. The evaluation should have at least two key issues, which require attention. The first one is its effectiveness, and the second one is its economic sustainability. In this paper, we deal with a novel glucose-sensing technology as a case study to examine the matter in depth. An evidence-based point of view is used to highlight this important issue.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nobre MR, Costa FM (2012) Surrogate outcomes are associated with low methodological necrosis factor agents: a systematic review. Evid Based Med 17(1):3–7CrossRefPubMed Nobre MR, Costa FM (2012) Surrogate outcomes are associated with low methodological necrosis factor agents: a systematic review. Evid Based Med 17(1):3–7CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Callea G, Armeni P, Marsilio M et al (2016) The impact of HTA and procurement practices on the selection and prices of medical devices. Soc Sci Med 174:89–95CrossRefPubMed Callea G, Armeni P, Marsilio M et al (2016) The impact of HTA and procurement practices on the selection and prices of medical devices. Soc Sci Med 174:89–95CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Porzsolt F, Rocha NG, Toledo-Arruda AC et al (2015) Efficacy and effectiveness trials have different goals, use different tools, and generate different messages. Pragmat Obs Res 6:47–54CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Porzsolt F, Rocha NG, Toledo-Arruda AC et al (2015) Efficacy and effectiveness trials have different goals, use different tools, and generate different messages. Pragmat Obs Res 6:47–54CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Bolinder J, Antuna R, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn P et al (2016) Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 388(10057):2254–2263CrossRefPubMed Bolinder J, Antuna R, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn P et al (2016) Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 388(10057):2254–2263CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kyeremanteng K, Wan C, D’Egidio G et al (2016) Approach to economic analysis in critical care. J Crit Care 36:92–96CrossRefPubMed Kyeremanteng K, Wan C, D’Egidio G et al (2016) Approach to economic analysis in critical care. J Crit Care 36:92–96CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Porzsolt F, Ghosh AK, Kaplan RM (2009) Qualitative assessment of innovations in healthcare provision. BMC Health Serv Res 19(9):50CrossRef Porzsolt F, Ghosh AK, Kaplan RM (2009) Qualitative assessment of innovations in healthcare provision. BMC Health Serv Res 19(9):50CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Meltzer M, Pizzi LT, Jutkowitz E (2012) Payer decision-making with limited comparative and cost effectiveness data: the case of new pharmacological treatments for gout. Evid Based Med. 17(4):105–108CrossRefPubMed Meltzer M, Pizzi LT, Jutkowitz E (2012) Payer decision-making with limited comparative and cost effectiveness data: the case of new pharmacological treatments for gout. Evid Based Med. 17(4):105–108CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Shapiro AR (2017) FDA approval of nonadjunctive use of continuous glucose monitors for insulin dosing: a potentially risky decision. JAMA 318(16):1541–1542CrossRefPubMed Shapiro AR (2017) FDA approval of nonadjunctive use of continuous glucose monitors for insulin dosing: a potentially risky decision. JAMA 318(16):1541–1542CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A novel flash glucose monitoring system in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 and 2: which are the pieces of evidence for payer decision-makers?
Authors
Salvatore Corrao
Biagio Nativo
Giuseppe Natoli
Marika Lo Monaco
Francesco Perticone
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Internal and Emergency Medicine / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 1828-0447
Electronic ISSN: 1970-9366
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-018-1855-5

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

Internal and Emergency Medicine 6/2018 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.