Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 7/2009

Open Access 01-07-2009 | Original Article

A nationwide survey to measure practice variation of catheterisation management in patients undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery

Authors: R. A. Hakvoort, M. P. Burger, M. H. Emanuel, J. P. Roovers

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 7/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Urinary catheterisation following vaginal prolapse surgery causes inconvenience for patients, risk of urinary tract infections and potentially longer hospitalisation. Possibly, practice variation exists concerning diagnosis and management of abnormal postvoid residual (PVR) volume implying suboptimal treatment for certain subgroups.

Methods

Nationwide questionnaire-based survey.

Results

Post-operatively, 77% performed transurethral indwelling catheterisation, 12% suprapubic catheterisation and 11% intermittent catheterisation. Catheterisation was applied 3 days (1–7 days) following anterior repair and 1 day (1–3 days) following all other procedures. The median cut-off point for abnormal PVR was 150 mL (range 50–250 mL). Treatment of abnormal PVR consisted mostly of prolonging transurethral indwelling catheterisation for 2 days (range 1–5 days; 57%), 29% by intermittent and 12% by suprapubic catheterisation. Antibiotics were administered by 21% either routinely or based on symptoms only.

Conclusions

Due to insufficient evidence and suboptimal implementation of available evidence, practice variation in catheterisation regimens is high.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Saint S, Wiese J, Amory JK, Bernstein ML, Patel UD, Zemencuk JK et al (2000) Are physicians aware of which of their patients have indwelling urinary catheters? Am J Med 109:476–480PubMedCrossRef Saint S, Wiese J, Amory JK, Bernstein ML, Patel UD, Zemencuk JK et al (2000) Are physicians aware of which of their patients have indwelling urinary catheters? Am J Med 109:476–480PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tambyah PA, Makis DG (2000) Catheter-associated urinary tract infection is rarely symptomatic: a prospective study of 1,497 catheterized patients. Arch Intern Med 160:678–682PubMedCrossRef Tambyah PA, Makis DG (2000) Catheter-associated urinary tract infection is rarely symptomatic: a prospective study of 1,497 catheterized patients. Arch Intern Med 160:678–682PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jain P, Parada JP, David A, Smith LG (1995) Overuse of the indwelling urinary tract catheter in hospitalized medical patients. Ann Intern Med 155:1425–1429CrossRef Jain P, Parada JP, David A, Smith LG (1995) Overuse of the indwelling urinary tract catheter in hospitalized medical patients. Ann Intern Med 155:1425–1429CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pratt RJ, Pellowe C, Loveday HP, Robinson N, Smith GW, Barrett S et al (2001) Department of Health (England).The epic project: developing national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare associated infections. Phase I: Guidelines for preventing hospital-acquired infections. Department of Health (England). J Hosp Infect 47 Suppl:S3-82 Pratt RJ, Pellowe C, Loveday HP, Robinson N, Smith GW, Barrett S et al (2001) Department of Health (England).The epic project: developing national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare associated infections. Phase I: Guidelines for preventing hospital-acquired infections. Department of Health (England). J Hosp Infect 47 Suppl:S3-82
5.
go back to reference Hilton P (1988) Bladder drainage: a survey of practices among gynaecologists in the British Isles. BJOG 95:1178–1189CrossRef Hilton P (1988) Bladder drainage: a survey of practices among gynaecologists in the British Isles. BJOG 95:1178–1189CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Phipps S, Lim YN, McClinton S, Barry C, Rane A, N'Dow J (2006) Short term urinary catheter policies following urogenital surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD004374 ReviewPubMed Phipps S, Lim YN, McClinton S, Barry C, Rane A, N'Dow J (2006) Short term urinary catheter policies following urogenital surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD004374 ReviewPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ottesen M, Sørensen M, Rasmussen Y, Smidt-Jensen S, Kehlet H, Ottesen B (2002) Fast track vaginal surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81:138–146PubMedCrossRef Ottesen M, Sørensen M, Rasmussen Y, Smidt-Jensen S, Kehlet H, Ottesen B (2002) Fast track vaginal surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81:138–146PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Glavind K, Morup L, Madsen H, Glavind J (2007) A prospective, randomised, controlled trial comparing 3 hour and 24 hour postoperative removal of bladder catheter and vaginal pack following vaginal prolapse surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86:1122–1125PubMedCrossRef Glavind K, Morup L, Madsen H, Glavind J (2007) A prospective, randomised, controlled trial comparing 3 hour and 24 hour postoperative removal of bladder catheter and vaginal pack following vaginal prolapse surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86:1122–1125PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Schiøtz HA, Tanbo TG (2006) Postoperative voiding, bacteriuria and urinary tract infection with Foley catheterization after gynaecological surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85:476–481PubMed Schiøtz HA, Tanbo TG (2006) Postoperative voiding, bacteriuria and urinary tract infection with Foley catheterization after gynaecological surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85:476–481PubMed
10.
go back to reference Hakvoort RA, Elberink R, Vollebregt A, Ploeg T, Emanuel MH (2004) How long should urinary bladder catheterisation be continued after vaginal prolapse surgery? A randomised controlled trial comparing short term versus long term catheterisation after vaginal prolapse surgery. BJOG 111:828–830PubMedCrossRef Hakvoort RA, Elberink R, Vollebregt A, Ploeg T, Emanuel MH (2004) How long should urinary bladder catheterisation be continued after vaginal prolapse surgery? A randomised controlled trial comparing short term versus long term catheterisation after vaginal prolapse surgery. BJOG 111:828–830PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Haylen BT, Frazer MI, MacDonald JH (1989) Assessing the effectiveness of different urinary catheters in emptying the bladder: an application of transvaginal ultrasound. Br J Urol 64:353–356PubMedCrossRef Haylen BT, Frazer MI, MacDonald JH (1989) Assessing the effectiveness of different urinary catheters in emptying the bladder: an application of transvaginal ultrasound. Br J Urol 64:353–356PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fuse H, Yokoyama T, Muraishi Y, Katayama T (1996) Measurement of residual urine volume using a portable ultrasound instrument. Int Urol Nephrol 28:633–637PubMedCrossRef Fuse H, Yokoyama T, Muraishi Y, Katayama T (1996) Measurement of residual urine volume using a portable ultrasound instrument. Int Urol Nephrol 28:633–637PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bent AE, Nahhas DE, McLennan MT (1989) Portable ultrasound determination of urinary residual volume. Am J Obstet Gynecol 160:1013–1016 Bent AE, Nahhas DE, McLennan MT (1989) Portable ultrasound determination of urinary residual volume. Am J Obstet Gynecol 160:1013–1016
14.
go back to reference Goode PS, Locher JL, Bryant RL, Roth DL, Burgio KL (2000) Measurement of postvoid residual urine with portable transabdominal bladder ultrasound scanner and urethral catheterization. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 11:296–300PubMedCrossRef Goode PS, Locher JL, Bryant RL, Roth DL, Burgio KL (2000) Measurement of postvoid residual urine with portable transabdominal bladder ultrasound scanner and urethral catheterization. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 11:296–300PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fedorkow DM, Dore S, Cotton A (2005) The use of an ultrasound bladder scanning device in women undergoing urogynaecologic surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 27:945–948PubMed Fedorkow DM, Dore S, Cotton A (2005) The use of an ultrasound bladder scanning device in women undergoing urogynaecologic surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 27:945–948PubMed
16.
go back to reference Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society et al (2003) The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology 61:37–49PubMedCrossRef Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society et al (2003) The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology 61:37–49PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Niël-Weise BS, van den Broek PJ (2005) Urinary catheter policies for short-term bladder drainage in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD004203 ReviewPubMed Niël-Weise BS, van den Broek PJ (2005) Urinary catheter policies for short-term bladder drainage in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD004203 ReviewPubMed
18.
go back to reference Andersen JT, Heisterberg L, Hebjørn S, Petersen K, Stampe Sørensen S, Fischer-Rasmussen W, Mølsted Pedersen L, Nielsen NC (1985) Suprapubic versus transurethral bladder drainage after colposuspension/vaginal repair. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 64:139–143PubMedCrossRef Andersen JT, Heisterberg L, Hebjørn S, Petersen K, Stampe Sørensen S, Fischer-Rasmussen W, Mølsted Pedersen L, Nielsen NC (1985) Suprapubic versus transurethral bladder drainage after colposuspension/vaginal repair. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 64:139–143PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ahluwalia RS, Johal N, Kouriefs C, Kooiman G, Montgomery BS, Plail RO (2006) The surgical risk of suprapubic catheter insertion and long-term sequelae. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88:210–213PubMedCrossRef Ahluwalia RS, Johal N, Kouriefs C, Kooiman G, Montgomery BS, Plail RO (2006) The surgical risk of suprapubic catheter insertion and long-term sequelae. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88:210–213PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Summitt RL Jr, Stovall TG, Bran DF (1994) Prospective comparison of indwelling bladder catheter drainage versus no catheter after vaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:1815–1818 discussion 1818-21PubMed Summitt RL Jr, Stovall TG, Bran DF (1994) Prospective comparison of indwelling bladder catheter drainage versus no catheter after vaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:1815–1818 discussion 1818-21PubMed
21.
go back to reference Devillé WL, Yzermans JC, van Duijn NP, Bezemer PD, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM (2004) The urine dipstick test useful to rule out infections. A meta-analysis of the accuracy. BMC Urol 4:4PubMedCrossRef Devillé WL, Yzermans JC, van Duijn NP, Bezemer PD, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM (2004) The urine dipstick test useful to rule out infections. A meta-analysis of the accuracy. BMC Urol 4:4PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference St John A, Boyd JC, Lowes AJ, Price CP (2006) The use of urinary dipstick tests to exclude urinary tract infection: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Clin Pathol 126:428–436PubMedCrossRef St John A, Boyd JC, Lowes AJ, Price CP (2006) The use of urinary dipstick tests to exclude urinary tract infection: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Clin Pathol 126:428–436PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A nationwide survey to measure practice variation of catheterisation management in patients undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery
Authors
R. A. Hakvoort
M. P. Burger
M. H. Emanuel
J. P. Roovers
Publication date
01-07-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 7/2009
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0847-4

Other articles of this Issue 7/2009

International Urogynecology Journal 7/2009 Go to the issue