Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2006

01-09-2006

A Multisite Telemammography System for Remote Management of Screening Mammography: An Assessment of Technical, Operational, and Clinical Issues

Authors: Joseph K. Leader, Ph.D., Christiane M. Hakim, M.D., Marie A. Ganott, M.D., Denise M. Chough, M.D., Luisa P. Wallace, M.D., Ronald J. Clearfield, M.D., Ronald L. Perrin, M.D., John M. Drescher, B.S., Glenn S. Maitz, M.S., Jules H. Sumkin, M.D., David Gur, Sc.D.

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 3/2006

Login to get access

Objective

This paper describes a high-quality, multisite telemammography system to enable “almost real-time” remote patient management while the patient remains in the clinic. One goal is to reduce the number of women who would physically need to return to the clinic for additional imaging procedures (termed “recall”) to supplement “routine” imaging of screening mammography.

Materials and Methods

Mammography films from current and prior (when available) examinations are digitized at three remote sites and transmitted along with other pertinent information across low-level communication systems to the central site. Images are automatically cropped, wavelet compressed, and encrypted prior to transmission to the central site. At the central site, radiologists review and rate examinations on a high-resolution workstation that displays the images, computer-assisted detection results, and the technologist's communication. Intersite communication is provided instantly via a messaging “chat” window.

Results

The technologists recommended additional procedures at 2.7 times the actual clinical recall rate for the same cases. Using the telemammography system during a series of “off-line” clinically simulated studies, radiologists recommended additional procedures at 1.3 times the actual clinical recall rate. Percent agreement and kappa between the study and actual clinical interpretations were 66.1% and 0.315, respectively. For every physical recall potentially avoided using the telemammography system, approximately one presumed “unnecessary” imaging procedure was recommended.

Conclusion

Remote patient management can reduce the number of women recalled by as much as 50% without performing an unreasonable number of presumed “unnecessary” procedures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Taplin, SH, Ichikawa, L, Buist, DS, Seger, D, White, E 2004Evaluating organized breast cancer screening implementation: the prevention of late-stage disease?Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev13225234CrossRef Taplin, SH, Ichikawa, L, Buist, DS, Seger, D, White, E 2004Evaluating organized breast cancer screening implementation: the prevention of late-stage disease?Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev13225234CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Humphrey, LL, Helfand, M, Chan, BKS, Woolf, SH 2002Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. preventive services task forceAnn Intern Med137E347E367 Humphrey, LL, Helfand, M, Chan, BKS, Woolf, SH 2002Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. preventive services task forceAnn Intern Med137E347E367
3.
go back to reference Elmore, JG, Reisch, LM, Barton, MB, Barlow, WE, Rolnick, S, Harris, EL, Herrinton, LJ, Geiger, AM, Beverly, RK, Hart, G, Yu, O, Greene, SM, Weiss, NS, Fletcher, SW 2005Efficacy of breast cancer screening in the community according to risk levelJ Natl Cancer Inst9710351043PubMedCrossRef Elmore, JG, Reisch, LM, Barton, MB, Barlow, WE, Rolnick, S, Harris, EL, Herrinton, LJ, Geiger, AM, Beverly, RK, Hart, G, Yu, O, Greene, SM, Weiss, NS, Fletcher, SW 2005Efficacy of breast cancer screening in the community according to risk levelJ Natl Cancer Inst9710351043PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Miller, AB, To, T, Baines, CJ, Wall, C 2002The Canadian Nation Breast Screening Study-1: breast cancer mortality after 11 to 16 years of follow-up: a randomized screening trial of mammography in women age 40 to 49 yearsAnn Intern Med137E305E315 Miller, AB, To, T, Baines, CJ, Wall, C 2002The Canadian Nation Breast Screening Study-1: breast cancer mortality after 11 to 16 years of follow-up: a randomized screening trial of mammography in women age 40 to 49 yearsAnn Intern Med137E305E315
5.
go back to reference Elmore, JG, Wells, CK, Lee, CH, Howard, DH, Feinstein, AR 1994Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammogramsN Engl J Med33114931499PubMedCrossRef Elmore, JG, Wells, CK, Lee, CH, Howard, DH, Feinstein, AR 1994Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammogramsN Engl J Med33114931499PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Warren, RML, Duffy, SW 1995Comparison of single reading with double reading of mammograms and change in effectiveness with experienceBr J Radiol68958962PubMedCrossRef Warren, RML, Duffy, SW 1995Comparison of single reading with double reading of mammograms and change in effectiveness with experienceBr J Radiol68958962PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sandin, B, Chorot, P, Valiente, RM, Lostao, L, Santed, MA 2002Adverse psychological effects in women attending a second-stage breast cancer screeningJ Psychosom Res52303309PubMedCrossRef Sandin, B, Chorot, P, Valiente, RM, Lostao, L, Santed, MA 2002Adverse psychological effects in women attending a second-stage breast cancer screeningJ Psychosom Res52303309PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lindfors, KK, O'Connor, J, Parker, RA 2001False-positive screening mammograms: effect of immediate versus later work-up on patient stressRadiology218247253PubMed Lindfors, KK, O'Connor, J, Parker, RA 2001False-positive screening mammograms: effect of immediate versus later work-up on patient stressRadiology218247253PubMed
9.
go back to reference Dolan, NC, McDermott, MM, Morrow, M, Venta, L, Martin, GJ 1999Impact of same-day screening mammography availability: results of a controlled clinical trialArch Intern Med159393398PubMedCrossRef Dolan, NC, McDermott, MM, Morrow, M, Venta, L, Martin, GJ 1999Impact of same-day screening mammography availability: results of a controlled clinical trialArch Intern Med159393398PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Elmore, JG, Barton, MB, Moceri, VM, Polk, S, Arena, PJ, Fletcher, SW 1998Ten-year risk of false-positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinationsN Engl J Med33810891096PubMedCrossRef Elmore, JG, Barton, MB, Moceri, VM, Polk, S, Arena, PJ, Fletcher, SW 1998Ten-year risk of false-positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinationsN Engl J Med33810891096PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Yankaskas, BC, Cleveland, RJ, Schell, MJ, Kozar, R 2001Association of recall rates with sensitivity and positive predictive values of screening mammographyAJR Am J Roentgenol177543549PubMed Yankaskas, BC, Cleveland, RJ, Schell, MJ, Kozar, R 2001Association of recall rates with sensitivity and positive predictive values of screening mammographyAJR Am J Roentgenol177543549PubMed
12.
go back to reference May, DS, Lee, NC, Nadel, MR, Henson, RM, Miller, DS 1998The national breast and cervical cancer early detection program: report of the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved womenAJR Am J Roentgenol17097104PubMed May, DS, Lee, NC, Nadel, MR, Henson, RM, Miller, DS 1998The national breast and cervical cancer early detection program: report of the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved womenAJR Am J Roentgenol17097104PubMed
13.
go back to reference Sumkin, JH, Klaman, HM, Graham, M, Ruskauff, T, Gennari, RC, King, JL, Klym, AH, Ganott, MA, Gur, D 2003Prescreening mammography by technologists: a preliminary assessmentAJR Am J Roentgenol180253256PubMed Sumkin, JH, Klaman, HM, Graham, M, Ruskauff, T, Gennari, RC, King, JL, Klym, AH, Ganott, MA, Gur, D 2003Prescreening mammography by technologists: a preliminary assessmentAJR Am J Roentgenol180253256PubMed
14.
go back to reference Tonita, JM, Hillis, JP, Lim, CH 1999Medical radiologic technologist review: effects on a population-based breast cancer screening programRadiology211529533PubMed Tonita, JM, Hillis, JP, Lim, CH 1999Medical radiologic technologist review: effects on a population-based breast cancer screening programRadiology211529533PubMed
15.
go back to reference Feig, SA, Yaffe, MJ 1995Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammographyRadiol Clin North Am3312051228PubMed Feig, SA, Yaffe, MJ 1995Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammographyRadiol Clin North Am3312051228PubMed
16.
go back to reference Goldberg, MA, Dwyer, SJ,3rd 1995Telemammography: implementation issuesTelemed J1215226PubMed Goldberg, MA, Dwyer, SJ,3rd 1995Telemammography: implementation issuesTelemed J1215226PubMed
17.
go back to reference Lou, SL, Lin, HD, Lin, KP, Hoogstrate, D 2000Automatic breast region extraction from digital mammograms for PACS and telemammography applicationsComput Med Imaging Graph24205220PubMedCrossRef Lou, SL, Lin, HD, Lin, KP, Hoogstrate, D 2000Automatic breast region extraction from digital mammograms for PACS and telemammography applicationsComput Med Imaging Graph24205220PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Murphy, JM, O'Hare, NJ, Wheat, D, McCarthy, PA, Dowling, A, Hayes, R, Bowmer, H, Wilson, GF, Molloy, MP 1999Digitized mammograms: a preliminary clinical evaluation and the potential for telemammographyJ Telemed Telecare5193197PubMedCrossRef Murphy, JM, O'Hare, NJ, Wheat, D, McCarthy, PA, Dowling, A, Hayes, R, Bowmer, H, Wilson, GF, Molloy, MP 1999Digitized mammograms: a preliminary clinical evaluation and the potential for telemammographyJ Telemed Telecare5193197PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lou, SL, Sickles, EA, Huang, HK, Hoogstrate, D, Cao, F, Wang, J, Jahangiri, M 1997Full-field direct digital telemammography: technical components, study protocols, and preliminary resultsIEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed1270278PubMedCrossRef Lou, SL, Sickles, EA, Huang, HK, Hoogstrate, D, Cao, F, Wang, J, Jahangiri, M 1997Full-field direct digital telemammography: technical components, study protocols, and preliminary resultsIEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed1270278PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Maitz, GS, Chang, TS, Sumkin, JH, Wintz, PW, Johns, CM, Ganott, M, Holbert, BL, Hakim, CM, Harris, KM, Gur, D, Herron, JM 1997Preliminary clinical evaluation of a high-resolution telemammography systemInvest Radiol32236240PubMedCrossRef Maitz, GS, Chang, TS, Sumkin, JH, Wintz, PW, Johns, CM, Ganott, M, Holbert, BL, Hakim, CM, Harris, KM, Gur, D, Herron, JM 1997Preliminary clinical evaluation of a high-resolution telemammography systemInvest Radiol32236240PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Drescher, JM, Maitz, GS, Traylor, C, Leader, JK, Clearfield, RJ, Shah, R, Ganott, MA, Pugliese, F, Duffner, D, Lockhart, J, Gur, D 2003A multi-site telemammography system: preliminary assessment of technical and operational issuesProc SPIE5033360369 Drescher, JM, Maitz, GS, Traylor, C, Leader, JK, Clearfield, RJ, Shah, R, Ganott, MA, Pugliese, F, Duffner, D, Lockhart, J, Gur, D 2003A multi-site telemammography system: preliminary assessment of technical and operational issuesProc SPIE5033360369
22.
go back to reference Leader, JK, Sumkin, JH, Ganott, MA, Hakim, C, Hardesty, L, Shah, R, Wallace, L, Klym, A, Drescher, JM, Maitz, GS, Gur, D 2004Subjective assessment of high-level image compression of digitized mammogramsProc SPIE5372415422 Leader, JK, Sumkin, JH, Ganott, MA, Hakim, C, Hardesty, L, Shah, R, Wallace, L, Klym, A, Drescher, JM, Maitz, GS, Gur, D 2004Subjective assessment of high-level image compression of digitized mammogramsProc SPIE5372415422
23.
go back to reference Lucier, BJ, Kallergi, M, Qian, W, DeVore, RA, Clark, RA, Saff, EB, Clarke, LP 1994Wavelet compression and segmentation of digital mammogramsJ Digit Imaging72738PubMedCrossRef Lucier, BJ, Kallergi, M, Qian, W, DeVore, RA, Clark, RA, Saff, EB, Clarke, LP 1994Wavelet compression and segmentation of digital mammogramsJ Digit Imaging72738PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Perlmutter, SM, Cosman, PC, Gray, RM, Olshen, RA, Ikeda, D, Adams, CN, Betts, BJ, Williams, MB, Perlmutter, KO, Li, J, Aiyer, A, Fajardo, L, Birdwell, R, Daniel, BL 1997Image quality in lossy compressed digital mammogramsSignal Process59189210CrossRef Perlmutter, SM, Cosman, PC, Gray, RM, Olshen, RA, Ikeda, D, Adams, CN, Betts, BJ, Williams, MB, Perlmutter, KO, Li, J, Aiyer, A, Fajardo, L, Birdwell, R, Daniel, BL 1997Image quality in lossy compressed digital mammogramsSignal Process59189210CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Multisite Telemammography System for Remote Management of Screening Mammography: An Assessment of Technical, Operational, and Clinical Issues
Authors
Joseph K. Leader, Ph.D.
Christiane M. Hakim, M.D.
Marie A. Ganott, M.D.
Denise M. Chough, M.D.
Luisa P. Wallace, M.D.
Ronald J. Clearfield, M.D.
Ronald L. Perrin, M.D.
John M. Drescher, B.S.
Glenn S. Maitz, M.S.
Jules H. Sumkin, M.D.
David Gur, Sc.D.
Publication date
01-09-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 3/2006
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-006-0585-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2006

Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2006 Go to the issue