Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2006

01-09-2006

ROC Analysis for Diagnostic Accuracy of Fracture by Using Different Monitors

Authors: Zhigang Liang, Kuncheng Li, Xiaolin Yang, Xiangying Du, Jiabin Liu, Xin Zhao, Xiangdong Qi

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 3/2006

Login to get access

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare diagnostic accuracy by using two types of monitors.

Methods

Four radiologists with 10 years experience twice interpreted the films of 77 fracture cases by using the ViewSonic P75f+ and BARCO MGD221 monitors, with a time interval of 3 weeks. Each time the radiologists used one type of monitor to interpret the images. The image browser used was the Unisight software provided by Atlastiger Company (Shanghai, China), and interpretation result was analyzed via the LABMRMC software.

Results

In studies of receiver operating characteristics to score the presence or absence of fracture, the results of images interpreted through monochromic monitors showed significant statistical difference compared to those interpreted using the color monitors.

Conclusion

A significant difference was observed in the results obtained by using two kinds of monitors. Color monitors cannot serve as substitutes for monochromatic monitors in the process of interpreting computed radiography (CR) images with fractures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hertzberg, BS, Kliewer, MA, Paulson, EK, et al. 1999PACS in sonography: accuracy of interpretation using film compared with monitor display. Picture archiving and communication systemsAJR Am J Roentgenol17311751179PubMed Hertzberg, BS, Kliewer, MA, Paulson, EK,  et al. 1999PACS in sonography: accuracy of interpretation using film compared with monitor display. Picture archiving and communication systemsAJR Am J Roentgenol17311751179PubMed
2.
go back to reference Ishigaki, T, Endo, T, Ikeda, M, et al. 1996Subtle pulmonary disease: detection with computed radiography versus conventional chest radiographyRadiology2015160PubMed Ishigaki, T, Endo, T, Ikeda, M,  et al. 1996Subtle pulmonary disease: detection with computed radiography versus conventional chest radiographyRadiology2015160PubMed
3.
go back to reference Kondoh, H, Hatazawa, K, Kozuka, T 2001The performance of general-purpose colour CRT monitors in PACS environmentComput Methods Programs Biomed7;666368CrossRef Kondoh, H, Hatazawa, K, Kozuka, T 2001The performance of general-purpose colour CRT monitors in PACS environmentComput Methods Programs Biomed7;666368CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Passadore, DJ, Isoardi, RA, Ariza, PP, Padin, C 2001Use of a low-cost, PC-based image review workstation at a radiology departmentJ Digit Imaging6;14222223CrossRef Passadore, DJ, Isoardi, RA, Ariza, PP, Padin, C 2001Use of a low-cost, PC-based image review workstation at a radiology departmentJ Digit Imaging6;14222223CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Partan, G, Mayrhofer, R, Urban, M, et al. 2003Diagnostic performance of liquid crystal and cathode-ray-tube monitors in brain computed tomographyEur Radiol1323972401PubMedCrossRef Partan, G, Mayrhofer, R, Urban, M,  et al. 2003Diagnostic performance of liquid crystal and cathode-ray-tube monitors in brain computed tomographyEur Radiol1323972401PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Oschatz, E, Prokop, M, Scharitzer, M, et al. 2005Comparison of liquid crystal versus cathode ray tube display for the detection of simulated chest lesionsEur Radiol7;1514721476CrossRef Oschatz, E, Prokop, M, Scharitzer, M,  et al. 2005Comparison of liquid crystal versus cathode ray tube display for the detection of simulated chest lesionsEur Radiol7;1514721476CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Peer, S, Giacomuzzi, SM, Peer, R, et al. 2003Resolution requirements for monitor viewing of digital flat-panel detector radiographs: a contrast detail analysisEur Radiol13413417PubMed Peer, S, Giacomuzzi, SM, Peer, R,  et al. 2003Resolution requirements for monitor viewing of digital flat-panel detector radiographs: a contrast detail analysisEur Radiol13413417PubMed
8.
go back to reference Iwano, S, Ishigaki, T, Shimamoto, K, et al. 2001Detection of subtle pulmonary disease on CR chest images: monochromatic CRT monitor vs. color CRT monitorEur Radiol115964PubMedCrossRef Iwano, S, Ishigaki, T, Shimamoto, K,  et al. 2001Detection of subtle pulmonary disease on CR chest images: monochromatic CRT monitor vs. color CRT monitorEur Radiol115964PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Doyle, AJ, Gunn, ML, Gamble, GD, Zhang, M 2002Personal computer-based PACS display system: comparison with a dedicated PACS workstation for review of computed radiographic images in rheumatoid arthritisAcad Radiol6;9646653CrossRef Doyle, AJ, Gunn, ML, Gamble, GD, Zhang, M 2002Personal computer-based PACS display system: comparison with a dedicated PACS workstation for review of computed radiographic images in rheumatoid arthritisAcad Radiol6;9646653CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jervis, SE, Brettle, DS 2003A practical approach to soft-copy display consistency for PC-based review workstationsBr J Radiol9;76648652CrossRef Jervis, SE, Brettle, DS 2003A practical approach to soft-copy display consistency for PC-based review workstationsBr J Radiol9;76648652CrossRef
Metadata
Title
ROC Analysis for Diagnostic Accuracy of Fracture by Using Different Monitors
Authors
Zhigang Liang
Kuncheng Li
Xiaolin Yang
Xiangying Du
Jiabin Liu
Xin Zhao
Xiangdong Qi
Publication date
01-09-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 3/2006
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-006-0265-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2006

Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2006 Go to the issue