Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Gastric Cancer 5/2018

Open Access 01-09-2018 | Original Article

A multicenter, randomized trial comparing efficacy and safety of paclitaxel/capecitabine and cisplatin/capecitabine in advanced gastric cancer

Authors: Zhihao Lu, Xiaotian Zhang, Wei Liu, Tianshu Liu, Bing Hu, Wei Li, Qingxia Fan, Jianming Xu, Nong Xu, Yuxian Bai, Yueyin Pan, Qing Xu, Wei Bai, Li Xia, Yong Gao, Wenling Wang, Yongqian Shu, Lin Shen

Published in: Gastric Cancer | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We compared efficacy and safety of paclitaxel/capecitabine therapy followed by capecitabine for maintenance (PACX) versus cisplatin/capecitabine therapy (XP) in advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

Multicenter, randomized, phase III trial was conducted in China (December 2009–February 2014). Adults (n = 320) with histologically confirmed, untreated metastatic/unresectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma; with ≥ 1 measureable lesions according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.0 criteria; Karnofsky performance score ≥ 70 and life expectancy ≥ 3 months were randomized (1:1) to PACX or XP. PACX group received paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 intravenous on days 1 and 8; capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally BD on days 1–14, followed by a 7-day rest interval for 4 cycles, followed by maintenance capecitabine at same dosage/schedule until disease progression, unendurable adverse events or death. XP group received cisplatin intravenous 80 mg/m2 on day 1 and capecitabine at same dosage/schedule as PACX group per cycle for 6 cycles.

Results

Median progression-free survival (5.0 versus 5.3 months; hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.906; 0.706–1.164; p = 0.44) and overall survival (12.5 versus 11.8 months; hazard ratio: 0.878 [0.685–1.125]; p = 0.30) were not significantly different between PACX and XP groups. Objective response rate was significantly higher (43.1 versus 28.8%; p = 0.012) and disease control rate was similar (77.5 versus 72.5%; p = 0.75) in PACX versus XP, respectively. Quality of life was significantly improved in PACX versus XP after three treatment cycles. Many treatment-related adverse events were significantly lesser in PACX than XP.

Conclusions

First-line chemotherapy with PACX is effective with milder toxicities in advanced gastric cancer, but could not replace XP.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–917.CrossRefPubMed Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–917.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Wagner AD, Grothe W, Haerting J, Kleber G, Grothey A, Fleig WE. Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2903–9.CrossRefPubMed Wagner AD, Grothe W, Haerting J, Kleber G, Grothey A, Fleig WE. Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2903–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Glimelius B, Ekström K, Hoffman K, Graf W, Sjödén PO, Haglund U, et al. Randomized comparison between chemotherapy plus best supportive care with best supportive care in advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 1997;8:163–8.CrossRefPubMed Glimelius B, Ekström K, Hoffman K, Graf W, Sjödén PO, Haglund U, et al. Randomized comparison between chemotherapy plus best supportive care with best supportive care in advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 1997;8:163–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Waddell T, Verheij M, Allum W, Cunningham D, Cervantes A, Arnold D, et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:57–63.CrossRef Waddell T, Verheij M, Allum W, Cunningham D, Cervantes A, Arnold D, et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:57–63.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376:687–97.CrossRefPubMed Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376:687–97.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sakamoto J, Matsui T, Kodera Y. Paclitaxel chemotherapy for the treatment of gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2009;12:69–78.CrossRefPubMed Sakamoto J, Matsui T, Kodera Y. Paclitaxel chemotherapy for the treatment of gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2009;12:69–78.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Sakamoto J, Chin K, Kondo K, Kojima H, Terashima M, Yamamura Y, et al. Phase II study of a 4-week capecitabine regimen in advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. Anticancer Drugs. 2006;17:231–6.CrossRefPubMed Sakamoto J, Chin K, Kondo K, Kojima H, Terashima M, Yamamura Y, et al. Phase II study of a 4-week capecitabine regimen in advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. Anticancer Drugs. 2006;17:231–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ryu MH, Kang YK. ML17032 trial: capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009;9:1745–51.CrossRefPubMed Ryu MH, Kang YK. ML17032 trial: capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009;9:1745–51.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Koizumi W, Saigenji K, Ujiie S, Terashima M, Sakata Y, Taguchi T, et al. A pilot phase II study of capecitabine in advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. Oncology. 2003;64:232–6.CrossRefPubMed Koizumi W, Saigenji K, Ujiie S, Terashima M, Sakata Y, Taguchi T, et al. A pilot phase II study of capecitabine in advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. Oncology. 2003;64:232–6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kang YK, Kang WK, Shin DB, Chen J, Xiong J, Wang J, et al. Capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised phase III noninferiority trial. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:666–73.CrossRefPubMed Kang YK, Kang WK, Shin DB, Chen J, Xiong J, Wang J, et al. Capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised phase III noninferiority trial. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:666–73.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Park YH, Ryoo BY, Choi SJ, Kim HT. A phase II study of capecitabine and docetaxel combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:1329–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Park YH, Ryoo BY, Choi SJ, Kim HT. A phase II study of capecitabine and docetaxel combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:1329–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Tournigand C, Cervantes A, Figer A, Lledo G, Flesch M, Buyse M, et al. OPTIMOX1: a randomized study of FOLFOX4 or FOLFOX7 with oxaliplatin in a stop-and-Go fashion in advanced colorectal cancer–a GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:394–400.CrossRefPubMed Tournigand C, Cervantes A, Figer A, Lledo G, Flesch M, Buyse M, et al. OPTIMOX1: a randomized study of FOLFOX4 or FOLFOX7 with oxaliplatin in a stop-and-Go fashion in advanced colorectal cancer–a GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:394–400.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Gong J, Hu B, Zhang X, Zhang F, Zhang J, Xu N, et al. The multicenter, phase II prospective study of paclitaxel plus capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric carcinoma. Oncologist. 2014;19:173–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gong J, Hu B, Zhang X, Zhang F, Zhang J, Xu N, et al. The multicenter, phase II prospective study of paclitaxel plus capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric carcinoma. Oncologist. 2014;19:173–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Kang HJ, Chang HM, Kim TW, Ryu MH, Sohn HJ, Yook JH, et al. A phase II study of paclitaxel and capecitabine as a first-line combination chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008;98:316–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kang HJ, Chang HM, Kim TW, Ryu MH, Sohn HJ, Yook JH, et al. A phase II study of paclitaxel and capecitabine as a first-line combination chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008;98:316–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Yuan M, Yang Y, Lv W, Song Z, Zhong H. Paclitaxel combined with capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. Oncol Lett. 2014;8:351–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yuan M, Yang Y, Lv W, Song Z, Zhong H. Paclitaxel combined with capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. Oncol Lett. 2014;8:351–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Kano Y, Akutsu M, Tsunoda S, Ando J, Matsui J, Suzuki K, et al. Schedule-dependent interaction between paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil in human carcinoma cell lines in vitro. Br J Cancer. 1996;74:704–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kano Y, Akutsu M, Tsunoda S, Ando J, Matsui J, Suzuki K, et al. Schedule-dependent interaction between paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil in human carcinoma cell lines in vitro. Br J Cancer. 1996;74:704–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
18.
go back to reference Ajani J. Review of capecitabine as oral treatment of gastric, gastroesophageal, and esophageal cancers. Cancer. 2006;107:221–31.CrossRefPubMed Ajani J. Review of capecitabine as oral treatment of gastric, gastroesophageal, and esophageal cancers. Cancer. 2006;107:221–31.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Schüller J, Cassidy J, Dumont E, Roos B, Durston S, Banken L, et al. Preferential activation of capecitabine in tumor following oral administration to colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2000;45:291–7.CrossRefPubMed Schüller J, Cassidy J, Dumont E, Roos B, Durston S, Banken L, et al. Preferential activation of capecitabine in tumor following oral administration to colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2000;45:291–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A multicenter, randomized trial comparing efficacy and safety of paclitaxel/capecitabine and cisplatin/capecitabine in advanced gastric cancer
Authors
Zhihao Lu
Xiaotian Zhang
Wei Liu
Tianshu Liu
Bing Hu
Wei Li
Qingxia Fan
Jianming Xu
Nong Xu
Yuxian Bai
Yueyin Pan
Qing Xu
Wei Bai
Li Xia
Yong Gao
Wenling Wang
Yongqian Shu
Lin Shen
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Gastric Cancer / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1436-3291
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3305
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-018-0809-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Gastric Cancer 5/2018 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.