Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 12/2013

01-12-2013 | Glaucoma

A modified glaucoma staging system based on visual field index

Authors: Kazunori Hirasawa, Nobuyuki Shoji, Tetsuya Morita, Kimiya Shimizu

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 12/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To describe a modified glaucoma staging system (Modified GSS) based on the visual field index (VFI) and evaluate the performance of the Modified GSS compared with the Bascom Palmer GSS and Enhanced GSS.

Methods

A total of 549 eyes of 549 patients were studied retrospectively. The Modified GSS was used to classify the glaucomatous visual field defects into stage 0 to 5 based on the VFI. The cutoff values for each stage were derived from VFI that were equivalent to mean deviations of −6, −12, −20, and −25 dB by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The staging performances, based on each of three GSSs, were compared with both the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) and Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS) scores.

Results

The VFI cutoff values calculated for each stage were 81.5, 62.5, 42.5, and 22.5 %, respectively. The correlation coefficient of Modified GSS was greater than that of Bascom Palmer GSS (p < 0.001), and correlation coefficients of Modified GSS and Enhanced GSS were equivalent. However, Enhanced GSS tended to classify moderate to severe AGIS and CIGTS scores into higher stages (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The Modified GSS is easy to use and accurate, and the staging performance is either equal or superior to existing GSSs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference The advanced glaucoma intervention study investigators (1994) Advanced glaucoma intervention study: 2. visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology 101:1445–1455CrossRef The advanced glaucoma intervention study investigators (1994) Advanced glaucoma intervention study: 2. visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology 101:1445–1455CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Musch DC, Lichter PR, Guire KE, Standardi CL (1999) The collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study: study design, methods, and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients. Ophthalmology 106:653–662PubMedCrossRef Musch DC, Lichter PR, Guire KE, Standardi CL (1999) The collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study: study design, methods, and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients. Ophthalmology 106:653–662PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hodapp E, Parrish RK II, Anderson DR (1995) Clinical decisions in glaucoma. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 52–61 Hodapp E, Parrish RK II, Anderson DR (1995) Clinical decisions in glaucoma. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 52–61
4.
go back to reference Mills RP, Budenz DL, Lee PP, Noecker RJ, Walt JG, Siegartel LR, Evans SJ, Doyle JJ (2006) Categorizing the stage of glaucoma from pre-diagnosis to end-stage disease. Am J Ophthalmol 141:24–30PubMedCrossRef Mills RP, Budenz DL, Lee PP, Noecker RJ, Walt JG, Siegartel LR, Evans SJ, Doyle JJ (2006) Categorizing the stage of glaucoma from pre-diagnosis to end-stage disease. Am J Ophthalmol 141:24–30PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Brusini P, Filacorda S (2006) Enhanced glaucoma staging system (GSS2) for classifying functional damage in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 15:40–46PubMedCrossRef Brusini P, Filacorda S (2006) Enhanced glaucoma staging system (GSS2) for classifying functional damage in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 15:40–46PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ng M, Sample PA, Pascual JP, Zangwill LM, Girkin CA, Liebmann JM, Weinreb RN, Racette L (2012) Comparison of visual field severity classification systems for glaucoma. J Glaucoma 21:551–561PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ng M, Sample PA, Pascual JP, Zangwill LM, Girkin CA, Liebmann JM, Weinreb RN, Racette L (2012) Comparison of visual field severity classification systems for glaucoma. J Glaucoma 21:551–561PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bengtsson B, Heijl A (2008) A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression. Am J Ophthalmol 145:343–353PubMedCrossRef Bengtsson B, Heijl A (2008) A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression. Am J Ophthalmol 145:343–353PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Casas-Llera P, Rebolleda G, Muñoz-Negrete FJ, Arnalich-Montiel F, Pérez-López M, Fernández-Buenaga R (2009) Visual field index rate and event-based glaucoma progression analysis: comparison in a glaucoma population. Br J Ophthalmol 93:1576–1579PubMedCrossRef Casas-Llera P, Rebolleda G, Muñoz-Negrete FJ, Arnalich-Montiel F, Pérez-López M, Fernández-Buenaga R (2009) Visual field index rate and event-based glaucoma progression analysis: comparison in a glaucoma population. Br J Ophthalmol 93:1576–1579PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bengtsson B, Patella VM, Heijl A (2009) Prediction of glaucomatous visual field loss by extrapolation of linear trends. Arch Ophthalmol 127:1610–1615PubMedCrossRef Bengtsson B, Patella VM, Heijl A (2009) Prediction of glaucomatous visual field loss by extrapolation of linear trends. Arch Ophthalmol 127:1610–1615PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Grewal DS, Sehi M, Greenfield DS, Advanced Imaging in Glaucoma Study Group (2011) Comparing rates of retinal nerve fibre layer loss with GDxECC using different methods of visual-field progression. Br J Ophthalmol 95:1122–1127PubMedCrossRef Grewal DS, Sehi M, Greenfield DS, Advanced Imaging in Glaucoma Study Group (2011) Comparing rates of retinal nerve fibre layer loss with GDxECC using different methods of visual-field progression. Br J Ophthalmol 95:1122–1127PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Artes PH, O’Leary N, Hutchison DM, Heckler L, Sharpe GP, Nicolela MT, Chauhan BC (2011) Properties of the statpac visual field index. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:4030–4038PubMedCrossRef Artes PH, O’Leary N, Hutchison DM, Heckler L, Sharpe GP, Nicolela MT, Chauhan BC (2011) Properties of the statpac visual field index. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:4030–4038PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Leung CK, Liu S, Weinreb RN, Lai G, Ye C, Cheung CY, Pang CP, Tse KK, Lam DS (2011) Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma a prospective analysis with neuroretinal rim and visual field progression. Ophthalmology 118:1551–1557PubMedCrossRef Leung CK, Liu S, Weinreb RN, Lai G, Ye C, Cheung CY, Pang CP, Tse KK, Lam DS (2011) Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma a prospective analysis with neuroretinal rim and visual field progression. Ophthalmology 118:1551–1557PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sawada H, Fukuchi T, Abe H (2011) Evaluation of the relationship between quality of vision and the visual function index in Japanese glaucoma patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:1721–1727PubMedCrossRef Sawada H, Fukuchi T, Abe H (2011) Evaluation of the relationship between quality of vision and the visual function index in Japanese glaucoma patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:1721–1727PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ang GS, Mustafa MS, Scott N, Diaz-Aleman VT, Azuara-Blanco A (2011) Perimetric progression in open angle glaucoma and the Visual Field Index (VFI). J Glaucoma 20:223–227PubMedCrossRef Ang GS, Mustafa MS, Scott N, Diaz-Aleman VT, Azuara-Blanco A (2011) Perimetric progression in open angle glaucoma and the Visual Field Index (VFI). J Glaucoma 20:223–227PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ang GS, Shunmugam M, Azuara-Blanco A (2010) Effect of cataract extraction on the glaucoma progression index (GPI) in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 19:275–278PubMed Ang GS, Shunmugam M, Azuara-Blanco A (2010) Effect of cataract extraction on the glaucoma progression index (GPI) in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 19:275–278PubMed
16.
go back to reference Rao HL, Jonnadula GB, Addepalli UK, Senthil S, Garudadri CS (2013) Effect of cataract extraction on visual field index in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 22:164–168PubMedCrossRef Rao HL, Jonnadula GB, Addepalli UK, Senthil S, Garudadri CS (2013) Effect of cataract extraction on visual field index in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 22:164–168PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Koucheki B, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Patel G, Gaasterland D, Caprioli J (2004) Visual field changes after cataract extraction: the AGIS experience. Am J Ophthalmol 138:1022–1028PubMedCrossRef Koucheki B, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Patel G, Gaasterland D, Caprioli J (2004) Visual field changes after cataract extraction: the AGIS experience. Am J Ophthalmol 138:1022–1028PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Emery JM, Little JH (1979) Phacoemulsification and aspiration of cataracts; surgical techniques, complications, and results. MO, CV Mosby, St Louis, pp 45–48 Emery JM, Little JH (1979) Phacoemulsification and aspiration of cataracts; surgical techniques, complications, and results. MO, CV Mosby, St Louis, pp 45–48
19.
go back to reference McKean-Cowdin R, Wang Y, Wu J, Azen SP, Varma R, Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group (2008) Impact of visual field loss on health-related quality of life in glaucoma: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology 115:941–948PubMedCrossRef McKean-Cowdin R, Wang Y, Wu J, Azen SP, Varma R, Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group (2008) Impact of visual field loss on health-related quality of life in glaucoma: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology 115:941–948PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sawada H, Fukuchi T, Abe H (2011) Evaluation of the relationship between quality of vision and visual function in Japanese glaucoma patients. Clin Ophthalmol 5:259–267PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Sawada H, Fukuchi T, Abe H (2011) Evaluation of the relationship between quality of vision and visual function in Japanese glaucoma patients. Clin Ophthalmol 5:259–267PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Asaoka R, Crabb DP, Yamashita T, Russell RA, Wang YX, Garway-Heath DF (2011) Patients have two eyes!: binocular versus better eye visual field indices. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:7007–7011PubMedCrossRef Asaoka R, Crabb DP, Yamashita T, Russell RA, Wang YX, Garway-Heath DF (2011) Patients have two eyes!: binocular versus better eye visual field indices. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:7007–7011PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Anderson DR (1992) Automated static perimetry. Mosby-Year Book, St. Louis, p 123 Anderson DR (1992) Automated static perimetry. Mosby-Year Book, St. Louis, p 123
Metadata
Title
A modified glaucoma staging system based on visual field index
Authors
Kazunori Hirasawa
Nobuyuki Shoji
Tetsuya Morita
Kimiya Shimizu
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 12/2013
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2490-5

Other articles of this Issue 12/2013

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 12/2013 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor (by invitation)

Macular pigment optical density in aging eye