Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2016

Open Access 01-10-2016

A hydraulically driven colonoscope

Authors: Stuart A. Coleman, Silvia C. Tapia-Siles, Markus Pakleppa, Jan B. Vorstius, Robert P. Keatch, Benjie Tang, Alfred Cuschieri

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Conventional colonoscopy requires a high degree of operator skill and is often painful for the patient. We present a preliminary feasibility study of an alternative approach where a self-propelled colonoscope is hydraulically driven through the colon.

Methods

A hydraulic colonoscope which could be controlled manually or automatically was developed and assessed in a test bed modelled on the anatomy of the human colon. A conventional colonoscope was used by an experienced colonoscopist in the same test bed for comparison. Pressures and forces on the colon were measured during the test.

Results

The hydraulic colonoscope was able to successfully advance through the test bed in a comparable time to the conventional colonoscope. The hydraulic colonoscope reduces measured loads on artificial mesenteries, but increases intraluminal pressure compared to the colonoscope. Both manual and automatically controlled modes were able to successfully advance the hydraulic colonoscope through the colon. However, the automatic controller mode required lower pressures than manual control, but took longer to reach the caecum.

Conclusions

The hydraulic colonoscope appears to be a viable device for further development as forces and pressures observed during use are comparable to those used in current clinical practice.
Footnotes
1
All values are mean ± SD.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Seeff LC, Richards TB, Shapiro JA, Nadel MR, Manninen DL, Given LS, Dong FB, Winges LD, McKenna MT (2004) How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC’s survey of endoscopic capacity. Gastroenterology 127:1670–1677CrossRefPubMed Seeff LC, Richards TB, Shapiro JA, Nadel MR, Manninen DL, Given LS, Dong FB, Winges LD, McKenna MT (2004) How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC’s survey of endoscopic capacity. Gastroenterology 127:1670–1677CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Ghevariya V, Duddempudi S, Ghevariya N, Reddy M, Anand S (2013) Barriers to screening colonoscopy in an urban population: a study to help focus further efforts to attain full compliance. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:1497–1503CrossRefPubMed Ghevariya V, Duddempudi S, Ghevariya N, Reddy M, Anand S (2013) Barriers to screening colonoscopy in an urban population: a study to help focus further efforts to attain full compliance. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:1497–1503CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Häfner M (2007) Conventional colonoscopy: technique, indications, limits. Eur J Radiol 61:409–414CrossRefPubMed Häfner M (2007) Conventional colonoscopy: technique, indications, limits. Eur J Radiol 61:409–414CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Chandel S, Akhtar R, Sarotra P, Medhi B (2015) Status of colorectal cancer devices: present scenario. J Gastrointest Cancer 46:91–103CrossRefPubMed Chandel S, Akhtar R, Sarotra P, Medhi B (2015) Status of colorectal cancer devices: present scenario. J Gastrointest Cancer 46:91–103CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Xie Q, Chen B, Liu L, Gan H (2012) Does the variable-stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of the variable stiffness colonoscope compared with the standard adult colonoscope. BMC Gastroenterol 12:151CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Xie Q, Chen B, Liu L, Gan H (2012) Does the variable-stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of the variable stiffness colonoscope compared with the standard adult colonoscope. BMC Gastroenterol 12:151CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Yamada A, Watabe H, Takano N, Togo G, Yamaji Y, Yoshida H, Kawabe T, Omata M, Koike K (2013) Utility of single and double balloon endoscopy in patients with difficult colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 19:4732–4736CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yamada A, Watabe H, Takano N, Togo G, Yamaji Y, Yoshida H, Kawabe T, Omata M, Koike K (2013) Utility of single and double balloon endoscopy in patients with difficult colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 19:4732–4736CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Shike M, Fireman Z, Eliakim R, Segol O, Sloyer A, Cohen LB, Goldfarb-Albak S, Repici A (2008) Sightline ColonoSight system for a disposable, power-assisted, non-fiber-optic colonoscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 68:701–710CrossRefPubMed Shike M, Fireman Z, Eliakim R, Segol O, Sloyer A, Cohen LB, Goldfarb-Albak S, Repici A (2008) Sightline ColonoSight system for a disposable, power-assisted, non-fiber-optic colonoscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 68:701–710CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Rösch T, Adler A, Pohl H, Wettschureck E, Koch M, Wiedenmann B, Hoepffner N (2008) A motor-driven single-use colonoscope controlled with a hand-held device: a feasibility study in volunteers. Gastrointest Endosc 67:1139–1146CrossRefPubMed Rösch T, Adler A, Pohl H, Wettschureck E, Koch M, Wiedenmann B, Hoepffner N (2008) A motor-driven single-use colonoscope controlled with a hand-held device: a feasibility study in volunteers. Gastrointest Endosc 67:1139–1146CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Tumino E, Sacco R, Bertini M, Bertoni M, Parisi G, Capria A (2010) Endotics system vs colonoscopy for the detection of polyps. World J Gastroenterol 16(43):5452–5456CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tumino E, Sacco R, Bertini M, Bertoni M, Parisi G, Capria A (2010) Endotics system vs colonoscopy for the detection of polyps. World J Gastroenterol 16(43):5452–5456CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Vucelic B, Rex D, Pulanic R, Pfefer J, Hrstic I, Levin B, Halpern Z, Arber N (2006) The aer-o-scope: proof of concept of a pneumatic, skill-independent, self-propelling, self-navigating colonoscope. Gastroenterology 130:672–677CrossRefPubMed Vucelic B, Rex D, Pulanic R, Pfefer J, Hrstic I, Levin B, Halpern Z, Arber N (2006) The aer-o-scope: proof of concept of a pneumatic, skill-independent, self-propelling, self-navigating colonoscope. Gastroenterology 130:672–677CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Tapia-Siles S, Coleman S, Cuschieri A (2016) Current state of micro-robots/devices as substitutes for screening colonoscopy: assessment based on technology readiness levels. Surg Endosc. 30:404–413CrossRefPubMed Tapia-Siles S, Coleman S, Cuschieri A (2016) Current state of micro-robots/devices as substitutes for screening colonoscopy: assessment based on technology readiness levels. Surg Endosc. 30:404–413CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Cosentino F, Tumino E, Passoni GR, Morandi E, Capria A (2009) Functional evaluation of the endotics system, a new disposable self-propelled robotic colonoscope: in vitro tests and clinical trial. Int J Artif Organs 32:517–527PubMed Cosentino F, Tumino E, Passoni GR, Morandi E, Capria A (2009) Functional evaluation of the endotics system, a new disposable self-propelled robotic colonoscope: in vitro tests and clinical trial. Int J Artif Organs 32:517–527PubMed
16.
go back to reference Lin S, Zhu W, Xiao K, Su P, Liu Y, Chen P, Bai Y (2013) Water intubation method can reduce patients’ pain and sedation rate in colonoscopy: a meta-analysis. Dig Endosc 25:231–240CrossRefPubMed Lin S, Zhu W, Xiao K, Su P, Liu Y, Chen P, Bai Y (2013) Water intubation method can reduce patients’ pain and sedation rate in colonoscopy: a meta-analysis. Dig Endosc 25:231–240CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Watters DAK, Smith AN, Eastwood MA, Anderson KC, Elton RA, Mugerwa JW (1985) Mechanical properties of the colon: comparison of the features of the African and European colon in vitro. Gut 26:384–392CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Watters DAK, Smith AN, Eastwood MA, Anderson KC, Elton RA, Mugerwa JW (1985) Mechanical properties of the colon: comparison of the features of the African and European colon in vitro. Gut 26:384–392CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Loeve AJ, Fockens P, Breedveld P (2013) Mechanical analysis of insertion problems and pain during colonoscopy: why highly skill-dependent colonoscopy routines are necessary in the first place… and how they may be avoided. Can J Gastroenterol 27:293–302CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Loeve AJ, Fockens P, Breedveld P (2013) Mechanical analysis of insertion problems and pain during colonoscopy: why highly skill-dependent colonoscopy routines are necessary in the first place… and how they may be avoided. Can J Gastroenterol 27:293–302CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Wolstenholme P (2004) Misunderstandings about state machines. Comput Control Eng 15(5):40–45CrossRef Wolstenholme P (2004) Misunderstandings about state machines. Comput Control Eng 15(5):40–45CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Saunders BP, Phillips RKS, Williams CB (1995) Intraoperative measurement of colonic anatomy and attachments with relevance to colonoscopy. Br J Surg 82:1491–1493CrossRefPubMed Saunders BP, Phillips RKS, Williams CB (1995) Intraoperative measurement of colonic anatomy and attachments with relevance to colonoscopy. Br J Surg 82:1491–1493CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Brocchi E, Pezzilli R, Tomassetti P, Campana D, Morselli-Labate AM, Corinaldesi R (2008) Warm water or oil-assisted colonoscopy: toward simpler examinations? Am J Gastroenterol 103:581–587CrossRefPubMed Brocchi E, Pezzilli R, Tomassetti P, Campana D, Morselli-Labate AM, Corinaldesi R (2008) Warm water or oil-assisted colonoscopy: toward simpler examinations? Am J Gastroenterol 103:581–587CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kim WH, Cho YJ, Park JY, Min PK, Kang JK, Park IS (2000) Factors affecting insertion time and patient discomfort during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 52:600–605CrossRefPubMed Kim WH, Cho YJ, Park JY, Min PK, Kang JK, Park IS (2000) Factors affecting insertion time and patient discomfort during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 52:600–605CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kozarek RA, Earnest DL, Silverstein ME, Smith RG (1980) Air-pressure-induced colon injury during diagnostic colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 78:7–14PubMed Kozarek RA, Earnest DL, Silverstein ME, Smith RG (1980) Air-pressure-induced colon injury during diagnostic colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 78:7–14PubMed
24.
go back to reference Kararli T (1995) Comparison of the gastrointestinal anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry of humans and commonly used laboratory animals. Biopharm Drug Dispos 16:351–380CrossRefPubMed Kararli T (1995) Comparison of the gastrointestinal anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry of humans and commonly used laboratory animals. Biopharm Drug Dispos 16:351–380CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Givel JC, Mortensen N, Roche B (2009) Anorectal and colonic diseases: a practical guide to their management. Springer, New York Givel JC, Mortensen N, Roche B (2009) Anorectal and colonic diseases: a practical guide to their management. Springer, New York
26.
go back to reference Sosna J, Bar-Ziv J, Libson E, Eligulashvili M, Blachar A (2008) CT colonography: positioning order and intracolonic pressure. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1100CrossRefPubMed Sosna J, Bar-Ziv J, Libson E, Eligulashvili M, Blachar A (2008) CT colonography: positioning order and intracolonic pressure. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1100CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Baert AL, Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S (2009) Virtual colonoscopy: a practical guide. Springer, Berlin Baert AL, Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S (2009) Virtual colonoscopy: a practical guide. Springer, Berlin
28.
go back to reference Redelmeier D, Kahneman D (1996) Patients’ memories of painful medical treatments: real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain 66:3–8CrossRefPubMed Redelmeier D, Kahneman D (1996) Patients’ memories of painful medical treatments: real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain 66:3–8CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Wehrmeyer JA, Barthel JA, Roth JP, Saifuddin T (1998) Colonoscope flexural rigidity measurement. Med Biol Eng Comput 36:475–479CrossRefPubMed Wehrmeyer JA, Barthel JA, Roth JP, Saifuddin T (1998) Colonoscope flexural rigidity measurement. Med Biol Eng Comput 36:475–479CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Leung FW, Amato A, Ell C, Friedland S, Harker JO, Hsieh Y-H, Leung JW, Mann SK, Paggi S, Pohl J, Radaelli F, Ramirez FC, Siao-Salera R, Terruzzi V (2012) Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 76:657–666CrossRefPubMed Leung FW, Amato A, Ell C, Friedland S, Harker JO, Hsieh Y-H, Leung JW, Mann SK, Paggi S, Pohl J, Radaelli F, Ramirez FC, Siao-Salera R, Terruzzi V (2012) Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 76:657–666CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A hydraulically driven colonoscope
Authors
Stuart A. Coleman
Silvia C. Tapia-Siles
Markus Pakleppa
Jan B. Vorstius
Robert P. Keatch
Benjie Tang
Alfred Cuschieri
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4784-2

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2016 Go to the issue