Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 4/2015

01-12-2015

Preclinical Medical Student Hematology/Oncology Education Environment

Authors: Marc S. Zumberg, Virginia C. Broudy, Elizabeth M. Bengtson, Scott D. Gitlin

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

To better prepare medical students to care for patients in today’s changing health-care environment as they transition to continuing their education as residents, many US medical schools have been reviewing and modifying their curricula and are considering integration of newer adult learning techniques, including team-based learning, flipped classrooms, and other active learning approaches (Assoc Am Med Coll. 2014). Directors of hematology/oncology (H/O) courses requested an assessment of today’s H/O education environment to help them respond to the ongoing changes in the education content and environment that will be necessary to meet this goal. Several recommendations for the improvement of cancer education resulted from American Association for Cancer Education’s (ACCE’s) “Cancer Education Survey II” including a call for medical schools to evaluate the effectiveness of current teaching methods in achieving cancer education objectives (Chamberlain et al. J Cancer Educ 7(2):105-114.2014). To understand the current environment and resources used in medical student preclinical H/O courses, an Internet-based, Survey Monkey®-formatted, questionnaire focusing on nine topic areas was distributed to 130 United States Hematology/Oncology Course Directors (HOCDs). HOCDs represent a diverse group of individuals who work in variably supportive environments and who are variably satisfied with their position. Several aspects of these courses remain relatively unchanged from previous assessments, including a predominance of traditional lectures, small group sessions, and examinations that are either written or computer-based. Newer technology, including web-based reproduction of lectures, virtual microscopes, and availability of additional web-based content has been introduced into these courses. A variety of learner evaluation and course assessment approaches are used. The ultimate effectiveness and impact of these changes needs to be determined.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Chamberlain RM, Bakemeier RF, Gallagher RE, Kupchella CE, O’Donnell JF, Parker JA, Hill GJ, Brooks CM (1992) Cancer prevention education in United States medical schools. J Cancer Educ 7(2):105–114CrossRefPubMed Chamberlain RM, Bakemeier RF, Gallagher RE, Kupchella CE, O’Donnell JF, Parker JA, Hill GJ, Brooks CM (1992) Cancer prevention education in United States medical schools. J Cancer Educ 7(2):105–114CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Dajani Z, Geller AC (2008) Cancer prevention education in United States medical schools: how far have we come? J Cancer Educ 23(4):204–208CrossRefPubMed Dajani Z, Geller AC (2008) Cancer prevention education in United States medical schools: how far have we come? J Cancer Educ 23(4):204–208CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Skochelak SE (2010) A decade of reports calling for change in medical education: what do they say? Acad Med 85(Sept suppl):S26–S33CrossRefPubMed Skochelak SE (2010) A decade of reports calling for change in medical education: what do they say? Acad Med 85(Sept suppl):S26–S33CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sandars J, Morrison C (2007) What is the net generation? The challenge for future medical education. Med Teach 29:85–88CrossRefPubMed Sandars J, Morrison C (2007) What is the net generation? The challenge for future medical education. Med Teach 29:85–88CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Koles PG, Stolfi A, Borges NJ, Nelson S, Parmelee DX (2010) The impact of team-based learning on medical students’ academic performance. Acad Med 85(11):1739–1745CrossRefPubMed Koles PG, Stolfi A, Borges NJ, Nelson S, Parmelee DX (2010) The impact of team-based learning on medical students’ academic performance. Acad Med 85(11):1739–1745CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Enarson C, Cariaga-Lo L (2001) Influence of curriculum type on student performance in the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and Step 2 exams: problem-based learning vs. lecture-based curriculum. Med Educ 35:1050–1055CrossRefPubMed Enarson C, Cariaga-Lo L (2001) Influence of curriculum type on student performance in the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and Step 2 exams: problem-based learning vs. lecture-based curriculum. Med Educ 35:1050–1055CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Schindler N, Winchester DP, Sherman H (2002) Recognizing clinical faculty’s contributions in education. Acad Med 77:940–941CrossRefPubMed Schindler N, Winchester DP, Sherman H (2002) Recognizing clinical faculty’s contributions in education. Acad Med 77:940–941CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Nutter DO, Bond JS, Coller BS, D’Alessandri RM, Gewertz BL, Nora LM, Perkins JP, Shomaker TS, Watson RT (2000) Measuring faculty effort and contributions in medical education. Acad Med 75:199–207CrossRefPubMed Nutter DO, Bond JS, Coller BS, D’Alessandri RM, Gewertz BL, Nora LM, Perkins JP, Shomaker TS, Watson RT (2000) Measuring faculty effort and contributions in medical education. Acad Med 75:199–207CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hemphill RR, Heavrin BS, Lesnick J, Santen SS (2011) Those who can, do and they teach too: Faculty clinical productivity and teaching. W J Emerg Med 12:254–257 Hemphill RR, Heavrin BS, Lesnick J, Santen SS (2011) Those who can, do and they teach too: Faculty clinical productivity and teaching. W J Emerg Med 12:254–257
13.
go back to reference Gunderman RB (2004) The perils of paying academic physicians according to the clinical revenue they generate. Med Sci Monit 10:RA15–RA20PubMed Gunderman RB (2004) The perils of paying academic physicians according to the clinical revenue they generate. Med Sci Monit 10:RA15–RA20PubMed
14.
go back to reference Broudy VC, Hickman S (2007) Teaching hematology to second year medical students: results of a national survey of hematology course directors. Ann Hematol 86:283–287CrossRefPubMed Broudy VC, Hickman S (2007) Teaching hematology to second year medical students: results of a national survey of hematology course directors. Ann Hematol 86:283–287CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Personal communication to authors MSZ and SDG. Hematology course directors program, Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology. New Orleans, Louisiana. December 6, 2009 Personal communication to authors MSZ and SDG. Hematology course directors program, Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology. New Orleans, Louisiana. December 6, 2009
16.
go back to reference Gallagher RE, Bakemeier RF, Chamberlain RM, Kupchella CE, O’Donnell JF, Parker JA, Hill GJ, Brooks CM (1992) Instructional methods and the use of teaching resources in cancer education curricula. J Cancer Educ 7(2):95–104CrossRefPubMed Gallagher RE, Bakemeier RF, Chamberlain RM, Kupchella CE, O’Donnell JF, Parker JA, Hill GJ, Brooks CM (1992) Instructional methods and the use of teaching resources in cancer education curricula. J Cancer Educ 7(2):95–104CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Nguyen AND, Uthman MO, Johnson KA (2000) A web-based teaching program for laboratory diagnosis of coagulation disorders. Arch Pathol Lab Med 124:588–593PubMed Nguyen AND, Uthman MO, Johnson KA (2000) A web-based teaching program for laboratory diagnosis of coagulation disorders. Arch Pathol Lab Med 124:588–593PubMed
22.
go back to reference Paulsen FP, Eichhorn M, Brauer L (2010) Virtual microscopy-the future of teaching histology in the medical curriculum? Ann Anat 192:378–382CrossRefPubMed Paulsen FP, Eichhorn M, Brauer L (2010) Virtual microscopy-the future of teaching histology in the medical curriculum? Ann Anat 192:378–382CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Preclinical Medical Student Hematology/Oncology Education Environment
Authors
Marc S. Zumberg
Virginia C. Broudy
Elizabeth M. Bengtson
Scott D. Gitlin
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0778-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Journal of Cancer Education 4/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine