Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 2/2017

01-02-2017 | Scientific Article

A cadaver study validating CT assessment of acetabular component orientation: the Perth CT hip protocol

Authors: Varun Arora, Richard Hannan, Richard Beaver, Timothy Fletcher, Paul Harvie

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The aim was to develop a CT-based protocol to accurately measure post-operative acetabular cup inclination and anteversion establishing which bony reference points facilitate the most accurate estimation of these variables.

Materials and methods

An all-polyethylene acetabular liner was implanted into a cadaveric acetabulum. A conventional pelvic CT scan was performed and reformatted images created in both functional and anterior pelvic planes. CT images were transferred to a Freedom-Plus Graphics software package enabling an identical, virtual 3D model of the cadaveric pelvis to be created and definitive acetabular cup orientation established. Using coronal and axial slices of the CT scans, acetabular cup inclination and anteversion were measured on five occasions by ten radiographers using differing predetermined bony landmarks as reference points. The intra- and inter-observer variation in measurement of acetabular cup orientation using varying bony reference points was assessed in comparison to the elucidated definitive cup position.

Results and conclusion

Virtually derived definitive acetabular cup orientation was measured showing cup inclination and anteversion as 41.0 and 22.5° respectively. Mean CT-based measurement of cup inclination and anteversion by ten radiographers were 43.1 and 20.8° respectively. No statistically significant difference was found in intra- and inter-observer recorded results. No statistically significant differences were found when using different bony landmarks. CT assessment of acetabular component inclination and anteversion is accurate, reliable and reproducible when measured using differing bony landmarks as reference points. We recommend measuring acetabular inclination and anteversion from the inferior acetabular wall/teardrop and posterior ischium respectively.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ali Khan MA, Brakenbury PH, Reynolds IS. Dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1981;63-B:214–8. Ali Khan MA, Brakenbury PH, Reynolds IS. Dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1981;63-B:214–8.
2.
go back to reference Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere LC, Zimmerman J. Dislocations after total hip replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1978;217–20. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere LC, Zimmerman J. Dislocations after total hip replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1978;217–20.
3.
go back to reference Steppacher SD, Tannast M, Zheng G, Zhang X, Kowal J, Anderson SE, et al. Validation of a new method for determination of cup orientation in THA. J Orthop Res. 2009;27:1583–8.CrossRefPubMed Steppacher SD, Tannast M, Zheng G, Zhang X, Kowal J, Anderson SE, et al. Validation of a new method for determination of cup orientation in THA. J Orthop Res. 2009;27:1583–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Grutzner PA, Zheng G, Langlotz U, von Recum J, Nolte LP, Wentzensen A, et al. C-arm based navigation in total hip arthroplasty-background and clinical experience. Injury. 2004;35 Suppl 1:S – A90–5.CrossRef Grutzner PA, Zheng G, Langlotz U, von Recum J, Nolte LP, Wentzensen A, et al. C-arm based navigation in total hip arthroplasty-background and clinical experience. Injury. 2004;35 Suppl 1:S – A90–5.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kalteis T, Handel M, Herold T, Perlick L, Paetzel C, Grifka J. Position of the acetabular cup—accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. Eur J Radiol. 2006;58:294–300.CrossRefPubMed Kalteis T, Handel M, Herold T, Perlick L, Paetzel C, Grifka J. Position of the acetabular cup—accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. Eur J Radiol. 2006;58:294–300.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Saxler G, Marx A, Vandevelde D, Langlotz U, Tannast M, Wiese M, et al. The accuracy of free-hand cup positioning—A CT based measurement of cup placement in 105 total hip arthroplasties. Int Orthop. 2004;28:198–201.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Saxler G, Marx A, Vandevelde D, Langlotz U, Tannast M, Wiese M, et al. The accuracy of free-hand cup positioning—A CT based measurement of cup placement in 105 total hip arthroplasties. Int Orthop. 2004;28:198–201.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Kalteis T, Beckmann J, Herold T, Zysk S, Bathis H, Perlick L, et al. Accuracy of an image-free cup navigation system—an anatomical study. Biomed Tech. 2004;49:257–62.CrossRef Kalteis T, Beckmann J, Herold T, Zysk S, Bathis H, Perlick L, et al. Accuracy of an image-free cup navigation system—an anatomical study. Biomed Tech. 2004;49:257–62.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1993;75:228–32.CrossRef Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1993;75:228–32.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ackland MK, Bourne WB, Uhthoff HK. Anteversion of the acetabular cup—measurement of angle after total hip replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1986;68:409–13. Ackland MK, Bourne WB, Uhthoff HK. Anteversion of the acetabular cup—measurement of angle after total hip replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1986;68:409–13.
10.
go back to reference Mian SW, Truchly G, Pflum FA. Computed tomography measurement of acetabular cup anteversion and retroversion in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;206–9. Mian SW, Truchly G, Pflum FA. Computed tomography measurement of acetabular cup anteversion and retroversion in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;206–9.
11.
go back to reference Olivecrona H, Weidenhielm L, Olivecrona L, Beckman MO, Stark A, Noz ME, et al. A new CT method for measuring cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 10 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:252–60.CrossRefPubMed Olivecrona H, Weidenhielm L, Olivecrona L, Beckman MO, Stark A, Noz ME, et al. A new CT method for measuring cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 10 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:252–60.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wines AP, McNicol D. Computed tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:696–701.CrossRefPubMed Wines AP, McNicol D. Computed tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:696–701.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Olivecrona L, Olivecrona H, Weidenhielm L, Noz ME, Maguire GQ, Zeleznik MP. Model studies on acetabular component migration in total hip arthroplasty using CT and a semiautomated program for volume merging. Acta Radiol. 2003;44:419–29.CrossRefPubMed Olivecrona L, Olivecrona H, Weidenhielm L, Noz ME, Maguire GQ, Zeleznik MP. Model studies on acetabular component migration in total hip arthroplasty using CT and a semiautomated program for volume merging. Acta Radiol. 2003;44:419–29.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Olivecrona H, Weidenhielm L, Olivecrona L, Noz ME, Maguire GQ, Zeleznik MP, et al. Spatial component position in total hip arthroplasty: accuracy and repeatability with a new CT method. Acta Radiol. 2003;44:84–91.CrossRefPubMed Olivecrona H, Weidenhielm L, Olivecrona L, Noz ME, Maguire GQ, Zeleznik MP, et al. Spatial component position in total hip arthroplasty: accuracy and repeatability with a new CT method. Acta Radiol. 2003;44:84–91.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Olivecrona H, Olivecrona L, Weidenhielm L, Noz ME, Maguire GQ, Zeleznik MP, et al. Stability of acetabular axis after total hip arthroplasty, repeatability using CT and a semiautomated program for volume fusion. Acta Radiol. 2003;44:653–61.CrossRefPubMed Olivecrona H, Olivecrona L, Weidenhielm L, Noz ME, Maguire GQ, Zeleznik MP, et al. Stability of acetabular axis after total hip arthroplasty, repeatability using CT and a semiautomated program for volume fusion. Acta Radiol. 2003;44:653–61.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lin F, Lim D, Wixson RL, Milos S, Hendrix RW, Makhsous M. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study. Clin Biomech. 2008;23:1004–11.CrossRef Lin F, Lim D, Wixson RL, Milos S, Hendrix RW, Makhsous M. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study. Clin Biomech. 2008;23:1004–11.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Herrlin K, Pettersson H, Selvik G. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional methods for assessment of orientation of the total hip prosthesis. Acta Radiol. 1988;29:357–61.CrossRefPubMed Herrlin K, Pettersson H, Selvik G. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional methods for assessment of orientation of the total hip prosthesis. Acta Radiol. 1988;29:357–61.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Pettersson H, Gentz CF, Lindberg HO, Carlsson AS. Radiologic evaluation of the position of the acetabular component of the total hip prosthesis. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1982;23:259–63. Pettersson H, Gentz CF, Lindberg HO, Carlsson AS. Radiologic evaluation of the position of the acetabular component of the total hip prosthesis. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1982;23:259–63.
19.
go back to reference Widmer K-H. A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:387–90.CrossRefPubMed Widmer K-H. A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:387–90.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Arai N, Nakamura S, Matsushita T. Difference between 2 measurement methods of version angles of the acetabular component. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:715–20.CrossRefPubMed Arai N, Nakamura S, Matsushita T. Difference between 2 measurement methods of version angles of the acetabular component. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:715–20.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Fontes D, Benoit J, Lortat-Jacob A, Didry R. Luxation of total hip prosthesis. Mathematic modelization and biomechanical approach. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1991;77:151–62.PubMed Fontes D, Benoit J, Lortat-Jacob A, Didry R. Luxation of total hip prosthesis. Mathematic modelization and biomechanical approach. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1991;77:151–62.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Hassan DM, Johnston GHF, Dust WNC, Watson G, Cassidy D. Radiographic calculation of anteversion in acetabular prostheses. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:369–72.CrossRefPubMed Hassan DM, Johnston GHF, Dust WNC, Watson G, Cassidy D. Radiographic calculation of anteversion in acetabular prostheses. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:369–72.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Paterno SA, Lachiewicz PF, Kelley SS. The influence of patient-related factors and the position of the acetabular component on the rate of dislocation after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1202–10.CrossRefPubMed Paterno SA, Lachiewicz PF, Kelley SS. The influence of patient-related factors and the position of the acetabular component on the rate of dislocation after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1202–10.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Tannast M, Zheng G, Anderegg C, Burckhardt K, Langlotz F, Ganz R, et al. Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;438:182–90.CrossRefPubMed Tannast M, Zheng G, Anderegg C, Burckhardt K, Langlotz F, Ganz R, et al. Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;438:182–90.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Seradge H, Nagle KR, Miller RJ. Analysis of version in the acetabular cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;152–7. Seradge H, Nagle KR, Miller RJ. Analysis of version in the acetabular cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;152–7.
26.
go back to reference Visser JD, Konings JG. A new method for measuring angles after total hip arthroplasty. A study of the acetabular cup and femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1981;63B:556–9. Visser JD, Konings JG. A new method for measuring angles after total hip arthroplasty. A study of the acetabular cup and femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1981;63B:556–9.
27.
go back to reference Yao L, Yao J, Gold RH. Measurement of acetabular version on the axiolateral radiograph. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;106–11. Yao L, Yao J, Gold RH. Measurement of acetabular version on the axiolateral radiograph. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;106–11.
28.
go back to reference Ghelman B, Kepler CK, Lyman S, Della Valle AG. CT outperforms radiography for determination of acetabular cup version after THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2362–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ghelman B, Kepler CK, Lyman S, Della Valle AG. CT outperforms radiography for determination of acetabular cup version after THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2362–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Ybinger T, Kumpan W, Hoffart HE, Muschalik B, Bullmann W, Zweymüller K. Accuracy of navigation-assisted acetabular component positioning studied by computed tomography measurements. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:812–7.CrossRefPubMed Ybinger T, Kumpan W, Hoffart HE, Muschalik B, Bullmann W, Zweymüller K. Accuracy of navigation-assisted acetabular component positioning studied by computed tomography measurements. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:812–7.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Hernandez RJ, Tachdjian MO, Poznansk AK, Dias LS. CT determination of femoral torsion. Am J Roentgenol. 1981;137:97–101.CrossRef Hernandez RJ, Tachdjian MO, Poznansk AK, Dias LS. CT determination of femoral torsion. Am J Roentgenol. 1981;137:97–101.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Arai N, Nakamura S, Matsushita T, Suzuki S. Minimal radiation dose computed tomography for measurement of cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:263–7.CrossRefPubMed Arai N, Nakamura S, Matsushita T, Suzuki S. Minimal radiation dose computed tomography for measurement of cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:263–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A cadaver study validating CT assessment of acetabular component orientation: the Perth CT hip protocol
Authors
Varun Arora
Richard Hannan
Richard Beaver
Timothy Fletcher
Paul Harvie
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2527-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Skeletal Radiology 2/2017 Go to the issue

Browser's Notes

Browser’s Notes