Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2013

01-04-2013 | Preclinical study

A 3-gene proliferation score (TOP-FOX-67) can re-classify histological grade-2, ER-positive breast cancers into low- and high-risk prognostic categories

Authors: Borbala Szekely, Takayuki Iwamoto, A. Marcell Szasz, Yuan Qi, Junji Matsuoka, W. Fraser Symmans, Anna-Maria Tokes, Janina Kulka, Charles Swanton, Lajos Pusztai

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

The goal of this study was to assess the prognostic value of a 3-gene (TOP2A, FOXM1, and MKI67) proliferation score and use it to risk stratify grade-2, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers into low- and high-risk groups. We used 4 different breast cancer gene expression datasets including two cohorts of patients who received no systemic adjuvant therapy (Mainz: n = 206, TRANSBIG: n = 134) and two other cohorts that received adjuvant tamoxifen (JBI: n = 227, MDACC/SET: n = 192). We compared individual and combined expression values of the 3 genes between grade 1, 2, and 3 tumors and plotted distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) curves by the 3-gene score for grade-2 cancers. We compared the prognostic value of the 3-gene score to the Genomic Grade Index (GGI). The individual and combined expression of TOP2A, FOXM1, and MKI67 were significantly different between the 3 histological grade groups with the highest expression in grade-3 and the lowest in grade-1 cancers. Expression levels were variable in grade-2 cancers. Grade-2 tumors with high expression of the 3 genes (>median) showed significantly worse DMFS in one prognostic and one tamoxifen-treated set and showed a similar but non-significant trend for worse survival in the remaining two datasets. The 3-gene score performed equally well in risk stratification as the GGI. A 3-gene proliferation score shows similar prognostic value as the GGI in ER-positive, grade-2 cancers and may serve as basis for a PCR-based assay that could aid prognostic prediction for clinically intermediate-risk cancers.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Galea MH, Blamey RW, Elston CE, Ellis IO (1992) The Nottingham prognostic index in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 22(3):207–219PubMedCrossRef Galea MH, Blamey RW, Elston CE, Ellis IO (1992) The Nottingham prognostic index in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 22(3):207–219PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Elston CW, Ellis IO (1991) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19(5):403–410PubMedCrossRef Elston CW, Ellis IO (1991) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19(5):403–410PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Simpson JF, Gray R, Dressler LG et al (2000) Prognostic value of histologic grade and proliferative activity in axillary node-positive breast cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Companion Study, EST 4189. J Clin Oncol 18:2059–2069PubMed Simpson JF, Gray R, Dressler LG et al (2000) Prognostic value of histologic grade and proliferative activity in axillary node-positive breast cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Companion Study, EST 4189. J Clin Oncol 18:2059–2069PubMed
4.
go back to reference Frierson HF, Wolber RA, Berean KW et al (1995) Interobserver reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Bloom and Richardson histologic grading scheme for infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 103:195–198PubMed Frierson HF, Wolber RA, Berean KW et al (1995) Interobserver reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Bloom and Richardson histologic grading scheme for infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 103:195–198PubMed
5.
go back to reference Dalton LW, Page DL, Dupont WD (1994) Histologic grading of breast carcinoma: a reproducibility study. Cancer 73:2765–2770PubMedCrossRef Dalton LW, Page DL, Dupont WD (1994) Histologic grading of breast carcinoma: a reproducibility study. Cancer 73:2765–2770PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Robbins P, Pinder S, de Klerk N et al (1995) Histologic grading of breast carcinomas: a study of interobserver agreement. Hum Pathol 26:873–879PubMedCrossRef Robbins P, Pinder S, de Klerk N et al (1995) Histologic grading of breast carcinomas: a study of interobserver agreement. Hum Pathol 26:873–879PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sotiriou C, Wirapati P, Loi S, Harris A, Fox S, Smeds J, Nordgren H, Farmer P, Praz V, Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Larsimont D, Cardoso F, Peterse H, Nuyten D, Buyse M, Van de Vijver MJ, Bergh J, Piccart M, Delorenzi M (2006) Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 98(4):262–272PubMedCrossRef Sotiriou C, Wirapati P, Loi S, Harris A, Fox S, Smeds J, Nordgren H, Farmer P, Praz V, Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Larsimont D, Cardoso F, Peterse H, Nuyten D, Buyse M, Van de Vijver MJ, Bergh J, Piccart M, Delorenzi M (2006) Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 98(4):262–272PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wirapati P, Sotiriou C, Kunkel S, Farmer P, Pradervand S, Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Ignatiadis M, Sengstag T, Schutz F, Goldstein DR, Piccart M, Delorenzi M (2008) Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles in breast cancer: toward a unified understanding of breast cancer subtyping and prognosis signatures. Breast Cancer Res 10(4):R65PubMedCrossRef Wirapati P, Sotiriou C, Kunkel S, Farmer P, Pradervand S, Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Ignatiadis M, Sengstag T, Schutz F, Goldstein DR, Piccart M, Delorenzi M (2008) Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles in breast cancer: toward a unified understanding of breast cancer subtyping and prognosis signatures. Breast Cancer Res 10(4):R65PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Toussaint J, Sieuwerts AM, Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Rouas G, Harris AL, Larsimont D, Piccart M, Foekens JA, Durbecq V, Sotiriou C (2009) Improvement of the clinical applicability of the genomic grade index through a qrt-pcr test performed on frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. BMC Genomics 10:424. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-10-424 PubMedCrossRef Toussaint J, Sieuwerts AM, Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Rouas G, Harris AL, Larsimont D, Piccart M, Foekens JA, Durbecq V, Sotiriou C (2009) Improvement of the clinical applicability of the genomic grade index through a qrt-pcr test performed on frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. BMC Genomics 10:424. doi:10.​1186/​1471-2164-10-424 PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ma XJ, Salunga R, Dahiya S, Wang W, Carney E, Durbecq V, Harris A, Goss P, Sotiriou C, Erlander M, Sgroi D (2008) A five-gene molecular grade index and hoxb13:Il17br are complementary prognostic factors in early stage breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14(9):2601–2608PubMedCrossRef Ma XJ, Salunga R, Dahiya S, Wang W, Carney E, Durbecq V, Harris A, Goss P, Sotiriou C, Erlander M, Sgroi D (2008) A five-gene molecular grade index and hoxb13:Il17br are complementary prognostic factors in early stage breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14(9):2601–2608PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Aleskandarany MA, Rakha EA, Macmillan RD, Powe DG, Ellis IO, Green AR (2010) Mib1/ki-67 labelling index can classify grade 2 breast cancer into two clinically distinct subgroups. Breast Cancer Res Treat 127(3):591–599. doi:10.1007/s10549-010-1028-3 PubMedCrossRef Aleskandarany MA, Rakha EA, Macmillan RD, Powe DG, Ellis IO, Green AR (2010) Mib1/ki-67 labelling index can classify grade 2 breast cancer into two clinically distinct subgroups. Breast Cancer Res Treat 127(3):591–599. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-010-1028-3 PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wang JC (2002) Cellular roles of DNA topoisomerases: a molecular perspective. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3:430–440PubMedCrossRef Wang JC (2002) Cellular roles of DNA topoisomerases: a molecular perspective. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3:430–440PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Myatt SS, Lam EW (2007) The emerging roles of forkhead box (fox) proteins in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 7(11):847–859PubMedCrossRef Myatt SS, Lam EW (2007) The emerging roles of forkhead box (fox) proteins in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 7(11):847–859PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wierstra I, Alves J (2007) Foxm1, a typical proliferation-associated transcription factor. Biol Chem 388(12):1257–1274PubMedCrossRef Wierstra I, Alves J (2007) Foxm1, a typical proliferation-associated transcription factor. Biol Chem 388(12):1257–1274PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Duchrow M, Gerdes J, Schlüter C (1994) The proliferation-associated Ki-67 protein: definition in molecular terms. Cell Prolif 27:235–242PubMedCrossRef Duchrow M, Gerdes J, Schlüter C (1994) The proliferation-associated Ki-67 protein: definition in molecular terms. Cell Prolif 27:235–242PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bueno-de-Mesquita JM, van Harten WH, Retel VP, van’t Veer LJ, van Dam FS, Karsenberg K, Douma KF, van Tinteren H, Peterse JL, Wesseling J, Wu TS, Atsma D, Rutgers EJ, Brink G, Floore AN, Glas AM, Roumen RM, Bellot FE, van Krimpen C, Rodenhuis S, van de Vijver MJ, Linn SC (2007) Use of 70-gene signature to predict prognosis of patients with node-negative breast cancer: a prospective community-based feasibility study (RASTER). Lancet Oncol 8(12):1079–1087PubMedCrossRef Bueno-de-Mesquita JM, van Harten WH, Retel VP, van’t Veer LJ, van Dam FS, Karsenberg K, Douma KF, van Tinteren H, Peterse JL, Wesseling J, Wu TS, Atsma D, Rutgers EJ, Brink G, Floore AN, Glas AM, Roumen RM, Bellot FE, van Krimpen C, Rodenhuis S, van de Vijver MJ, Linn SC (2007) Use of 70-gene signature to predict prognosis of patients with node-negative breast cancer: a prospective community-based feasibility study (RASTER). Lancet Oncol 8(12):1079–1087PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Goldstein LJ, Gray R, Badve S, Childs BH, Yoshizawa C, Rowley S, Shak S, Baehner FL, Ravdin PM, Davidson NE, Sledge GW Jr, Perez EA, Shulman LN, Martino S, Sparano JA (2008) Prognostic utility of the 21-gene assay in hormone receptor-positive operable breast cancer compared with classical clinicopathologic features. J Clin Oncol 26(25):4063–4071PubMedCrossRef Goldstein LJ, Gray R, Badve S, Childs BH, Yoshizawa C, Rowley S, Shak S, Baehner FL, Ravdin PM, Davidson NE, Sledge GW Jr, Perez EA, Shulman LN, Martino S, Sparano JA (2008) Prognostic utility of the 21-gene assay in hormone receptor-positive operable breast cancer compared with classical clinicopathologic features. J Clin Oncol 26(25):4063–4071PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schmidt M, Bohm D, von Torne C, Steiner E, Puhl A, Pilch H, Lehr HA, Hengstler JG, Kolbl H, Gehrmann M (2008) The humoral immune system has a key prognostic impact in node-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 68(13):5405–5413PubMedCrossRef Schmidt M, Bohm D, von Torne C, Steiner E, Puhl A, Pilch H, Lehr HA, Hengstler JG, Kolbl H, Gehrmann M (2008) The humoral immune system has a key prognostic impact in node-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 68(13):5405–5413PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Desmedt C, Piette F, Loi S, Wang Y, Lallemand F, Haibe-Kains B, Viale G, Delorenzi M, Zhang Y, d’Assignies MS, Bergh J, Lidereau R, Ellis P, Harris AL, Klijn JG, Foekens JA, Cardoso F, Piccart MJ, Buyse M, Sotiriou C (2007) Strong time dependence of the 76-gene prognostic signature for node-negative breast cancer patients in the transbig multicenter independent validation series. Clin Cancer Res 13(11):3207–3214PubMedCrossRef Desmedt C, Piette F, Loi S, Wang Y, Lallemand F, Haibe-Kains B, Viale G, Delorenzi M, Zhang Y, d’Assignies MS, Bergh J, Lidereau R, Ellis P, Harris AL, Klijn JG, Foekens JA, Cardoso F, Piccart MJ, Buyse M, Sotiriou C (2007) Strong time dependence of the 76-gene prognostic signature for node-negative breast cancer patients in the transbig multicenter independent validation series. Clin Cancer Res 13(11):3207–3214PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Loi S, Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Lallemand F, Tutt AM, Gillet C, Ellis P, Harris A, Bergh J, Foekens JA, Klijn JG, Larsimont D, Buyse M, Bontempi G, Delorenzi M, Piccart MJ, Sotiriou C (2007) Definition of clinically distinct molecular subtypes in estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinomas through genomic grade. J Clin Oncol 25(10):1239–1246PubMedCrossRef Loi S, Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Lallemand F, Tutt AM, Gillet C, Ellis P, Harris A, Bergh J, Foekens JA, Klijn JG, Larsimont D, Buyse M, Bontempi G, Delorenzi M, Piccart MJ, Sotiriou C (2007) Definition of clinically distinct molecular subtypes in estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinomas through genomic grade. J Clin Oncol 25(10):1239–1246PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Symmans WF, Hatzis C, Sotiriou C, Andre F, Peintinger F, Regitnig P, Daxenbichler G, Desmedt C, Domont J, Marth C, Delaloge S, Bauernhofer T, Valero V, Booser DJ, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L (2010) Genomic index of sensitivity to endocrine therapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:4273CrossRef Symmans WF, Hatzis C, Sotiriou C, Andre F, Peintinger F, Regitnig P, Daxenbichler G, Desmedt C, Domont J, Marth C, Delaloge S, Bauernhofer T, Valero V, Booser DJ, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L (2010) Genomic index of sensitivity to endocrine therapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:4273CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Gong Y, Yan K, Lin F, Anderson K, Sotiriou C, Andre F, Holmes FA, Valero V, Booser D, Pippen JE Jr, Vukelja S, Gomez H, Mejia J, Barajas LJ, Hess KR, Sneige N, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L, Symmans WF (2007) Determination of oestrogen-receptor status and erbb2 status of breast carcinoma: a gene-expression profiling study. Lancet Oncol 8(3):203–211PubMedCrossRef Gong Y, Yan K, Lin F, Anderson K, Sotiriou C, Andre F, Holmes FA, Valero V, Booser D, Pippen JE Jr, Vukelja S, Gomez H, Mejia J, Barajas LJ, Hess KR, Sneige N, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L, Symmans WF (2007) Determination of oestrogen-receptor status and erbb2 status of breast carcinoma: a gene-expression profiling study. Lancet Oncol 8(3):203–211PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Piette F, Buyse M, Cardoso F, Van’t Veer L et al (2008) Comparison of prognostic gene expression signatures for breast cancer. BMC Genomics 9:394PubMedCrossRef Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Piette F, Buyse M, Cardoso F, Van’t Veer L et al (2008) Comparison of prognostic gene expression signatures for breast cancer. BMC Genomics 9:394PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Gelber RD et al (2007) Progress and promise: highlights of the international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2007. Ann Oncol 18:1133–1144PubMedCrossRef Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Gelber RD et al (2007) Progress and promise: highlights of the international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2007. Ann Oncol 18:1133–1144PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, Kim C, Baker J, Cronin M, Baehner FL, Walker MG, Watson D, Park T, Hiller W, Fisher ER, Wickerham DL, Bryant J, Wolmark N (2004) A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351(27):2817–2826PubMedCrossRef Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, Kim C, Baker J, Cronin M, Baehner FL, Walker MG, Watson D, Park T, Hiller W, Fisher ER, Wickerham DL, Bryant J, Wolmark N (2004) A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351(27):2817–2826PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sotiriou C, Pusztai L (2009) Gene expression signatures in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 360(8):790–800PubMedCrossRef Sotiriou C, Pusztai L (2009) Gene expression signatures in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 360(8):790–800PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Szasz AM, Li Q, Eklund AC, Sztupinszki Z, Rowan A, Tokes AM, Szekely B, Kiss A, Szendroi M, Gyorffy B, Szallasi Z, Swanton C, Kulka J (2013) The CIN4 chromosomal instability qPCR classifier defines tumor aneuploidy and stratifies outcome in grade 2 breast cancer. PLoS One 8(2):e56707PubMedCrossRef Szasz AM, Li Q, Eklund AC, Sztupinszki Z, Rowan A, Tokes AM, Szekely B, Kiss A, Szendroi M, Gyorffy B, Szallasi Z, Swanton C, Kulka J (2013) The CIN4 chromosomal instability qPCR classifier defines tumor aneuploidy and stratifies outcome in grade 2 breast cancer. PLoS One 8(2):e56707PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A 3-gene proliferation score (TOP-FOX-67) can re-classify histological grade-2, ER-positive breast cancers into low- and high-risk prognostic categories
Authors
Borbala Szekely
Takayuki Iwamoto
A. Marcell Szasz
Yuan Qi
Junji Matsuoka
W. Fraser Symmans
Anna-Maria Tokes
Janina Kulka
Charles Swanton
Lajos Pusztai
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2475-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2013 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine