Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 9/2005

01-09-2005 | Cardiac

A 16-slice multidetector computed tomography protocol for evaluation of the gastroepiploic artery grafts in patients after coronary artery bypass surgery

Authors: J. Dorgelo, T. P. Willems, P. M. A. van Ooijen, G. F. V. Panday, P. W. Boonstra, F. Zijlstra, M. Oudkerk

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 9/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Arterial coronary bypass grafts [internal mammary arteries and gastroepiploic artery (GEA)] are in widespread use for coronary surgery. Since selective catheterisation of the GEA graft to monitor patency, is often unsuccessful, a non-invasive protocol to visualise the GEA-graft from origin to anastomosis is presented using 16-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Twenty-six male patients (mean age 58.1±6.7 years) with GEA grafts were scanned according to a protocol of an ECG-synchronised cardiac scan followed by a thoracoabdominal scan. To terminate the scan at the correct anatomical level, the lowest level of the GEA was coded based on the lumbar vertebrae level. Scores ranging from one (excellent) to four (bad) were assigned to evaluate visualisation quality of the grafts. GEA grafts were assessable in 62% of the thoracoabdominal scans and 69% of the cardiac scans. On average, the lowest part of the GEA corresponded with a level between L1 and L2, in two cases in the upper part of L3. Mean visualisation score in the thoracoabdominal scans and cardiac scans was good (respectively 1.4±0.6 and 1.4±1.0). Sixteen-slice MDCT is a promising alternative for catheterisation in evaluating patency of GEA grafts, using the presented protocol with thoracoabdominal scan including L3 for complete coverage of the GEA graft.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bergsma TM, Grandjean JG, Voors AA et al. (1998) Low recurrence of angina pectoris after coronary artery bypass graft surgery with bilateral internal thoracic and right gastroepiploic arteries. Circulation 97:2402–2405PubMed Bergsma TM, Grandjean JG, Voors AA et al. (1998) Low recurrence of angina pectoris after coronary artery bypass graft surgery with bilateral internal thoracic and right gastroepiploic arteries. Circulation 97:2402–2405PubMed
2.
go back to reference Grandjean JG, Voors AA, Boonstra PW et al. (1996) Exclusive use of arterial grafts in coronary artery bypass operations for three-vessel disease: use of both thoracic arteries and the gastroepiploic artery in 256 consecutive patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112:935–942PubMed Grandjean JG, Voors AA, Boonstra PW et al. (1996) Exclusive use of arterial grafts in coronary artery bypass operations for three-vessel disease: use of both thoracic arteries and the gastroepiploic artery in 256 consecutive patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112:935–942PubMed
3.
go back to reference Isshiki T, Yamaguchi T, Nakamura M et al. (1990) Postoperative angiographic evaluation of gastroepiploic artery grafts: technical considerations and short-term patency. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 21:233–238 Isshiki T, Yamaguchi T, Nakamura M et al. (1990) Postoperative angiographic evaluation of gastroepiploic artery grafts: technical considerations and short-term patency. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 21:233–238
4.
go back to reference de Bono D (1993) Complications of diagnostic cardiac catheterisation: results from 34,041 patients in the United Kingdom confidential enquiry into cardiac catheter complications. The Joint Audit Committee of the British Cardiac Society and Royal College of Physicians of London. Br Heart J 70:297–300PubMed de Bono D (1993) Complications of diagnostic cardiac catheterisation: results from 34,041 patients in the United Kingdom confidential enquiry into cardiac catheter complications. The Joint Audit Committee of the British Cardiac Society and Royal College of Physicians of London. Br Heart J 70:297–300PubMed
5.
go back to reference Laskey W, Boyle J, Johnson LW (1993) Multivariable model for prediction of risk of significant complication during diagnostic cardiac catheterization. The registry committee of the society for cardiac angiography and interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 30:185–190 Laskey W, Boyle J, Johnson LW (1993) Multivariable model for prediction of risk of significant complication during diagnostic cardiac catheterization. The registry committee of the society for cardiac angiography and interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 30:185–190
6.
go back to reference Ueyama K, Ohashi H, Tsutsumi Y et al. (1999) Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts using helical scan computed tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 46:322–326CrossRefPubMed Ueyama K, Ohashi H, Tsutsumi Y et al. (1999) Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts using helical scan computed tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 46:322–326CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D et al. (1997) Noninvasive, three-dimensional visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts by electron beam tomography. Am J Cardiol 79:856–861CrossRefPubMed Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D et al. (1997) Noninvasive, three-dimensional visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts by electron beam tomography. Am J Cardiol 79:856–861CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ropers D, Ulzheimer S, Wenkel E et al. (2001) Investigation of aortocoronary artery bypass grafts by multislice spiral computed tomography with electrocardiographic-gated image reconstruction. Am J Cardiol 88:792–795CrossRefPubMed Ropers D, Ulzheimer S, Wenkel E et al. (2001) Investigation of aortocoronary artery bypass grafts by multislice spiral computed tomography with electrocardiographic-gated image reconstruction. Am J Cardiol 88:792–795CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Frohner S, Wagner M, Schmitt R et al. (2002) Multi-slice CT of aortocoronary venous bypasses and mammary artery bypasses: evaluation of bypasses and their anastomoses. Rontgenpraxis 54:163–173PubMed Frohner S, Wagner M, Schmitt R et al. (2002) Multi-slice CT of aortocoronary venous bypasses and mammary artery bypasses: evaluation of bypasses and their anastomoses. Rontgenpraxis 54:163–173PubMed
10.
go back to reference Nieman K, Pattynama PM, Rensing BJ et al. (2003) Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries. Radiology 229:749–756 Nieman K, Pattynama PM, Rensing BJ et al. (2003) Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries. Radiology 229:749–756
11.
go back to reference Marano R, Storto ML, Maddestra N et al. (2004) Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated four-row multi-detector spiral computed tomography. Eur Radiol 14:1353–1362CrossRefPubMed Marano R, Storto ML, Maddestra N et al. (2004) Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated four-row multi-detector spiral computed tomography. Eur Radiol 14:1353–1362CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Gurevitch J, Gaspar T, Orlov B et al. (2003) Noninvasive evaluation of arterial grafts with newly released multidetector computed tomography. Ann Thorac Surg 76:1523–1527CrossRefPubMed Gurevitch J, Gaspar T, Orlov B et al. (2003) Noninvasive evaluation of arterial grafts with newly released multidetector computed tomography. Ann Thorac Surg 76:1523–1527CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Panday GF, Grandjean JG, Ho KY et al. (2003) A rare case of herniation of omentum into the pericardial cavity after using the right gastro-epiploic artery for coronary bypass grafting. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2:154–155CrossRef Panday GF, Grandjean JG, Ho KY et al. (2003) A rare case of herniation of omentum into the pericardial cavity after using the right gastro-epiploic artery for coronary bypass grafting. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2:154–155CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA et al. (2002) Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 106:2051–2054PubMed Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA et al. (2002) Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 106:2051–2054PubMed
15.
go back to reference Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K et al. (2003) Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 107:664–666PubMed Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K et al. (2003) Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 107:664–666PubMed
16.
go back to reference Tello R, Hartnell GG, Costello P et al. (2002) Coronary artery bypass graft flow: qualitative evaluation with cine single-detector row CT and comparison with findings at angiography. Radiology 224:913–918 Tello R, Hartnell GG, Costello P et al. (2002) Coronary artery bypass graft flow: qualitative evaluation with cine single-detector row CT and comparison with findings at angiography. Radiology 224:913–918
17.
go back to reference Hirose H, Amano A, Takanashi S et al. (2002) Coronary artery bypass grafting using the gastroepiploic artery in 1,000 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 73:1371–1379CrossRefPubMed Hirose H, Amano A, Takanashi S et al. (2002) Coronary artery bypass grafting using the gastroepiploic artery in 1,000 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 73:1371–1379CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A 16-slice multidetector computed tomography protocol for evaluation of the gastroepiploic artery grafts in patients after coronary artery bypass surgery
Authors
J. Dorgelo
T. P. Willems
P. M. A. van Ooijen
G. F. V. Panday
P. W. Boonstra
F. Zijlstra
M. Oudkerk
Publication date
01-09-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 9/2005
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2766-1

Other articles of this Issue 9/2005

European Radiology 9/2005 Go to the issue