Top

Published in:

01-09-2005 | Physics

Flat detectors and their clinical applications

Author: Martin Spahn

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 9/2005

Abstract

Diagnostic and interventional flat detector X-ray systems are penetrating the market in all application segments. First introduced in radiography and mammography, they have conquered cardiac and general angiography and are getting increasing attention in fluoroscopy. Two flat detector technologies prevail. The dominating method is based on an indirect X-ray conversion process, using cesium iodide scintillators. It offers considerable advantages in radiography, angiography and fluoroscopy. The other method employs a direct converter such as selenium which is particularly suitable for mammography. Both flat detector technologies are based on amorphous silicon active pixel matrices. Flat detectors facilitate the clinical workflow in radiographic rooms, foster improved image quality and provide the potential to reduce dose. This added value is based on their large dynamic range, their high sensitivity to X-rays and the instant availability of the image. Advanced image processing is instrumental in these improvements and expand the range of conventional diagnostic methods. In angiography and fluoroscopy the transition from image intensifiers to flat detectors is facilitated by ample advantages they offer, such as distortion-free images, excellent coarse contrast, large dynamic range and high X-ray sensitivity. These characteristics and their compatibility with strong magnetic fields are the basis for improved diagnostic methods and innovative interventional applications.

Antonuk LE (1993) Thin-film, flat imagers—a coming revolution in megavoltage and diagnostic imaging? Phys Med 9:63–68

Chabbal J, Chaussat C, Ducourant T, Fritsch L, Michailos J, Spinnler V, Vieux G, Arques M, Hahm G, Hoheisel M, Horbaschek H, Schulz R, Spahn M (1996) Amorphous silicon X-ray image sensor. Proc SPIE 2708:499–510

Lee DL, Cheung LK, Jeromin LS (1995) A new detector for projection radiography. Proc SPIE 2432:237–249

Street RA (2000) Technology and applications of amorphous Silicon. Springer Series in Material Science. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 47–221

Weisfield RL, Hartney M, Schneider R, Alfatooni K, Lujan R (1999) High performance amorphous silicon image sensor for X-ray diagnostic medical imaging applications. Proc SPIE 3659:307–317

Zhao W, Rowlands JA (1995) X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: feasibility of a flat self-scanned detector for digital radiology. Med Phys 22:1595–1604

Noel A, Thibault F (2004) Digital detectors for mammography: the technical challenges. Eur Radiol 14:1990–1998

Beutel J, Kundel HL, Van Metter RL (2000) Handbook of medical imaging. Vol. 1: Physics and Psychophysics. SPIE Press

Antonuk LE, El-Mohri Y, Siewerdsen JH, Yorkston J, Huang W, Scarpine VE, Street RA (1997) Empirical investigation of the signal performance of a high-resolution, indirect detection, active matrix flat imager (AMFPI) for fluoroscopic and radiographic operation. Med Phys 24:51–70

10.

Chaussat C, Chabbal J, Ducourant T, Spinnler V, Vieux G, Neyret R (1998) New CsI/a-Si 17″×17″ X-ray flat detector provides superior detectivity and immediate direct digital output for General Radiography systems. Proc SPIE 3336:45–56

11.

Granfors PR, Albagli D, Tkaczyk JE, Aufrichtig R, Netel H, Brunst G, Boudry J, Luo D (2001) Performance of a flat cardiac detector. Proc SPIE 4320:77–86

12.

Spahn M, Strotzer M, Völk M, Böhm S, Geiger B, Hahm G, Feuerbach S (2000) Digital radiography with a large-area, amorphous-silicon, flat X-ray detector system. Invest Radiol 35:260–266

13.

Yamazaki T, Tamura T, Nokita M, Okada S, Hayashida S, Ogawa Y (2004) Perforamance of a novel 43-cm×43-cm flat-panel detector with CsI:Tl scintillator. Proc SPIE 5368:379–385

14.

Mainprize JG, Hunt DC, Yaffe MJ (2002) Direct conversion detectors: the effect of incomplete charge collection on detective quantum efficiency. Med Phys 29:976–990

15.

Simon M, Ford RA, Franklin AR, Grabowski SP, Menser B, Much G, Nascetti M, Overdick M, Wiechert DU (2004) PbO as direct conversion X-ray detector material. Proc SPIE 3659:188–199

16.

Street RA, Ready SE, Melekhov L, Ho J, Zuck A, Breen B (2002) Approaching the theoretical X-ray sensitivity with HgI2 direct detection image sensors. Proc SPIE 4682:414–422

17.

Polischuk B, Rougeot H, Kerwin W, Debrie A, Poloquin E, Hansroul M, Martin JP, Truong TT, Choquette M, Laperrière L, Shukri Z (1999) Direct conversion detector for digital mammography. Proc SPIE 3859:417–425

18.

Kasap SO, Rowlands JA (2002) Direct-conversion flat X-ray image sensors for digital radiography. IEEE 90:591–604

19.

Stone MF, Zhao W, Jacak BV, O’Connor P, Yu B, Rehak P (2002) The X-ray sensitivity of amorphous selenium for mammography. Med Phys 29:319–324CrossRefPubMed

20.

Völk M, Strotzer M, Holzknecht N, Manke C, Lenhart M, Gmeinwieser J, Link J, Reiser M, Feuerbach S (2000) Digital radiography of the skeleton using a large-area detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for dose reduction in comparison with screen-film radiography. Clin Radiol 55:615–621

21.

Völk M, Strotzer M, Gmeinwieser J, Alexander J, Fründ R, Seitz J, Manke C, Spahn M, Feuerbach S (1997) Flat X-ray detector using amorphous silicon technology: reduced radiation dose for the detection of foreign bodies. Invest Radiol 32:373–377

22.

Dobbins JT III (1995) Effects of undersampling on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra, and noise equivalent quanta of digital imaging systems. Med Phys 22:171–181CrossRefPubMed

23.

Stierstorfer K, Spahn M (1999) Self-normalizing method to measure the detective quantum efficiency of a wide range of X-ray detectors. Med Phys 26:1312–1319

24.

Van Metter R, Dickerson R (1994) Objective performance characteristics of a new asymmetric screen-film system. Med Phys 21:1483–1490

25.

Dobbins JT III, Ergun DL, Rutz L, Hinshaw DA, Blume H, Clark DC (1995) DQE(f) of four generations of computed radiography acquisition devices. Med Phys 22:1581–1593

26.

Granfors PR, Aufrichtig R (2000) DQE(f) of an amorphous Silicon flat X-ray detector: detector parameter influences and measurement methodology (2000) Proc SPIE 3977:2–13

27.

Lee DL, Cheung LK, Rodricks B, Powell GF (1998) Improved imaging performance of a 14×17-inch Direct Radiography system using Se/TFT detector. Proc SPIE 3336:14–23

28.

Moy JP (1998) Image quality of scintillator based X-ray electronic imagers. Proc SPIE 3336:187–194

29.

Metz CE, Wagner RF, Doi K, Brown DG, Nishikawa RM, Myers KJ (1995) Towards consensus on quantitative assessment of medical imaging systems. Med Phys 22:1057–1061

30.

Nakano Y, Gido T, Honda S, Maezawa A, Wakamatsu H, Yanagita T (2002) Improved computed radiography image quality from a BaFl:Eu photostimulable phosphor plate. Med Phys 29:592–597CrossRefPubMed

31.

Hamers S, Freyschmidt J, Neitzel U (2001) Digital radiography with a large-scale electronic flat-panel detector vs screen-film radiography: observer preference in clinical skeletal diagnostics. Eur Radiol 11:1753–1759

32.

Kotter E, Langer M (2002) Digital radiography with large-area flat-panel detectors. Eur Radiol 12:2562–2570PubMed

33.

Völk M, Hamer OW, Feuerbach S, Strotzer M (2004) Dose reduction in skeletal and chest radiography using a large-area flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon and thallium-doped cesium iodide: technical background, basic image quality parameters, and review of the literature. Eur Radiol 14:827–834CrossRefPubMed

34.

Ludwig K, Henschel A, Bernhardt TM, Lenzen H, Wormanns D, Diederich S, Heindel W (2003) Performance of a flat-panel detector in the detection of artificial erosive changes: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography. Eur Radiol 13:1316–1323PubMed

35.

Yorker JG, Jeromin LS, Lee DLY, Palecki EF, Golden KP, Jing Z (2002) Characterization of a full field mammography detector based on direct X-ray conversion in selenium. Proc SPIE 4682:21–29

36.

Vedantham S, Karellas A, Suryanarayanan S et al. (2000) Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characterization of a clinical prototype. Med Phys 27:558–567

37.

Yorkston J (2004) Specifications, performance evaluation, and quality assurance of radiographic and fluoroscopic systems in the digital era. AAPM Summer School Proceedings. Medical Physics Monograph No. 30:177–228

38.

Loustauneau V, Bissonnette M, Cadieux S, Hansroul M, Masson E, Savard S, Polischuk B (2004) Ghosting comparison for large-area selenium detectors suitable for mammography and general radiography. Proc SPIE 5368:162–169

39.

DeMaster DR (2001) Digital radiography offers major productivity gains over computed radiography: results of time–motion study. Appl Radiol 30:28–31

40.

Dobbins JT III, Godfrey DJ (2003) Digital X-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. Phys Med Biol 48:R65–R106

41.

Van Ginneken B, ter Haar Romeny BM, Viergever MA (2001) Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiography: a survey. IEEE 20:1228–1241CrossRefPubMed

42.

Hendee WR (1999) In the next decade automated computer analysis will be an accepted sole method to separate “normal” from “abnormal” radiological images. Med Phys 26:1–4

43.

Bruijns T, Bastiaens R, Hoornart B, von Reth E, Busse F, Heer V, Ducourant T, Cowen A, Davies A, Terrier F (2002) Image quality of a large area dynamic flat detector: comparison with a state of the art II/TV system. Proc SPIE 4682:332–343

44.

Busse F, Rütten W, Sandkamp B, Alving PL, Bastiaens R, Ducourant T (2002) Design and performance of a high-quality cardiac flat detector. Proc SPIE 4682:819–827

45.

Choquette M, Demers Y, Shukri Z, Tousignant O, Aoki K, Honda M, Takahashi A, Tsukamoto A (2001) Real time performance of a selenium-based detector for fluoroscopy. Proc SPIE 4320:501–508

46.

Colbeth RE, Boyce S, Fong R, Gray K, Harris R, Job ID, Mollov I, Nepo B, Pavkovich J, Taie-Nobarie N, Seppi EJ, Shapiro EG, Wright MD, Webb C, Yu JM (2001) 40×30 cm² flat imager for angiography, R&F and cone-beam CT applications. Proc SPIE 4320:94–102

47.

Suzuki K, Ikeda S, Ishikawa K, Iinuma G, Ogasawara S, Moriyama N, Konno Y (2002) Development and evaluation of a digital radiography system using a large-area flat detector. Proc SPIE 4682:363–370

48.

Faddis MN, Blume W, Finney J, Hall A, Rauch J, Sell J, Bae KT, Talcott M, Lindsay B (2002) Novel, magnetically guided catheter for endocardial mapping and radiofrequency catheter ablation. Circulation 106:2980–2985

49.

Lundqvist M, Danielsson M, Cederström B, Chmill V, Chuntonov A, Aslund M (2003) Measurements on a full-field digital mammography system with a photon counting crystalline silicon detector. Proc SPIE 5030:547–552

Title: Flat detectors and their clinical applications
Author: Martin Spahn
Publication date: 01-09-2005
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: European Radiology / Issue 9/2005
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2734-9

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Flat detectors and their clinical applications

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 9/2005

Upright, weight-bearing, dynamic–kinetic MRI of the spine: initial results

In vitro characterization of atherosclerotic carotid plaque with multidetector computed tomography and histopathological correlation

Significance of the “halo” sign for progression and regression of nodular pulmonary amyloidosis: radiographic-pathological correlation (2005:6b)

Uterine restoration after repeated sloughing of fibroids or vaginal expulsion following uterine artery embolization

Giant-cell tumours of bone of the hand and wrist: a review of imaging findings and differential diagnoses

Renal artery entrapment by the diaphragmatic crus