Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2015

01-05-2015

3-Dimensional (3D) laparoscopy improves operating time in small spaces without impact on hemodynamics and psychomental stress parameters of the surgeon

Authors: Xiaoyan Feng, Anna Morandi, Martin Boehne, Tawan Imvised, Benno M. Ure, Joachim F. Kuebler, Martin Lacher

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and purpose

Three-dimensional (3D) imaging, a recent technical innovation in laparoscopic surgery, has been postulated to enhance depth perception and facilitate operations. However, it has never been evaluated in conditions where the focus is close to the optical system. Thus, it is unclear whether 3D cameras can improve laparoscopic surgical performance in neonates and infants. We tested 3D versus two-dimensional (2D) vision during laparoscopic surgery in rabbits, mimicking the size of a neonatal patient.

Materials and methods

Cadaver New Zealand white rabbits (mean weight 2,755 g) were operated by two surgeons experienced in 2D laparoscopic surgery and two surgical residents (with basic skills in 2D laparoscopy). All surgeons had never performed 3D laparoscopic surgery. Animals underwent six operations: Nissen fundoplication, small bowel anastomosis, and closure of a diaphragmatic defect using either 2D or 3D. Primary endpoint was cumulative operating time and operating time of each operation. Secondary endpoints included the hemodynamic response and psychomental stress level of the surgeons. Finally, subjective data on depth perception were assessed by questionnaires.

Results

Cumulative operating time of all three types of operations was significantly shorter with 3D laparoscopy in experts (3D: 23.01 ± 5.65 min vs 2D: 29.51 ± 7.51 min, p < 0.01) and residents (3D: 27.95 ± 3.69 min vs 2D: 33.95 ± 6.21 min, p < 0.05). This effect could be shown for each operation in the expert group and the Nissen fundoplication in the resident group. There were no differences in the hemodynamic response as well as the psychomental stress level between 2D and 3D imaging. 3D provided better depth perception.

Conclusion

3D laparoscopy in small spaces is associated with a significant shorter operating time. It induces no additional physical or psychomental stress in surgeons naive to 3D imaging. 3D may therefore facilitate minimal invasive surgery in neonates and infants.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kuebler JF, Ure BM (2011) Minimally invasive surgery in the neonate. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 16:151–156CrossRefPubMed Kuebler JF, Ure BM (2011) Minimally invasive surgery in the neonate. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 16:151–156CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lacher M, Kuebler JF, Dingemann J, Ure BM (2014) Minimal invasive surgery in the newborn: current status and evidence. Semin Pediatr Surg 23:249–256CrossRef Lacher M, Kuebler JF, Dingemann J, Ure BM (2014) Minimal invasive surgery in the newborn: current status and evidence. Semin Pediatr Surg 23:249–256CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Dingemann C, Petersen C, Kuebler JF, Ure BM, Lacher M (2013) Laparoscopic transperitoneal heminephrectomy for duplex kidney in infants and children: a comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:889–893CrossRefPubMed Dingemann C, Petersen C, Kuebler JF, Ure BM, Lacher M (2013) Laparoscopic transperitoneal heminephrectomy for duplex kidney in infants and children: a comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:889–893CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lacher M, Kuebler JF, Yannam GR, Aprahamian CJ, Perger L, Beierle EA, Anderson SA, Chen MK, Harmon CM, Muensterer OJ (2013) Single-incision pediatric endosurgery for ovarian pathology. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:291–296CrossRefPubMed Lacher M, Kuebler JF, Yannam GR, Aprahamian CJ, Perger L, Beierle EA, Anderson SA, Chen MK, Harmon CM, Muensterer OJ (2013) Single-incision pediatric endosurgery for ovarian pathology. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:291–296CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Dingemann J, Ure BM (2013) Systematic review of level 1 evidence for laparoscopic pediatric surgery: do our procedures comply with the requirements of evidence-based medicine? Eur J Pediatr Surg 23:474–479CrossRefPubMed Dingemann J, Ure BM (2013) Systematic review of level 1 evidence for laparoscopic pediatric surgery: do our procedures comply with the requirements of evidence-based medicine? Eur J Pediatr Surg 23:474–479CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Impellizzeri P, Simona A, Grasso M, Antonuccio P, Crisafi C, Scalfari G, Arena F, Salpietro C, Lima M, Romeo C (2014) Surgical stress after open and transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 24:174–178PubMed Impellizzeri P, Simona A, Grasso M, Antonuccio P, Crisafi C, Scalfari G, Arena F, Salpietro C, Lima M, Romeo C (2014) Surgical stress after open and transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 24:174–178PubMed
7.
go back to reference Sun CC, Chiu AW, Chen KK, Chang LS (2000) Assessment of a three-dimensional operating system with skill tests in a pelvic trainer. Urol Int 64:154–158CrossRefPubMed Sun CC, Chiu AW, Chen KK, Chang LS (2000) Assessment of a three-dimensional operating system with skill tests in a pelvic trainer. Urol Int 64:154–158CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Chan AC, Chung SC, Yim AP, Lau JY, Ng EK, Li AK (1997) Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 11:438–440CrossRefPubMed Chan AC, Chung SC, Yim AP, Lau JY, Ng EK, Li AK (1997) Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 11:438–440CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (1999) Influence of optical axis-to-target view angle on endoscopic task performance. Surg Endosc 13:371–375CrossRefPubMed Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (1999) Influence of optical axis-to-target view angle on endoscopic task performance. Surg Endosc 13:371–375CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Cicione A, Autorino R, Breda A, De Sio M, Damiano R, Fusco F, Greco F, Carvalho-Dias E, Mota P, Nogueira C, Pinho P, Mirone V, Correia-Pinto J, Rassweiler J, Lima E (2013) Three-dimensional vs standard laparoscopy: comparative assessment using a validated program for laparoscopic urologic skills. Urology 82:1444–1450CrossRefPubMed Cicione A, Autorino R, Breda A, De Sio M, Damiano R, Fusco F, Greco F, Carvalho-Dias E, Mota P, Nogueira C, Pinho P, Mirone V, Correia-Pinto J, Rassweiler J, Lima E (2013) Three-dimensional vs standard laparoscopy: comparative assessment using a validated program for laparoscopic urologic skills. Urology 82:1444–1450CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Votanopoulos K, Brunicardi FC, Thornby J, Bellows CF (2008) Impact of three-dimensional vision in laparoscopic training. World J Surg 32:110–118CrossRefPubMed Votanopoulos K, Brunicardi FC, Thornby J, Bellows CF (2008) Impact of three-dimensional vision in laparoscopic training. World J Surg 32:110–118CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Storz P, Buess GF, Kunert W, Kirschniak A (2012) 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks. Surg Endosc 26:1454–1460CrossRefPubMed Storz P, Buess GF, Kunert W, Kirschniak A (2012) 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks. Surg Endosc 26:1454–1460CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Tanagho YS, Andriole GL, Paradis AG, Madison KM, Sandhu GS, Varela JE, Benway BM (2012) 2D versus 3D visualization: impact on laparoscopic proficiency using the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skill set. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:865–870CrossRefPubMed Tanagho YS, Andriole GL, Paradis AG, Madison KM, Sandhu GS, Varela JE, Benway BM (2012) 2D versus 3D visualization: impact on laparoscopic proficiency using the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skill set. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:865–870CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bilgen K, Uestuen M, Karakahya M (2013) Comparison of 3D imaging and 2D imaging for performance time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23:180–183CrossRefPubMed Bilgen K, Uestuen M, Karakahya M (2013) Comparison of 3D imaging and 2D imaging for performance time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23:180–183CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Tuschy B, Berlit S, Brade J, Sütterlin M, Hornemann A (2014) Full High-definition three-dimensional gynaecological laparoscopy–clinical assessment of a new robot-assisted device. In Vivo 28:111–115PubMed Tuschy B, Berlit S, Brade J, Sütterlin M, Hornemann A (2014) Full High-definition three-dimensional gynaecological laparoscopy–clinical assessment of a new robot-assisted device. In Vivo 28:111–115PubMed
16.
go back to reference Norozi K, Beck C, Osthaus WA, Wille I, Wessel A, Bertram H (2008) Electrical velocimetry for measuring cardiac output in children with congenital heart disease. Br J Anaesth 100:88–94CrossRefPubMed Norozi K, Beck C, Osthaus WA, Wille I, Wessel A, Bertram H (2008) Electrical velocimetry for measuring cardiac output in children with congenital heart disease. Br J Anaesth 100:88–94CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Engelmann C, Schneider M, Kirschbaum C, Grote G, Dingemann J, Schoof S, Ure BM (2011) Effects of intraoperative breaks on mental and somatic operator fatigue: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 25:1245–1250CrossRefPubMed Engelmann C, Schneider M, Kirschbaum C, Grote G, Dingemann J, Schoof S, Ure BM (2011) Effects of intraoperative breaks on mental and somatic operator fatigue: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 25:1245–1250CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Feng C, Rozenblit JW, Hamilton AJ (2010) A computerized assessment to compare the impact of standard, stereoscopic, and high-definition laparoscopic monitor displays on surgical technique. Surg Endosc 24:2743–2748CrossRefPubMed Feng C, Rozenblit JW, Hamilton AJ (2010) A computerized assessment to compare the impact of standard, stereoscopic, and high-definition laparoscopic monitor displays on surgical technique. Surg Endosc 24:2743–2748CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Badani KK, Bhandari A, Tewari A, Menon M (2005) Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional suturing: is there a difference in a robotic surgery setting? J Endourol 19:1212–1215CrossRefPubMed Badani KK, Bhandari A, Tewari A, Menon M (2005) Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional suturing: is there a difference in a robotic surgery setting? J Endourol 19:1212–1215CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference ElSahwi KS, Hooper C, De Leon MC, Gallo TN, Ratner E, Silasi DA, Santin AD, Schwartz PE, Rutherford TJ, Azodi M (2012) Comparison between 155 cases of robotic vs. 150 cases of open surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 124:260–264CrossRefPubMed ElSahwi KS, Hooper C, De Leon MC, Gallo TN, Ratner E, Silasi DA, Santin AD, Schwartz PE, Rutherford TJ, Azodi M (2012) Comparison between 155 cases of robotic vs. 150 cases of open surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 124:260–264CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Simforoosh N, Khazaeli M, Nouralizadeh A, Soltani MH, Samzadeh M, Saffarian O, Rahmani J (2011) Laparoscopic animal surgery for training without sacrificing animals; introducing the rabbit as a model for infantile laparoscopy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:929–933CrossRefPubMed Simforoosh N, Khazaeli M, Nouralizadeh A, Soltani MH, Samzadeh M, Saffarian O, Rahmani J (2011) Laparoscopic animal surgery for training without sacrificing animals; introducing the rabbit as a model for infantile laparoscopy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:929–933CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Molinas CR, Binda MM, Mailova K, Koninckx PR (2004) The rabbit nephrectomy model for training in laparoscopic surgery. Hum Reprod 19:185–190CrossRefPubMed Molinas CR, Binda MM, Mailova K, Koninckx PR (2004) The rabbit nephrectomy model for training in laparoscopic surgery. Hum Reprod 19:185–190CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Aykan S, Singhal P, Nguyen DP, Yigit A, Tuken M, Yakut E, Colakerol A, Sulejman S, Semercioz A (2014) Perioperative, pathologic, and early continence outcomes comparing three-dimensional and two-dimensional display systems for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy–a retrospective, single-surgeon study. J Endourol 28:539–543CrossRefPubMed Aykan S, Singhal P, Nguyen DP, Yigit A, Tuken M, Yakut E, Colakerol A, Sulejman S, Semercioz A (2014) Perioperative, pathologic, and early continence outcomes comparing three-dimensional and two-dimensional display systems for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy–a retrospective, single-surgeon study. J Endourol 28:539–543CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Berguer R, Smith WD, Chung YH (2001) Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery. Surg Endosc 15:1204–1207CrossRefPubMed Berguer R, Smith WD, Chung YH (2001) Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery. Surg Endosc 15:1204–1207CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Klein MI, Warm JS, Riley MA, Matthews G, Doarn C, Donovan JF, Gaitonde K (2012) Mental workload and stress perceived by novice operators in the laparoscopic and robotic minimally invasive surgical interfaces. J Endourol 26:1089–1094CrossRefPubMed Klein MI, Warm JS, Riley MA, Matthews G, Doarn C, Donovan JF, Gaitonde K (2012) Mental workload and stress perceived by novice operators in the laparoscopic and robotic minimally invasive surgical interfaces. J Endourol 26:1089–1094CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference van der Schatte Olivier RH, van‘t Hullenaar CDP, Ruurda JP, Broeders IAMJ (2009) Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23:1365–1371CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed van der Schatte Olivier RH, van‘t Hullenaar CDP, Ruurda JP, Broeders IAMJ (2009) Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23:1365–1371CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
29.
go back to reference Silvestri M, Simi M, Cavallotti C, Vatteroni M, Ferrari V, Freschi C, Valdastri P, Menciassi A, Dario P (2011) Autostereoscopic three-dimensional viewer evaluation through comparison with conventional interfaces in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 18:223–230CrossRefPubMed Silvestri M, Simi M, Cavallotti C, Vatteroni M, Ferrari V, Freschi C, Valdastri P, Menciassi A, Dario P (2011) Autostereoscopic three-dimensional viewer evaluation through comparison with conventional interfaces in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 18:223–230CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Ohuchida K, Kenmotsu H, Yamamoto A, Sawada K, Hayami T, Morooka K, Hoshino H, Uemura M, Konishi K, Yoshida D, Maeda T, Ieiri S, Tanoue K, Tanaka M, Hashizume M (2009) The effect of CyberDome, a novel 3-dimensional dome-shaped display system, on laparoscopic procedures. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 4:125–132CrossRefPubMed Ohuchida K, Kenmotsu H, Yamamoto A, Sawada K, Hayami T, Morooka K, Hoshino H, Uemura M, Konishi K, Yoshida D, Maeda T, Ieiri S, Tanoue K, Tanaka M, Hashizume M (2009) The effect of CyberDome, a novel 3-dimensional dome-shaped display system, on laparoscopic procedures. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 4:125–132CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Kong SH, Oh BM, Yoon H, Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Chung SG, Shiraishi N, Kitano S, Yang HK (2010) Comparison of two- and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic performance: a novel 3D system with one camera. Surg Endosc 24:1132–1143CrossRefPubMed Kong SH, Oh BM, Yoon H, Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Chung SG, Shiraishi N, Kitano S, Yang HK (2010) Comparison of two- and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic performance: a novel 3D system with one camera. Surg Endosc 24:1132–1143CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
3-Dimensional (3D) laparoscopy improves operating time in small spaces without impact on hemodynamics and psychomental stress parameters of the surgeon
Authors
Xiaoyan Feng
Anna Morandi
Martin Boehne
Tawan Imvised
Benno M. Ure
Joachim F. Kuebler
Martin Lacher
Publication date
01-05-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4083-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2015 Go to the issue