Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 7/2020

01-07-2020 | Scientific Article

2019 musculoskeletal radiology fellowship match process: initial experiences and lessons learned

Authors: Soterios Gyftopoulos, Jennifer L. Demertzis, Bethany Casagranda

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 7/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To present the 2019 Musculoskeletal (MSK) fellowship Match information most useful to MSK fellowship programs and sections in hopes of optimizing the fellowship application and selection process for MSK fellowship applicants and training programs.

Materials/methods

We performed a mixed method analysis to gain a better understanding of the 2019 MSK Fellowship Match process. First, we distributed a ten-question survey to the fellowship leadership from the 78 US fellowship programs registered with the Society of Skeletal Radiology. Second, we collected and reviewed NRMP Match data that were distributed on Match Day.

Results

We received completed surveys from 37 (45.7%) programs. Thirty-three (89.2%) of the responding programs identified themselves as academic, 3 (8.1%) as hybrid, and 1 (2.7%) as private practice. On average, programs interviewed 15.4 applicants over the interview session, with a range between 2 and 40. There was an average of 2.7 (range 1–8) open positions per fellowship and 1.2 (range 0–4) internal candidates per program. Each program interviewed 5.8 applicants per open position (range 1–24). There were a total of 81 certified MSK fellowship programs and 204 available positions in these programs. Twenty-four programs (29.6%) did not fill all positions resulting in a total of 36 unfilled positions (17.6%). The percentage of MSK unfilled programs, unfilled positions, and unmatched applicants were comparable to the Breast Imaging and Neuroradiology subspecialty matches.

Conclusion

The MSK Fellowship Match was a success with high match rates for applicants and programs. Most importantly, the Match allowed programs to make more informed decisions on their fellowship training opportunities.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Radiology match results statistics in the specialities matching service for 2020 appointments. Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program. Accessed 6/12/19. Radiology match results statistics in the specialities matching service for 2020 appointments. Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program. Accessed 6/12/19.
2.
go back to reference Demertzis JL, Baker JC, Friedman MV, Resnik CS, Miller TT, Rubin DA. Musculoskeletal radiology fellowship application and selection process: perceptions of residents, fellows, and fellowship directors. Acad Radiol. 2018;25(9):1219–26.CrossRef Demertzis JL, Baker JC, Friedman MV, Resnik CS, Miller TT, Rubin DA. Musculoskeletal radiology fellowship application and selection process: perceptions of residents, fellows, and fellowship directors. Acad Radiol. 2018;25(9):1219–26.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Glover M, Patel TY. The radiology fellowship arms race cannot be won. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13(4):461–4.CrossRef Glover M, Patel TY. The radiology fellowship arms race cannot be won. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13(4):461–4.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pfeifer CM. Breast imaging match highlights the need to unify the approach to fellowship. Acad Radiol. 2018;25(4):543.CrossRef Pfeifer CM. Breast imaging match highlights the need to unify the approach to fellowship. Acad Radiol. 2018;25(4):543.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hoffmann JC, Azimov N, Chick JFB, et al. The current status of the interventional radiology fellowship match: results of a resident survey. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2018;47(3):146–51.CrossRef Hoffmann JC, Azimov N, Chick JFB, et al. The current status of the interventional radiology fellowship match: results of a resident survey. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2018;47(3):146–51.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
2019 musculoskeletal radiology fellowship match process: initial experiences and lessons learned
Authors
Soterios Gyftopoulos
Jennifer L. Demertzis
Bethany Casagranda
Publication date
01-07-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03393-0

Other articles of this Issue 7/2020

Skeletal Radiology 7/2020 Go to the issue