Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 4/2019

01-08-2019 | Interesting Image

18F-FDG PET/MR Refines Evaluation in Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Urethral Adenocarcinoma

Authors: Riccardo Laudicella, Guido Davidzon, Shreyas Vasanawala, Sergio Baldari, Andrei Iagaru

Published in: Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

We described the clinical impact of 18F-FDG PET/MR in refining the evaluation of a 39-year-old female with newly diagnosed metastatic urethral adenocarcinoma. We detailed the diagnostic imaging workup focusing our attention on the CT, MR, and 18F-FDG PET/MR different findings. In this case, 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging evaluation resulted not only effective but also altered staging and spared additional invasive procedures in the assessment of a metastatic urethral adenocarcinoma. Combining a highly sensitive PET with the increase tissue resolution of MR (PET/MR) may improve abdominal and pelvic lesion detection outperforming PET/CT for this indication.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Tagliabue L, Del Sole A. Appropriate use of positron emission tomography with [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose for staging of oncology patients. Eur J Intern Med. 2014;25:6–11.CrossRefPubMed Tagliabue L, Del Sole A. Appropriate use of positron emission tomography with [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose for staging of oncology patients. Eur J Intern Med. 2014;25:6–11.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ha HK, Koo PJ, Kim SJ. Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT for preoperative lymph node staging in newly diagnosed bladder cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncology. 2018;95:31–8.CrossRefPubMed Ha HK, Koo PJ, Kim SJ. Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT for preoperative lymph node staging in newly diagnosed bladder cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncology. 2018;95:31–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Drzezga A, Souvatzoglou M, Eiber M, et al. First clinical experience with integrated whole-body PET/MR: comparison to PET/CT in patients with oncologic diagnoses. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:845–55.CrossRefPubMed Drzezga A, Souvatzoglou M, Eiber M, et al. First clinical experience with integrated whole-body PET/MR: comparison to PET/CT in patients with oncologic diagnoses. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:845–55.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Quick HH, von Gall C, Zeilinger M, et al. Integrated whole-body PET/MR hybrid imaging: clinical experience. Investig Radiol. 2013;48:280–9.CrossRef Quick HH, von Gall C, Zeilinger M, et al. Integrated whole-body PET/MR hybrid imaging: clinical experience. Investig Radiol. 2013;48:280–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wehrl HF, Sauter AW, Divine MR, et al. Combined PET/MR: a technology becomes mature. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:165–8.CrossRefPubMed Wehrl HF, Sauter AW, Divine MR, et al. Combined PET/MR: a technology becomes mature. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:165–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Xin J, Ma Q, Guo Q, et al. PET/MRI with diagnostic MR sequences vs PET/CT in the detection of abdominal and pelvic cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85:751–9.CrossRefPubMed Xin J, Ma Q, Guo Q, et al. PET/MRI with diagnostic MR sequences vs PET/CT in the detection of abdominal and pelvic cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85:751–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Schwartz M, Gavane SC, Bou-Ayache J, et al. Feasibility and diagnostic performance of hybrid PET/MRI compared with PET/CT for gynecological malignancies: a prospective pilot study. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018;43:3462–7.CrossRef Schwartz M, Gavane SC, Bou-Ayache J, et al. Feasibility and diagnostic performance of hybrid PET/MRI compared with PET/CT for gynecological malignancies: a prospective pilot study. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018;43:3462–7.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
18F-FDG PET/MR Refines Evaluation in Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Urethral Adenocarcinoma
Authors
Riccardo Laudicella
Guido Davidzon
Shreyas Vasanawala
Sergio Baldari
Andrei Iagaru
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 1869-3474
Electronic ISSN: 1869-3482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-019-00597-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 4/2019 Go to the issue