Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Surgery 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Study protocol

Wound Infections Following Implant removal below the knee: the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis; the WIFI-trial, a multi-centre randomized controlled trial

Authors: Manouk Backes, Siem A Dingemans, Niels WL Schep, Frank W Bloemers, Bart Van Dijkman, Frank P Garssen, Robert Haverlag, Jochem M Hoogendoorn, Pieter Joosse, Boj Mirck, Victor Postma, Ewan Ritchie, W Herbert Roerdink, Jan Bernard Sintenie, Nicolaj MR Soesman, Nico L Sosef, Bas A Twigt, Ruben N Van Veen, Alexander H Van der Veen, Romuald Van Velde, Dagmar I Vos, Mark R De Vries, Jasper Winkelhagen, J Carel Goslings, Tim Schepers

Published in: BMC Surgery | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In the Netherlands about 18,000 procedures with implant removal are performed annually following open or closed reduction and fixation of fractures, of which 30-80% concern the foot, ankle and lower leg region. For clean surgical procedures, the rate of postoperative wound infections (POWI) should be less than ~2%. However, rates of 10-12% following implant removal have been reported, specifically after foot, ankle and lower leg fractures. Currently, surgeons individually decide if antibiotics prophylaxis is given, since no guideline exists. This leads to undesirable practice variation. The aim of the study is to assess the (cost-)effectiveness of a single intravenous gift of Cefazolin prior to implant removal following surgical fixation of foot, ankle and/or lower leg fractures.

Methods

This is a double-blind randomized controlled trial in patients scheduled for implant removal following a foot, ankle or lower leg fracture. Primary outcome is a POWI within 30 days after implant removal. Secondary outcomes are quality of life, functional outcome and costs at 30 days and 6 months after implant removal. With 2 x 250 patients a decrease in POWI rate from 10% to 3.3% (expected rate in clean-contaminated elective orthopaedic trauma procedures) can be detected (Power = 80%, 2-sided alpha = 5%, including 15% lost to follow up).

Discussion

If administration of prophylactic antibiotics prior to implant removal reduces the infectious complication rate, this will offer a strong argument to adopt this as standard practice of care. This will consequently lead to less physical and social disabilities and health care use. A preliminary, conservative estimation suggests yearly cost savings in the Netherlands of € 3.5 million per year.

Trial registration

This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02225821) and the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR4393) and was granted permission by the Medical Ethical Review Committee of the Academic Medical Centre on October 7 2014.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Williams AA, Witten DM, Duester R, Chou LB: The benefits of implant removal from the foot and ankle.J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012,94(14):1316–20. 10.2106/JBJS.J.01756CrossRefPubMed Williams AA, Witten DM, Duester R, Chou LB: The benefits of implant removal from the foot and ankle.J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012,94(14):1316–20. 10.2106/JBJS.J.01756CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Vos DI: Implant removal after fracture healing. Facts and fiction. PhD thesis. Enschede: University Utrecht, Department of Surgery; 2013. Gildeprint Drukkerijen Enschede Vos DI: Implant removal after fracture healing. Facts and fiction. PhD thesis. Enschede: University Utrecht, Department of Surgery; 2013. Gildeprint Drukkerijen Enschede
3.
go back to reference Vos D, Hanson B, Verhofstad M: Implant removal of osteosynthesis: The dutch practice. Results of a survey.J Trauma Manag Outcomes 2012,6(1):6,2897. -6–6CrossRef Vos D, Hanson B, Verhofstad M: Implant removal of osteosynthesis: The dutch practice. Results of a survey.J Trauma Manag Outcomes 2012,6(1):6,2897. -6–6CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Raahave D: Postoperative wound infection after implant and removal of osteosynthetic material.Acta Orthop Scand 1976,47(1):28–35. 10.3109/17453677608998968CrossRefPubMed Raahave D: Postoperative wound infection after implant and removal of osteosynthetic material.Acta Orthop Scand 1976,47(1):28–35. 10.3109/17453677608998968CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Richards RH, Palmer JD, Clarke NM: Observations on removal of metal implants.Injury 1992,23(1):25–8. 10.1016/0020-1383(92)90120-HCrossRefPubMed Richards RH, Palmer JD, Clarke NM: Observations on removal of metal implants.Injury 1992,23(1):25–8. 10.1016/0020-1383(92)90120-HCrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sanderson PL, Ryan W, Turner PG: Complications of metalwork removal.Injury 1992,23(1):29–30. 10.1016/0020-1383(92)90121-8CrossRefPubMed Sanderson PL, Ryan W, Turner PG: Complications of metalwork removal.Injury 1992,23(1):29–30. 10.1016/0020-1383(92)90121-8CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Minkowitz RB, Bhadsavle S, Walsh M, Egol KA: Removal of painful orthopaedic implants after fracture union.J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007,89(9):1906–12. 10.2106/JBJS.F.01536PubMed Minkowitz RB, Bhadsavle S, Walsh M, Egol KA: Removal of painful orthopaedic implants after fracture union.J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007,89(9):1906–12. 10.2106/JBJS.F.01536PubMed
8.
go back to reference Backes M, Schep NW, Luitse JS, Goslings JC, Schepers T: High rates of postoperative wound infection following elective implant removal. Under review Backes M, Schep NW, Luitse JS, Goslings JC, Schepers T: High rates of postoperative wound infection following elective implant removal. Under review
9.
go back to reference Schepers T, Van Lieshout EM, de Vries MR, Van der Elst M: Complications of syndesmotic screw removal.Foot Ankle Int 2011,32(11):1040–4. 10.3113/FAI.2011.1040CrossRefPubMed Schepers T, Van Lieshout EM, de Vries MR, Van der Elst M: Complications of syndesmotic screw removal.Foot Ankle Int 2011,32(11):1040–4. 10.3113/FAI.2011.1040CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Backes M, Schep NW, Luitse JS, Goslings JC, Schepers T: Indications for implant removal following intra-articular calcaneal fractures and subsequent complications.Foot Foot Ankle Int 2013,34(11):1521–5. doi:10.1177/1071100713502466 10.1177/1071100713502466CrossRefPubMed Backes M, Schep NW, Luitse JS, Goslings JC, Schepers T: Indications for implant removal following intra-articular calcaneal fractures and subsequent complications.Foot Foot Ankle Int 2013,34(11):1521–5. doi:10.1177/1071100713502466 10.1177/1071100713502466CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR: Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital infection control practices advisory committee.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999,20(4):250,78. quiz 279–80CrossRef Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR: Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital infection control practices advisory committee.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999,20(4):250,78. quiz 279–80CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Boxma H, Broekhuizen T, Patka P, Oosting H: Randomised controlled trial of single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical treatment of closed fractures: The Dutch trauma trial.Lancet 1996,347(9009):1133–7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90606-6CrossRefPubMed Boxma H, Broekhuizen T, Patka P, Oosting H: Randomised controlled trial of single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical treatment of closed fractures: The Dutch trauma trial.Lancet 1996,347(9009):1133–7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90606-6CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Rabin R, de Charro F: EQ-5D: A measure of health status from the EuroQol group.Ann Med 2001,33(5):337–43. 10.3109/07853890109002087CrossRefPubMed Rabin R, de Charro F: EQ-5D: A measure of health status from the EuroQol group.Ann Med 2001,33(5):337–43. 10.3109/07853890109002087CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott SA, Riddle DL: The lower extremity functional scale (LEFS): Scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North american orthopaedic rehabilitation research network.Phys Ther 1999,79(4):371–83.PubMed Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott SA, Riddle DL: The lower extremity functional scale (LEFS): Scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North american orthopaedic rehabilitation research network.Phys Ther 1999,79(4):371–83.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Hoogeboom TJ, de Bie RA, den Broeder AA, van den Ende CH: The Dutch Lower Extremity Functional Scale was highly reliable, valid and responsive in individuals with hip/knee osteoarthritis: a validation study.BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012, 13:117. doi:10.1186/1471–2474–13–117 10.1186/1471-2474-13-117CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hoogeboom TJ, de Bie RA, den Broeder AA, van den Ende CH: The Dutch Lower Extremity Functional Scale was highly reliable, valid and responsive in individuals with hip/knee osteoarthritis: a validation study.BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012, 13:117. doi:10.1186/1471–2474–13–117 10.1186/1471-2474-13-117CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Wound Infections Following Implant removal below the knee: the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis; the WIFI-trial, a multi-centre randomized controlled trial
Authors
Manouk Backes
Siem A Dingemans
Niels WL Schep
Frank W Bloemers
Bart Van Dijkman
Frank P Garssen
Robert Haverlag
Jochem M Hoogendoorn
Pieter Joosse
Boj Mirck
Victor Postma
Ewan Ritchie
W Herbert Roerdink
Jan Bernard Sintenie
Nicolaj MR Soesman
Nico L Sosef
Bas A Twigt
Ruben N Van Veen
Alexander H Van der Veen
Romuald Van Velde
Dagmar I Vos
Mark R De Vries
Jasper Winkelhagen
J Carel Goslings
Tim Schepers
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-15-12

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Surgery 1/2015 Go to the issue