Top

28-03-2024 | Review

Work Disability and Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Teleworkers: A Scoping Review

Authors: Quan Nha Hong, Jingjing Li, Marietta Kersalé, Eloi Dieterlen, Adrian Mares, Zeinab Ahmadian Sangkar, Virginie Paquet, Valérie Lederer, Marie Laberge, Marie-France Coutu

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Abstract

Purpose

This project aimed to examine the existing evidence on work disability or musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) among teleworkers.

Method

A scoping review was conducted in eight bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, ABI/Inform Global, EBM Reviews, Web of Science, Dissertations & Theses Global) from inception to June 2022.

Results

Out of 9192 records identified, a total of 79 selected articles representing 77 studies were retained. Most studies were published after 2019, aligning with the COVID-19 pandemic’s telework surge. Among the included papers, 51 addressed MSDs among teleworkers, 17 were on work disability, and 11 addressed both concepts. The studies were predominantly cross-sectional. Some trends are emerging, although study results are contradictory. Several papers reported increased musculoskeletal discomfort among teleworkers. Factors associated with MSDs among teleworkers include poor workstation setup, extended workdays, sedentary lifestyle, excessive devices use, and psychological factors. Regarding work disability, studies found that telework is associated with reduced absenteeism but increased presenteeism, with employees more likely to work while unwell from home than when on-site. Mixed results were found regarding teleworkers’ work ability and functioning.

Conclusion

This paper provides an overview of the literature on work disability and MSDs among teleworkers. It identifies literature gaps, underlining the need for ergonomic improvements, long-term impact studies, a better conceptualization of presenteeism in the context of telework, and tailored interventions to enhance the telework experience.

Available only for authorised users

Kniffin KM, Narayanan J, Anseel F, Antonakis J, Ashford SP, Bakker AB, et al. COVID-19 and the workplace: implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. Am Psychol. 2021;76(1):63–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000716.CrossRefPubMed

International Labour Organization. Teleworking during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: a practical guide. Geneva: International Labour Organization; 2020.

de Macêdo TAM, Cabral ELDS, Silva Castro WR, de Souza Junior CC, da Costa Junior JF, Pedrosa FM, et al. Ergonomics and telework: a systematic review. Work. 2020;66(4):777–788. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-203224.CrossRefPubMed

Tavares AI. Telework and health effects review. Int J Healthc. 2017;3(2):30–36. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijh.v3n2p30.CrossRef

Robertson MM, Schleifer LM, Huang Y-h. Examining the macroergonomics and safety factors among teleworkers: development of a conceptual model. Work. 2012;41:2611–2615. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-1029-2611.CrossRefPubMed

Montreuil S, Lippel K. Telework and occupational health: a Quebec empirical study and regulatory implications. Saf Sci. 2003;41(4):339–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(02)00042-5.CrossRef

Bouziri H, Smith DRM, Descatha A, Dab W, Jean K. Working from home in the time of COVID-19: how to best preserve occupational health? Occup Environ Med. 2020;77(7):509–510. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-106599.CrossRefPubMed

Cruz-Ausejo L, Copez-Lonzoy A, Vilela-Estrada AL, Valverde JJ, Bohórquez M, Moscoso-Porras M. Can working at home be a hazard? Ergonomic factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders among teleworkers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2023;29(4):1335–1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2022.2127246.CrossRefPubMed

Dos Santos IN, Pernambuco ML, da Silva AMB, Ruela GA, de Oliveira AS. Association between musculoskeletal pain and telework in the context of the COVID 19 pandemic: an integrative review. Revista Brasileira De Med Do Trabalho. 2021;19(3):342–350. https://doi.org/10.47626/1679-4435-2021-812.CrossRef

10.

Fadel M, Bodin J, Cros F, Descatha A, Roquelaure Y. Teleworking and musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(6):4973.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Sanon L, Stock S. Les troubles musculo-squelettiques liés Au travail: Un fardeau Humain et économique évitable. Québec: Institut national de santé publique du Québec (INSPQ); 2021.

12.

Commission des Normes Dlé. De la santé et de la sécurité du travail Du Québec (CNESST),. Statistiques sur les lésions attribuables aux troubles musculosquelettiques (TMS) en milieu de travail, 2017–2020. Québec: CNESST; 2021.

13.

Loisel P, Anema JR. Handbook of work disability: prevention and management. New York: Springer; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6214-9.CrossRef

14.

World Health Organization (WHO). : Musculoskeletal conditions. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/musculoskeletal-conditions (2022). Accessed June 11 2023.

15.

Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, Hanson SW, Chatterji S, Vos T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10267):2006–2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32340-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Ekberg K, Pransky GS, Besen E, Fassier J-B, Feuerstein M, Munir F, et al. New business structures creating organizational opportunities and challenges for work disability prevention. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(4):480–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9671-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Meth. 2005;8(1):19–32.CrossRef

18.

Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(10):2119–2126. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-20-00167.CrossRefPubMed

19.

McKeown S, Mir ZM. Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references. Syst Rev. 2021;10:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01583-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Lederer V, Loisel P, Rivard M, Champagne F. Exploring the diversity of conceptualizations of work (dis)ability: a scoping review of published definitions. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(2):242–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-013-9459-4.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Lucas PJ, Baird J, Arai L, Law C, Roberts HM. Worked examples of alternative methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Steidelmuller C, Meyer S-C, Muller G. Home-based telework and presenteeism across Europe. J Occup Environ Med. 2020;62(12):998–1005. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001992.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Bailly F, Genevay S, Foltz V, Bohm-Sigrand A, Zagala A, Nizard J, Petit A. Effects of COVID-19 lockdown on low back pain intensity in chronic low back pain patients: results of the multicenter CONFI-LOMB study. Eur Spine J. 2022;31(1):159–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-07007-8.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Joice W, Flexiplace. Getting the job done at home. Public Manager. 1993;22(2):22–24.

25.

Miranda-Schaeubinger M, Schwartz ES, Sze RW, Larsen EP. A pilot program of virtual ergonomics consults for radiology staff working from home. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021;18(12):1643–1645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.016.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Ertel M, Pech E, Ullsperger P. Telework in perspective—new challenges to occupational health and safety. In: Isaksson K, Hogstedt C, Eriksson C, Theorell T, editors. Health effects of the new labour market. Boston: Springer; 2002. p. 169–181.CrossRef

27.

Ferreira EJ, Strydom EA. Ergonomics and technologies: regulatory compliance in the virtual office in South Africa. Ergon SA. 2015;27(2):4–17. https://doi.org/10.4314/esa.v27i2.2.CrossRef

28.

Almhdawi KA, Obeidat D, Kanaan SF, Hajela N, Bsoul M, Arabiat A, et al. University professors’ mental and physical well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic and distance teaching. Work. 2021;69(4):1153–1161. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-205276.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Argus M, Paasuke M. Effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on musculoskeletal pain, physical activity, and work environment in Estonian office workers transitioning to working from home. Work. 2021;69(3):741–749. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-210033.CrossRefPubMed

30.

de Oliveira TCDS, Muzeka ALP, Batista E, Dos Santos GNFE, Rocha LFId, Legey ALC, et al. Worker health impacts from working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Work. 2022;72(1):9–17. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-210553.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Massimo FS.: Impact of the Covid-19 confinement measures on telework–qualitative survey for France. Working paper series on Labour, Education and Technology. Seville: Joint Research Centre, European Commission; 2020.

32.

Gerding T, Syck M, Daniel D, Naylor J, Kotowski SE, Gillespie GL, et al. An assessment of ergonomic issues in the home offices of university employees sent home due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Work. 2021;68(4):981–992. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-205294.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Jajoo B, Bhatbolan S, Bhatbolan S. Lifestyle behaviors and their influence on work-related musculoskeletal discomfort: a web-based survey during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Indian J Occup Ther. 2021;53(3):99–103. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijoth.ijoth_30_21.CrossRef

34.

Kotowski SE, Davis KG, Gerding T. Almost a year in: virtual offices remained an ergonomic trouble spot. Work. 2022;71(2):319–326. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-211052.CrossRefPubMed

35.

MacLean KFE, Neyedli HF, Dewis C, Frayne RJ. The role of at home workstation ergonomics and gender on musculoskeletal pain. Work. 2022;71(2):309–318. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-210692.CrossRefPubMed

36.

McAllister MJ, Costigan PA, Davies JP, Diesbourg TL. The effect of training and workstation adjustability on teleworker discomfort during the COVID-19 pandemic. Appl Ergon. 2022;102:103749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103749.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Minoura A, Ishimaru T, Kokaze A, Tabuchi T. Increased work from home and low back pain among Japanese desk workers during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(23):12363. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312363.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Moretti A, Menna F, Aulicino M, Paoletta M, Liguori S, Iolascon G. Characterization of home working population during COVID-19 emergency: a cross-sectional analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(17):6284. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176284.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Niu Q, Nagata T, Fukutani N, Tezuka M, Shimoura K, Nagai-Tanima M, Aoyama T. Health effects of immediate telework introduction during the COVID-19 era in Japan: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2021;16(10):e0256530. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256530.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Oakman J, Kinsman N, Lambert K, Stuckey R, Graham M, Weale V. Working from home in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional results from the employees working from home (EWFH) study. BMJ Open. 2022a;12:e052733. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052733.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Radulovic AH, Zaja R, Milosevic M, Radulovic B, Luketic I, Bozic T. Work from home and musculoskeletal pain in telecommunications workers during COVID-19 pandemic: a pilot study. Arch Ind Hygiene Toxicol. 2021;72(3):232–239. https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2021-72-3559.CrossRef

42.

Sagat P, Bartik P, Prieto Gonzalez P, Tohanean DI, Knjaz D. Impact of COVID-19 quarantine on low back pain intensity, prevalence, and associated risk factors among adult citizens residing in Riyadh (Saudi Arabia): a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197302.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Yoshimoto T, Fujii T, Oka H, Kasahara S, Kawamata K, Matsudaira K. Pain status and its association with physical activity, psychological stress, and telework among Japanese workers with pain during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):5595. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115595.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Majumdar P, Biswas A, Sahu S. COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown: cause of sleep disruption, depression, somatic pain, and increased screen exposure of office workers and students of India. Chronobiol Int. 2020;37(8):1191–1200. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2020.1786107.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Guler MA, Guler K, Guneser Gulec M, Ozdoglar E. Working from home during a pandemic: investigation of the impact of COVID-19 on employee health and productivity. J Occup Environ Med. 2021;63(9):731–741. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002277.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Aegerter AM, Deforth M, Johnston V, Sjogaard G, Volken T, Luomajoki H, et al. No evidence for an effect of working from home on neck pain and neck disability among Swiss office workers: short-term impact of COVID-19. Eur Spine J. 2021;30(6):1699–1707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06829-w.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Barone Gibbs B, Kline CE, Huber KA, Paley JL, Perera S. Covid-19 shelter-at-home and work, lifestyle and well-being in desk workers. Occup Med. 2021;71(2):86–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqab011.CrossRef

48.

Rodriguez-Nogueira O, Leiros-Rodriguez R, Benitez-Andrades JA, Alvarez-alvarez MJ, Marques-Sanchez P, Pinto-Carral A. Musculoskeletal pain and teleworking in times of the COVID-19: analysis of the impact on the workers at two Spanish universities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(1):31. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010031.CrossRef

49.

Regmi A, Suresh J, Asokan R. Changes in work patterns during COVID-19 lockdown and its impact on the eyes and body. Clin Experimental Optometry. 2022;106(3):331–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2022.2029682.CrossRef

50.

Tezuka M, Nagata T, Saeki K, Tsuboi Y, Fukutani N. Association between abrupt change to teleworking and physical symptoms during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emergency declaration in Japan. J Occup Environ Med. 2022;64(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002367.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Garcia M-G, Estrella M, Penafiel A, Arauz PG, Martin BJ. Impact of 10-min daily yoga exercises on physical and mental discomfort of home-office workers during COVID-19. Hum Factors. 2023;65(7):1525–1541. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211045766.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Harrington SS, Walker BL. The effects of ergonomics training on the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of teleworkers. J Saf Res. 2004;35(1):13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2003.07.002.CrossRef

53.

Moreira S, Criado MB, Ferreira MS, Machado J, Goncalves C, Clemente FM, et al. Positive effects of an online workplace exercise intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic on quality of life perception in computer workers: a quasi-experimental study design. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(5):3142. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19053142.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

54.

Robertson MM, Lee J, Huang Y-H, Schleifer L. Virtual office intervention effectiveness: a systems approach. Work. 2022;71(2):451–464. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-210698.CrossRefPubMed

55.

Barbosa REC, Fonseca GC, Souza E, Silva NS, Silva RRV, Assuncao AA, Haikal DSA. Back pain occurred due to changes in routinary activities among Brazilian schoolteachers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2022;95(2):527–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-021-01793-w.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Jain R, Meena ML, Rana KB. Risk factors of musculoskeletal symptoms among mobile device users during work from home. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022;28(4):2262–2268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2021.1979318.CrossRefPubMed

57.

Larrea-Araujo C, Ayala-Granja J, Vinueza-Cabezas A, Acosta-Vargas P. Ergonomic risk factors of teleworking in Ecuador during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(10):5063. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105063.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

58.

Mitchard G. Association between home office ergonomics and musculoskeletal pain. Lowa City: The University of Iowa; 2021.CrossRef

59.

Oakman J, Neupane S, Kyrönlahti S, Nygård C-H, Lambert K. Musculoskeletal pain trajectories of employees working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2022b;95(9):1891–1901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01885-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

60.

Prieto-Gonzalez P, Sutvajova M, Lesnakova A, Bartik P, Bulakova K, Friediger T. Back pain prevalence, intensity, and associated risk factors among female teachers in Slovakia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. Healthcare. 2021;9(7):860. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9070860.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

61.

Graham M, Weale V, Lambert KA, Kinsman N, Stuckey R, Oakman J. Working at home: the impacts of COVID-19 on health, family-work-life conflict, gender, and parental responsibilities. J Occup Environ Med. 2021;63(11):938–943. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002337.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

62.

Singh N, Kiran UV, Pandey P, Sharma V. Remote working and its impact on upper extremities. J Ecophysiol Occup Health. 2021;21(4):180–182. https://doi.org/10.18311/JEOH/2021/28471.CrossRef

63.

Black NL, St-Onge S. Measuring pandemic home-work conditions to determine ergonomic recommendation relevance. Work. 2022;71(2):299–308. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-210726.CrossRefPubMed

64.

Muniandy RK, Mudin K, Yeap BT, Voo SKP. Increased incidence and aetiological factors of back pain among Universiti Malaysia Sabah staff and undergraduates during the COVID-19 lockdown period. Med J Malay. 2022;77(2):185–188.

65.

David S. The effect of online schooling on emotional intelligence of Indian young adults during COVID-19. J Appl Manage. 2021;13(2):37–67.

66.

Özdemir YB. Investigation of low back pain in the white-collar population working from home due to the COVID-19 pandemic. J Phys Med Rehabilit Sci. 2021;24(2):135–142. https://doi.org/10.31609/jpmrs.2021-81527.CrossRef

67.

El Kadri Filho F, Roberto de Lucca S. Telework during the COVID-19 pandemic: ergonomic and psychosocial risks among Brazilian labor justice workers. Work. 2022;71(2):395–405. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-210490.CrossRefPubMed

68.

Matsugaki R, Muramatsu K, Tateishi S, Nagata T, Tsuji M, Hino A, et al. Association between telecommuting environment and low back pain among Japanese telecommuting workers: a cross-sectional study. J Occup Environ Med. 2021;63(12):e944–e948. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002412.CrossRefPubMed

69.

Nelson EE. A review of health outcomes resulting from an expanded federal telework policy. Minneapolis: Capella University; 2016.

70.

Seva RR, Tejero LMS, Fadrilan-Camacho VFF. Barriers and facilitators of productivity while working from home during pandemic. J Occup Health. 2021;63(1):e12242. https://doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12242.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

71.

Widianawati E, Khorioni A, Nugroho BYS, Wulan WR. The ergonomics design of work-from-home facility during COVID-19 outbreak in Indonesia and its implications for musculoskeletal. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2020;14(4):1619–1622.

72.

Houle M, Lessard A, Marineau-Bélanger É, Lardon A, Marchand A-A, Descarreaux M, Abboud J. Factors associated with headache and neck pain among telecommuters–a five days follow-up. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1086. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11144-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

73.

Matsugaki R, Ishimaru T, Hino A, Muramatsu K, Nagata T, Ikegami K, et al. Low back pain and telecommuting in Japan: influence of work environment quality. J Occup Health. 2022;64(1):e12329. https://doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12329.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

74.

Verma T, Verma R, Bameta D, Sharma V, Saroha S, Taneja A. Prevalence of work from home on female-it workers, on neck pain and its psycho-social effects during epidemic period. Medico-Legal Update. 2021;21(1):1240–1246. https://doi.org/10.37506/mlu.v21i1.2488.CrossRef

75.

Knardahl S, Christensen JO. Working at home and expectations of being available: effects on perceived work environment, turnover intentions, and health. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022;48(2):99–108. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3996.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

76.

Matisane L, Paegle L, Vanadzins I, Rozentale S, Grintale I, Mietule I, et al. Transition to the forced telework–a challenge for trade unions identified by the study on working life with COVID-19 in Latvia. Work. 2022;71(3):527–537. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-211042.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

77.

Berling I, Jollenbeck M, Stamer T, Ochsmann E. Association between mobile work and work ability: a longitudinal study under the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2022;95(6):1401–1413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01849-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

78.

Ervasti J, Aalto V, Pentti J, Oksanen T, Kivimaki M, Vahtera J. Association of changes in work due to COVID-19 pandemic with psychosocial work environment and employee health: a cohort study of 24 299 Finnish public sector employees. Occup Environ Med. 2022;79(4):233–241. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2021-107745.CrossRefPubMed

79.

Kyronlahti S, Neupane S, Nygard C-H, Oakman J, Juutinen S, Makikangas A. Perceived work ability during enforced working from home due to the COVID-19 pandemic among Finnish higher educational staff. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(10):6230. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106230.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

80.

Niebuhr F, Borle P, Borner-Zobel F, Voelter-Mahlknecht S. Healthy and happy working from home? Effects of working from home on employee health and job satisfaction. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(3):1122. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031122.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

81.

Okawara M, Ishimaru T, Tateishi S, Hino A, Tsuji M, Ikegami K, et al. Association between the physical work environment and work functioning impairment while working from home under the COVID-19 pandemic in Japanese workers. J Occup Environ Med. 2021;63(9):e565–e570. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002280.CrossRefPubMed

82.

Yamashita S, Ishimaru T, Nagata T, Tateishi S, Hino A, Tsuji M, et al. Association of preference and frequency of teleworking with work functioning impairment: a nationwide cross-sectional study of Japanese full-time employees. J Occup Environ Med. 2022;64(6):e363–368. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002536.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

83.

Alexander AL. Telework’s impact on employee effectiveness: Is it the time or the place that really matters? College Station: Texas A&M University; 2014.

84.

Biron C, Karanika-Murray M, Ivers H, Salvoni S, Fernet C. Teleworking while sick: a three-wave study of psychosocial safety climate, psychological demands, and presenteeism. Front Psychol. 2021;12:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734245.CrossRef

85.

Bloom N, Liang J, Roberts J, Ying ZJ. Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. Q J Econ. 2015;130(1):165–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju032.CrossRef

86.

Linos E. Three essays on human capital in the public sector. Cambridge: Harvard University; 2016.

87.

Spinks WA. A survey of home-based workers in Japan: emerging health issues. J Occup Health. 2002;44(4):248–253. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.44.248.CrossRef

88.

St George I, Baker J, Karabatsos G, Brimble R, Wilson A, Cullen M. How safe is telenursing from home? Collegian. 2009;16(3):119–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2009.05.002.CrossRefPubMed

89.

Steward B. Fit to telework - the changing meaning of fitness in new forms of employment. Adv Physiotherapy. 2000b;2(3):103–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14038190050175781.CrossRef

90.

Steward B. Telework and health: A sociological study of illness and sickness in new forms of employment. Norwich: University of East Anglia (UK); 2000.

91.

Van Der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Varley D, Allgar VL, de Beurs E. Workplace stress, presenteeism, absenteeism, and resilience amongst university staff and students in the COVID-19 lockdown. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:588803. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.588803.CrossRefPubMed

92.

Gerich J. Home-based telework and presenteeism: new lessons learned from the Covid-19 pandemic. J Occup Environ Med. 2022;64(3):243–249. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002414.CrossRefPubMed

93.

Michael M. Is teleworking really working: the connection between presenteeism, mindfulness, work engagement and teleworking. Chicago: The Chicago School of Professional Psychology; 2021.

94.

Ruhle SA, Schmoll R. COVID-19, telecommuting, and (virtual) sickness presenteeism: working from home while ill during a pandemic. Front Psychol. 2021;12:734106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

95.

Shimura A, Yokoi K, Ishibashi Y, Akatsuka Y, Inoue T. Remote work decreases psychological and physical stress responses, but full-remote work increases presenteeism. Front Psychol. 2021;12:730969. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.730969.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

96.

Johns G. Presenteeism in the workplace: a review and research agenda. J Organ Behav. 2010;31(4):519–542. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.630.CrossRef

97.

Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety. Telework and home office health and safety guide. Hamilton: Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety; 2009.

98.

Karanika-Murray M, Biron C. The health-performance framework of presenteeism: towards understanding an adaptive behaviour. Hum Relat. 2020;73(2):242–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719827081.CrossRef

99.

Durand MJ, Vézina N, Baril R, Loisel P, Richard MC, Ngomo S. Margin of manoeuvre indicators in the workplace during the rehabilitation process: a qualitative analysis. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(2):194–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-009-9173-4.CrossRefPubMed

100.

Major M-E, Vézina N. Analysis of worker strategies: a comprehensive understanding for the prevention of work related musculoskeletal disorders. Int J Ind Ergon. 2015;48:149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2015.05.003.CrossRef

101.

Durand M-J, Vézina N, Baril R, Loisel P, Richard M-C, Ngomo S. Relationship between the margin of manoeuvre and the return to work after a long-term absence due to a musculoskeletal disorder: an exploratory study. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(13–14):1245–1252. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2010.526164.CrossRefPubMed

102.

Coutu M-F, Durand M-J, O’Hagan F, Gosselin P, Nastasia I, Berbiche D, et al. Workers’ worries, pain, psychosocial factors, and margin of manoeuvre, in relation to outcomes in a return-to-work program: an exploratory study. J Occup Rehabil. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-023-10155-x.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Work Disability and Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Teleworkers: A Scoping Review
Authors: Quan Nha Hong
Jingjing Li
Marietta Kersalé
Eloi Dieterlen
Adrian Mares
Zeinab Ahmadian Sangkar
Virginie Paquet
Valérie Lederer
Marie Laberge
Marie-France Coutu
Publication date: 28-03-2024
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-024-10184-0

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Work Disability and Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Teleworkers: A Scoping Review

Abstract

Purpose

Method

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Method

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content