Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Women’s preferences for contraceptive counseling in Mexico: Results from a focus group study

Authors: Kelsey Holt, Icela Zavala, Ximena Quintero, Doroteo Mendoza, Marie C. McCormick, Christine Dehlendorf, Ellice Lieberman, Ana Langer

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Client-centered contraceptive counseling is critical to meeting demand for contraception and protecting human rights. However, despite various efforts to optimize counseling, little is known outside of the United States about what individuals themselves value in counseling. In the present study we investigate women’s preferences for contraceptive counseling in Mexico to inform efforts to improve service quality.

Methods

We conducted applied qualitative research, using six focus group discussions with 43 women in two cities in Mexico with distinct sizes and sociocultural contexts (Mexico City and Tepeji del Río, Hidalgo) to assess contraceptive counseling preferences. We used a framework approach to thematically code and analyze the transcriptions from focus groups.

Results

Consistent with quality of care and human rights frameworks for family planning service delivery, participants expressed a desire for privacy, confidentiality, informed choice, and respectful treatment. They expanded on usual concepts of respectful care within family planning to include avoidance of sexual assault or harassment—in line with definitions of respectful care in maternal health. In contrast to counseling approaches with method effectiveness as the organizing principle, participants preferred counseling centered on personalized assessments of needs and preferences. Many, particularly older, less educated women, highly valued hearing provider opinions about what method they should use, based on those personalized assessments. Participants highlighted the necessity of clinical assessments or physical exams to inform provider recommendations for appropriate methods. This desire was largely due to beliefs that more exhaustive medical exams could help prevent negative contraceptive outcomes perceived to be common, in particular expulsion of intra-uterine devices (IUDs), by identifying methods compatible with a woman's body. Trust in provider, built in various ways, was seen as essential to women's contraceptive needs being met.

Conclusions

Findings shed light on under-represented perspectives of clients related to counseling preferences. They highlight specific avenues for service delivery improvement in Mexico to ensure clients experience privacy, confidentiality, informed choice, respectful treatment, and personalized counseling—including around reasons for higher IUD expulsion rates postpartum—during contraceptive visits. Findings suggest interventions to improve provider counseling should prioritize a focus on relationship-building to foster trust, and needs assessment skills to facilitate personalization of decision-making support without imposition of a provider's personal opinions. Trust is particularly important to address in family planning given historical abuses against women’s autonomy that may still influence perspectives on contraceptive programs. Findings can also be used to improve quantitative client experience measures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gavin L, Moskosky S, Carter M, Curtis K, Glass E, Godfrey E, Marcell A, Mautone-Smith N, Pazol K, Tepper N. Providing quality family planning services: recommendations of CDC and the US Office of Population Affairs. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2014;63:1–54.PubMed Gavin L, Moskosky S, Carter M, Curtis K, Glass E, Godfrey E, Marcell A, Mautone-Smith N, Pazol K, Tepper N. Providing quality family planning services: recommendations of CDC and the US Office of Population Affairs. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2014;63:1–54.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Bruce J. Fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework. Stud Fam Plan. 1990;21:61–91.CrossRef Bruce J. Fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework. Stud Fam Plan. 1990;21:61–91.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Abdel-Tawab N, RamaRao S. Do improvements in client-provider interaction increase contraceptive continuation? Unraveling the puzzle. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;81:381–7.CrossRefPubMed Abdel-Tawab N, RamaRao S. Do improvements in client-provider interaction increase contraceptive continuation? Unraveling the puzzle. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;81:381–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Dehlendorf C, Henderson JT, Vittinghoff E, Grumbach K, Levy K, Schmittdiel J, Lee J, Schillinger D, Steinauer J. Association of the quality of interpersonal care during family planning counseling with contraceptive use. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:78. e71–9.CrossRef Dehlendorf C, Henderson JT, Vittinghoff E, Grumbach K, Levy K, Schmittdiel J, Lee J, Schillinger D, Steinauer J. Association of the quality of interpersonal care during family planning counseling with contraceptive use. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:78. e71–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jain AK, RamaRao S, Kim J, Costello M. Evaluation of an intervention to improve quality of care in family planning programme in the Philippines. J Biosoc Sci. 2012;44:27–41.CrossRefPubMed Jain AK, RamaRao S, Kim J, Costello M. Evaluation of an intervention to improve quality of care in family planning programme in the Philippines. J Biosoc Sci. 2012;44:27–41.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lei Z-W, Wu SC, Garceau RJ, Jiang S, Yang Q-Z, Wang W-L, Vander Meulen TC. Effect of pretreatment counseling on discontinuation rates in Chinese women given depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception. Contraception. 1996;53:357–61.CrossRefPubMed Lei Z-W, Wu SC, Garceau RJ, Jiang S, Yang Q-Z, Wang W-L, Vander Meulen TC. Effect of pretreatment counseling on discontinuation rates in Chinese women given depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception. Contraception. 1996;53:357–61.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference RamaRao S, Lacuesta M, Costello M, Pangolibay B, Jones H. The link between quality of care and contraceptive use. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2003:76–83. RamaRao S, Lacuesta M, Costello M, Pangolibay B, Jones H. The link between quality of care and contraceptive use. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2003:76–83.
8.
go back to reference Sedgh G, Hussain R. Reasons for contraceptive nonuse among women having unmet need for contraception in developing countries. Stud Fam Plan. 2014;45:151–69.CrossRef Sedgh G, Hussain R. Reasons for contraceptive nonuse among women having unmet need for contraception in developing countries. Stud Fam Plan. 2014;45:151–69.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Ensuring human rights in the provision of contraceptive information and services: guidance and recommendations. World Health Organization; 2014. World Health Organization. Ensuring human rights in the provision of contraceptive information and services: guidance and recommendations. World Health Organization; 2014.
10.
go back to reference RamaRao S, Mohanam R. The quality of family planning programs: concepts, measurements, interventions, and effects. Stud Fam Plan. 2003;34:227–48.CrossRef RamaRao S, Mohanam R. The quality of family planning programs: concepts, measurements, interventions, and effects. Stud Fam Plan. 2003;34:227–48.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bertrand J: Quick investigation of quality: measuring quality of care in family planning programs, Chapel Hill, NC, USA: Carolina Population Center, 2001; and Sullivan T and Bertrand J, Monitoring quality of care in family planning programs by the quick investigation of quality (QIQ): country reports. MEASURE Evaluation Technical Report, Chapel Hill, NC, USA: Carolina Population Center; 2000. Bertrand J: Quick investigation of quality: measuring quality of care in family planning programs, Chapel Hill, NC, USA: Carolina Population Center, 2001; and Sullivan T and Bertrand J, Monitoring quality of care in family planning programs by the quick investigation of quality (QIQ): country reports. MEASURE Evaluation Technical Report, Chapel Hill, NC, USA: Carolina Population Center; 2000.
12.
go back to reference Dehlendorf C, Fitzpatrick J, Steinauer J, Swiader L, Grumbach K, Hall C, Kuppermann M. Development and field testing of a decision support tool to facilitate shared decision making in contraceptive counseling. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(17):1374-81. Dehlendorf C, Fitzpatrick J, Steinauer J, Swiader L, Grumbach K, Hall C, Kuppermann M. Development and field testing of a decision support tool to facilitate shared decision making in contraceptive counseling. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(17):1374-81.
13.
go back to reference Johnson SL, Kim YM, Church K. Towards client-centered counseling: development and testing of the WHO Decision-Making Tool. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;81:355–61.CrossRefPubMed Johnson SL, Kim YM, Church K. Towards client-centered counseling: development and testing of the WHO Decision-Making Tool. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;81:355–61.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference León FR, Ríos A, Zumarán A, de la Cruz M, Brambila C: Enhancing quality for clients: the balanced counseling strategy. 2003. León FR, Ríos A, Zumarán A, de la Cruz M, Brambila C: Enhancing quality for clients: the balanced counseling strategy. 2003.
15.
go back to reference Stanback J, Steiner M, Dorflinger L, Solo J, Cates W. WHO tiered-effectiveness counseling is rights-based family planning. Global Health: Science and Practice. 2015;3:352–7. Stanback J, Steiner M, Dorflinger L, Solo J, Cates W. WHO tiered-effectiveness counseling is rights-based family planning. Global Health: Science and Practice. 2015;3:352–7.
16.
go back to reference Rinehart W, Rudy S, Drennan M. GATHER guide to counseling. Popul Rep J Fam Plan Programs. 1998:1–31. Rinehart W, Rudy S, Drennan M. GATHER guide to counseling. Popul Rep J Fam Plan Programs. 1998:1–31.
17.
go back to reference Madden T, Mullersman JL, Omvig KJ, Secura GM, Peipert JF. Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception. 2013;88:243–9.CrossRefPubMed Madden T, Mullersman JL, Omvig KJ, Secura GM, Peipert JF. Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception. 2013;88:243–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Becker D, Koenig MA, Mi Kim Y, Cardona K, Sonenstein FL. The quality of family planning services in the United States: findings from a literature review. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2007;39:206–15.CrossRefPubMed Becker D, Koenig MA, Mi Kim Y, Cardona K, Sonenstein FL. The quality of family planning services in the United States: findings from a literature review. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2007;39:206–15.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Dehlendorf C, Levy K, Kelley A, Grumbach K, Steinauer J. Women's preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making. Contraception. 2013;88:250–6.CrossRefPubMed Dehlendorf C, Levy K, Kelley A, Grumbach K, Steinauer J. Women's preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making. Contraception. 2013;88:250–6.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Dehlendorf C, Grumbach K, Schmittdiel JA, Steinauer J. Shared decision making in contraceptive counseling. Contraception. 2017; Dehlendorf C, Grumbach K, Schmittdiel JA, Steinauer J. Shared decision making in contraceptive counseling. Contraception. 2017;
21.
go back to reference Juárez F, Singh S, Maddow-Zimet I, Wulf D. Unintended pregnancy and induced abortion. In: Mexico. Causes and consequences. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2013. Juárez F, Singh S, Maddow-Zimet I, Wulf D. Unintended pregnancy and induced abortion. In: Mexico. Causes and consequences. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2013.
22.
go back to reference Programa Sectorial de Salud, Mexico. Programa de Acción Específico: Planificación Familiar y Anticoncepción 2013-2018. 2014. Programa Sectorial de Salud, Mexico. Programa de Acción Específico: Planificación Familiar y Anticoncepción 2013-2018. 2014.
23.
go back to reference Darney BG, Saavedra-Avendano B, Sosa-Rubi SG, Lozano R, Rodriguez MI. Comparison of family-planning service quality reported by adolescents and young adult women in Mexico. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2016;134:22–8.CrossRef Darney BG, Saavedra-Avendano B, Sosa-Rubi SG, Lozano R, Rodriguez MI. Comparison of family-planning service quality reported by adolescents and young adult women in Mexico. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2016;134:22–8.CrossRef
24.
25.
go back to reference Holt K, Dehlendorf C, Langer A. Defining quality in contraceptive counseling to improve measurement of individuals’ experiences and enable service delivery improvement: Contraception. 2017;96(3):133–7. Holt K, Dehlendorf C, Langer A. Defining quality in contraceptive counseling to improve measurement of individuals’ experiences and enable service delivery improvement: Contraception. 2017;96(3):133–7.
26.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: The qualitative researcher’s companion, vol. 573; 2002. p. 305–29. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: The qualitative researcher’s companion, vol. 573; 2002. p. 305–29.
27.
go back to reference White Ribbon Alliance. Respectful maternity care: the universal rights of childbearing women. 2011. White Ribbon Alliance. Respectful maternity care: the universal rights of childbearing women. 2011.
28.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Family planning: A global handbook for providers: Johns Hopkins Ccp-Info; 2018. World Health Organization. Family planning: A global handbook for providers: Johns Hopkins Ccp-Info; 2018.
29.
go back to reference Dehlendorf C, Kimport K, Levy K, Steinauer J. A qualitative analysis of approaches to contraceptive counseling. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;46:233–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dehlendorf C, Kimport K, Levy K, Steinauer J. A qualitative analysis of approaches to contraceptive counseling. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;46:233–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Amuchástegui A, Cruz G, Aldaz E, Mejía MC. Politics, Religion and Gender Equality in Contemporary Mexico: women's sexuality and reproductive rights in a contested secular state. Third World Q. 2010;31:989–1005.CrossRefPubMed Amuchástegui A, Cruz G, Aldaz E, Mejía MC. Politics, Religion and Gender Equality in Contemporary Mexico: women's sexuality and reproductive rights in a contested secular state. Third World Q. 2010;31:989–1005.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Amuchástegui A, Flores E. Women's interpretations of the right to legal abortion in Mexico City: citizenship, experience and clientelism. Citizenship Studies. 2013;17:912–27.CrossRef Amuchástegui A, Flores E. Women's interpretations of the right to legal abortion in Mexico City: citizenship, experience and clientelism. Citizenship Studies. 2013;17:912–27.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference UNFPA- I: Programme of Action. Programme of Action 1994. UNFPA- I: Programme of Action. Programme of Action 1994.
33.
go back to reference Erviti J, Sosa Sanchez IA, Castro R. Social origin of contraceptive counseling practices by male doctors in Mexico. Qual Health Res. 2010;20:778–87.CrossRefPubMed Erviti J, Sosa Sanchez IA, Castro R. Social origin of contraceptive counseling practices by male doctors in Mexico. Qual Health Res. 2010;20:778–87.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Hindin MJ, McGough LJ, Adanu RM: Misperceptions, misinformation and myths about modern contraceptive use in Ghana. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2013:jfprhc-2012-100464. Hindin MJ, McGough LJ, Adanu RM: Misperceptions, misinformation and myths about modern contraceptive use in Ghana. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2013:jfprhc-2012-100464.
35.
go back to reference Darney BG, Sosa-Rubi SG, Servan-Mori E, Rodriguez MI, Walker D, Lozano R. The relationship of age and place of delivery with postpartum contraception prior to discharge in Mexico: A retrospective cohort study. Contraception. 2016;93:478–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Darney BG, Sosa-Rubi SG, Servan-Mori E, Rodriguez MI, Walker D, Lozano R. The relationship of age and place of delivery with postpartum contraception prior to discharge in Mexico: A retrospective cohort study. Contraception. 2016;93:478–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Curtis KM. US medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2016. MMWR Recommendations and Reports. 2016:65. Curtis KM. US medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2016. MMWR Recommendations and Reports. 2016:65.
37.
go back to reference Anderson LA, Dedrick RF. Development of the Trust in Physician Scale: A Measure to Assess Interpersonal Trust in Patient-Physician Relationships. Psychol Rep. 1990;67:1091–100.PubMed Anderson LA, Dedrick RF. Development of the Trust in Physician Scale: A Measure to Assess Interpersonal Trust in Patient-Physician Relationships. Psychol Rep. 1990;67:1091–100.PubMed
38.
go back to reference Hardee K, Harris S, Rodriguez M, Kumar J, Bakamjian L, Newman K, Brown W. Achieving the goal of the london summit on family planning by adhering to voluntary, rights-based family planning: what can we learn from past experiences with coercion? Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;40:206–14.CrossRefPubMed Hardee K, Harris S, Rodriguez M, Kumar J, Bakamjian L, Newman K, Brown W. Achieving the goal of the london summit on family planning by adhering to voluntary, rights-based family planning: what can we learn from past experiences with coercion? Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;40:206–14.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Ward V, Santiso-Galvez R, Bertrand J. Family planning in Mexico: the achievements of 50 years. MEASURE Evaluation, 2015. Apr. [26]: SR-15-118E. Ward V, Santiso-Galvez R, Bertrand J. Family planning in Mexico: the achievements of 50 years. MEASURE Evaluation, 2015. Apr. [26]: SR-15-118E.
Metadata
Title
Women’s preferences for contraceptive counseling in Mexico: Results from a focus group study
Authors
Kelsey Holt
Icela Zavala
Ximena Quintero
Doroteo Mendoza
Marie C. McCormick
Christine Dehlendorf
Ellice Lieberman
Ana Langer
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0569-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Reproductive Health 1/2018 Go to the issue