Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 3/2011

01-03-2011 | Original Article

Women’s Health Training in Gastroenterology Fellowship: A National Survey of Fellows and Program Directors

Authors: Sumona Saha, Erica Roberson, Kelly Richie, Mary J. Lindstrom, Silvia Degli Esposti, Arnold Wald

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and Aims

The Gastroenterology Core Curriculum requires training in women’s digestive disorders; however, requirements do not necessarily produce knowledge and competence. Our study goals were: (1) to compare perceptions of education, fellow-reported levels of competence, and attitudes towards training in women’s gastrointestinal (GI) health issues during fellowship between gastroenterology fellows and program directors, and (2) to determine the barriers for meeting training requirements.

Methods

A national survey assessing four domains of training was conducted. All GI program directors in the United States (n = 153) and a random sample of gastroenterology fellows (n = 769) were mailed surveys. Mixed effects linear modeling was used to estimate all mean scores and to assess differences between the groups. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess the consistency of the measures which make up the means.

Results

Responses were received from 61% of program directors and 31% of fellows. Mean scores in perceived didactic education, clinical experiences, and competence in women’s GI health were low and significantly differed between the groups (P < 0.0001). Fellows’ attitudes towards women’s GI health issues were more positive compared to program directors’ (P = 0.004). Barriers to training were: continuity clinic at a Veteran’s Administration hospital, low number of pregnant patients treated, low number of referrals from obstetrics and gynecology, and lack of faculty interest in women’s health.

Conclusions

(1) Fellows more so than program directors perceive training in women’s GI health issues to be low. (2) Program directors more so than fellows rate fellows to be competent in women’s GI health. (3) Multiple barriers to women’s health training exist.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine (US). Committee on understanding the biology of sex and gender differences. In: Wizemann TM, Pardue ML, eds. Exploring the Biological Contributions to Human Health: Does Sex Matter? Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2001. Institute of Medicine (US). Committee on understanding the biology of sex and gender differences. In: Wizemann TM, Pardue ML, eds. Exploring the Biological Contributions to Human Health: Does Sex Matter? Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
2.
go back to reference Directory of Residency and Fellowship Programs in Interdisciplinary Women’s Health, Association of Academic Women’s Health Programs. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2010; 19:1005–1043. Directory of Residency and Fellowship Programs in Interdisciplinary Women’s Health, Association of Academic Women’s Health Programs. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2010; 19:1005–1043.
3.
go back to reference Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Special requirements for residency training in internal medicine. Available at: www.acgme.org. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Special requirements for residency training in internal medicine. Available at: www.​acgme.​org.
4.
go back to reference Cassel C, Blank L, Braunstein G, et al. What internists need to know: core competencies in women’s health. ABIM Subcommittee on Clinical Competence in Women’s Health. Am J Med. 1997;102:507–512.CrossRefPubMed Cassel C, Blank L, Braunstein G, et al. What internists need to know: core competencies in women’s health. ABIM Subcommittee on Clinical Competence in Women’s Health. Am J Med. 1997;102:507–512.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Gastroenterology Leadership Council, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, AGA Institute, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Training the gastroenterologist for the future: the gastroenterology core curriculum. Gastroenterology 2003; 124:1066–1104. Gastroenterology Leadership Council, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, AGA Institute, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Training the gastroenterologist for the future: the gastroenterology core curriculum. Gastroenterology 2003; 124:1066–1104.
8.
go back to reference George D, Mallery P. SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference 11.0 Update. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2003. George D, Mallery P. SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference 11.0 Update. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2003.
9.
go back to reference Spagnoletti CL, Rubio DM, McNeil MA. Internal medicine residents’ preparedness to care for reproductive-age and pregnant women. Teach Learn Med. 2007;19:257–263.PubMed Spagnoletti CL, Rubio DM, McNeil MA. Internal medicine residents’ preparedness to care for reproductive-age and pregnant women. Teach Learn Med. 2007;19:257–263.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Guardino JM, Proctor DH, Lopez R, et al. Utilization and adherence to the gastroenterology core curriculum on hepatology training during a gastroenterology fellowship. Clin Gastro Hepatol. 2008;6:682–688.CrossRef Guardino JM, Proctor DH, Lopez R, et al. Utilization and adherence to the gastroenterology core curriculum on hepatology training during a gastroenterology fellowship. Clin Gastro Hepatol. 2008;6:682–688.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Martin B. Don’t survey physicians! Chicago, IL: Center for Health Services Research and Development, American Medical Association; 1974. Martin B. Don’t survey physicians! Chicago, IL: Center for Health Services Research and Development, American Medical Association; 1974.
12.
go back to reference Shosteck H, Fairweather WR. Physician response rates to mail and personal interview surveys. Public Opinion Q. 1979;43:206–217.CrossRef Shosteck H, Fairweather WR. Physician response rates to mail and personal interview surveys. Public Opinion Q. 1979;43:206–217.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sudman S. Mailed survey of reluctant professionals. Eval Rev. 1985;9:349–360.CrossRef Sudman S. Mailed survey of reluctant professionals. Eval Rev. 1985;9:349–360.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Women’s Health Training in Gastroenterology Fellowship: A National Survey of Fellows and Program Directors
Authors
Sumona Saha
Erica Roberson
Kelly Richie
Mary J. Lindstrom
Silvia Degli Esposti
Arnold Wald
Publication date
01-03-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-010-1532-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 3/2011 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine