Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 9/2016

01-09-2016 | Symposium: Women and Underrepresented Minorities in Orthopaedics

Women in Orthopaedic Fellowships: What Is Their Match Rate, and What Specialties Do They Choose?

Author: Lisa K. Cannada, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 9/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Orthopaedic fellowship training is a common step before becoming a practicing orthopaedic surgeon. In the past, fellowship decisions in orthopaedics were made early in the residency and without a formal match. The process was disorganized, often not fair to the applicants or fellowship programs. More recently, there has been an organized match process for nine different disciplines in orthopaedics. Although the numbers of women applicants into orthopaedic residency has been reported and is the target of efforts to continue to improve gender diversity in orthopaedics, the numbers regarding women in orthopaedic fellowships have not been known. Other details including if there is a difference in match rate between male and female fellowship applicants and what discipline they choose to pursue across orthopaedic surgery has not been reported.

Questions/purposes

(1) How have the numbers of women applying to orthopaedic fellowships changed over a 5-year period? (2) Is gender associated with fellowship match success? (3) Which subspecialties have greater proportions of female applicants?

Methods

Available orthopaedic residency match data regarding number of applicants and number of female residents between 2010 and 2014 were obtained. For fellowship data, our method was a review of the applicants who submitted rank lists and the number of applicants who matched in all subspecialties through San Francisco Match and from the American Shoulder and Elbow Society from 2010 to 2014. For each year, the number of females versus males applying was abstracted. The total number of females versus males who matched was then obtained. For each subspecialty represented in this article, the number of female applicants and matches was compared with the male applicants and matches.

Results

The proportion of fellowship applicants who are female ranged from 7% to 10% annually, and the percentage of matched female applicants ranged from 8% to 12%. Overall, combining results from 2010 to 2014, female fellowship applicants had a higher proportion of match success when compared with men (women: 320 of 335 [96%]; men: 2696 of 3325 [81%]; p < 0.001). Pediatric orthopaedic fellowships had the highest proportion of women (79 of 318 [25%] followed by foot and ankle (42 of 311 [14%]; spine had the lowest (15 of 525 [3%]).

Conclusions

Women applicants for advanced orthopaedic training matched at a higher proportion than men in fellowship training. Pediatrics has a higher proportion of women applicants and fellows. Orthopaedics should be a model for other surgical specialties by encouraging women to successfully pursue advanced training.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bae GH, Lee AW, Park DJ, Maniwa K, Zurakowski D; ASSH Diversity Committee, Day CS. Ethnic and gender diversity in hand surgery trainees. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40:790–797. Bae GH, Lee AW, Park DJ, Maniwa K, Zurakowski D; ASSH Diversity Committee, Day CS. Ethnic and gender diversity in hand surgery trainees. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40:790–797.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
go back to reference Cannada LK, Luhmann SJ, Hu SS, Quinn RH. The fellowship match process: the history and a report of the current experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:e3(1–7). Cannada LK, Luhmann SJ, Hu SS, Quinn RH. The fellowship match process: the history and a report of the current experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:e3(1–7).
8.
go back to reference Grabowski G, Walker JW. Orthopaedic fellowship selection criteria: a survey of fellowship directors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95:e154(1–6). Grabowski G, Walker JW. Orthopaedic fellowship selection criteria: a survey of fellowship directors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95:e154(1–6).
9.
go back to reference Hill JF, Johnson AH, Cannada L. A profile of female academic orthopaedic surgeons. Curr Orthop Pract. 2013: 24:636–640.CrossRef Hill JF, Johnson AH, Cannada L. A profile of female academic orthopaedic surgeons. Curr Orthop Pract. 2013: 24:636–640.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hill JF, Yule A, Zurakowski D, Day CS. Residents’ perceptions of sex diversity in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:e144(1–6). Hill JF, Yule A, Zurakowski D, Day CS. Residents’ perceptions of sex diversity in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:e144(1–6).
11.
go back to reference Huntington WP, Haines N, Patt JC. What factors influence applicants’ rankings of orthopaedic surgery residency programs in the National Resident Matching Program? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:2859–2866.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Huntington WP, Haines N, Patt JC. What factors influence applicants’ rankings of orthopaedic surgery residency programs in the National Resident Matching Program? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:2859–2866.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Leopold SS, Beadling L, Dobbs MB, Gebhardt MC, Lotke PA, Manner PA, Rimnac CM, Wongworawat MD. Fairness to all: gender and sex in scientific reporting. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:391–392.CrossRefPubMed Leopold SS, Beadling L, Dobbs MB, Gebhardt MC, Lotke PA, Manner PA, Rimnac CM, Wongworawat MD. Fairness to all: gender and sex in scientific reporting. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:391–392.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Morrell NT, Mercer DM, Moneim MS. Trends in the orthopedic job market and the importance of fellowship subspecialty training. Orthopedics. 2012;35e 555–560. Morrell NT, Mercer DM, Moneim MS. Trends in the orthopedic job market and the importance of fellowship subspecialty training. Orthopedics. 2012;35e 555–560.
14.
go back to reference Niesen MC, Wong J, Ebramzadeh E, Sangiorgio S, SooHoo NF, Luck JV, Eckardt J. Orthopedic surgery fellowships: the effects of interviewing and how residents establish a rank list. Orthopedics. 2015;38:175–179.CrossRefPubMed Niesen MC, Wong J, Ebramzadeh E, Sangiorgio S, SooHoo NF, Luck JV, Eckardt J. Orthopedic surgery fellowships: the effects of interviewing and how residents establish a rank list. Orthopedics. 2015;38:175–179.CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Van Heest AE, Agel J. The uneven distribution of women in porthopaedic residency training programs in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;18:e9(1–8). Van Heest AE, Agel J. The uneven distribution of women in porthopaedic residency training programs in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;18:e9(1–8).
Metadata
Title
Women in Orthopaedic Fellowships: What Is Their Match Rate, and What Specialties Do They Choose?
Author
Lisa K. Cannada, MD
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4829-9

Other articles of this Issue 9/2016

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 9/2016 Go to the issue