Top

Published in:

01-06-2021 | Original Article

Witnessing Quality of Life of Persons with Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities. A practical-Philosophical Approach

Authors: Erik Olsman, Appolonia M. Nieuwenhuijse, Dick L. Willems

Published in: Health Care Analysis | Issue 2/2021

Abstract

Persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) cannot speak about their Quality of Life (QoL), which makes it necessary to involve others. In current approaches, these ‘others’ are seen as assessors trying to describe QoL as objectively as possible, which involves a reduction of their experiences, through which they develop knowledge on the QoL of the person with PIMD. The objective of this paper is to give caregivers’ knowledge on the QoL of a person with PIMD a theoretical basis that values these experiences. We will argue that caregivers should be seen as witnesses, not assessors, and their statements on QoL as testimonies, not assessments. Audiences judge the trustworthiness of these witnesses intersubjectively, which implies a relationship characterized by trust and suspicion. Trust supports the witness to tell in her own words about the QoL of the person with PIMD; it demands receptivity, indicating that both the witness and the audience are willing to reconsider their perspective on QoL. Suspicion is necessary too, which helps the witness to critically approach her own interpretations and supports her to create more trustworthy testimonies. We conclude that the concept of witnessing helps to acknowledge caregivers’ experiential knowledge of QoL of a person with PIMD, which may also apply to other persons who cannot speak about their own QoL. We hope that our study will empower caregivers to give testimonies on QoL of a person with PIMD, which is crucial when complex decisions about the life of this person have to be made.

Carter, B., Arnott, J., Simons, J., & Bray, L. (2017). Developing a sense of knowing and acquiring the skills to manage pain in children with profound cognitive impairments: Mothers’ perspectives. Pain Research and Management, 2017, 2514920. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2514920.

Chambers, T., & Montgomery, K. (2002). Plot: Framing contingency and choice in bioethics. In R. Charon & M. Montello (Eds.), Stories matter: The role of narrative in medical ethics (pp. 77–84). New York: Routledge.

Connelly, J. E. (2002). In the absence of narrative. In R. Charon & M. Montello (Eds.), Stories matter. The role of narrative in medical ethics (pp. 138–146). New York: Routledge.

Costa, S. J. (2015). Reflective, causal, and composite indicators of quality of life: A conceptual or an empirical distinction? Quality of Life Research, 24, 2057–2065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-0954-2.PubMedCrossRef

Derrida, J. (1972). La mythologie blanche La métaphore dans le texte philosophique. In J. Derrida (Ed.), Marges de la philosophie (pp. 247–324). Paris: Seuil.

Frank, A. W. (2013). The wounded storyteller. Body, illness, and ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Gadamer, H. G. (2010). Wahrheit und methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen hermeneutik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

Grondin, J. (1994). Introduction to philosophical hermeneutics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Johnson, M. (2008). Philosophy’s debt to metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 39–52). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

10.

Kittay, E. F. (2007). Metaphor: Its cognitive force and linguistic structure (pp. 214–300). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

11.

Kruithof, K., Willems, D., van Etten-Jamaludin, F., & Olsman, E. (2020). Parents' knowledge of their child with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: An interpretative synthesis. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 33(6), 1141–1150. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12740.

12.

Nieuwenhuijse, A. M., Willems, D. L., & Olsman, E. (2020). Physicians' perception on Quality of Life of persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: A qualitative study. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 45(2), 176–183. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2019.1580117.

13.

Nieuwenhuijse, A. M., Willems, D. L., & Olsman, E. (2020). The perspectives of professional caregivers on quality of life of persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: A qualitative study. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2020.1737469.

14.

Nieuwenhuijse, A. M., Willems D. L., van Goudoever, J. B., Echteld, M. A., & Olsman, E. (2019). Quality of life of persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: A narrative literature review of concepts, assessment methods and assessors. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 44(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2017.1388913.

15.

O’Connor, E. (2017). Touching tacit knowledge: Handwork as ethnographic method in a glassblowing studio. Qualitative Research, 17(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116686651.CrossRef

16.

Petry, K., & Maes, B. (2006). Identifying expressions of pleasure and displeasure by persons with profound and multiple disabilities. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 31(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250500488678.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Rapley, M. (2003). Quality of life research: A critical introduction. London: Sage.CrossRef

18.

Rapley, M. (2003). Quality of life research: A critical introduction (p. 66). London: Sage.CrossRef

19.

Ricoeur, P. (1967). The symbolism of evil (pp. 347–357). New York: Harper & Row.

20.

Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud and philosophy. An essay on interpretation (pp. 20–36). New Haven: Yale University Press.

21.

Ricoeur, P. (1990). Time and narrative (Vol. 1, pp. 5–51). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

22.

Ricoeur, P. (1990). Time and narrative (Vol. 1, p. 78). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

23.

Ricoeur, P. (1990). Time and narrative (Vol. 1, pp. 64–70). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

24.

Ricoeur, P. (1990). Time and narrative (Vol. 1, p. 46). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

25.

Ricoeur, P. (1994). Oneself as another (pp. 21–23). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

26.

Ricoeur, P. (1995). Figuring the sacred. Religion, narrative and imagination (pp. 262–275). Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

27.

Ricoeur, P. (2003). The rule of metaphor. The creation of meaning in language. London: Routledge.

28.

Ricoeur, P. (2006). Memory, history, forgetting (p. 164). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

29.

Ricoeur, P. (2006). Memory, history, forgetting (pp. 163–165). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

30.

Ricoeur, P. (2006). Memory, history, forgetting (p. 147). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

31.

Ricoeur, P. (2007). From text to action. Essays in hermeneutics, II (pp. 29–38). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

32.

Ricoeur, P. (2007). From text to action. Essays in hermeneutics, II (pp. 75–88). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

33.

Roemer, M., Verheul, E., & Velthausz, F. (2018). Identifying perception behaviours in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 31(5), 820–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12436.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Seeber, A. A., Pols, A. J., Hijdra, A., & Willems, D. L. (2015). How Dutch neurologists involve families of critically ill patients in end-of-life care and decision-making. Neurology Clinical Practice, 5(1), 50–57.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

35.

Stefánsdóttir, G. V., & Traustadóttir, R. (2015). Life histories as counter-narratives against dominant and negative stereotypes about people with intellectual disabilities. Disability & Society, 30(3), 368–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2015.1024827.CrossRef

36.

Urban Walker, M. (2006). Moral repair: Reconstructing moral relations after wrongdoing (pp. 65–71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

37.

Vorhaus, J. (2016). Giving voice to profound disability. Dignity, dependence and human capabilities (pp. 41–55). London: Routledge.

38.

Vos, P., de Cock, P., Petry, K., van den Noortgate, W., & Maes, B. (2013). Investigating the relationship between observed mood and emotions in people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 57(5), 440–451.CrossRef

39.

Zaal-Schuller, I. H., Willems, D. L., Ewals, F. V. P. M., van Goudoever, J. B., & de Vos, M. A. (2018). Considering quality of life in end-of-life decisions for severely disabled children. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 73, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2017.12.015.

Title: Witnessing Quality of Life of Persons with Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities. A practical-Philosophical Approach
Authors: Erik Olsman
Appolonia M. Nieuwenhuijse
Dick L. Willems
Publication date: 01-06-2021
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Health Care Analysis / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1065-3058
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3394
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-021-00428-y

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Witnessing Quality of Life of Persons with Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities. A practical-Philosophical Approach

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

The Teaching of Ethics and the Moral Competence of Medical and Nursing Students

Quotas: Enabling Conscientious Objection to Coexist with Abortion Access

How to Draw the Line Between Health and Disease? Start with Suffering

Foucault’s Concept of Clinical Gaze Today