Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Emergency Radiology 2/2012

01-04-2012 | Original Article

Will they fit? Development of a measurement device to assess body habitus compatibility with MRI bore diameter for emergency trauma imaging

Authors: Amanda Corwin, Adam Aresty, Suzanne Chong, Melissa Brunsvold, James R. Evans, R. Brent Gillespie, Lena M. Napolitano

Published in: Emergency Radiology | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Excessive obesity poses a significant limitation to radiographic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), particularly related to aperture or bore diameter due to the patient’s girth. Determination of whether a patient will fit into the bore of the MRI scanner is currently accomplished using patient height, weight, and MRI technician experience. These simple methods have proven unreliable. We sought to develop a device and method which could accurately determine whether a patient would fit into the MRI scanner. We developed an MRI template prototype which was tested against the standard radiology methods in a pilot study (n = 6). We then performed a prospective validation study in adult human volunteers (n = 100) to assess the accuracy of the MRI template. We collected height, weight, shoulder and pelvis girth/diameter for each study participant to evaluate the body dimension measurements that would assist in determination of whether a patient would fit into the MRI scanner. Using the MRI template, we determined that 11 of the 100 study participants would not fit in the MRI scanner and 10 were confirmed to not fit into the MRI aperture [positive predictive value (PPV) 0.91 (0.58–0.99); negative predictive value (NPV) 1.00 (0.95–1.00), sensitivity 1.00 (0.69–1.00), specificity 0.99 (0.93–0.99), likelihood ratio positive test 90 (12.81–632), likelihood ratio negative test 0, accuracy 99%]. In comparison, the body measurement method did not perform as well [PPV 0.66 (0.34–0.90), NPV 0.97 (0.92–0.99), sensitivity 0.80 (0.44–0.97), specificity 0.95 (0.89–0.98), likelihood ratio positive test 17.97 (6.56–49.2), likelihood ratio negative test 0.209 (0.06–0.72), accuracy 94%]. This study confirmed that the use of an MRI template is an accurate tool in determining whether an obese patient can fit through the MRI bore and be accommodated in the MRI scanner.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR (2010) Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA 303(3):235–241PubMedCrossRef Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR (2010) Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA 303(3):235–241PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Uppot RN, Sahani DV, Hahn PF et al (2007) Impact of obesity on medical imaging and image-guided intervention. AJR 188:433–440PubMedCrossRef Uppot RN, Sahani DV, Hahn PF et al (2007) Impact of obesity on medical imaging and image-guided intervention. AJR 188:433–440PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Reynolds A (2011) Obesity and medical imaging challenges. Radiol Technol 82(3):219–239PubMed Reynolds A (2011) Obesity and medical imaging challenges. Radiol Technol 82(3):219–239PubMed
8.
go back to reference Rothschild PA, Domesek JM, Eastham ME, Kaufman L (1991) MR imaging of excessively obese patients: the use of an open permanent magnet. Magn Reson Imaging 9(2):151–154PubMedCrossRef Rothschild PA, Domesek JM, Eastham ME, Kaufman L (1991) MR imaging of excessively obese patients: the use of an open permanent magnet. Magn Reson Imaging 9(2):151–154PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Will they fit? Development of a measurement device to assess body habitus compatibility with MRI bore diameter for emergency trauma imaging
Authors
Amanda Corwin
Adam Aresty
Suzanne Chong
Melissa Brunsvold
James R. Evans
R. Brent Gillespie
Lena M. Napolitano
Publication date
01-04-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Emergency Radiology / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 1070-3004
Electronic ISSN: 1438-1435
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-011-1010-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Emergency Radiology 2/2012 Go to the issue