Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Why parents are skeptical about using probiotics preventively for small children: a Danish qualitative study

Authors: S. S. Andersen, K. F. Michaelsen, R. P. Laursen, L. Holm

Published in: BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Research on the health effects of probiotics continues to grow, but less is known about consumers’ perceptions of probiotic products and their health effects, and the impact of these perceptions on consumption. Particularly little is known about the way parents perceive probiotic consumption by small children, and whether parental willingness to use probiotics as a treatment differs from their willingness to use them preventively. The aim of this study was to explore how parents perceive probiotic consumption by their small children, and their willingness to use such products in treatment and prevention.

Methods

Semi-structured qualitative interviews with 17 Danish parents with at least one child aged 8–18 months. The interview guide centered on parental consumer practices and health-related attitudes both in general and in relation to probiotics. The data were coded in Nvivo and analyzed in a four-step analytical approach.

Results

Parents are willing to use probiotics as a treatment but are skeptical about preventive use. Some parents define probiotics as a kind of medicine they use only if their child is ill. Probiotics also conflict with parental understandings of their children as small, perfect parts of nature. Parents worry that probiotics may cause an imbalance in the vulnerable perfection of a small child.

Conclusion

The study shows that parental probiotic consumption practices are embedded in a cultural understanding of the child as both a perfect example of nature and vulnerable. Health authorities need to take this understanding into account if parents are to be successfully encouraged to use probiotics preventively.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference FAO/WHOWorking Group Report on Drafting Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food London, Ontario, Canada, 2002. FAO/WHOWorking Group Report on Drafting Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food London, Ontario, Canada, 2002.
8.
go back to reference Kamper-Jørgensen M, Wohlfahrt J, Simonsen J, Grønbæk M, Benn CS. Population-based study of the impact of childcare attendance on hospitalizations for acute respiratory infections. Pediatrics. 2006;118(4):1439–46.CrossRefPubMed Kamper-Jørgensen M, Wohlfahrt J, Simonsen J, Grønbæk M, Benn CS. Population-based study of the impact of childcare attendance on hospitalizations for acute respiratory infections. Pediatrics. 2006;118(4):1439–46.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Zutavern A, Rzehak P, Brockow I, et al. Day care in relation to respiratory-tract and gastrointestinal infections in a German birth cohort study. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96(10):1494–9.CrossRefPubMed Zutavern A, Rzehak P, Brockow I, et al. Day care in relation to respiratory-tract and gastrointestinal infections in a German birth cohort study. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96(10):1494–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Laursen RP, Larnkjær A, Ritz C, et al. Probiotics and child care absence due to infections: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2017;140(2):e20170735.CrossRefPubMed Laursen RP, Larnkjær A, Ritz C, et al. Probiotics and child care absence due to infections: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2017;140(2):e20170735.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bridgman SL, Azad MB, Field CJ, Letourneau N, Johnston DW, Kaplan BJ, Kozyrskyj AL. Maternal perspectives on the use of probiotics in infants : a cross-sectional survey, 1–9. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;14:366.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bridgman SL, Azad MB, Field CJ, Letourneau N, Johnston DW, Kaplan BJ, Kozyrskyj AL. Maternal perspectives on the use of probiotics in infants : a cross-sectional survey, 1–9. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;14:366.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards , challenges , and guidelines. Lancet. 2001;358(panel 2):483–8.CrossRefPubMed Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards , challenges , and guidelines. Lancet. 2001;358(panel 2):483–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company; 1967. Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company; 1967.
20.
go back to reference Andersen & Holm (2018): Naturalness as a safe haven: parental consumption practices and the management of risk. Vol. 19 No. 3 2018, pp. 296–309. Andersen & Holm (2018): Naturalness as a safe haven: parental consumption practices and the management of risk. Vol. 19 No. 3 2018, pp. 296–309.
22.
go back to reference Nelson MK. Watching children. Describing the use of baby monitors on Epinions.com. J Fam Issues. 2008;29(4):516–38.CrossRef Nelson MK. Watching children. Describing the use of baby monitors on Epinions.com. J Fam Issues. 2008;29(4):516–38.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Scott S, Jackson S, Backett-Milburn K. Swings and Roundabouts: Risk Anxiety and the Everyday Worlds of Children.; 1998. Scott S, Jackson S, Backett-Milburn K. Swings and Roundabouts: Risk Anxiety and the Everyday Worlds of Children.; 1998.
25.
go back to reference Beck U. Risiko samfundet - mod en ny modernitet [Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity]. 4th ed. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag; 2004. Beck U. Risiko samfundet - mod en ny modernitet [Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity]. 4th ed. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag; 2004.
Metadata
Title
Why parents are skeptical about using probiotics preventively for small children: a Danish qualitative study
Authors
S. S. Andersen
K. F. Michaelsen
R. P. Laursen
L. Holm
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2662-7671
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-018-2387-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies 1/2018 Go to the issue