Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 4/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011

Why Don’t Employers Hire and Retain Workers with Disabilities?

Authors: H. Stephen Kaye, Lita H. Jans, Erica C. Jones

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction Despite persistently low employment rates among working-age adults with disabilities, prior research on employer practices and attitudes toward workers with disabilities paints a generally rosy picture of successfully accommodated workers in a welcoming environment. Findings from previous studies might have been biased because of either employer self-selection or social desirability, yielding non-representative or artificially positive conclusions. Methods In this study, a novel approach was used to survey human resource professionals and supervisors working for employers known or reputed to be resistant to complying with the ADA’s employment provisions. Attendees of employer-requested ADA training sessions were asked to assess various possible reasons that employers in general might not hire, retain, or accommodate workers with disabilities and to rate strategies and policy changes that might make it more likely for employers to do so. Results As cited by respondents, the principal barriers to employing workers with disabilities are lack of awareness of disability and accommodation issues, concern over costs, and fear of legal liability. With regard to strategies employers might use to increase hiring and retention, respondents identified increased training and centralized disability and accommodation expertise and mechanisms. Public policy approaches preferred by respondents include no-cost external problem-solving, subsidized accommodations, tax breaks, and mediation in lieu of formal complaints or lawsuits. Conclusions Findings suggest straightforward approaches that employers might use to facilitate hiring and retention of workers with disabilities, as well as new public programs or policy changes that could increase labor force participation among working-age adults who have disabilities.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hernandez B, Keys C, Balcazar F. Employer attitudes toward workers with disabilities and their ADA employment rights: a literature review. J Rehabil. 2000;66(4):4–16. Hernandez B, Keys C, Balcazar F. Employer attitudes toward workers with disabilities and their ADA employment rights: a literature review. J Rehabil. 2000;66(4):4–16.
2.
go back to reference Levy JM, Jessop DJ, Rimmerman A, Levy PH. Employment of persons with severe disabilities in large businesses in the United States. Int J Rehabil Res. 1991;14(4):323–32.PubMedCrossRef Levy JM, Jessop DJ, Rimmerman A, Levy PH. Employment of persons with severe disabilities in large businesses in the United States. Int J Rehabil Res. 1991;14(4):323–32.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Levy JM, Jessop DJ, Rimmerman A, Levy PH. Attitudes of Fortune 500 corporate executives toward the employability of persons with severe disabilities: a national study. Ment Retard. 1992;30(2):67–75.PubMed Levy JM, Jessop DJ, Rimmerman A, Levy PH. Attitudes of Fortune 500 corporate executives toward the employability of persons with severe disabilities: a national study. Ment Retard. 1992;30(2):67–75.PubMed
4.
go back to reference McFarlin DB, Song J, Sonntag M. Integrating the disabled into the work force: a survey of fortune 500 company attitudes and practices. Empl Responsib Rights J. 1991;4(2):107–23.CrossRef McFarlin DB, Song J, Sonntag M. Integrating the disabled into the work force: a survey of fortune 500 company attitudes and practices. Empl Responsib Rights J. 1991;4(2):107–23.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chan F, Strauser D, Maher P, Lee EJ, Jones R, Johnson ET. Demand-side factors related to employment of people with disabilities: a survey of employers in the mid-west region of the United States. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(4):412–9.PubMedCrossRef Chan F, Strauser D, Maher P, Lee EJ, Jones R, Johnson ET. Demand-side factors related to employment of people with disabilities: a survey of employers in the mid-west region of the United States. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(4):412–9.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Unger DD, Wehman P, Yasuda S, Campbell L, Green H. Human resource professionals and the employment of people with disabilities: a business perspective. In: Unger DD, Kregel J, Wehman P, Brooke V, editors. Employers’ views of workplace supports: Virginia Commonwealth University Charter Business Roundtable’s national study of employers’ experiences with workers with disabilities. Richmond: Virginia Commonwealth University; 2002. Unger DD, Wehman P, Yasuda S, Campbell L, Green H. Human resource professionals and the employment of people with disabilities: a business perspective. In: Unger DD, Kregel J, Wehman P, Brooke V, editors. Employers’ views of workplace supports: Virginia Commonwealth University Charter Business Roundtable’s national study of employers’ experiences with workers with disabilities. Richmond: Virginia Commonwealth University; 2002.
7.
go back to reference Bruyere SM. Disability employment policies and practices in private and federal sector organizations. Ithaca: Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations Extension Division, Program on Employment and Disability; 2000. Bruyere SM. Disability employment policies and practices in private and federal sector organizations. Ithaca: Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations Extension Division, Program on Employment and Disability; 2000.
8.
go back to reference Bruyere SM, Erickson WA, Van Looy S. Comparative study of workplace policy and practices contributing to disability nondiscrimination. Rehabil Psychol. 2004;49(1):28–38.CrossRef Bruyere SM, Erickson WA, Van Looy S. Comparative study of workplace policy and practices contributing to disability nondiscrimination. Rehabil Psychol. 2004;49(1):28–38.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bruyere SM, Erickson WA, VanLooy SA. The impact of business size on employer ADA response. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2006;49(4):194–206.CrossRef Bruyere SM, Erickson WA, VanLooy SA. The impact of business size on employer ADA response. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2006;49(4):194–206.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Harris Interactive. Kessler foundation/NOD survey of employment of Americans with disabilities. N Y: Harris Interactive; 2010. Harris Interactive. Kessler foundation/NOD survey of employment of Americans with disabilities. N Y: Harris Interactive; 2010.
11.
go back to reference Dixon KA, Kruse D, Van Horn CE. Restricted access: a survey of employers about people with disabilities and lowering barriers to work. Work trends. New Brunswick, NJ: John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development, Rutgers University; 2003. Report no. 3.6. Dixon KA, Kruse D, Van Horn CE. Restricted access: a survey of employers about people with disabilities and lowering barriers to work. Work trends. New Brunswick, NJ: John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development, Rutgers University; 2003. Report no. 3.6.
13.
go back to reference Lee B, Newman K. Employer responses to disability: preliminary evidence and a research agenda. Empl Responsib Rights J. 1995;8(3):209–29. Lee B, Newman K. Employer responses to disability: preliminary evidence and a research agenda. Empl Responsib Rights J. 1995;8(3):209–29.
14.
go back to reference Lee BA. Legal requirements and employer responses to accommodating employees with disabilities. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 1996;6(4):231–51.CrossRef Lee BA. Legal requirements and employer responses to accommodating employees with disabilities. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 1996;6(4):231–51.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Unger DD, Kregel J. Employers’ knowledge and utilization of accommodations. In: Unger DD, Kregel J, Wehman P, Brooke V, editors. Employers’ views of workplace supports: Virginia Commonwealth University Charter Business Roundtable’s national study of employers’ experiences with workers with disabilities. Richmond: Virginia Commonwealth University; 2002. Unger DD, Kregel J. Employers’ knowledge and utilization of accommodations. In: Unger DD, Kregel J, Wehman P, Brooke V, editors. Employers’ views of workplace supports: Virginia Commonwealth University Charter Business Roundtable’s national study of employers’ experiences with workers with disabilities. Richmond: Virginia Commonwealth University; 2002.
16.
go back to reference Hartnett HP, Stuart H, Thurman H, Loy B, Batiste LC. Employers’ perceptions of the benefits of workplace accommodations: reasons to hire, retain and promote people with disabilities. J Vocat Rehabil. 2011;34(1):17–23. Hartnett HP, Stuart H, Thurman H, Loy B, Batiste LC. Employers’ perceptions of the benefits of workplace accommodations: reasons to hire, retain and promote people with disabilities. J Vocat Rehabil. 2011;34(1):17–23.
17.
go back to reference Domzal C, Houtenville A, Sharma R. Survey of employer perspectives on the employment of people with disabilities: technical report. McLean: CESSI; 2008. Domzal C, Houtenville A, Sharma R. Survey of employer perspectives on the employment of people with disabilities: technical report. McLean: CESSI; 2008.
18.
go back to reference Diksa E, Rogers ES. Employer concerns about hiring persons with psychiatric disability: results of the employer attitude questionnaire. Rehabil Couns Bull. 1996;40(1):31–44. Diksa E, Rogers ES. Employer concerns about hiring persons with psychiatric disability: results of the employer attitude questionnaire. Rehabil Couns Bull. 1996;40(1):31–44.
19.
go back to reference Millington MJ, Szymanski EM, Hanley-Maxwell C. Effect of the label of mental retardation on employer concerns and selection. Rehabil Couns Bull. 1994;38(1):27. Millington MJ, Szymanski EM, Hanley-Maxwell C. Effect of the label of mental retardation on employer concerns and selection. Rehabil Couns Bull. 1994;38(1):27.
20.
go back to reference Gilbride D, Stensrud R, Ehlers C, Evans E, Peterson C. Employers’ attitudes toward hiring persons with disabilities and vocational rehabilitation services. J Rehabil. 2000;66(4):17–23. Gilbride D, Stensrud R, Ehlers C, Evans E, Peterson C. Employers’ attitudes toward hiring persons with disabilities and vocational rehabilitation services. J Rehabil. 2000;66(4):17–23.
21.
go back to reference Bureau of Labor Statistics. Persons with a disability: labor force characteristics: 2009. News release. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Labor; 2010. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Persons with a disability: labor force characteristics: 2009. News release. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Labor; 2010.
22.
go back to reference Kaye HS. The impact of the 2007–09 recession on workers with disabilities. Mon Labor Rev. 2010;133(10):19–30. Kaye HS. The impact of the 2007–09 recession on workers with disabilities. Mon Labor Rev. 2010;133(10):19–30.
23.
go back to reference Brooks RA, Martin DJ, Ortiz DJ, Veniegas RC. Perceived barriers to employment among persons living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS Care. 2004;16(6):756–66.PubMedCrossRef Brooks RA, Martin DJ, Ortiz DJ, Veniegas RC. Perceived barriers to employment among persons living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS Care. 2004;16(6):756–66.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Cook JA. Employment barriers for persons with psychiatric disabilities: update of a report for the president’s commission. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57(10):1391–405.PubMedCrossRef Cook JA. Employment barriers for persons with psychiatric disabilities: update of a report for the president’s commission. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57(10):1391–405.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Honey A. The impact of mental illness on employment: consumers’ perspectives. Work. 2003;20(3):267–76.PubMed Honey A. The impact of mental illness on employment: consumers’ perspectives. Work. 2003;20(3):267–76.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Wilson-Kovacs D, Ryan MK, Haslam SA, Rabinovich A. ‘Just because you can get a wheelchair in the building doesn’t necessarily mean that you can still participate’: barriers to the career advancement of disabled professionals. Disabil Soc. 2008;23(7):705–17.CrossRef Wilson-Kovacs D, Ryan MK, Haslam SA, Rabinovich A. ‘Just because you can get a wheelchair in the building doesn’t necessarily mean that you can still participate’: barriers to the career advancement of disabled professionals. Disabil Soc. 2008;23(7):705–17.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Shier M, Graham JR, Jones ME. Barriers to employment as experienced by disabled people: a qualitative analysis in Calgary and Regina, Canada. Disabil Soc. 2009;24(1):63–75.CrossRef Shier M, Graham JR, Jones ME. Barriers to employment as experienced by disabled people: a qualitative analysis in Calgary and Regina, Canada. Disabil Soc. 2009;24(1):63–75.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Edwards AL. The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed. J Appl Psychol. 1953;37(2):90–3.CrossRef Edwards AL. The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed. J Appl Psychol. 1953;37(2):90–3.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Unger DD. Employers’ attitudes toward persons with disabilities in the workforce: myths or realities? Focus Aut Other Dev Disabil. 2002;17(1):2–10.CrossRef Unger DD. Employers’ attitudes toward persons with disabilities in the workforce: myths or realities? Focus Aut Other Dev Disabil. 2002;17(1):2–10.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Ren LR, Paetzold RL, Colella A. A meta-analysis of experimental studies on the effects of disability on human resource judgments. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2008;18(3):191–203.CrossRef Ren LR, Paetzold RL, Colella A. A meta-analysis of experimental studies on the effects of disability on human resource judgments. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2008;18(3):191–203.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Luecking RG. Emerging employer views of people with disabilities and the future of job development. J Vocat Rehabil. 2008;29(1):3–13. Luecking RG. Emerging employer views of people with disabilities and the future of job development. J Vocat Rehabil. 2008;29(1):3–13.
32.
go back to reference Fisher RJ. Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. J Consum Res. 1993;20(2):303–15.CrossRef Fisher RJ. Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. J Consum Res. 1993;20(2):303–15.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Fisher RJ, Tellis GJ. Removing social desirability bias with indirect questioning: is the cure worse than the disease? Adv Consum Res. 1998;25(1):563–7. Fisher RJ, Tellis GJ. Removing social desirability bias with indirect questioning: is the cure worse than the disease? Adv Consum Res. 1998;25(1):563–7.
34.
go back to reference Supphellen M, Kvitastein OA, Johansen ST. Projective questioning and ethnic discrimination: a procedure for measuring employer bias. Pub Opin Quart. 1997;61(1):208–24.CrossRef Supphellen M, Kvitastein OA, Johansen ST. Projective questioning and ethnic discrimination: a procedure for measuring employer bias. Pub Opin Quart. 1997;61(1):208–24.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Rinck C, Stickney S. Survey and focus groups of employers: Medicaid Infrastructure Grant. Kansas City: University of Missouri Kansas City; 2003. Rinck C, Stickney S. Survey and focus groups of employers: Medicaid Infrastructure Grant. Kansas City: University of Missouri Kansas City; 2003.
36.
go back to reference Peck B, Kirkbride LT. Why businesses don’t employ people with disabilities. J Vocat Rehabil. 2001;16(2):71–5. Peck B, Kirkbride LT. Why businesses don’t employ people with disabilities. J Vocat Rehabil. 2001;16(2):71–5.
37.
go back to reference Albrecht GL, Walker VG, Levy JA. Social distance from the stigmatized. A test of two theories. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(14):1319–27.PubMedCrossRef Albrecht GL, Walker VG, Levy JA. Social distance from the stigmatized. A test of two theories. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(14):1319–27.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Siperstein GN, Romano N, Mohler A, Parker R. A national survey of consumer attitudes towards companies that hire people with disabilities. J Vocat Rehabil. 2006;24(1):3–9. Siperstein GN, Romano N, Mohler A, Parker R. A national survey of consumer attitudes towards companies that hire people with disabilities. J Vocat Rehabil. 2006;24(1):3–9.
Metadata
Title
Why Don’t Employers Hire and Retain Workers with Disabilities?
Authors
H. Stephen Kaye
Lita H. Jans
Erica C. Jones
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9302-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 4/2011 Go to the issue