Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 3/2010

01-06-2010 | Clinical Investigation

Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Angiography with Additional Steady-State Acquisition of the Infragenicular Arteries in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease

Authors: Yousef W. Nielsen, Jonas P. Eiberg, Vibeke B. Løgager, Sven Just, Torben V. Schroeder, Henrik S. Thomsen

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 3/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine if addition of infragenicular steady-state (SS) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to first-pass imaging improves diagnostic performance compared with first-pass imaging alone in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) undergoing whole-body (WB) MRA. Twenty consecutive patients with PAD referred to digital-subtraction angiography (DSA) underwent WB-MRA. Using a bolus-chase technique, first-pass WB-MRA was performed from the supra-aortic vessels to the ankles. The blood-pool contrast agent gadofosveset trisodium was used at a dose of 0.03 mmol/kg body weight. Ten minutes after injection of the contrast agent, high-resolution (0.7-mm isotropic voxels) SS-MRA of the infragenicular arteries was performed. Using DSA as the “gold standard,” sensitivities and specificities for detecting significant arterial stenoses (≥50% luminal narrowing) with first-pass WB-MRA, SS-MRA, and combined first-pass and SS-MRA were calculated. Kappa statistics were used to determine intermodality agreement between MRA and DSA. Overall sensitivity and specificity for detecting significant arterial stenoses with first-pass WB-MRA was 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.78) and 0.97 (0.94 to 0.99), respectively. In first-pass WB-MRA, the lowest sensitivity was in the infragenicular region, with a value of 0.42 (0.23 to 0.63). Combined analysis of first-pass WB-MRA and SS-MRA increased sensitivity to 0.81 (0.60 to 0.93) in the infragenicular region, with specificity of 0.94 (0.88 to 0.97). Sensitivity and specificity for detecting significant arterial stenoses with isolated infragenicular SS-MRA was 0.47 (0.27 to 0.69) and 0.86 (0.78 to 0.91), respectively. Intermodality agreement between MRA and DSA in the infragenicular region was moderate for first-pass WB-MRA (κ = 0.49), fair for SS-MRA (κ = 0.31), and good for combined first-pass/SS-MRA (κ = 0.71). Addition of infragenicular SS-MRA to first-pass WB MRA improves diagnostic performance.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Collins R, Burch J, Cranny G et al (2007) Duplex ultrasonography, magnetic resonance angiography, and computed tomography angiography for diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease: systematic review. Br Med J 334:1257–1266CrossRef Collins R, Burch J, Cranny G et al (2007) Duplex ultrasonography, magnetic resonance angiography, and computed tomography angiography for diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease: systematic review. Br Med J 334:1257–1266CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Koelemay MJ, Lijmer JG, Stoker J et al (2001) Magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of lower extremity arterial disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA 285:1338–1345CrossRefPubMed Koelemay MJ, Lijmer JG, Stoker J et al (2001) Magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of lower extremity arterial disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA 285:1338–1345CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Goyen M, Quick HH, Debatin JF et al (2002) Whole-body three-dimensional MR angiography with a rolling table platform: initial clinical experience. Radiology 224:270–277CrossRefPubMed Goyen M, Quick HH, Debatin JF et al (2002) Whole-body three-dimensional MR angiography with a rolling table platform: initial clinical experience. Radiology 224:270–277CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hansen T, Wikstrom J, Eriksson MO et al (2006) Whole-body magnetic resonance angiography of patients using a standard clinical scanner. Eur Radiol 16:147–153CrossRefPubMed Hansen T, Wikstrom J, Eriksson MO et al (2006) Whole-body magnetic resonance angiography of patients using a standard clinical scanner. Eur Radiol 16:147–153CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Barkhausen J et al (2001) Rapid magnetic resonance angiography for detection of atherosclerosis. Lancet 357(9262):1086–1091CrossRefPubMed Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Barkhausen J et al (2001) Rapid magnetic resonance angiography for detection of atherosclerosis. Lancet 357(9262):1086–1091CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ruehm SG, Goehde SC, Goyen M (2004) Whole body MR angiography screening. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 20:587–591CrossRefPubMed Ruehm SG, Goehde SC, Goyen M (2004) Whole body MR angiography screening. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 20:587–591CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lauffer RB, Parmelee DJ, Dunham SU et al (1998) MS-325: albumin-targeted contrast agent for MR angiography. Radiology 207:529–538PubMed Lauffer RB, Parmelee DJ, Dunham SU et al (1998) MS-325: albumin-targeted contrast agent for MR angiography. Radiology 207:529–538PubMed
8.
go back to reference Goyen M (2008) Gadofosveset-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Vasc Health Risk Manag 4:1–9CrossRefPubMed Goyen M (2008) Gadofosveset-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Vasc Health Risk Manag 4:1–9CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Grist TM, Korosec FR, Peters DC et al (1998) Steady-state and dynamic MR angiography with MS-325: initial experience in humans. Radiology 207:539–544PubMed Grist TM, Korosec FR, Peters DC et al (1998) Steady-state and dynamic MR angiography with MS-325: initial experience in humans. Radiology 207:539–544PubMed
10.
go back to reference Hadizadeh DR, Gieseke J, Lohmaier SH et al (2008) Peripheral MR angiography with blood pool contrast agent: prospective intraindividual comparative study of high-spatial-resolution steady-state MR angiography versus standard-resolution first-pass MR Angiography and DSA. Radiology 249:701–711CrossRefPubMed Hadizadeh DR, Gieseke J, Lohmaier SH et al (2008) Peripheral MR angiography with blood pool contrast agent: prospective intraindividual comparative study of high-spatial-resolution steady-state MR angiography versus standard-resolution first-pass MR Angiography and DSA. Radiology 249:701–711CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Michaely HJ, Attenberger UI, Dietrich O et al (2008) Feasibility of gadofosveset-enhanced steady-state magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral vessels at 3 Tesla with Dixon fat saturation. Invest Radiol 43:635–641CrossRefPubMed Michaely HJ, Attenberger UI, Dietrich O et al (2008) Feasibility of gadofosveset-enhanced steady-state magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral vessels at 3 Tesla with Dixon fat saturation. Invest Radiol 43:635–641CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB et al (1999) A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 30:461–470 Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB et al (1999) A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 30:461–470
13.
go back to reference Nielsen YW, Eiberg JP, Logager VB et al (2009) Whole-body MR angiography with body coil acquisition at 3 T in patients with peripheral arterial disease using the contrast agent gadofosveset trisodium. Acad Radiol 16:654–661CrossRefPubMed Nielsen YW, Eiberg JP, Logager VB et al (2009) Whole-body MR angiography with body coil acquisition at 3 T in patients with peripheral arterial disease using the contrast agent gadofosveset trisodium. Acad Radiol 16:654–661CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Fenchel M, Requardt M, Tomaschko K et al (2005) Whole-body MR angiography using a novel 32-receiving-channel MR system with surface coil technology: first clinical experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:596–603CrossRefPubMed Fenchel M, Requardt M, Tomaschko K et al (2005) Whole-body MR angiography using a novel 32-receiving-channel MR system with surface coil technology: first clinical experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:596–603CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Goyen M, Herborn CU, Kroger K et al (2003) Detection of atherosclerosis: systemic imaging for systemic disease with whole-body three-dimensional MR angiography—initial experience. Radiology 227:277–282CrossRefPubMed Goyen M, Herborn CU, Kroger K et al (2003) Detection of atherosclerosis: systemic imaging for systemic disease with whole-body three-dimensional MR angiography—initial experience. Radiology 227:277–282CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Herborn CU, Goyen M, Quick HH et al (2004) Whole-body 3D MR angiography of patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1427–1434PubMed Herborn CU, Goyen M, Quick HH et al (2004) Whole-body 3D MR angiography of patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1427–1434PubMed
17.
go back to reference Hartmann M, Wiethoff AJ, Hentrich HR et al (2006) Initial imaging recommendations for Vasovist angiography. Eur Radiol 16(Suppl 2):B15–B23PubMed Hartmann M, Wiethoff AJ, Hentrich HR et al (2006) Initial imaging recommendations for Vasovist angiography. Eur Radiol 16(Suppl 2):B15–B23PubMed
18.
go back to reference Rohrer M, Bauer H, Mintorovitch J et al (2005) Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths. Invest Radiol 40:715–724CrossRefPubMed Rohrer M, Bauer H, Mintorovitch J et al (2005) Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths. Invest Radiol 40:715–724CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hoogeveen RM, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA (1998) Limits to the accuracy of vessel diameter measurement in MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:1228–1235CrossRefPubMed Hoogeveen RM, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA (1998) Limits to the accuracy of vessel diameter measurement in MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:1228–1235CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Maki JH, Wilson GJ, Eubank WB et al (2002) Utilizing SENSE to achieve lower station sub-millimeter isotropic resolution and minimal venous enhancement in peripheral MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:484–491CrossRefPubMed Maki JH, Wilson GJ, Eubank WB et al (2002) Utilizing SENSE to achieve lower station sub-millimeter isotropic resolution and minimal venous enhancement in peripheral MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:484–491CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Alexandrova NA, Gibson WC, Norris JW et al (1996) Carotid artery stenosis in peripheral vascular disease. J Vasc Surg 23:645–649CrossRefPubMed Alexandrova NA, Gibson WC, Norris JW et al (1996) Carotid artery stenosis in peripheral vascular disease. J Vasc Surg 23:645–649CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
go back to reference Wachtell K, Ibsen H, Olsen MH et al (1996) Prevalence of renal artery stenosis in patients with peripheral vascular disease and hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 10:83–85PubMed Wachtell K, Ibsen H, Olsen MH et al (1996) Prevalence of renal artery stenosis in patients with peripheral vascular disease and hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 10:83–85PubMed
24.
go back to reference Goyen M, Herborn CU, Kroger K et al (2006) Total-body 3D magnetic resonance angiography influences the management of patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Eur Radiol 16:685–691CrossRefPubMed Goyen M, Herborn CU, Kroger K et al (2006) Total-body 3D magnetic resonance angiography influences the management of patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Eur Radiol 16:685–691CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Goehde SC, Hunold P, Vogt FM et al (2005) Full-body cardiovascular and tumor MRI for early detection of disease: feasibility and initial experience in 298 subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:598–611PubMed Goehde SC, Hunold P, Vogt FM et al (2005) Full-body cardiovascular and tumor MRI for early detection of disease: feasibility and initial experience in 298 subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:598–611PubMed
26.
go back to reference Hansen T, Ahlstrom H, Johansson L (2007) Whole-body screening of atherosclerosis with magnetic resonance angiography. Top Magn Reson Imaging 18:329–337CrossRefPubMed Hansen T, Ahlstrom H, Johansson L (2007) Whole-body screening of atherosclerosis with magnetic resonance angiography. Top Magn Reson Imaging 18:329–337CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Hansen T, Ahlstrom H, Wikstrom J et al (2008) A total atherosclerotic score for whole-body MRA and its relation to traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Eur Radiol 18:1174–1180CrossRefPubMed Hansen T, Ahlstrom H, Wikstrom J et al (2008) A total atherosclerotic score for whole-body MRA and its relation to traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Eur Radiol 18:1174–1180CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Ladd SC, Debatin JF, Stang A et al (2007) Whole-body MR vascular screening detects unsuspected concomitant vascular disease in coronary heart disease patients. Eur Radiol 17:1035–1045CrossRefPubMed Ladd SC, Debatin JF, Stang A et al (2007) Whole-body MR vascular screening detects unsuspected concomitant vascular disease in coronary heart disease patients. Eur Radiol 17:1035–1045CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference de Vries M, Nijenhuis RJ, Hoogeveen RM et al (2005) Contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography using SENSE in multiple stations: feasibility study. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:37–45CrossRefPubMed de Vries M, Nijenhuis RJ, Hoogeveen RM et al (2005) Contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography using SENSE in multiple stations: feasibility study. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:37–45CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Fenchel M, Doering J, Seeger A et al (2008) Ultrafast whole-body MR angiography with two-dimensional parallel imaging at 3.0 T: feasibility study. Radiology 250:254–263CrossRefPubMed Fenchel M, Doering J, Seeger A et al (2008) Ultrafast whole-body MR angiography with two-dimensional parallel imaging at 3.0 T: feasibility study. Radiology 250:254–263CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Klessen C, Hein PA, Huppertz A et al (2007) First-pass whole-body magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) using the blood-pool contrast medium gadofosveset trisodium: comparison to gadopentetate dimeglumine. Invest Radiol 42:659–664CrossRefPubMed Klessen C, Hein PA, Huppertz A et al (2007) First-pass whole-body magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) using the blood-pool contrast medium gadofosveset trisodium: comparison to gadopentetate dimeglumine. Invest Radiol 42:659–664CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Nael K, Ruehm SG, Michaely HJ et al (2007) Multistation whole-body high-spatial-resolution MR angiography using a 32-channel MR system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:529–539CrossRefPubMed Nael K, Ruehm SG, Michaely HJ et al (2007) Multistation whole-body high-spatial-resolution MR angiography using a 32-channel MR system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:529–539CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Nael K, Krishnam M, Nael A et al (2008) Peripheral contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0T, improved spatial resolution and low dose contrast: initial clinical experience. Eur Radiol 18:2893–2900CrossRefPubMed Nael K, Krishnam M, Nael A et al (2008) Peripheral contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0T, improved spatial resolution and low dose contrast: initial clinical experience. Eur Radiol 18:2893–2900CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Angiography with Additional Steady-State Acquisition of the Infragenicular Arteries in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease
Authors
Yousef W. Nielsen
Jonas P. Eiberg
Vibeke B. Løgager
Sven Just
Torben V. Schroeder
Henrik S. Thomsen
Publication date
01-06-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 3/2010
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-009-9759-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2010

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 3/2010 Go to the issue