Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Who is the gate keeper for treatment in a fertility clinic in Germany? -baseline results of a prospective cohort study (PinK study)-

Authors: Eva Münster, Stephan Letzel, Jasmin Passet-Wittig, Norbert F. Schneider, Bettina Schuhrke, Rudolf Seufert, Ulrike Zier

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

It is estimated that 5-15% of all couples in industrialised nations are infertile. A perceived unfulfilled desire for a child or self-identification as infertile can lead to psychological strain and social isolation. About 53.000 women underwent assisted reproduction treatments in Germany in 2014. Little is known about the first medical consultation and patient needs prior to the first visit in a fertility clinic in Germany. The baseline survey of the prospective cohort study on couples undergoing fertility treatment in Germany (PinK Study) provides first results on this topic for Germany.

Methods

The baseline survey was conducted between 2012 and 2013. Self-administered questionnaires were handed out to patients of six fertility clinics at the beginning of treatment by clinic staff. At a participation rate of 31.0%, we were able to analyse data on 323 women and 242 men.

Results

92.6% of the women had their initial medical consultation on their unfulfilled desire for a child with a gynaecologist. After the urologist (44.2%), the general practitioner (12.0%) was the second most approached initial contact person for men. 36.4% of all men had no medical consultation on the unfulfilled desire for a child before visiting a fertility clinic. 46.9% of the respondents expressed the wish that the conversation about infertility should be initiated by a physician. Prior to their first visit to a fertility clinic, 11.2% of the men and 24.8% of the women were informed by a physician that infertility treatment can cause emotional strain.

Conclusion

While almost all women consult a gynaecologist prior to the first visit in a fertility centre, one out of three men do not consult any physician at that stage. For the remaining group of men, urologists and general practitioners are the most important contact persons. Gender-specific health care needs are evident. In order to close the health care gap for men in Germany, more opportunities for discreet access to consultation should be offered. Due to its low threshold and family-oriented approach, general practice could make an important contribution to this effect.
Literature
11.
go back to reference Helfferich C. Frauen Leben: Eine Studie zu Lebensläufen und Familienplanung. Köln: Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung; 2001. Helfferich C. Frauen Leben: Eine Studie zu Lebensläufen und Familienplanung. Köln: Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung; 2001.
13.
go back to reference Calhaz-Jorge C. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2012: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:1638–52.CrossRefPubMed Calhaz-Jorge C. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2012: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:1638–52.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Deutsches IVF-Register. DIR Jahrbuch 2015. Journal für Reproduktionsmedizin und Endokrinologie 2016;13(1 Spec No):6–44. Deutsches IVF-Register. DIR Jahrbuch 2015. Journal für Reproduktionsmedizin und Endokrinologie 2016;13(1 Spec No):6–44.
15.
go back to reference Deutsches IVF-Register. DIR Jahrbuch 2014. Journal für Reproduktionsmedizin und Endokrinologie 2015;12(1 Spec No):6–41. Deutsches IVF-Register. DIR Jahrbuch 2014. Journal für Reproduktionsmedizin und Endokrinologie 2015;12(1 Spec No):6–41.
17.
go back to reference Bundesärztekammer. (Muster-)Richtlinie zur Durchführung der assistierten Reproduktion. Novelle 2006. Deutsches Ärzteblatt. 2006;103:A1392–403. Bundesärztekammer. (Muster-)Richtlinie zur Durchführung der assistierten Reproduktion. Novelle 2006. Deutsches Ärzteblatt. 2006;103:A1392–403.
22.
go back to reference Wischmann T. Psychosoziale Aspekte bei Fertilitätsstörungen. Urologe. 2005:185–95. Wischmann T. Psychosoziale Aspekte bei Fertilitätsstörungen. Urologe. 2005:185–95.
23.
go back to reference Boivin J, Lancastle D. Medical waiting periods: imminence, emotions and comping. Women's Health. 2011;6:59–69. Boivin J, Lancastle D. Medical waiting periods: imminence, emotions and comping. Women's Health. 2011;6:59–69.
25.
go back to reference Passet-Wittig J, Letzel S, Schneider NF, et al. The PinK study – methodology of the baseline survey of a prospective cohort study of couples undergoing fertility treatment. Wiesbaden: Federal Institute for Population Research; 2014. p. 36. (BiB Daten- und Methodenberichte; 1/2014) Passet-Wittig J, Letzel S, Schneider NF, et al. The PinK study – methodology of the baseline survey of a prospective cohort study of couples undergoing fertility treatment. Wiesbaden: Federal Institute for Population Research; 2014. p. 36. (BiB Daten- und Methodenberichte; 1/2014)
26.
go back to reference Wippermann C. Kinderlose Frauen und Männer. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend; 2014. p. 190. Wippermann C. Kinderlose Frauen und Männer. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend; 2014. p. 190.
33.
go back to reference Ittner E, Himmel W, Kochen MM. Gehört das Problem "ungewollte Kinderlosigkeit" zum familienmedizinischen Auftrag des Hausarztes? Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 1997;47:263–70.PubMed Ittner E, Himmel W, Kochen MM. Gehört das Problem "ungewollte Kinderlosigkeit" zum familienmedizinischen Auftrag des Hausarztes? Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 1997;47:263–70.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Who is the gate keeper for treatment in a fertility clinic in Germany? -baseline results of a prospective cohort study (PinK study)-
Authors
Eva Münster
Stephan Letzel
Jasmin Passet-Wittig
Norbert F. Schneider
Bettina Schuhrke
Rudolf Seufert
Ulrike Zier
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1690-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018 Go to the issue