Top

Published in:

01-12-2017 | Original Research

Who are mobile app users from healthy lifestyle websites? Analysis of patterns of app use and user characteristics

Authors: Steriani Elavsky, Ph.D, David Smahel, Ph.D., Hana Machackova, Ph.D.

Published in: Translational Behavioral Medicine | Issue 4/2017

Abstract

The use of online communities and websites for health information has proliferated along with the use of mobile apps for managing health behaviors such as diet and exercise. The scarce evidence available to date suggests that users of these websites and apps differ in significant ways from non-users but most data come from US- and UK-based populations. In this study, we recruited users of nutrition, weight management, and fitness-oriented websites in the Czech Republic to better understand who uses mobile apps and who does not, including user sociodemographic and psychological profiles. Respondents aged 13–39 provided information on app use through an online survey (n = 669; M age = 24.06, SD = 5.23; 84% female). Among users interested in health topics, respondents using apps for managing nutrition, weight, and fitness (n = 403, 60%) were more often female, reported more frequent smartphone use, and more expert phone skills. In logistic regression models, controlling for sociodemographics, web, and phone activity, mHealth app use was predicted by levels of excessive exercise (OR 1.346, 95% CI 1.061–1.707, p < .01). Among app users, we found differences in types of apps used by gender, age, and weight status. Controlling for sociodemographics and web and phone use, drive for thinness predicted the frequency of use of apps for healthy eating (β = 0.14, p < .05), keeping a diet (β = 0.27, p < .001), and losing weight (β = 0.33, p < .001), whereas excessive exercise predicted the use of apps for keeping a diet (β = 0.18, p < .01), losing weight (β = 0.12, p < .05), and managing sport/exercise (β = 0.28, p < .001). Sensation seeking was negatively associated with the frequency of use of apps for maintaining weight (β = − 0.13, p < .05). These data unveil the user characteristics of mHealth app users from nutrition, weight management, and fitness websites, helping inform subsequent design of mHealth apps and mobile intervention strategies.

Pew. PEW Research Center/CHCF Health Survey. 2013. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/02/12/the-internet-and-health/.

European Commission D-G for C, Networks C and T. Flash Eurobarometer 404 “European Citizens’ Digital Health Literacy.” 2014. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_404_sum_en.pdf.

Kontos E, Blake KD, Chou W-YS, Prestin A. Predictors of eHealth usage: insights on the digital divide from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2012. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16(7):e172. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3117.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Graham AL, Papandonatos GD, Erar B, Stanton CA. Use of an online smoking cessation community promotes abstinence: results of propensity score weighting. Health Psychol. 2015; 34(Suppl):1286–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000278.CrossRefPubMedCentral

Leist AK. Social media use of older adults: a mini-review. Gerontology. 2013; 59(4):378–84. https://doi.org/10.1159/000346818. CrossRefPubMed

Antypas K, Wangberg SC. An internet- and mobile-based tailored intervention to enhance maintenance of physical activity after cardiac rehabilitation: short-term results of a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16(3):78–95. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3132.CrossRef

Statista. Worldwide Mobile App Revenues 2020|Statistic. https://www.statista.com/statistics/269025/worldwide-mobile-app-revenue-forecast/.

Yang C-H, Maher JP, Conroy DE. Implementation of behavior change techniques in mobile applications for physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2015; 48(4):452–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.10.010. CrossRefPubMed

Conroy DE, Yang C-H, Maher JP. Behavior change techniques in top-ranked mobile apps for physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2014; 46(6):649–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.01.010. CrossRefPubMed

10.

Middelweerd A, Mollee JS, van der Wal CN, Brug J, Te Velde SJ. Apps to promote physical activity among adults: a review and content analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014; 11:97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0097-9. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Pew Research Center. Few Americans Track Their Weight, Diet or Exercise Online | Pew Research Center. 2014. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/01/08/few-americans-track-their-weight-diet-or-exercise-online/.

12.

Purcell K. Pew Internet Research. Half of adult cell phone owners have apps on their phones Americans’ appetite for apps continues to grow. 2011. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/2011/PIP_Apps-Update-2011.pdf. Accessed December 1, 2016.¨.

13.

European Commission. Green Paper on Mobile Health (“mHealth”); 2014. file:///C:/Users/SterianiElavsky/Downloads/GreenPaperonmobilehealth (1).pdf.

14.

Schnall R, Rojas M, Bakken S, Brown W, Carballo-Dieguez A, Carry M, Gelaude D, Mosley JP, Travers J. A user-centered model for designing consumer mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps). J Biomed Inform. 2016; 60:243–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2016.02.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Kim Y, Briley DA, Ocepek MG. Differential innovation of smartphone and application use by sociodemographics and personality. Comput Hum Behav. 2015; 44:141–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.059. CrossRef

16.

Peñas-Lledó E, Bulik CM, Lichtenstein P, Larsson H, Baker JH. Risk for self-reported anorexia or bulimia nervosa based on drive for thinness and negative affect clusters/dimensions during adolescence: a three-year prospective study of the TChAD cohort. Int J Eat Disord. 2015; 48(6):692–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22431. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Dobmeyer AC, Stein DMA. Prospective analysis of eating disorder risk factors: drive for thinness, depressed mood, maladaptive cognitions, and ineffectiveness. Eat Behav. 2003; 4(2):135–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1471-0153(03)00013-8. CrossRefPubMed

18.

Krebs P, Duncan DT. Health app use among US mobile phone owners: a national survey. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2015; 3(4):e101. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4924.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Bhuyan SS, Lu N, Chandak A, et al. Use of mobile health applications for health-seeking behavior among US adults. J Med Syst. 2016; 40(6) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0492-7.

20.

Talmon J, Ammenwerth E, Brender J, de Keizer N, Nykänen P, Rigby M. STARE-HI—statement on reporting of evaluation studies in health informatics. Int J Med Inform. 2009; 78(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.09.002. CrossRefPubMed

21.

Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989; 13(3):319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008. CrossRef

22.

Venkatesh V, Smith RH, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD, Walton SM. User acceptance of information and technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 2003; 27(3):425–478.

23.

Kwon M-W, Mun K, Lee JK, Mcleod DM, D’angelo J. Is mobile health all peer pressure? The influence of mass media exposure on the motivation to use mobile health apps. Convergence: Int J Res New Media. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856516641065.

24.

Higgins O, Sixsmith J, Barry MM. A literature review on health information- seeking behaviour on the web: a health consumer and health professional perspective. A literature review on health information-seeking behaviour on the web. Stockholm: ECDC; 2011.https://doi.org/10.2900/5788.

25.

Viswanath K, Finnegan JR Jr, Gollust S. Communication and health behavior in a changing media environment. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bassy A Wiley Brand; 2015:327–48.

26.

Baumgartner SE, Hartmann T. The role of health anxiety in online health information search. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011; 14(10):613–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0425. CrossRefPubMed

27.

Lahey BB. Public health significance of neuroticism. Am Psychol. 2009; 64(4):241–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Kelders SM, Kok RN, Ossebaard HC, Van Gemert-Pijnen JE. Persuasive system design does matter: a systematic review of adherence to web-based interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2012; 14(6):e152. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Ginters N. A review: how user characteristics affect the effectiveness of persuasive strategies in the health promotion domain of online interventions. (Master´s Thesis). The Netherlands: University of Twente, Positive Psychology and Technology; 2016.

30.

Verkasalo H, López-Nicolás C, Molina-Castillo FJ, Bouwman H. Analysis of users and non-users of smartphone applications. Telematics Inform. 27:242–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2009.11.001.

31.

The internet society. The global internet report. https://www.internetsociety.org/globalinternetreport/2016/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/ISOC_GIR_2016-v1.pdf. Accessed 1 April 2017.

32.

Eurostat data. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Internet_access_and_use_statistics_-_households_and_individuals. Accessed 1 April 2017.

33.

PEW data. http://www.pewglobal.org/2016/02/22/smartphone-ownership-and-internet-usage-continues-to-climb-in-emerging-economies/. Accessed 1 April 2017.

34.

Czech Republic Just Tops Russia for Mobile Penetration—eMarketer. https://www.emarketer.com/Article/Czech-Republic-Just-Tops-Russia-Mobile-Penetration/1012047. Accessed 14 Dec 2016.

35.

Lupac P, Chrobakova A, Sladek J. Internet in the Czech Republic 2014. Prague; 2015. http://worldinternetproject.com/_files/_//234_report_wip_czr2014_eng_fin.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2016.

36.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2014. OECD Statistics. http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=HEALTH_STAT#. Accessed 1 April 2017.

37.

World Health Organization. Nutrition, physical activity, and obesity: Czech Republic; 2013. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/243293/Czech-Republic-WHO-Country-Profile.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 1 April 2017.

38.

Cole TJ, Lobstein T. Extended international (IOTF) body mass index cut-offs for thinness, overweight and obesity. Pediatr Obes. 2012; 7(4):284–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2047-6310.2012.00064.x. CrossRefPubMed

39.

Garner DM. Eating Disorder Inventory-3. Professional Manual. In: Lutz FL, ed. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. 2004.

40.

Forbush KT, Wildes JE, Pollack LO, et al. Development and validation of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI). Psychol Assess. 2013; 25(3):859–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032639. CrossRefPubMed

41.

Stephenson MT, Hoyle RH, Palmgreen P, Slater MD. Brief measures of sensation seeking for screening and large-scale surveys. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003; 72(3):279–86. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14643945. Accessed 22 Dec 2016CrossRefPubMed

42.

Lang FR, John D, Lüdtke O, Schupp J, Wagner GG. Short assessment of the Big Five: robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing. Behav Res Methods. 2011; 43(2):548–67. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0066-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Cook B, Engel S, Crosby R, Hausenblas H, Wonderlich S, Mitchell J. Pathological motivations for exercise and eating disorder specific health-related quality of life. Int J Eat Disord. 2014; 47(3):268–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22198. CrossRefPubMed

44.

Cook B, Hausenblas H, Crosby RD, Cao L, Wonderlich SA. Exercise dependence as a mediator of the exercise and eating disorders relationship: a pilot study. Eat Behav. 2015; 16:9–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.10.012. CrossRefPubMed

45.

Claes L, Vandereycken W, Luyten P, Soenens B, Pieters G, Vertommen H. Personality prototypes in eating disorders based on the big five model. J Personal Disord. 2006; 20(4):401–16. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2006.20.4.401. CrossRef

Title: Who are mobile app users from healthy lifestyle websites? Analysis of patterns of app use and user characteristics
Authors: Steriani Elavsky, Ph.D
David Smahel, Ph.D.
Hana Machackova, Ph.D.
Publication date: 01-12-2017
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Translational Behavioral Medicine / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1869-6716
Electronic ISSN: 1613-9860
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-017-0525-x

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Who are mobile app users from healthy lifestyle websites? Analysis of patterns of app use and user characteristics

Abstract

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Healthy Eating for Life English as a second language curriculum: applying the RE-AIM framework to evaluate a nutrition education intervention targeting cancer risk reduction

Momentary assessment of physical activity intention-behavior coupling in adults

Developing a peer-based healthy lifestyle program for people with serious mental illness in supportive housing

Implementation of an evidence-based biobehavioral treatment for cancer patients

Adherence with physical activity monitoring wearable devices in a community-based population: observations from the Washington, D.C., Cardiovascular Health and Needs Assessment

Peer mentors delivering a physical activity intervention for cancer survivors: effects among mentors