Top

BMC Public Health

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

Which educational messengers do medical students prefer for receiving healthinformation? Development and psychometrics of using health messengers questionnaire

Authors: Zahra Karimian, Mehrvash Moradi, Nahid Zarifsanaiey, Sara Kashefian-Naeeini

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2024

Abstract

Introduction

Individuals vary in their selection of health messengers. This research aimed to construct an instrument to measure the preferences of medical students in selecting health messengers and in the next step to validate the aforementioned questionnaire.

Method

This research is a descriptive survey with an approach to construct a questionnaire. The statistical population included all students studying at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in March to June 2022 in the academic year 2021-2022. 500 participants were involved in the study. To determine the types of health messengers and review the texts, a group of 15 primary items consisting of the 6 components of academic sources (2-items), formal news sources (2-items), mass media (3-items), internet search (2-items), social networks and messenger applications (4-items), and informal conversation (2-items) were compiled. A 4-point scale was developed the content validity of which was confirmed using CVI and CVR method and the reliability index was calculated to be 0.818. Factor analysis was also used to determine the construct validity and factor loading of each item.

Results

The research covers university students in different medical fields. Using factor analysis, together with KMO = 0.810 and Bartlett's sphericity index P < 0.0001, saturation and the suitability of the test were confirmed. Students' preferences based on factor load were social media (28.92%), official and unofficial health sources(10.76%), academic sources (9.08%), internet search (8.18%), and mass media (7.13%), respectively. Among social media, Telegram (0.85) had the highest factor load followed by Instagram (0.79), and WhatsApp (0.71).

Conclusion

Medical students are always on the move and naturally prioritize mobile-based methods. They prefer messengers that are free from time and space restrictions. The widespread availability of mobile devices and the ability to search for and access information make it easier to test health information. Therefore, in health policy, attention should be paid to the virtual capabilities, especially mobile-based approaches.

Ahmadi S, Almotahari F. Representation of health-related messages in print media content analysis of Iran. Hamshahri Jam-e Jam Dailies Rasaneh. 2018;29(1):127–44.

Salmon CT, Atkin C. Using media campaigns for health promotion. Handbook Health Commun. 2003;1(1):449–72.

Khaniki H, Rasi H. Various types of health messages framing the measurement of TV audiences attitude toward health messages framing effects. Soc Scie. 2016;23(73):33–61. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjss.2016.7208.CrossRef

Wakefield MA, Loken B, Hornik RC. Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour. Lancet. 2010;376(9748):1261–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60809-4.PMID:20933263;PMCID:PMC4248563.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Tapare VS, Borle PS, Parande MA, Sakore D, Ingole S, Salunke J, Gajbhiye S. Assessment of health-promoting lifestyle profile in undergraduate medical students of a medical college. Medic J Dr DY Patil Vidyapeeth. 2023;16(1):85–91. https://doi.org/10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_93_21.CrossRef

Hosseinnejad M, klantarzadeh M. Study of lifestyle based on the Pender's Health Promotion model among students of Islamic Azad University. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot. 2014;1(4):15–28. http://journal.ihepsa.ir/article-1-98-fa.html

Can G, Ozdilli K, Erol O. Comparison of the health–promoting lifestyles of nursing and non-nursing students in Istanbu. Turkey J Nurs Health Sci. 2008;10:273–80.CrossRef

Jang HJ. Comparative study of health promoting lifestyle profiles and subjective happiness in nursing and non-nursing students. Advanced Scie Tech Letters. 2016;128(7):78–82.CrossRef

Wei ChN, Harada K, Ueda K, Fukumoto K, Minamoto K, Ueda A. Assessment of health-promoting lifestyle profile in Japanese university students. Environ Health Prev Med. 2012;17:222–7.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Lee R, Yuen LA. Health-promoting behaviors and psychosocial well-being of university students in Hong Kong. Public Health Nursing. 2005;3(22):209–20.CrossRef

11.

Dini T, Tavakoli HR, Rahmati NF, Dabbagh MA, Khoshdel A. Knowledge, beliefs and behavior of food consumption among students of military university: the application of Health Belief Model (HBM). Iranian J Military Medicine. 2012;14(3):206–13.

12.

Norouzinia R, Aghabarari M, Kohan M, Karimi M. Health promotion behaviors and its correlation with anxiety and some students’demographic factors of Alborz University of Medical Sciences. J Health Promot Manag. 2013;2(4):39–49.

13.

Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Pender NJ. The health-promoting lifestyle profile: development and psychometric characteristics. Nurs Res. 1987;36(2):76–81.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Mehri A, Solhi M, Garmaroudi G, Nadrian H, Sighaldeh SS. Health promoting lifestyle and its determinants among university students in Sabzevar. Iran Int J Prev Med. 2016;14(7):65. https://doi.org/10.4103/2008-7802.180411.PMID:27141284;PMCID:PMC4837801.CrossRef

15.

AzamiGilan B, Janatolmakan M, Ashtarian H, Rezaei M, Khatony A. Health-Promoting Lifestyle and Associated Factors among Medical Sciences Students in Kermanshah, Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Environ Public Health. 2021;26(2021):6691593. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6691593.PMID:33995535;PMCID:PMC8096551.CrossRef

16.

Alzahrani SH, Malik AA, Bashawri J, et al. Health-promoting lifestyle profile and associated factors among medical students in a Saudi university. SAGE Open Medicine. 2019;7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312119838426

17.

Melnyk BM, Slevin C, Militello L, Hoying J, Teall A, McGovern C. Physical health, lifestyle beliefs and behaviors, and mental health of entering graduate health professional students: evidence to support screening and early intervention. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2016;28(4):204–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/2327-6924.12350.CrossRef

18.

Aceijas C, Waldhäusl S, Lambert N, Cassar S, Bello-Corassa R. Determinants of health-related lifestyles among university students. Perspect Public Health. 2017;137(4):227–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913916666875.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Tang L, Wang J. Effects of New Media Use on Health Behaviors: A Case Study in China. Iran J Public Health. 2021 May;50(5):949–958. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i5.6112. PMID: 34183953; PMCID: PC8223554.

20.

Nabi RL, Huskey R, Nicholls SB, et al. When audiences become advocates: self-induced behavior change through health message posting in social media. Comput Hum Behav. 2019;99(10):260–7.CrossRef

21.

Al-Dmour H, Masa’deh R, Salman A, Abuhashesh M, Al-Dmour R. Influence of social media platforms on public health protection against the covid-19 pandemic via the mediating effects of public health awareness and behavioral changes: integrated model. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8):e19996. https://doi.org/10.2196/19996.PMID:32750004;PMCID:PMC7439806.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Yang QH. Are social networking sites making health behavior change interventions more effective? a meta-analytic review. J Health Commun. 2017;22(3):223–33.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Gough A, Hunter RF, Ajao O, et al. Tweet for behavior change: using social media for the dissemination of public health messages. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017;3(1):e14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Zheng MN. Absence and reconstruction: the influencing mechanism of new media on health communication. Shanghai J R. 2014;9:78–84.

25.

Winkleby MA, Flora JA, Kraemer HC. A community-based heart disease intervention: predictors of change. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(5):767–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Grimes HA, Forster DA, Newton MS. Sources of information used by women during pregnancy to meet their information needs. Midwifery. 2014;30:e26–33.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Lewallen LP. Healthy behaviors and sources of health information among low-income pregnant women. Public Health Nurs. 2004;21:200–6.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Oviatt JR, Reich SM. Pregnancy posting: exploring characteristics of social media posts around pregnancy and user engagement. Mhealth. 2019;5:46 (PMID: 31728381; PMCID: PMC6851430).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Jimenez P, Bregenzer A. Integration of ehealth tools in the process of workplace health promotion: proposal for design and implementation. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(2):e65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Webb TL, Joseph J, Yardley L, et al. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(1):e4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Oh HJ, Lauckner C, Boehmer J, et al. Facebooking for health: an examination into the solicitation and effects of health-related social support on social networking sites. Comput Human Behav. 2013;29:2072–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.017.CrossRef

32.

Romiani N, Miresmaili BS, Azam K, Borjalilu S. Exploring the relationships between internet usage and family values of college students. Iran J Public Health. 2016;45(10):1381–2 (PMID: 27957451; PMCID: PMC5149508).PubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Riper H, Andersson G, Christensen H, Cuijpers P, Lange A, Eysenbach G. Theme issue on e-mental health: a growing field in internet research. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(5):e74. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1713.PMID:21169177;PMCID:PMC3057318.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Hall AK, Cole-Lewis H, Bernhardt JM. Mobile text messaging for health: a systematic review of reviews. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015;18(36):393–415. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122855.PMID:25785892;PMCID:PMC4406229.CrossRef

35.

Severin WJ, Tankard JW. Communication Theories: Origins, Methods, and Uses in the Mass Media. New York: Longman; 2010.

36.

Wilson BJ. Designing media messages about health and nutrition: what strategies are most effective? J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007;39(2):S13-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2006.09.001. (PMID: 17336800).CrossRefPubMed

37.

Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol. 1975;28(4):563–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x.CrossRef

38.

Waltz C. F., Bausell B. R. Nursing research: design statistics and computer analysis. Davis FA. 1981

39.

Cerny CA, Kaiser HF. A study of a measure of sampling adequacy for factor-analytic correlation matrices. Multivar Behav Res. 1977;12(1):43–7.CrossRef

40.

Arash H, Maryam A. Structral Equation Modeling and Factor Analysis. Application Training of LISREL Software: Jahad Daneshgahi Publisher; 2017.

41.

Thomson RG, De Brún A, Flynn D, et al. Factors that influence variation in clinical decision-making about thrombolysis in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke: results of a discrete choice experiment. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2017 Jan. (Health Services and Delivery Research, No. 5.4.) Appendix 5, Factor analysis of Institutional Culture Scale. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK410188/

42.

Comrey AL, Lee HB. A First Course in Factor Analysis. Psychology Press; 2013

43.

Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ Psychol Meas. 1970;30:607–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308.CrossRef

44.

Samuels, P. (2017) Advice on Exploratory Factor Analysis. Technical Report. ResearchGate, 9/06/2017. Official URL: h https://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/6076/

45.

Streiner D. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J Pers Assess. 2003;80(1):99–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555.CrossRef

47.

Leontitsis A, Pagge J. A simulation approach on Cronbach’s alpha statistical significance. Math Comput Simul. 2007;73(5):336–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2006.08.001.CrossRef

48.

Gliem JA, Gliem RR. Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education. 2003. Retrieved from

49.

Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011;27(2):53–5. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.PMID:28029643;PMCID:PMC4205511.CrossRef

50.

Mohammadbeigi A, Mohammadsalehi N, Aligol M. Validity and Reliability of the Instruments and Types of MeasurmentS in Health Applied Researches. JRUMS 2015; 13 (12) :1153–1170 URL: http://journal.rums.ac.ir/article-1-2274-fa.html

51.

DeVellis RF. Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage Publications 2011.

52.

Nunnally J, Bernstein L. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher, INC; 1994.

53.

Browne G, O’Reilly D, Waters C, Tummon O, Devitt D, Stewart B, O’Connor P. Smart-phone and medical app use amongst Irish medical students: a survey of use and attitudes. BMC Proc. 2015;9(1):A26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-9-S1-A26.PMCID:PMC4306026.CrossRefPubMedCentral

54.

Raiman L, Antbring R, Mahmood A. WhatsApp messenger as a tool to supplement medical education for medical students on clinical attachment. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0855-x.PMID:28061777;PMCID:PMC5219809.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Manji K, Hanefeld J, Vearey J, Walls H, de Gruchy T. Using WhatsApp messenger for health systems research: a scoping review of available literature. Health Policy Plan. 2021;36(5):594–605. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czab024.PMID:33860314;PMCID:PMC8173666.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Kuerbis A, van Stolk-Cooke K, Muench F. An exploratory study of mobile messaging preferences by age: Middle-aged and older adults compared to younger adults. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2017 Jan-Dec;4:2055668317733257. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055668317733257. Epub 2017 Oct 5. PMID: 30533217; PMCID: PMC6284808.

57.

Humphreys L. Mobile social media: Future challenges and opportunities. Mobile Media & Communication. 2023;1(1):74–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157912459499.CrossRef

58.

Renahy E, Parizot I, Chauvin P. Determinants of the frequency of online health information seeking: results of a web-based survey conducted in France in 2007. Inform Health Soc Care. 2010;35:25–39. https://doi.org/10.3109/17538150903358784.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

59.

Maon SN, Hassan NM, Seman SAA. Online health information seeking behavior pattern. Adv Sci Lett. 2017;23:10582–5. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.10107.CrossRef

60.

Lu L, Liu J, Yuan YC. Health information seeking behaviors and source preferences between Chinese and US populations. J Health Commun. 2020;25:490–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2020.1806414.CrossRefPubMed

61.

Ghahramani F, Wang J. Impact of smartphones on quality of life: a health information behavior perspective. Inf Syst Front. 2020;22:1275–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09931-z.CrossRef

62.

Jia X, Pang Y, Liu LS. Online Health Information Seeking Behavior: A Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(12):1740. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9121740.PMID:34946466;PMCID:PMC8701665.CrossRefPubMed

63.

Bundorf MK, Wagner TH, Singer SJ, Baker LC. Who searches the internet for health information? Health Serv Res. 2006;41(3 Pt 1):819–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00510.x.PMID:16704514;PMCID:PMC1713205.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Xiong Z, Zhang L, Li Z, Xu W, Zhang Y, Ye T. Frequency of online health information seeking and types of information sought among the general Chinese population: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(12):e30855. https://doi.org/10.2196/30855.PMID:34860676;PMCID:PMC8686457.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

65.

Khoong EC, Le GM, Hoskote M, Rivadeneira NA, Hiatt RA, Sarkar U. Health Information-seeking Behaviors and Preferences of a Diverse. Multilingual Urban Cohort Med Care. 2019;57(2):S176–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001050.CrossRefPubMed

66.

Silver MP. Patient perspectives on online health information and communication with doctors: a qualitative study of patients 50 years old and over. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(1):e19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

67.

Razavi-Toosi SM, Ramazan-Azar H, Yahak S, Gholamipoor I. Creating health and medical messages in the media and its impact on people’s awareness. Bioethics Quarterly. 2016;3(8):43–77. https://doi.org/10.22037/bioeth.v3i8.13967.CrossRef

68.

Kashefian-Naeeini S., Sheikhnezami Naeini Z. Communication skills among School Masters of Different Gender in Shiraz, Iran. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology. 2020; 29(2): 1607–1611. http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/3405/2350

Title: Which educational messengers do medical students prefer for receiving healthinformation? Development and psychometrics of using health messengers questionnaire
Authors: Zahra Karimian
Mehrvash Moradi
Nahid Zarifsanaiey
Sara Kashefian-Naeeini
Publication date: 01-12-2024
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17400-1

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Which educational messengers do medical students prefer for receiving healthinformation? Development and psychometrics of using health messengers questionnaire

Abstract

Introduction

Method

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Introduction

Method

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Human resource shortage in India’s health sector: a scoping review of the current landscape

Cost effectiveness of preemptive school closures to mitigate pandemic influenza outbreaks of differing severity in the United States

Experiences with family planning and abortion services during the Covid-19 pandemic: a qualitative study in Bangladesh, Iran and Netherlands

Social capital for carers of patients with advanced organ failure: a qualitative exploration of stakeholders’ perspectives

Assessing family function: older adults vs. care nurses: a cross-sectional comparative study

Changes in physical activity and sedentary behavior during the first COVID-19 pandemic- restrictions in Germany: a nationwide survey