Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 2/2013

01-04-2013 | Original Article

When to perform bone scan in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: external validation of a novel risk stratification tool

Authors: Cosimo De Nunzio, Costantino Leonardo, Giorgio Franco, Francesco Esperto, Aldo Brassetti, Giovanni Simonelli, Dino Dente, Carlo De Dominicis, Andrea Tubaro

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To externally validate the performance characteristics of the Briganti’s risk stratification tool for baseline staging bone scan in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa).

Methods

From 2009 onwards, a consecutive series of patients with PCa were enrolled. All patients were staged to evaluate the presence of bone metastasis (BM) with a conventional total-body Tc 99 m MDP scintigraphy performed regardless of baseline PCa characteristics. The area under the curve (AUC) estimates were used to test the accuracy of the Briganti’s risk stratification tool that recommended staging baseline bone scan for patients with a biopsy Gleason score >7 or with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >10 ng/ml and palpable disease (cT2/T3). The new tool was compared to the European Association of Urology (EAU) guideline.

Results

A total of 313 patients were consecutively enrolled. Median age was 68 (range 49–95 years), and median PSA was 7 ng/ml (range 0.81–2,670). Twenty (6.4 %) patients presented BMs. Patients with BMs were significantly older, with higher PSA and a higher Gleason score (p = 0.001). The novel Briganti’s model was significantly (p = 0.001) more accurate (AUC: 0.75; CI: 0.632–0.859) than the EAU guideline (AUC: 0.64; CI: 0.52–0.761) for the prediction of BMs.

Conclusions

Our study validated in a group of patients with PCa the novel risk stratification tool proposed by Briganti, which presented a higher accuracy for baseline staging bone scan when compared with the EAU guideline. In our experience, this approach would further reduce (about 60 %) the use of staging baseline bone scan without compromising the ability to detect BMs in patients with PCa.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Wolf AM, Wender RC, Etzioni RB et al (2010) American Cancer Society Prostate Cancer Advisory Committee: American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 60(2):70–98. doi:10.3322/caac.20066 PubMedCrossRef Wolf AM, Wender RC, Etzioni RB et al (2010) American Cancer Society Prostate Cancer Advisory Committee: American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 60(2):70–98. doi:10.​3322/​caac.​20066 PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference Nørgaard M, Jensen AØ, Jacobsen JB, Cetin K, Fryzek JP, Sørensen HT (2010) Skeletal related events, bone metastasis and survival of prostate cancer: a population based cohort study in Denmark (1999 to 2007). J Urol 184(1):162–167. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.034 PubMedCrossRef Nørgaard M, Jensen AØ, Jacobsen JB, Cetin K, Fryzek JP, Sørensen HT (2010) Skeletal related events, bone metastasis and survival of prostate cancer: a population based cohort study in Denmark (1999 to 2007). J Urol 184(1):162–167. doi:10.​1016/​j.​juro.​2010.​03.​034 PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Briganti A, Passoni N, Ferrari M et al (2010) When to perform bone scan in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: external validation of the currently available guidelines and proposal of a novel risk stratification tool. Eur Urol 7:551–558. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.12.023 CrossRef Briganti A, Passoni N, Ferrari M et al (2010) When to perform bone scan in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: external validation of the currently available guidelines and proposal of a novel risk stratification tool. Eur Urol 7:551–558. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2009.​12.​023 CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lee SH, Chung MS, Park KK, Yom CD, Lee DH, Chung BH (2011) Is it suitable to eliminate bone scan for prostate cancer patients with PSA 20 ng/mL? World J Urol. doi:10.1007/s00345-011-0728-6 Lee SH, Chung MS, Park KK, Yom CD, Lee DH, Chung BH (2011) Is it suitable to eliminate bone scan for prostate cancer patients with PSA 20 ng/mL? World J Urol. doi:10.​1007/​s00345-011-0728-6
16.
go back to reference Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID et al (2002) American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer, New York Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID et al (2002) American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer, New York
18.
go back to reference Lin K, Szabo Z, Chin BB, Civelek AC (1999) The value of a baseline bone scan in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Clin Nucl Med 24:579–582PubMedCrossRef Lin K, Szabo Z, Chin BB, Civelek AC (1999) The value of a baseline bone scan in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Clin Nucl Med 24:579–582PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
When to perform bone scan in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: external validation of a novel risk stratification tool
Authors
Cosimo De Nunzio
Costantino Leonardo
Giorgio Franco
Francesco Esperto
Aldo Brassetti
Giovanni Simonelli
Dino Dente
Carlo De Dominicis
Andrea Tubaro
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0880-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

World Journal of Urology 2/2013 Go to the issue