Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research

What non-clinical factors influence the general dentist–specialist relationship in Canada?

Authors: Harpinder Kaur, Sonica Singhal, Michael Glogauer, Amir Azarpazhooh, Carlos Quiñonez

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The general dentist–specialist relationship is important for effective patient care and the professional environment. This study explores the non-clinical factors that may influence the general dentist–specialist relationship in Canada.

Methods

A cross-sectional web-based survey of a sample of general dentists across Canada was conducted (N ≈ 11,300). The survey collected information on practitioner (e.g., age, gender, years of practice) and practice (e.g., location, ownership) factors. Two outcomes were assessed: not perceiving specialists as completely collegial and perceiving competitive pressure from specialists. Binary and multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted.

Results

A total of 1328 general dentists responded, yielding a response rate of 11.7%. The strongest associations for perceiving specialists as not completely collegial include being a practice owner (OR = 2.15, 95% CI 1.23, 3.74), working in two or more practices (OR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.07, 2.65), practicing in a small population center (OR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.22, 0.94), and contributing equally to the household income (OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.26, 0.84). The strongest associations with perceiving medium/large competitive pressure from specialists include having a general practice residency or advanced education in general dentistry (OR = 2.00, 95% CI 1.17, 3.41) and having specialists in close proximity to the practice (OR = 2.52, 95% CI 1.12, 5.69).

Conclusion

Practitioner and practice factors, mostly related to business and dental care market dynamics, are associated with the potential for strained relationships between general dentists and specialists in Canada. This study points to the need for dental professional organizations to openly discuss the current state of the dental care market, as it has important implications for the profession.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Goldenberg AS. The dental referral process. New insights. N Y State Dent J. 1997;63(3):44–7.PubMed Goldenberg AS. The dental referral process. New insights. N Y State Dent J. 1997;63(3):44–7.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Goldenberg AS. Referral patterns of dentists: analysis and implications of a questionnaire. Int J Psychosom. 1992;39(1–4):76–80.PubMed Goldenberg AS. Referral patterns of dentists: analysis and implications of a questionnaire. Int J Psychosom. 1992;39(1–4):76–80.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Weiner L. The relationship between the specialist and the referring dentist. J Ont Dent Assoc. 1968;45(7):295–6.PubMed Weiner L. The relationship between the specialist and the referring dentist. J Ont Dent Assoc. 1968;45(7):295–6.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Schwartz B. The evolving relationship between specialists and general dentists: practical and ethical challenges. J Am Coll Dent. 2007;74(1):22–6.PubMed Schwartz B. The evolving relationship between specialists and general dentists: practical and ethical challenges. J Am Coll Dent. 2007;74(1):22–6.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Fang H, Rizzo JA. Competition and physician-enabled demand: the role of managed care. J Econ Behav Organ. 2009;72(1):463–74.CrossRef Fang H, Rizzo JA. Competition and physician-enabled demand: the role of managed care. J Econ Behav Organ. 2009;72(1):463–74.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Dillman DA. Mail and Internet surveys: the tailored design method–2007 Update with new Internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide. Hoboken: Wiley; 2011. Dillman DA. Mail and Internet surveys: the tailored design method–2007 Update with new Internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide. Hoboken: Wiley; 2011.
23.
go back to reference Hazelkorn HM. A comparison of dental treatment plans under different reimbursement systems. J Public Health Policy. 1985;6(2):223–35.CrossRef Hazelkorn HM. A comparison of dental treatment plans under different reimbursement systems. J Public Health Policy. 1985;6(2):223–35.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Guymon G, Buschang PH, Brown TJ. Criteria used by general dentists to choose an orthodontist. J Clin Orthod. 1999;33(2):87–93.PubMed Guymon G, Buschang PH, Brown TJ. Criteria used by general dentists to choose an orthodontist. J Clin Orthod. 1999;33(2):87–93.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Yuen K, Quiñonez C. Competition and financially related misconduct in dental practice: a retrospective descriptive study. J Can Dent Assoc. 2015;81:1488–2159. Yuen K, Quiñonez C. Competition and financially related misconduct in dental practice: a retrospective descriptive study. J Can Dent Assoc. 2015;81:1488–2159.
27.
go back to reference Zadik Y, Levin L. Clinical decision making in restorative dentistry, endodontics, and antibiotic prescription. J Dent Educ. 2008;72(1):81–6.CrossRef Zadik Y, Levin L. Clinical decision making in restorative dentistry, endodontics, and antibiotic prescription. J Dent Educ. 2008;72(1):81–6.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Chvartszaid D. A survey regarding the nature and type of dental implant complications in private practices in the province of Ontario. Ottawa: Library and Archives Canada; 2012. Chvartszaid D. A survey regarding the nature and type of dental implant complications in private practices in the province of Ontario. Ottawa: Library and Archives Canada; 2012.
Metadata
Title
What non-clinical factors influence the general dentist–specialist relationship in Canada?
Authors
Harpinder Kaur
Sonica Singhal
Michael Glogauer
Amir Azarpazhooh
Carlos Quiñonez
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01782-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Oral Health 1/2021 Go to the issue