Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 4/2016

01-05-2016 | Original Article

What is the pelvic lymph node normal size? Determination from normal MRI examinations

Authors: Marjorie Ramirez, Pierre Ingrand, Jean-Pierre Richer, Guillaume Herpe, Guillaume Vesselle, Samy Boucebci, Jean-Pierre Tasu

Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

There are few previous reports on maximal pelvic lymph node sizes and no data on normal mesorectal nodes. Therefore, the aim of the study was to estimate the normal size of pelvic lymph nodes and to determine the upper limits of the normal range.

Materials and methods

Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations were prospectively carried out using a Intera 1.5 T magnet (Philips, the Netherlands), on 36 healthy volunteers (22 females, 14 males, mean age 25 years). A balanced fast field echo (b-FFE) sequence was used with the following parameters: 3-mm-thick contiguous slice, matrix 512 × 512. Short axis diameters of pelvic and inguinal lymph nodes were measured in each anatomic territory (internal iliac, external iliac, common iliac, mesorectum and inguinal). After normalization of the measurements, the influences of age, gender, laterality and territory were evaluated. Upper limits (95th percentile) were then calculated.

Results

A total of 1147 lymph nodes were measured. Age, gender and side (right/left) had no significant influence on size. The upper limits of the normal range were, respectively, 5.3, 4.4, 6.3 and 3.9 mm for the external and common iliac, internal iliac, inguinal and mesorectum nodes.

Conclusion

This work presents maximal normal values for each pelvic area, and the values for mesorectum nodes are reported for the first time.

Advances in knowledge

The mesorectum nodes should be considered as abnormal when they are over 4 mm in short diameter. For the other node areas, the upper limits of the normal range were, respectively, 6, 6, 5, 7 mm for the external and common iliac, internal, iliac and inguinal nodes for the short axis.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Brunocilla E, Ceci F, Schiavina R, Castellucci P, Maffione AM, Cevenini M, Bianchi L, Borghesi M, Giunchi F, Fiorentino M, Chondrogiannis S, Colletti PM, Rubello D, Fanti S, Martorana G (2014) Diagnostic accuracy of (11) C-choline PET/CT in preoperative lymph node staging of bladder cancer: a systematic comparison with contrast-enhanced CT and histologic findings. Clin Nucl Med 39:e308–e312. doi:10.1097/RLU.0000000000000342 CrossRefPubMed Brunocilla E, Ceci F, Schiavina R, Castellucci P, Maffione AM, Cevenini M, Bianchi L, Borghesi M, Giunchi F, Fiorentino M, Chondrogiannis S, Colletti PM, Rubello D, Fanti S, Martorana G (2014) Diagnostic accuracy of (11) C-choline PET/CT in preoperative lymph node staging of bladder cancer: a systematic comparison with contrast-enhanced CT and histologic findings. Clin Nucl Med 39:e308–e312. doi:10.​1097/​RLU.​0000000000000342​ CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Choi EK, Kim JK, Choi HJ, Park SH, Park BW, Kim N, Kim JS, Im KC, Cho G, Cho KS (2009) Node-by-node correlation between MR and PET/CT in patients with uterine cervical cancer: diffusion-weighted imaging versus size-based criteria on T2WI. Eur Radiol 19:2024–2032. doi:10.1007/s00330-009-1350-5 CrossRefPubMed Choi EK, Kim JK, Choi HJ, Park SH, Park BW, Kim N, Kim JS, Im KC, Cho G, Cho KS (2009) Node-by-node correlation between MR and PET/CT in patients with uterine cervical cancer: diffusion-weighted imaging versus size-based criteria on T2WI. Eur Radiol 19:2024–2032. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-009-1350-5 CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Drieskens O, Stroobants S, Gysen M, Vandenbosch G, Mortelmans L, Vergote I (2003) Positron emission tomography with FDG in the detection of peritoneal and retroperitoneal metastases of ovarian cancer. Gynecol Obstet Invest 55:130–134. doi:10.1159/000071525 CrossRefPubMed Drieskens O, Stroobants S, Gysen M, Vandenbosch G, Mortelmans L, Vergote I (2003) Positron emission tomography with FDG in the detection of peritoneal and retroperitoneal metastases of ovarian cancer. Gynecol Obstet Invest 55:130–134. doi:10.​1159/​000071525 CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Forsberg L, Dale L, Hoiem L, Magnusson A, Mikulowski P, Olsson AM, Ous S, Stenwig AE (1986) Computed tomography in early stages of testicular carcinoma. Size of normal retroperitoneal lymph nodes and lymph nodes in patients with metastases in stage II A. A SWENOTECA study: Swedish–Norwegian Testicular Cancer Project. Acta Radiol 27:569–574CrossRef Forsberg L, Dale L, Hoiem L, Magnusson A, Mikulowski P, Olsson AM, Ous S, Stenwig AE (1986) Computed tomography in early stages of testicular carcinoma. Size of normal retroperitoneal lymph nodes and lymph nodes in patients with metastases in stage II A. A SWENOTECA study: Swedish–Norwegian Testicular Cancer Project. Acta Radiol 27:569–574CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Koh DM, Brown G, Temple L, Raja A, Toomey P, Bett N, Norman AR, Husband JE (2004) Rectal cancer: mesorectal lymph nodes at MR imaging with USPIO versus histopathologic findings—initial observations. Radiology 231:91–99. doi:10.1148/radiol.2311030142 CrossRefPubMed Koh DM, Brown G, Temple L, Raja A, Toomey P, Bett N, Norman AR, Husband JE (2004) Rectal cancer: mesorectal lymph nodes at MR imaging with USPIO versus histopathologic findings—initial observations. Radiology 231:91–99. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2311030142 CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T, Moffat F, Klimberg VS, Shriver C, Feldman S, Kusminsky R, Gadd M, Kuhn J, Harlow S, Beitsch P (1998) The sentinel node in breast cancer—a multicenter validation study. N Engl J Med 339:941–946. doi:10.1056/NEJM199810013391401 CrossRefPubMed Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T, Moffat F, Klimberg VS, Shriver C, Feldman S, Kusminsky R, Gadd M, Kuhn J, Harlow S, Beitsch P (1998) The sentinel node in breast cancer—a multicenter validation study. N Engl J Med 339:941–946. doi:10.​1056/​NEJM199810013391​401 CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lahaye MJ, Engelen SM, Kessels AG, de Bruine AP, von Meyenfeldt MF, van Engelshoven JM, van de Velde CJ, Beets GL, Beets-Tan RG (2008) USPIO-enhanced MR imaging for nodal staging in patients with primary rectal cancer: predictive criteria. Radiology 246:804–811. doi:10.1148/radiol.2463070221 CrossRefPubMed Lahaye MJ, Engelen SM, Kessels AG, de Bruine AP, von Meyenfeldt MF, van Engelshoven JM, van de Velde CJ, Beets GL, Beets-Tan RG (2008) USPIO-enhanced MR imaging for nodal staging in patients with primary rectal cancer: predictive criteria. Radiology 246:804–811. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2463070221 CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Mangan CE, Rubin SC, Rabin DS, Mikuta JJ (1986) Lymph node nomenclature in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol 23:222–226CrossRefPubMed Mangan CE, Rubin SC, Rabin DS, Mikuta JJ (1986) Lymph node nomenclature in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol 23:222–226CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Matsuoka H, Masaki T, Kobayashi T, Sato K, Sugiyama M, Atomi Y, Ohkura Y (2009) Morphological criteria for metastatic mesorectal lymph nodes in rectal cancer. Hepato-Gastroenterol 56:1661–1664 Matsuoka H, Masaki T, Kobayashi T, Sato K, Sugiyama M, Atomi Y, Ohkura Y (2009) Morphological criteria for metastatic mesorectal lymph nodes in rectal cancer. Hepato-Gastroenterol 56:1661–1664
19.
go back to reference Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, Mozzillo N, Elashoff R, Essner R, Nieweg OE, Roses DF, Hoekstra HJ, Karakousis CP, Reintgen DS, Coventry BJ, Glass EC, Wang HJ, Group M (2006) Sentinel-node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med 355:1307–1317CrossRefPubMed Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, Mozzillo N, Elashoff R, Essner R, Nieweg OE, Roses DF, Hoekstra HJ, Karakousis CP, Reintgen DS, Coventry BJ, Glass EC, Wang HJ, Group M (2006) Sentinel-node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med 355:1307–1317CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Nakai G, Matsuki M, Inada Y, Tatsugami F, Tanikake M, Narabayashi I, Yamada T (2008) Detection and evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with gynecologic malignancies using body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32:764–768. doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e318153fd43 CrossRefPubMed Nakai G, Matsuki M, Inada Y, Tatsugami F, Tanikake M, Narabayashi I, Yamada T (2008) Detection and evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with gynecologic malignancies using body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32:764–768. doi:10.​1097/​RCT.​0b013e318153fd43​ CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Ogawa S, Kobayashi H, Amada S, Yahata H, Sonoda K, Abe K, Baba S, Sasaki M, Kaku T, Wake N (2010) Sentinel node detection with (99m)Tc phytate alone is satisfactory for cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Int J Clin Oncol 15:52–58. doi:10.1007/s10147-009-0010-8 CrossRefPubMed Ogawa S, Kobayashi H, Amada S, Yahata H, Sonoda K, Abe K, Baba S, Sasaki M, Kaku T, Wake N (2010) Sentinel node detection with (99m)Tc phytate alone is satisfactory for cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Int J Clin Oncol 15:52–58. doi:10.​1007/​s10147-009-0010-8 CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Perez RO, Pereira DD, Proscurshim I, Gama-Rodrigues J, Rawet V, Sao Juliao GP, Kiss D, Cecconello I, Habr-Gama A (2009) Lymph node size in rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation–can we rely on radiologic nodal staging after chemoradiation? Dis Colon Rectum 52:1278–1284. doi:10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181a0af4b CrossRefPubMed Perez RO, Pereira DD, Proscurshim I, Gama-Rodrigues J, Rawet V, Sao Juliao GP, Kiss D, Cecconello I, Habr-Gama A (2009) Lymph node size in rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation–can we rely on radiologic nodal staging after chemoradiation? Dis Colon Rectum 52:1278–1284. doi:10.​1007/​DCR.​0b013e3181a0af4b​ CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
What is the pelvic lymph node normal size? Determination from normal MRI examinations
Authors
Marjorie Ramirez
Pierre Ingrand
Jean-Pierre Richer
Guillaume Herpe
Guillaume Vesselle
Samy Boucebci
Jean-Pierre Tasu
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-1038
Electronic ISSN: 1279-8517
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1581-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 4/2016 Go to the issue