Published in:
01-11-2010 | Symposium: Highlights of the ISOLS/MSTS 2009 Meeting
What is the Emotional Acceptance After Limb Salvage with an Expandable Prosthesis?
Authors:
Eric R. Henderson, MD, Andrew M. Pepper, BS, German A. Marulanda, MD, Justin D. Millard, MD, G. Douglas Letson, MD
Published in:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
|
Issue 11/2010
Login to get access
Abstract
Background
Limb preservation surgery for extremity sarcomas offers the promise of improved function and cosmesis over amputation. Application of limb salvage surgery for pediatric patients with expandable metallic endoprostheses is gaining acceptance. The few studies reporting these devices have focused on functional outcomes; one has addressed quality of life.
Questions/purposes
We asked the following questions: (1) how happy are these patients; (2) how do these patients perceive their bodies; (3) do these children have difficulty with social interactions; and (4) how satisfied are patients and their parents with their outcomes?
Methods
We retrospectively identified and contacted 26 living patients who underwent limb salvage with an expandable device. The Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument was administered to 15 of the 26 families. Attention was paid to the happiness domain of the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument and specific answers within this domain were reported.
Results
Children who received limb salvage with an expandable endoprosthesis showed high emotional satisfaction with their outcome. Overall patients reported excellent perceptions of body image and physical attractiveness. Most patients reported frequent social interactions with their peers and no difficulty with making new friends.
Conclusions
Although this study has a limited number of subjects and no control group, the data correlate with previously scores and indicate a high degree of emotional acceptance after limb salvage with an expandable endoprosthesis in a pediatric population.
Level of Evidence
Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.