Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 4/2011

01-04-2011 | Symposium: Controversies in Orthopaedics

What Is the Best Femoral Fixation of Hamstring Autografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?: A Meta-analysis

Authors: Alexis Colvin, MD, Charu Sharma, MD, Michael Parides, PhD, Jonathan Glashow, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Several methods are available for fixing the femoral side of a hamstring autograft in ACL reconstruction and the best method is unclear. Biomechanical studies have shown varying results with regard to fixation failure.

Questions/purposes

We asked whether there were any differences with regard to graft failures and functional outcome measures with differing methods of femoral fixation of hamstring autografts in ACL reconstruction.

Methods

We systematically reviewed the literature using PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Controlled Trial Register databases with regard to interference screw fixation (aperture fixation) versus noninterference screw fixation (fixation away from the joint line). A meta-analysis was performed of those studies reporting on surgical failures and postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee score. Eight studies met our inclusion criteria of Level I or II evidence.

Results

Use of interference screws for femoral fixation resulted in a trend toward decreased risk of surgical failure (relative risk = 0.57; confidence interval, 0.1678–1.0918). When only Level I trials were evaluated, the same trend was noted toward a decreased risk of surgical failures using femoral interference screws (relative risk = 0.52; confidence interval, 0.1794–1.3122). There was no difference in postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee score with Level I and II studies (relative risk = 0.9940; confidence interval, 0.6230–1.5860) or only Level I studies (relative risk = 1.0380; confidence interval, 0.6381–1.6886).

Conclusions

The literature suggests a trend toward decreased surgical failures with femoral fixation at the joint line with an interference screw. However, there is no difference when postoperative functional outcomes are compared. Future studies are needed with standardized fixation methods and outcomes assessment to determine the importance of femoral fixation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ahmad CS, Gardner TR, Groh M, Arnouk J, Levine WN. Mechanical properties of soft tissue femoral fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:635–640.PubMedCrossRef Ahmad CS, Gardner TR, Groh M, Arnouk J, Levine WN. Mechanical properties of soft tissue femoral fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:635–640.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Alentorn-Geli E, Lajara F, Samitier G, Cugat R. The transtibial versus the anteromedial portal technique in the arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:1013–1037.PubMedCrossRef Alentorn-Geli E, Lajara F, Samitier G, Cugat R. The transtibial versus the anteromedial portal technique in the arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:1013–1037.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Fleming BC, Kannus P, Kaplan M, Samani J, Renstrom P. Anterior cruciate ligament replacement: comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts with two-strand hamstring grafts: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1503–1513.PubMed Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Fleming BC, Kannus P, Kaplan M, Samani J, Renstrom P. Anterior cruciate ligament replacement: comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts with two-strand hamstring grafts: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1503–1513.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Brand J, Weiler A, Caborn DN, Brown CH Jr, Johnson DL. Graft fixation in cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:761–774.PubMed Brand J, Weiler A, Caborn DN, Brown CH Jr, Johnson DL. Graft fixation in cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:761–774.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Buelow JU, Siebold R, Ellermann A. A prospective evaluation of tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings: extracortical versus anatomical fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2002;10:80–85.PubMedCrossRef Buelow JU, Siebold R, Ellermann A. A prospective evaluation of tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings: extracortical versus anatomical fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2002;10:80–85.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Capuano L, Hardy P, Longo UG, Denaro V, Maffulli N. No difference in clinical results between femoral transfixation and bio-interference screw fixation in hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction: a preliminary study. Knee. 2008;15:174–179.PubMedCrossRef Capuano L, Hardy P, Longo UG, Denaro V, Maffulli N. No difference in clinical results between femoral transfixation and bio-interference screw fixation in hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction: a preliminary study. Knee. 2008;15:174–179.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Chhabra A, Kline AJ, Nilles KM, Harner CD. Tunnel expansion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous hamstrings: a comparison of the medial portal and transtibial techniques. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:1107–1112.PubMedCrossRef Chhabra A, Kline AJ, Nilles KM, Harner CD. Tunnel expansion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous hamstrings: a comparison of the medial portal and transtibial techniques. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:1107–1112.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Clark R, Olsen RE, Larson BJ, Goble EM, Farrer RP. Cross-pin femoral fixation: a new technique for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee. Arthroscopy. 1998;14:258–267.PubMedCrossRef Clark R, Olsen RE, Larson BJ, Goble EM, Farrer RP. Cross-pin femoral fixation: a new technique for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee. Arthroscopy. 1998;14:258–267.PubMedCrossRef
9.
10.
go back to reference Ekdahl M, Wang JH, Ronga M, Fu FH. Graft healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:935–947.PubMedCrossRef Ekdahl M, Wang JH, Ronga M, Fu FH. Graft healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:935–947.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fauno P, Kaalund S. Tunnel widening after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is influenced by the type of graft fixation used: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:1337–1341.PubMedCrossRef Fauno P, Kaalund S. Tunnel widening after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is influenced by the type of graft fixation used: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:1337–1341.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fu FH, Bennett CH, Lattermann C, Ma CB. Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part I: biology and biomechanics of reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27:821–830.PubMed Fu FH, Bennett CH, Lattermann C, Ma CB. Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part I: biology and biomechanics of reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27:821–830.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Fu FH, Bennett CH, Ma CB, Menetrey J, Lattermann C. Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part II: operative procedures and clinical correlations. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:124–130.PubMed Fu FH, Bennett CH, Ma CB, Menetrey J, Lattermann C. Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part II: operative procedures and clinical correlations. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:124–130.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Harilainen A, Sandelin J. A prospective comparison of 3 hamstring ACL fixation devices—Rigidfix, BioScrew, and Intrafix—randomized into 4 groups with 2 years of follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:699–706.PubMedCrossRef Harilainen A, Sandelin J. A prospective comparison of 3 hamstring ACL fixation devices—Rigidfix, BioScrew, and Intrafix—randomized into 4 groups with 2 years of follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:699–706.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Harilainen A, Sandelin J, Jansson KA. Cross-pin femoral fixation versus metal interference screw fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons: results of a controlled prospective randomized study with 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:25–33.PubMedCrossRef Harilainen A, Sandelin J, Jansson KA. Cross-pin femoral fixation versus metal interference screw fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons: results of a controlled prospective randomized study with 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:25–33.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hoher J, Livesay GA, Ma CB, Withrow JD, Fu FH, Woo SL. Hamstring graft motion in the femoral bone tunnel when using titanium button/polyester tape fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999;7:215–219.PubMedCrossRef Hoher J, Livesay GA, Ma CB, Withrow JD, Fu FH, Woo SL. Hamstring graft motion in the femoral bone tunnel when using titanium button/polyester tape fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999;7:215–219.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kamath GV, Redfern JC, Greis PE, Burks RT. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2010 August 13 [Epub ahead of print]. Kamath GV, Redfern JC, Greis PE, Burks RT. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2010 August 13 [Epub ahead of print].
19.
go back to reference Kousa P, Jarvinen TL, Vihavainen M, Kannus P, Jarvinen M. The fixation strength of six hamstring tendon graft fixation devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:174–181.PubMed Kousa P, Jarvinen TL, Vihavainen M, Kannus P, Jarvinen M. The fixation strength of six hamstring tendon graft fixation devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:174–181.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Kowalchuk DA, Harner CD, Fu FH, Irrgang JJ. Prediction of patient-reported outcome after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:457–463.PubMedCrossRef Kowalchuk DA, Harner CD, Fu FH, Irrgang JJ. Prediction of patient-reported outcome after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:457–463.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference L’Insalata JC, Klatt B, Fu FH, Harner CD. Tunnel expansion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1997;5:234–238.PubMedCrossRef L’Insalata JC, Klatt B, Fu FH, Harner CD. Tunnel expansion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1997;5:234–238.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ma CB, Francis K, Towers J, Irrgang J, Fu FH, Harner CH. Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of bioabsorbable interference screw and endobutton-post fixation. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:122–128.PubMedCrossRef Ma CB, Francis K, Towers J, Irrgang J, Fu FH, Harner CH. Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of bioabsorbable interference screw and endobutton-post fixation. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:122–128.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Maletis GB, Cameron SL, Tengan JJ, Burchette RJ. A prospective randomized study of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of patellar tendon and quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis tendons fixed with bioabsorbable interference screws. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:384–394.PubMedCrossRef Maletis GB, Cameron SL, Tengan JJ, Burchette RJ. A prospective randomized study of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of patellar tendon and quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis tendons fixed with bioabsorbable interference screws. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:384–394.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference McGuire DA, Barber FA, Elrod BF, Paulos LE. Bioabsorbable interference screws for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1999;15:463–473.PubMedCrossRef McGuire DA, Barber FA, Elrod BF, Paulos LE. Bioabsorbable interference screws for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1999;15:463–473.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Micucci CJ, Frank DA, Kompel J, Muffly M, DeMeo PJ, Altman GT. The effect of interference screw diameter on fixation of soft-tissue grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:1105–1110.PubMedCrossRef Micucci CJ, Frank DA, Kompel J, Muffly M, DeMeo PJ, Altman GT. The effect of interference screw diameter on fixation of soft-tissue grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:1105–1110.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Milano G, Mulas PD, Ziranu F, Piras S, Manunta A, Fabbriciani C. Comparison between different femoral fixation devices for ACL reconstruction with doubled hamstring tendon graft: a biomechanical analysis. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:660–668.PubMedCrossRef Milano G, Mulas PD, Ziranu F, Piras S, Manunta A, Fabbriciani C. Comparison between different femoral fixation devices for ACL reconstruction with doubled hamstring tendon graft: a biomechanical analysis. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:660–668.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Monaco E, Labianca L, Speranza A, Agro AM, Camillieri G, D’Arrigo C, Ferretti A. Biomechanical evaluation of difference anterior cruciate ligament fixation techniques for hamstring graft. J Orthop Sci. 2010;15:125–131.PubMedCrossRef Monaco E, Labianca L, Speranza A, Agro AM, Camillieri G, D’Arrigo C, Ferretti A. Biomechanical evaluation of difference anterior cruciate ligament fixation techniques for hamstring graft. J Orthop Sci. 2010;15:125–131.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Rodeo SA, Kawamura S, Kim HJ, Dynybil C, Ying L. Tendon healing in a bone tunnel differs at the tunnel entrance versus the tunnel exit. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1790–1800.PubMedCrossRef Rodeo SA, Kawamura S, Kim HJ, Dynybil C, Ying L. Tendon healing in a bone tunnel differs at the tunnel entrance versus the tunnel exit. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1790–1800.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Rose T, Hepp P, Venus J, Stockmar C, Josten C, Lill H. Prospective randomized clinical comparison of femoral transfixation versus bioscrew fixation in hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction—a preliminary report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:730–738.PubMedCrossRef Rose T, Hepp P, Venus J, Stockmar C, Josten C, Lill H. Prospective randomized clinical comparison of femoral transfixation versus bioscrew fixation in hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction—a preliminary report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:730–738.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Scheffler SU, Sudkamp NP, Gockenjan A, Hoffman RF, Weiler A. Biomechanical comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: the impact of fixation level and fixation method under cyclic loading. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:304–315.PubMedCrossRef Scheffler SU, Sudkamp NP, Gockenjan A, Hoffman RF, Weiler A. Biomechanical comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: the impact of fixation level and fixation method under cyclic loading. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:304–315.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Siebold R, Dehler C, Ellert T. Prospective randomized comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:137–145.PubMedCrossRef Siebold R, Dehler C, Ellert T. Prospective randomized comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:137–145.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Stengel D, Matthes G, Seifert J, Tober V, Mutze S, Rademacher G, Ekkernkamp A, Bauwens K, Wich M, Casper D; SPOT Group. Resorbable screws versus pins for optimal transplant fixation (SPOT) in anterior cruciate ligament replacement with autologous hamstring grafts: rationale and design of a randomized, controlled, patient and investigator blinded trial [ISRCTN17384369]. BMC Surg. 2005;21:1. Stengel D, Matthes G, Seifert J, Tober V, Mutze S, Rademacher G, Ekkernkamp A, Bauwens K, Wich M, Casper D; SPOT Group. Resorbable screws versus pins for optimal transplant fixation (SPOT) in anterior cruciate ligament replacement with autologous hamstring grafts: rationale and design of a randomized, controlled, patient and investigator blinded trial [ISRCTN17384369]. BMC Surg. 2005;21:1.
Metadata
Title
What Is the Best Femoral Fixation of Hamstring Autografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?: A Meta-analysis
Authors
Alexis Colvin, MD
Charu Sharma, MD
Michael Parides, PhD
Jonathan Glashow, MD
Publication date
01-04-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1662-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 4/2011 Go to the issue

Symposium: Controversies in Orthopaedics

Controversies in Orthopaedics: Editorial Comment