Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 11/2013

01-11-2013 | Basic Research

What Is Normal Femoral Head/Neck Anatomy? An Analysis of Radial CT Reconstructions in Adolescents

Authors: Amir A. Jamali, MD, Walter Mak, MD, Ping Wang, BS, Lynn Tai, BS, John P. Meehan, MD, Ramit Lamba, MBBS, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 11/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cam morphology in femoroacetabular impingement has been implicated in the development of osteoarthritis. The alpha angle and femoral head/neck offset are widely used to determine femoral head asphericity. To our knowledge, no study has evaluated the alpha angle circumferentially using three-dimensional imaging in a population of healthy individuals of adolescent age.

Questions/purposes

We sought to (1) determine normal values for the alpha angle in adolescents, (2) define the location along the neck with the highest alpha angle, and (3) determine normal femoral head and neck radii and femoral head/neck offset.

Methods

Fifty CT scans from a database of scans obtained for reasons not related to hip pain were studied. The average age of the subjects was 15 years (range, 14–16 years). Alpha angle and femoral head/neck offset were measured circumferentially.

Results

The alpha angle averaged 40.66 ± 4.46 mm for males and 37.77 ± 5.65 mm for females. The alpha angle generally was highest between the 11:40 and 12:40 o’clock and between the 6:00 and 7:40 o’clock positions. The femoral head radius was 24.53 ± 1.74 mm for males and 21.94 ± 1.13 mm for females, and the femoral neck radius was 16.14 ± 2.32 mm for males and 13.82 ± 2.38 mm for females. The mean femoral head/neck offset was 8.39 ± 1.97 mm for males and 8.13 ± 2.27 mm for females.

Conclusions

In this healthy population of 14- to 16-year-old subjects, the highest alpha angle was at the superior and inferior aspects of the heads rather than at the anterosuperior aspect. This information will provide benchmark values for distinction between normal and abnormal morphologic features of the femoral head.

Level of Evidence

Level III, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Beaule PE, Zaragoza E, Motamedi K, Copelan N, Dorey FJ. Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:1286–1292.PubMed Beaule PE, Zaragoza E, Motamedi K, Copelan N, Dorey FJ. Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:1286–1292.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, Harris WH. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:264–272.PubMedCrossRef Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, Harris WH. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:264–272.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Notzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:112–120.PubMed Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Notzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:112–120.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Gosvig KK, Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Gebuhr P. The prevalence of cam-type deformity of the hip joint: a survey of 4151 subjects of the Copenhagen Osteoarthritis Study. Acta Radiol. 2008;49:436–441.PubMedCrossRef Gosvig KK, Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Gebuhr P. The prevalence of cam-type deformity of the hip joint: a survey of 4151 subjects of the Copenhagen Osteoarthritis Study. Acta Radiol. 2008;49:436–441.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hack K, Di Primio G, Rakhra K, Beaule PE. Prevalence of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement morphology in asymptomatic volunteers. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2436–2444.PubMedCrossRef Hack K, Di Primio G, Rakhra K, Beaule PE. Prevalence of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement morphology in asymptomatic volunteers. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2436–2444.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ito K, Minka MA 2nd, Leunig M, Werlen S, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect: a MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:171–176.PubMedCrossRef Ito K, Minka MA 2nd, Leunig M, Werlen S, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect: a MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:171–176.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jamali AA. Digital templating and preoperative deformity analysis with standard imaging software. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2695–2704.PubMedCrossRef Jamali AA. Digital templating and preoperative deformity analysis with standard imaging software. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2695–2704.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Leunig M, Podeszwa D, Beck M, Werlen S, Ganz R. Magnetic resonance arthrography of labral disorders in hips with dysplasia and impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:74–80.PubMedCrossRef Leunig M, Podeszwa D, Beck M, Werlen S, Ganz R. Magnetic resonance arthrography of labral disorders in hips with dysplasia and impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:74–80.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Meyer DC, Beck M, Ellis T, Ganz R, Leunig M. Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;445:181–185.PubMed Meyer DC, Beck M, Ellis T, Ganz R, Leunig M. Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;445:181–185.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Notzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:556–560.PubMedCrossRef Notzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:556–560.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rakhra KS, Sheikh AM, Allen D, Beaule PE. Comparison of MRI alpha angle measurement planes in femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:660–665.PubMedCrossRef Rakhra KS, Sheikh AM, Allen D, Beaule PE. Comparison of MRI alpha angle measurement planes in femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:660–665.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ranawat AS, Schulz B, Baumbach SF, Meftah M, Ganz R, Leunig M. Radiographic predictors of hip pain in femoroacetabular impingement. HSS J. 2011;7:115–119.PubMedCrossRef Ranawat AS, Schulz B, Baumbach SF, Meftah M, Ganz R, Leunig M. Radiographic predictors of hip pain in femoroacetabular impingement. HSS J. 2011;7:115–119.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Steppacher SD, Tannast M, Werlen S, Siebenrock KA. Femoral morphology differs between deficient and excessive acetabular coverage. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:782–790.PubMedCrossRef Steppacher SD, Tannast M, Werlen S, Siebenrock KA. Femoral morphology differs between deficient and excessive acetabular coverage. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:782–790.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Young EY, Gebhart J, Cooperman D, Ahn NU. Are the left and right proximal femurs symmetric? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:1593–1601.PubMedCrossRef Young EY, Gebhart J, Cooperman D, Ahn NU. Are the left and right proximal femurs symmetric? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:1593–1601.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
What Is Normal Femoral Head/Neck Anatomy? An Analysis of Radial CT Reconstructions in Adolescents
Authors
Amir A. Jamali, MD
Walter Mak, MD
Ping Wang, BS
Lynn Tai, BS
John P. Meehan, MD
Ramit Lamba, MBBS, MD
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 11/2013
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3166-5

Other articles of this Issue 11/2013

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 11/2013 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the Editor

Symposium: ABJS Carl T. Brighton Workshop on Outcome Measures

Statistical Considerations in the Psychometric Validation of Outcome Measures