Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Research

What do adults want in parks? A qualitative study using walk-along interviews

Authors: Jenny Veitch, Nicole Biggs, Benedicte Deforche, Anna Timperio

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Parks provide opportunities for physical activity and social interaction and are critical for enhancing public health. It is therefore important to better understand the needs and preferences of park features among adults to help park designers to create parks that optimise use. This qualitative study provided an in-depth examination of factors and characteristics that influence visitation, park-based physical activity, and social interaction among adults (19–64 years). We also explored perceptions of parks and park use and impacts of COVID on park usage and needs.

Methods

Participants (n = 27, 40.4 years [+ 11.9], 70% female) were interviewed from 2017 to 2020 while walking through one of eight diverse parks located in varying socioeconomic areas of metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Participants were prompted to discuss their experiences, opinions and preferences regarding park features. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using NVivo 12 software.

Results

Park features and characteristics highly valued for visitation related to aesthetics and atmosphere, including trees, gardens, spaciousness, and water features. Features most valued for physical activity included walking and bike tracks, basketball rings, nice aesthetics, and sports walls. Features most valued for social interaction included seating and tables, and picnic/barbecue areas.

Conclusions

This study highlights features and characteristics that may be important to prioritise, to encourage active and social park visits among adults. This evidence will help policy and decision makers, urban planners, landscape architects, and local, state, and national government organisations to create parks that support adults to lead healthy and active lives. Future research should examine the relative importance of the features identified in this study to inform future park design/redesign.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
3.
Sugiyama T, Carver A, Koohsari MJ, Veitch J. Advantages of public green spaces in enhancing population health. Landscape Urban Plann. 2018;178:12–7.CrossRef
4.
Lachowycz K, Jones A. Towards a better understanding of the relationship between greenspace and health: Development of a theoretical framework. Landscape Urban Plann. 2013;118:62–9.CrossRef
5.
6.
7.
van den Berg M, Wendel-Vos W, van Poppel M, Kemper HC, Van Mechelen W, Maas J. Health benefits of green spaces in the living environment: A systematic review of epidemiological studies. Urban Forest Urban Green. 2015;14:806–16.CrossRef
8.
Gladwell VF, Brown DK, Wood C, Sandercock GR, Barton JL. The great outdoors: how a green exercise environment can benefit all. Extrem Physiol Med. 2013;2(1):3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Hazer M, Formica MK, Dieterlen S, Morley CP. The relationship between self-reported exposure to greenspace and human stress in Baltimore, MD. Landscape Urban Plann. 2018;169:47–56.CrossRef
10.
Ayala-Azcarraga C, Diaz D, Zambrano L. Characteristics of urban parks and their relation to user well-being. Landscape Urban Plann. 2019;189:27–35.CrossRef
11.
Veitch J, Carver A, Abbott G, Giles-Corti B, Timperio A, Salmon J. How active are people in metropolitan parks? An observational study of park visitation in Australia. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:610.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
13.
Evenson KR, Jones SA, Holliday KM, Cohen DA, McKenzie TL. Park characteristics, use, and physical activity: A review of studies using SOPARC (System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities). Prev Med. 2016;86:153–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Wang X, Wu C. An Observational Study of Park Attributes and Physical Activity in Neighborhood Parks of Shanghai, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(6):2080.
15.
Hamilton K, Kaczynski AT, Fair ML, Levesque L. Examining the relationship between park neighborhoods, features, cleanliness, and condition with observed weekday park usage and physical activity: a case study. J Environ Public Health. 2017;2017:7582402.
16.
Evenson KR, Williamson S, Han B, McKenzie TL, Cohen DA. United States' neighborhood park use and physical activity over two years: The National Study of Neighborhood Parks. Prev Med. 2019;123:117–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Bai H, Wilhelm Stanis SA, Kaczynski AT, Besenyi GM. Perceptions of neighborhood park quality: associations with physical activity and body mass index. Ann Behav Med. 2013;45(Suppl 1):S39–48.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Kaczynski AT, Besenyi GM, Wilhelm Stanis SA, Koohsari MJ, Oestman KB, Bergstrom R, et al. Are park proximity and park features related to park use and park-based physical activity among adults? Variations by multiple socio-demographic characteristics. Int J Behav Nutr Phy. 2014;11:146.CrossRef
19.
Schipperijn J, Bentsen P, Troelsen J, Toftager M, Stigsdotter UK. Associations between physical activity and characteristics of urban green space. Urban Forest Urban Green. 2013;12(1):109–16.CrossRef
20.
Veitch J, Ball K, Crawford D, Abbott GR, Salmon J. Park improvements and park activity: a natural experiment. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(6):616–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Cohen DA, Han B, Isacoff J, Shulaker B, Williamson S. Renovations of neighbourhood parks: long-term outcomes on physical activity. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019;73(3):214–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Veitch J, Salmon J, Crawford D, Abbott G, Giles-Corti B, Carver A, et al. The REVAMP natural experiment study: the impact of a play-scape installation on park visitation and park-based physical activity. Int J Behav Nutr Phy. 2018;15(1):10.CrossRef
23.
Lal A, Moodie M, Abbott G, Carver A, Salmon J, Giles-Corti B, et al. The impact of a park refurbishment in a low socioeconomic area on physical activity: a cost-effectiveness study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Veitch J, Rodwell L, Abbott G, Carver A, Flowers E, Crawford D. Are park availability and satisfaction with neighbourhood parks associated with physical activity and time spent outdoors? BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):306.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Peschardt KK, Stigsdotter UK, Schipperijn J. Identifying features of pocket parks that may be related to health promoting use. Landsc Res. 2016;41(1):79–94.CrossRef
26.
Veitch J, Flowers E, Ball K, Deforche B, Timperio A. Exploring children’s views on important park features: a qualitative study using walk-along interviews. Int J Env Res Public Health. 2020;7:4625.CrossRef
27.
Veitch J, Flowers E, Ball K, Deforche B, Timperio A. Designing parks for older adults: A qualitative study using walk-along interviews. Urban Forest Urban Green. 2020;54:126768.CrossRef
28.
Rivera E, Timperio A, Venurs L, Deforche B, Veitch J. Critical factors influencing adolescents’ active and social park use: A qualitative study using walk-along interviews. Urban Forest Urban Green. 2021;58:26948.
29.
Van Hecke L, Deforche B, Van Dyck D, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Veitch J, Van Cauwenberg J. Social and Physical Environmental Factors Influencing Adolescents' Physical Activity in Urban Public Open Spaces: A Qualitative Study Using Walk-Along Interviews. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0155686.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Costigan SA, Veitch J, Crawford D, Carver A, Timperio A. A Cross-Sectional Investigation of the Importance of Park Features for Promoting Regular Physical Activity in Parks. Int J Env Res. Public Health. 2017;14(11):1335.
31.
Levy-Storms L, Chen L, Loukaitou-Sideris A. Older adults’ needs and preferences for open space and physical activity in and near parks: a systematic review. J Aging Phys Act. 2018;26(4):682–96.CrossRefPubMed
32.
33.
Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Veitch J, Ball K, Rivera E, Loh V, Deforche B, Best K, et al. What entices older adults to parks? Identification of park features that encourage park visitation, physical activity, and social interaction. Landscape Urban Plann. 2022;217:104254.
35.
Rivera E, Timperio A, Loh VH, Deforche B, Veitch J. Important park features for encouraging park visitation, physical activity and social interaction among adolescents: A conjoint analysis. Health Place. 2021;70:102617.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Cohen D, Marsh T, Williamson S, Derose KP, Martinez H, Setodji C, et al. Parks and physical activity: Why are some parks used more than others? Prev Med. 2010;50(Suppl):S9–S12.CrossRefPubMed
37.
McCormack GR, Rock M, Toohey AM, Hignell D. Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: a review of qualitative research. Health Place. 2010;16(4):712–26.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zhai YJ, Baran PK. Urban park pathway design characteristics and senior walking behavior. Urban Forest Urban Green. 2017;21:60–73.CrossRef
39.
Cohen DA, Han B, Williamson S, Nagel C, McKenzie T, Evenson K, et al. Playground features and physical activity in U.S. neighborhood parks. Prev Med. 2020;131:105945.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Cohen DA, Marsh T, Williamson S, Golinelli D, McKenzie TL. Impact and cost-effectiveness of family Fitness Zones: a natural experiment in urban public parks. Health Place. 2012;18(1):39–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Cranney L, Phongsavan P, Kariuki M, Stride V, Scott A, Hua M, et al. Impact of an outdoor gym on park users’ physical activity: a natural experiment. Health Place. 2016;37:26–34.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Veitch J, Salmon J, Abbott G, Timperio A, Sahlqvist S. Understanding the impact of the installation of outdoor fitness equipment and a multi-sports court on park visitation and park-based physical activity: A natural experiment. Health Place. 2021;71:102662.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
What do adults want in parks? A qualitative study using walk-along interviews
Authors
Jenny Veitch
Nicole Biggs
Benedicte Deforche
Anna Timperio
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13064-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Public Health 1/2022 Go to the issue

Research

Sleep problems, sleep duration, and use of digital devices among primary school students in Japan

Research

Help seeking and mental health outcomes among South Asian young adult survivors of sexual violence in the New York State Region

Research

Psychometric properties of the Last-7-Day Sedentary Time Questionnaire (SIT-Q-7d): Testing the validity and reliability among general population

Research

Achieving proportional representation in a reproductive health survey through social media: process and recommendations

Research

Operational challenges that may affect implementation of evidence-based mobile market interventions

Research

The association between the presence of fast-food outlets and BMI: the role of neighbourhood socio-economic status, healthy food outlets, and dietary factors