Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 7/2017

Open Access 01-07-2017 | Original Article

Web-based information and support for patients with a newly diagnosed neuroendocrine tumor: a feasibility study

Authors: Grietje Bouma, Lotte D. de Hosson, Claudia E. van Woerkom, Hennie van Essen, Geertruida H. de Bock, Jolien M. Admiraal, Anna K. L. Reyners, Annemiek M. E. Walenkamp

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 7/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Patients with a neuroendocrine tumor (NET) frequently experience physical and psychosocial complaints. Novel strategies to provide information to optimize supportive care in these patients are of interest. The aim of this study was to examine whether the use of a web-based system consisting of self-screening of problems and care needs, patient education, and self-referral to professional health care is feasible in NET patients and to evaluate their opinion on this.

Methods

Newly diagnosed NET patients were randomized between standard care (n = 10) or intervention with additional access to the web-based system (n = 10) during 12 weeks. Patients completed questionnaires regarding received information, distress, quality of life (QoL), and empowerment. The intervention group completed a semi-structured interview to assess patients’ opinion on the web-based system.

Results

The participation rate was 77% (20/26 invited patients) with no dropouts. The use of the web-based system had a negative effect on patients’ perception and satisfaction of received information (range Cohen’s d −0.88 to 0.13). Positive effects were found for distress (Cohen’s d 0.75), global QoL (subscale European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, Cohen’s d 0.46), resolving problems with social functioning and finding information (subscales EORTC QLQ-GINET 21, Cohen’s d 0.69, respectively, 1.04), and feeling informed (subscale empowerment questionnaire, Cohen’s d 0.51). The interview indicated that the web-based system was of additional value to standard care.

Conclusions

Use of this web-based system is feasible. Contradictory effects on informing and supporting NET patients were found and should be subject of further research.

Trial registration

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Oberg KE (2012) The management of neuroendocrine tumours: current and future medical therapy options. Clin Oncol 24:282–293CrossRef Oberg KE (2012) The management of neuroendocrine tumours: current and future medical therapy options. Clin Oncol 24:282–293CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ramage JK, Ahmed A, Ardill J, Bax N, Breen DJ, Caplin ME et al (2012) Guidelines for the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine (including carcinoid) tumours (NETs). Gut 61:6–32CrossRefPubMed Ramage JK, Ahmed A, Ardill J, Bax N, Breen DJ, Caplin ME et al (2012) Guidelines for the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine (including carcinoid) tumours (NETs). Gut 61:6–32CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Tuinman MA, Gazendam-Donofrio SM, Hoekstra-Weebers JE (2008) Screening and referral for psychosocial distress in oncologic practice: use of the Distress Thermometer. Cancer 113:870–878CrossRefPubMed Tuinman MA, Gazendam-Donofrio SM, Hoekstra-Weebers JE (2008) Screening and referral for psychosocial distress in oncologic practice: use of the Distress Thermometer. Cancer 113:870–878CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Frojd C, Larsson G, Lampic C, von Essen L (2007) Health related quality of life and psychosocial function among patients with carcinoid tumours. a longitudinal, prospective, and comparative study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 5:18CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Frojd C, Larsson G, Lampic C, von Essen L (2007) Health related quality of life and psychosocial function among patients with carcinoid tumours. a longitudinal, prospective, and comparative study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 5:18CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Haugland T, Vatn MH, Veenstra M, Wahl AK, Natvig GK (2009) Health related quality of life in patients with neuroendocrine tumors compared with the general Norwegian population. Qual Life Res 18:719–726CrossRefPubMed Haugland T, Vatn MH, Veenstra M, Wahl AK, Natvig GK (2009) Health related quality of life in patients with neuroendocrine tumors compared with the general Norwegian population. Qual Life Res 18:719–726CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Husson O, Mols F, van de Poll-Franse LV (2011) The relation between information provision and health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression among cancer survivors: a systematic review. Ann Oncol 22:761–772CrossRefPubMed Husson O, Mols F, van de Poll-Franse LV (2011) The relation between information provision and health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression among cancer survivors: a systematic review. Ann Oncol 22:761–772CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Davies NJ, Kinman G, Thomas RJ, Bailey T (2008) Information satisfaction in breast and prostate cancer patients: implications for quality of life. Psychooncology 17:1048–1052CrossRefPubMed Davies NJ, Kinman G, Thomas RJ, Bailey T (2008) Information satisfaction in breast and prostate cancer patients: implications for quality of life. Psychooncology 17:1048–1052CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cox A, Jenkins V, Catt S, Langridge C, Fallowfield L (2006) Information needs and experiences: an audit of UK cancer patients. Eur J Oncol Nurs 10:263–272CrossRefPubMed Cox A, Jenkins V, Catt S, Langridge C, Fallowfield L (2006) Information needs and experiences: an audit of UK cancer patients. Eur J Oncol Nurs 10:263–272CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Mallinger JB, Griggs JJ, Shields CG (2005) Patient-centered care and breast cancer survivors' satisfaction with information. Patient Educ Couns 57:342–349CrossRefPubMed Mallinger JB, Griggs JJ, Shields CG (2005) Patient-centered care and breast cancer survivors' satisfaction with information. Patient Educ Couns 57:342–349CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Rehnberg G, Absetz P, Aro AR (2001) Women's satisfaction with information at breast biopsy in breast cancer screening. Patient Educ Couns 42:1–8CrossRefPubMed Rehnberg G, Absetz P, Aro AR (2001) Women's satisfaction with information at breast biopsy in breast cancer screening. Patient Educ Couns 42:1–8CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CH, Taal E, Shaw BR, Seydel ER, van de Laar MA (2008) Empowering processes and outcomes of participation in online support groups for patients with breast cancer, arthritis, or fibromyalgia. Qual Health Res 18:405–417CrossRefPubMed van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CH, Taal E, Shaw BR, Seydel ER, van de Laar MA (2008) Empowering processes and outcomes of participation in online support groups for patients with breast cancer, arthritis, or fibromyalgia. Qual Health Res 18:405–417CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Samoocha D, Bruinvels DJ, Elbers NA, Anema JR, van der Beek AJ (2010) Effectiveness of webbased interventions on patient empowerment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 12:e23CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Samoocha D, Bruinvels DJ, Elbers NA, Anema JR, van der Beek AJ (2010) Effectiveness of webbased interventions on patient empowerment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 12:e23CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Bouma G, Admiraal JM, de Vries EG, Schroder CP, Walenkamp AM, Reyners AK (2015) Internetbased support programs to alleviate psychosocial and physical symptoms in cancer patients: a literature analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 95:26–37CrossRefPubMed Bouma G, Admiraal JM, de Vries EG, Schroder CP, Walenkamp AM, Reyners AK (2015) Internetbased support programs to alleviate psychosocial and physical symptoms in cancer patients: a literature analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 95:26–37CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Arraras JI, Greimel E, Sezer O, Chie WC, Bergenmar M, Costantini A et al (2010) An international validation study of the EORTC QLQ-INFO25 questionnaire: an instrument to assess the information given to cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 46:2726–2738CrossRefPubMed Arraras JI, Greimel E, Sezer O, Chie WC, Bergenmar M, Costantini A et al (2010) An international validation study of the EORTC QLQ-INFO25 questionnaire: an instrument to assess the information given to cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 46:2726–2738CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376CrossRefPubMed Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Yadegarfar G, Friend L, Jones L, Plum LM, Ardill J, Taal B et al (2013) Validation of the EORTC QLQGINET21 questionnaire for assessing quality of life of patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours. Br J Cancer 108:301–310CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yadegarfar G, Friend L, Jones L, Plum LM, Ardill J, Taal B et al (2013) Validation of the EORTC QLQGINET21 questionnaire for assessing quality of life of patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours. Br J Cancer 108:301–310CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CH, Taal E, Seydel ER, van de Laar MA (2009) Participation in online patient support groups endorses patients' empowerment. Patient Educ Couns 74:61–69CrossRefPubMed van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CH, Taal E, Seydel ER, van de Laar MA (2009) Participation in online patient support groups endorses patients' empowerment. Patient Educ Couns 74:61–69CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lepore SJ, Buzaglo JS, Lieberman MA, Golant M, Greener JR, Davey A (2014) Comparing standard versus prosocial internet support groups for patients with breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial of the helper therapy principle. J Clin Oncol 32:4081–4086CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lepore SJ, Buzaglo JS, Lieberman MA, Golant M, Greener JR, Davey A (2014) Comparing standard versus prosocial internet support groups for patients with breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial of the helper therapy principle. J Clin Oncol 32:4081–4086CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference van de Poll-Franse LV, van Eenbergen MC (2008) Internet use by cancer survivors: current use and future wishes. Support Care Cancer 16:1189–1195CrossRefPubMed van de Poll-Franse LV, van Eenbergen MC (2008) Internet use by cancer survivors: current use and future wishes. Support Care Cancer 16:1189–1195CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Web-based information and support for patients with a newly diagnosed neuroendocrine tumor: a feasibility study
Authors
Grietje Bouma
Lotte D. de Hosson
Claudia E. van Woerkom
Hennie van Essen
Geertruida H. de Bock
Jolien M. Admiraal
Anna K. L. Reyners
Annemiek M. E. Walenkamp
Publication date
01-07-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3598-7

Other articles of this Issue 7/2017

Supportive Care in Cancer 7/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine