Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 2/2011

01-04-2011 | Original article

Wearing times of orthodontic devices as measured by the TheraMon® microsensor

Authors: Dr. T.C. Schott, G. Göz

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The objective measurement of wearing times, a task attempted for decades without success, is examined for the first time in a clinical study using the newly-developed TheraMon® system.

Materials and methods

A prototype of the new TheraMon® sensor was embedded in the acrylic of various removable orthodontic devices worn by a group of 20 patients and assessed over a 5-month treatment period.

Results

Daily wearing times (hours) were recorded every day throughout the treatment period by means of a wearing-time graph printed out from a computer by the TheraMon® system. In an additional analysis, the length of time the device was worn on each date, as well as any relevant temperature deviations, were also determined. Using a representative sample, we assessed the time during which a 10-year-old patient had worn his upper plate over a 5-month period in relation to treatment progression.

Conclusion

The objective measurement of wearing times, in the sense of a patient’s “electronic intensive care”, may lead to a paradigm shift in how wearing times are prescribed, thus contributing to better patient compliance.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bos A, Kleverlaan CJ, Hoogstraten J et al (2007) Comparing subjective and objective measures of headgear compliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132:801–805PubMedCrossRef Bos A, Kleverlaan CJ, Hoogstraten J et al (2007) Comparing subjective and objective measures of headgear compliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132:801–805PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bos A, Vosselman N, Hoogstraten J et al (2005) Patient compliance: a determinant of patient satisfaction? Angle Orthod 75:526–531PubMed Bos A, Vosselman N, Hoogstraten J et al (2005) Patient compliance: a determinant of patient satisfaction? Angle Orthod 75:526–531PubMed
3.
go back to reference Clemmer EJ, Hayes EW (1979) Patient cooperation in wearing orthodontic headgear. Am J Orthod 75:517–524PubMedCrossRef Clemmer EJ, Hayes EW (1979) Patient cooperation in wearing orthodontic headgear. Am J Orthod 75:517–524PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cole WA (2002) Accuracy of patient reporting as an indication of headgear compliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121:419–423PubMedCrossRef Cole WA (2002) Accuracy of patient reporting as an indication of headgear compliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121:419–423PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cureton SL, Regennitter FJ, Yancey JM (1993) The role of the headgear calendar in headgear compliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104:387–394PubMedCrossRef Cureton SL, Regennitter FJ, Yancey JM (1993) The role of the headgear calendar in headgear compliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104:387–394PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fraisse P (1985) Psychologie der Zeit. Reinhardt, München Fraisse P (1985) Psychologie der Zeit. Reinhardt, München
7.
go back to reference Guray E, Orhan M (1997) Selcuk type headgear-timer (STHT). Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 111:87–92PubMedCrossRef Guray E, Orhan M (1997) Selcuk type headgear-timer (STHT). Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 111:87–92PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kyriacou PA, Jones DP (1997) Compliance monitor for use with removable orthodontic headgear appliances. Med Biol Eng Comput 35:57–60PubMedCrossRef Kyriacou PA, Jones DP (1997) Compliance monitor for use with removable orthodontic headgear appliances. Med Biol Eng Comput 35:57–60PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lee SJ, Ahn SJ, Kim TW (2008) Patient compliance and locus of control in orthodontic treatment: a prospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133:354–358PubMedCrossRef Lee SJ, Ahn SJ, Kim TW (2008) Patient compliance and locus of control in orthodontic treatment: a prospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133:354–358PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mandall NA, Matthew S, Fox D et al (2008) Prediction of compliance and completion of orthodontic treatment: are quality of life measures important? Eur J Orthod 30:40–45PubMedCrossRef Mandall NA, Matthew S, Fox D et al (2008) Prediction of compliance and completion of orthodontic treatment: are quality of life measures important? Eur J Orthod 30:40–45PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mitchell JI (1976) It’s time for the timing headgear. J Clin Orthod 10:919–920 Mitchell JI (1976) It’s time for the timing headgear. J Clin Orthod 10:919–920
12.
13.
go back to reference Piaget J (1955) Die Bildung des Zeitbegriffs beim Kinde. Rascher, Zürich Piaget J (1955) Die Bildung des Zeitbegriffs beim Kinde. Rascher, Zürich
14.
go back to reference Sahm G (1990) Vorstellung eines Tragezeitmessers zur Abklärung wissenschaftlicher Fragestellungen in der Kieferorthopädie. Fortschr Kieferorthop 51:243–247PubMedCrossRef Sahm G (1990) Vorstellung eines Tragezeitmessers zur Abklärung wissenschaftlicher Fragestellungen in der Kieferorthopädie. Fortschr Kieferorthop 51:243–247PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sahm G, Bartsch A, Witt E (1990) Micro-electronic monitoring of functional appliance wear. Eur J Orthod 12:297–301PubMed Sahm G, Bartsch A, Witt E (1990) Micro-electronic monitoring of functional appliance wear. Eur J Orthod 12:297–301PubMed
16.
go back to reference Sander FG (1987) Können Tragezeitmesser die Patienten zur Mitarbeit motivieren? Fortschr Kieferorthop 48:363–370PubMedCrossRef Sander FG (1987) Können Tragezeitmesser die Patienten zur Mitarbeit motivieren? Fortschr Kieferorthop 48:363–370PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sander G, Schumacher HA (1976) Problematik der Anwendungszeitmessung kieferorthopädischer Apparate. Fortschr Kieferorthop 37:428–434CrossRef Sander G, Schumacher HA (1976) Problematik der Anwendungszeitmessung kieferorthopädischer Apparate. Fortschr Kieferorthop 37:428–434CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schott TC, Göz G (2010) Applicative characteristics of new microelectronic sensors Smart Retainer® and TheraMon® for measuring wear time. J Orofac Orthop 71:339–347PubMedCrossRef Schott TC, Göz G (2010) Applicative characteristics of new microelectronic sensors Smart Retainer® and TheraMon® for measuring wear time. J Orofac Orthop 71:339–347PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sergl HG, Klages U, Zentner A (2000) Functional and social discomfort during orthodontic treatment – effects on compliance and prediction of patients’ adaptation by personality variables. Eur J Orthod 22:307–315PubMedCrossRef Sergl HG, Klages U, Zentner A (2000) Functional and social discomfort during orthodontic treatment – effects on compliance and prediction of patients’ adaptation by personality variables. Eur J Orthod 22:307–315PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Witt E, Bartsch A, Sahm G (1992) Tragezeitverordnungen bei herausnehmbaren Geräten − Ergebnisse einer Umfrage. Fortschr Kieferorthop 53:124–130PubMedCrossRef Witt E, Bartsch A, Sahm G (1992) Tragezeitverordnungen bei herausnehmbaren Geräten − Ergebnisse einer Umfrage. Fortschr Kieferorthop 53:124–130PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Wearing times of orthodontic devices as measured by the TheraMon® microsensor
Authors
Dr. T.C. Schott
G. Göz
Publication date
01-04-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-011-0014-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 2/2011 Go to the issue