Top

BMC Public Health

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

‘We get to learn as we move’: effects and feasibility of lesson-integrated physical activity in a Swedish primary school

Authors: Robert Larsson, Eva Ljung, Sara Josefsson, Thomas Ljung

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2024

Abstract

Background

Physical activity (PA) promotes health in adults as well as children. At the same time, a large proportion of children do not meet the recommendations for PA, and more school-based efforts to increase PA are needed. This study investigates the effectiveness and feasibility of lesson-integrated PA in a Swedish primary school.

Methods

We evaluate a new method called ‘Physical Activity and Lesson in Combination’ (abbreviated FALK in Swedish) using a mixed methods approach; a quasi-experimental study followed by qualitative interviews. Two schools participated in the study, one constituting the intervention group (I-school, n = 83) and the other the control group (C-school, n = 81). In addition to regular physical education, the I-school had three 30-minute FALK lessons each week. A total of 164 students aged 7–9 years wore pedometers for a whole week, four times over two semesters, and the number of steps per day (SPD) and the proportion of students with < 10,000 SPD were compared. Statistical differences between the schools were tested with ANOVA, Chi2, t-tests, and ANCOVA. Interviews with students (n = 17), parents (n = 9) and teachers (n = 9) were conducted and analysed using qualitative content analysis.

Results

The results show that FALK led to the I-school getting more SPD and fewer students with < 10,000 SPD. Also, FALK was experienced as a positive, clear, and flexible method, simultaneously encouraging PA and learning. Challenges experienced concerned the teachers’ work situation, time, finding suitable learning activities, outdoor school environment changes, and extreme weather conditions.

Conclusions

This study indicates that FALK has the desired effects on PA and is a feasible method of integrating PA into theoretical teaching. We conclude that FALK is worth testing at more schools, given that implementation and sustainment of FALK considers both general enablers and barriers, as well as context-specific factors at the individual school.

Available only for authorised users

Nyberg G. It is time to get a move on and tackle worrying health behaviour patterns in children and adolescents. Acta Paediatr. 2021;110(9):2499–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.15891.CrossRefPubMed

Annwall E, J-son Höök M. Pep-rapporten 2022: Rörelse viktigt för barns fysiska och psykiska hälsa. Stockholm: Generation Pep; 2022.

Nyberg G, Kjellenberg K, Fröberg A, Lindroos AK. A national survey showed low levels of physical activity in a representative sample of Swedish adolescents. Acta Paediatr. 2020;109(11):2342–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.15251.CrossRefPubMed

Chaput J-P, Willumsen J, Bull F, Chou R, Ekelund U, Firth J, et al. 2020 WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour for children and adolescents aged 5–17 years: summary of the evidence. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-01037-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Janssen I, Leblanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-7-40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Donnely JE, Hillman CH, Castelli D, Etnier JL, Lee S, Tomporowski P, et al. Physical activity, fitness, cognitive function, and academic achievement in children: a systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(6):1197–222. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000901.CrossRef

Käll LB, Nilsson M, Linden T. The impact of a physical activity intervention program on academic achievement in a Swedish primary school setting. J Sch Health. 2014;84(8):473–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12179.CrossRefPubMed

Watson A, Timperio A, Brown H, Best K, Hesketh KD. Effect of classroom-based physical activity interventions on academic and physical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):114. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0569-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Langford R, Bonell CP, Jones HE, Pouliou T, Murphy SM, Waters E, et al. The WHO Health Promoting School framework for improving the health and well-being of students and their academic achievement. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;4CD008958. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008958.pub2.

10.

Rosell M, Carlander A, Cassel S, Henriksson P, J-son Höök M, Löf M. Generation pep study: a population-based survey on diet and physical activity in 12,000 Swedish children and adolescents. Acta Paediatr. 2021;110(9):2597–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.15850.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Andermo S, Hallgren M, Nguyen T, Jonsson S, Petersen S, Friberg M, et al. School-related physical activity interventions and mental health among children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med Open. 2020;6(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-020-00254-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Errisuriz VL, Golaszewski NM, Born K, Bartholomew JB. Systematic review of physical education-based physical activity interventions among primary school children. J Prim Prev. 2018;39(3):303–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-018-0507-x.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Karlsson M, Lahti A, Cronholm F, Fritz J, Cöster M, Dencker M, et al. [Daily school physical activity increases bone mass and gradually reduce the fracture risk]. Lakartidningen. 2019;116:FHP7.PubMed

14.

Webster CA, Russ L, Vazou S, Goh TL, Erwin H. Integrating movement in academic classrooms: understanding, applying and advancing the knowledge base. Obes Rev. 2015;16(8):691–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12285.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Vazou S, Webster CA, Stewart G, Candal P, Egan CA, Pennell A, et al. A systematic review and qualitative synthesis resulting in a typology of elementary classroom movement integration interventions. Sports Med Open. 2020;6(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-019-0218-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Norris E, van Steen T, Direito A, Stamatakis E. Physically active lessons in schools and their impact on physical activity, educational, health and cognition outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(14):826–38. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-100502.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Michael RD, Webster CA, Egan CA, Nilges L, Brian A, Johnson R, et al. Facilitators and barriers to movement integration in primary classrooms: a systematic review. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2019;90(2):151–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2019.1571675.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Lee RM, Gortmaker SL. Health dissemination and implementation within schools. In: Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, editors. Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2017. pp. 401–16.

19.

Ljung T, Ljung E, Josefsson S. Fysisk Aktivitet och Lektion i Kombination (FALK). Ett arbetssätt för mera fysisk aktivitet i skolan. Soc Med Tidskr. 2022;99(2):252–65. https://socialmedicinsktidskrift.se/index.php/smt/article/view/2587

20.

Larsson R, Ljung E, Josefsson S, Ljung T. Ämnesintegrerad fysisk aktivitet i skolan:en intervjustudie om upplevda möjligheter, hinder och förbättringsförslag. Soc Med Tidskr. 2022;99(2):266–79. https://socialmedicinsktidskrift.se/index.php/smt/article/view/2643

21.

Glasgow RE. What does it mean to be pragmatic? Pragmatic methods, measures, and models to facilitate research translation. Health Educ Behav. 2013;40(3):257–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198113486805.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2014.

23.

Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2002.

24.

Kvale S, Brinkmann S, Interviews:Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2009.

25.

Elo S, Kyngäs B. (2008). The qualitative content analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.

26.

Tudor-Locke C, Craig CL, Beets MW, Belton S, Cardon GM, Duncan S, et al. How many steps/day are enough? For children and adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:78. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Gomersall SR, Rowlands AV, English C, Maher C, Olds TS. The ActivityStat hypothesis: the concept, the evidence and the methodologies. Sports Med. 2013;43(2):135–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-012-0008-7.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Brusseau TA, Hodges Kulinna P, Tudor-Locke C, van der Mars H, Darst PW. Children’s step counts on Weekend, Physical Education, and Non-physical Education days. J Hum Kinetics. 2011;27:116–34. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10078-011-0010-4.CrossRef

29.

Bugge A, El-Naaman B, Dencker M, Froberg K, Holme IK, McMurray RG, et al. Effects of a three-year intervention: the Copenhagen School child intervention study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(7):1310–7. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31824bd579.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Magnusson KT, Sigurgeirsson I, Sveinsson T, Johannsson E. Assessment of a two-year school-based physical activity intervention among 7-9-year-old children. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:138. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-138.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Cothran DJ, Hodges Kulinna P, Garn AC. Classroom teachers and physical activity integration. Teach Teacher Educ. 2010;26(7):1381–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.04.003.CrossRef

32.

Goh TL, Hannon JC, Newton M, Webster C, Podlog L, Pillow W. I’ll squeeze it in: transforming preservice classroom teachers’ perceptions towards movement integration in schools. Action Teach Educ. 2013;35(4):286–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2013.827600.CrossRef

33.

von Thiele Schwarz U, Nielsen K, Edwards K, Hasson H, Ipsen C, Savage C, et al. How to design, implement and evaluate organizational interventions for maximum impact: the Sigtuna principles. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2021;30(3):415–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1803960.CrossRef

34.

Durlak JA, DuPre EP. Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41(3–4):327–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Herlitz L, MacIntyre H, Osborn T, Bonell C. The sustainability of public health interventions in schools: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2020;15(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0961-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Shoesmith A, Hall A, Wolfenden L, Shelton RC, Powell BJ, Brown H, et al. Barriers and facilitators influencing the sustainment of health behaviour interventions: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2021;16(1):62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01134-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Betschart S, Sandmeier A, Skedsmo G, Hascher T, Okan O, Dadaczynski K. The importance of school leaders’ attitudes and health literacy to the implementation of a health-promoting schools approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(22):14829. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214829CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Shelton RC, Chambers DA, Glasgow RE. An extension of RE-AIM to enhance sustainability: addressing dynamic context and promoting health equity over time. Front Public Health. 2020;8:134. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00134.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Berg U, Ekblom Ö, Onerup A. (2021). 1.7 Rekommendationer om fysisk aktivitet och stillasittande för barn och ungdomar. In FYSS 2021. https://www.fyss.se/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Rek-unga.pdf Accessed 3 April 2023.

40.

Hagströmer M, Wisén A, Hassmén P. (2021). 1.10 Bedöma och utvärdera fysisk aktivitet. In FYSS 2021. https://www.fyss.se/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Kap1.10.Bedöma-o-utvärde-FA.pdf Accessed 3 April 2023.

41.

Vindrola-Padros C, Johnson GA. Rapid techniques in qualitative research: a critical review of the literature. Qual Health Res. 2020;30(10):1596–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320921835.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Bartelink NHM, van Assema P, Jansen MWJ, Savelberg HHCM, Moore GF, Hawkings J, et al. Process evaluation of the healthy primary school of the future: the key learning points. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):698. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6947-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Title: ‘We get to learn as we move’: effects and feasibility of lesson-integrated physical activity in a Swedish primary school
Authors: Robert Larsson
Eva Ljung
Sara Josefsson
Thomas Ljung
Publication date: 01-12-2024
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18509-7

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

‘We get to learn as we move’: effects and feasibility of lesson-integrated physical activity in a Swedish primary school

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Determinants of health poverty vulnerability in rural areas of Western China in the post-poverty relief era: an analysis based on the Anderson behavioral model

Equity in vaccine coverage in Uganda from 2000 to 2016: revealing the multifaceted nature of inequity

Feasibility and acceptability of a cohort study baseline data collection of device-measured physical behaviors and cardiometabolic health in Saudi Arabia: expanding the Prospective Physical Activity, Sitting and Sleep consortium (ProPASS) in the Middle East

Cigarette smoking and cardiovascular disease incidence and all-cause mortality: the modifying role of diet quality

Living in urban or rural environments affect the sleep quality of the elderly in Bushehr (Southern Iran): emphasizing the active and inactive of the elderly

Enhancing indicator condition–guided HIV testing in Taiwan: a nationwide case–control study from 2009 to 2015