Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 8/2016

01-08-2016 | Original Article

Vulnerable characteristics and interest in wellness programs among head and neck cancer caregivers

Authors: Chandylen L. Nightingale, Katherine R. Sterba, Janet A. Tooze, Brandy-Joe Milliron, Lee Anne Tetrick, Min-So Paek, Kathryn E. Weaver

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 8/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Head and neck cancer (HNC) caregivers have poorer psychological health compared to patients and the general population but have not yet been targeted for wellness programs to reduce adverse psychosocial or physical health outcomes. To inform development of such programs, we identified potential vulnerabilities to poor outcomes and examined wellness program preferences among HNC caregivers. We also examined whether interest in wellness programs varied by potential vulnerabilities among HNC caregivers.

Methods

Surveys were administered to caregivers (n = 33) of HNC patients undergoing major surgery. Sociodemographic factors, caregiving characteristics, psychosocial functioning, and health behavior data were collected. Fisher’s exact tests and t tests were used to examine characteristics associated with interest in the different types of wellness programs.

Results

Many caregivers reported a heavy caregiving load (88 % live with patient and 73 % provide daily care), a smoking history (42 %), and compromised psychosocial functioning (45 % with depressive symptoms and 33 % with anxiety above population norms). Most caregivers were interested in wellness programs focused on diet/exercise (71.9 %); cancer education (66.7 %); stress reduction (63.6 %); and finances, caregiving, and well-being (57.6 %). Caregivers endorsed highest interest in programs offered during the patient’s medical treatment (63.6 %), and mail was the preferred program format (50.0 %). Those with more depressive symptoms reported more interest in programs focused on cancer education (p = 0.03); stress reduction (p = 0.05); and educational classes on finances, caregiving, and well-being (p = 0.01).

Conclusions

Wellness programs offering a menu of options should be developed for HNC caregivers.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Cancer Society (2015) Cancer facts and figures. Retrieved September 15, 2015, from http://www.cancer.org/research/cancerfactsstatistics/cancerfactsfigures2015/ American Cancer Society (2015) Cancer facts and figures. Retrieved September 15, 2015, from http://​www.​cancer.​org/​research/​cancerfactsstati​stics/​cancerfactsfigur​es2015/​
3.
go back to reference Chen SC et al. (2009) Support needs of patients with oral cancer and burden to their family caregivers. Cancer Nurs 32(6):473–481CrossRefPubMed Chen SC et al. (2009) Support needs of patients with oral cancer and burden to their family caregivers. Cancer Nurs 32(6):473–481CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Li Q, Loke AY (2013) The positive aspects of caregiving for cancer patients: a critical review of the literature and directions for future research. Psychooncology 22(11):2399–2407. doi:10.1002/pon.3311 CrossRefPubMed Li Q, Loke AY (2013) The positive aspects of caregiving for cancer patients: a critical review of the literature and directions for future research. Psychooncology 22(11):2399–2407. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​3311 CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lee S et al. (2003) Caregiving and risk of coronary heart disease in U.S. women: a prospective study. Am J Prev Med 24(2):113–119CrossRefPubMed Lee S et al. (2003) Caregiving and risk of coronary heart disease in U.S. women: a prospective study. Am J Prev Med 24(2):113–119CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kiecolt-Glaser JK et al. (1991) Spousal caregivers of dementia victims: longitudinal changes in immunity and health. Psychosom Med 53(4):345–362CrossRefPubMed Kiecolt-Glaser JK et al. (1991) Spousal caregivers of dementia victims: longitudinal changes in immunity and health. Psychosom Med 53(4):345–362CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Schulz R, Beach SR (1999) Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study. JAMA 282(23):2215–2219CrossRefPubMed Schulz R, Beach SR (1999) Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study. JAMA 282(23):2215–2219CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Goldstein NE et al. (2004) Factors associated with caregiver burden among caregivers of terminally ill patients with cancer. J Palliat Care 20(1):38–43PubMed Goldstein NE et al. (2004) Factors associated with caregiver burden among caregivers of terminally ill patients with cancer. J Palliat Care 20(1):38–43PubMed
16.
18.
go back to reference Batty GD (2002) Physical activity and coronary heart disease in older adults. A systematic review of epidemiological studies. Eur J Pub Health 12(3):171–176CrossRef Batty GD (2002) Physical activity and coronary heart disease in older adults. A systematic review of epidemiological studies. Eur J Pub Health 12(3):171–176CrossRef
23.
26.
go back to reference Meyer A et al. (2015) Psychological distress and need for psycho-oncological support in spouses of total laryngectomised cancer patients—results for the first 3 years after surgery. Support Care Cancer 23(5):1331–1339. doi:10.1007/s00520-014-2485-8 CrossRefPubMed Meyer A et al. (2015) Psychological distress and need for psycho-oncological support in spouses of total laryngectomised cancer patients—results for the first 3 years after surgery. Support Care Cancer 23(5):1331–1339. doi:10.​1007/​s00520-014-2485-8 CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Ostroff J et al. (2004) Interest in and barriers to participation in multiple family groups among head and neck cancer survivors and their primary family caregivers. Fam Process 43(2):195–208CrossRefPubMed Ostroff J et al. (2004) Interest in and barriers to participation in multiple family groups among head and neck cancer survivors and their primary family caregivers. Fam Process 43(2):195–208CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Irwin M, Artin KH, Oxman MN (1999) Screening for depression in the older adult: criterion validity of the 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Arch Intern Med 159(15):1701–1704CrossRefPubMed Irwin M, Artin KH, Oxman MN (1999) Screening for depression in the older adult: criterion validity of the 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Arch Intern Med 159(15):1701–1704CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Bédard M et al. (2001) The Zarit Burden Interview: a new short version and screening version. Gerontologist 41(5):652–657CrossRefPubMed Bédard M et al. (2001) The Zarit Burden Interview: a new short version and screening version. Gerontologist 41(5):652–657CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Majerovitz SD (1995) Role of family adaptability in the psychological adjustment of spouse caregivers to patients with dementia. Psychol Aging 10(3):447–457CrossRefPubMed Majerovitz SD (1995) Role of family adaptability in the psychological adjustment of spouse caregivers to patients with dementia. Psychol Aging 10(3):447–457CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Zarit SH, Anthony CR, Boutselis M (1987) Interventions with care givers of dementia patients: comparison of two approaches. Psychol Aging 2(3):225–232CrossRefPubMed Zarit SH, Anthony CR, Boutselis M (1987) Interventions with care givers of dementia patients: comparison of two approaches. Psychol Aging 2(3):225–232CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Pinquart M, Sörensen S (2003) Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging 18(2):250–267CrossRefPubMed Pinquart M, Sörensen S (2003) Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging 18(2):250–267CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Pinquart M, Sörensen S (2006) Gender differences in caregiver stressors, social resources, and health: an updated meta-analysis. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 61(1):P33–P45CrossRefPubMed Pinquart M, Sörensen S (2006) Gender differences in caregiver stressors, social resources, and health: an updated meta-analysis. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 61(1):P33–P45CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Vulnerable characteristics and interest in wellness programs among head and neck cancer caregivers
Authors
Chandylen L. Nightingale
Katherine R. Sterba
Janet A. Tooze
Brandy-Joe Milliron
Lee Anne Tetrick
Min-So Paek
Kathryn E. Weaver
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3160-z

Other articles of this Issue 8/2016

Supportive Care in Cancer 8/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine