Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology 4/2023

28-04-2023 | Vitrectomy | Clinical Investigation

A factor for predicting simultaneous internal limiting membrane peeling during epiretinal membrane removal: swept-source optical coherence tomography-based evaluation of epiretinal membrane adhesion to the retina

Authors: Ryo Matoba, Yuki Kanzaki, Shuhei Kimura, Mio M. Hosokawa, Yusuke Shiode, Tetsuro Morita, Yuki Morizane

Published in: Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology | Issue 4/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate preoperative factors associated with simultaneous internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling during epiretinal membrane (ERM) removal.

Study design

Observational cross-sectional study.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 60 eyes with idiopathic ERM that underwent vitrectomy. The gap between the ERM and ILM was visualized using en face optical coherence tomography. The depth and width of the ERM–ILM gap at the initiation site of ERM removal were measured, and the relationship between preoperative factors including these parameters and simultaneous ILM peeling during ERM removal was investigated.

Results

The ILM was simultaneously peeled during ERM removal in 30 eyes, but not in the other 30 eyes. Age was significantly higher (P = 0.017) and the width of the ERM–ILM gap was significantly smaller (P < 0.001) in the simultaneous ILM peeling (+) group than in the simultaneous ILM peeling (–) group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed the width of the ERM–ILM gap as a significant negative predictor for simultaneous ILM peeling (odds ratio, 0.992; 95% confidence interval, 0.986–0.997; P = 0.003). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the width of the ERM–ILM gap revealed that the optimal cutoff for predicting simultaneous ILM peeling was 187.1 µm.

Conclusion

The small width of the ERM–ILM gap at the initiation site of ERM removal was significantly associated with simultaneous ILM peeling, indicating that the adhesion strength between the ERM and ILM at the initial ERM grasping site determines whether simultaneous ILM peeling will occur during ERM removal.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Matoba R, Morizane Y. Surgical treatment of epiretinal membrane. Acta Med Okayama. 2021;75:403–13.PubMed Matoba R, Morizane Y. Surgical treatment of epiretinal membrane. Acta Med Okayama. 2021;75:403–13.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Azuma K, Ueta T, Eguchi S, Aihara M. Effects of internal limiting membrane peeling combined with removal of idiopathic epiretinal membrane: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. Retina. 2017;37:1813–9.CrossRefPubMed Azuma K, Ueta T, Eguchi S, Aihara M. Effects of internal limiting membrane peeling combined with removal of idiopathic epiretinal membrane: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. Retina. 2017;37:1813–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Chang WC, Lin C, Lee CH, Sung TL, Tung TH, Liu JH. Vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2017;12: e0179105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chang WC, Lin C, Lee CH, Sung TL, Tung TH, Liu JH. Vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2017;12: e0179105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Huang Q, Li J. With or without internal limiting membrane peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2021;16: e0245459.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Huang Q, Li J. With or without internal limiting membrane peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2021;16: e0245459.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Spaide RF. Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance’ after internal limiting membrane removal is inner retinal dimpling. Retina. 2012;32:1719–26.CrossRefPubMed Spaide RF. Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance’ after internal limiting membrane removal is inner retinal dimpling. Retina. 2012;32:1719–26.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Uemura A, Kanda S, Sakamoto Y, Kita H. Visual field defects after uneventful vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane with indocyanine green-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:252–7.CrossRefPubMed Uemura A, Kanda S, Sakamoto Y, Kita H. Visual field defects after uneventful vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane with indocyanine green-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:252–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Terasaki H, Miyake Y, Nomura R, Piao CH, Hori K, Niwa T, et al. Focal macular ERGs in eyes after removal of macular ILM during macular hole surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:229–34.PubMed Terasaki H, Miyake Y, Nomura R, Piao CH, Hori K, Niwa T, et al. Focal macular ERGs in eyes after removal of macular ILM during macular hole surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:229–34.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Tsuchiya S, Higashide T, Sugiyama K. Visual field changes after vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for epiretinal membrane or macular hole in glaucomatous eyes. PLoS ONE. 2017;12: e0177526.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tsuchiya S, Higashide T, Sugiyama K. Visual field changes after vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for epiretinal membrane or macular hole in glaucomatous eyes. PLoS ONE. 2017;12: e0177526.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Hirano M, Morizane Y, Kimura S, Hosokawa M, Shiode Y, Doi S, et al. Assessment of lamellar macular hole and macular pseudohole with a combination of en face and radial B-scan optical coherence tomography imaging. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;188:29–40.CrossRefPubMed Hirano M, Morizane Y, Kimura S, Hosokawa M, Shiode Y, Doi S, et al. Assessment of lamellar macular hole and macular pseudohole with a combination of en face and radial B-scan optical coherence tomography imaging. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;188:29–40.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Matoba R, Kanzaki Y, Doi S, Kanzaki S, Kimura S, Hosokawa MM, et al. Assessment of epiretinal membrane formation using en face optical coherence tomography after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;259:2503–12.CrossRefPubMed Matoba R, Kanzaki Y, Doi S, Kanzaki S, Kimura S, Hosokawa MM, et al. Assessment of epiretinal membrane formation using en face optical coherence tomography after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;259:2503–12.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kanzaki Y, Doi S, Matoba R, Kanzaki S, Kimura S, Hosokawa MM, et al. Objective and quantitative estimation of the optimal timing for epiretinal membrane surgery on the basis of metamorphopsia. Retina. 2021;42:704–11.CrossRef Kanzaki Y, Doi S, Matoba R, Kanzaki S, Kimura S, Hosokawa MM, et al. Objective and quantitative estimation of the optimal timing for epiretinal membrane surgery on the basis of metamorphopsia. Retina. 2021;42:704–11.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kim JS, Chhablani J, Chan CK, Cheng L, Kozak I, Hartmann K, et al. Retinal adherence and fibrillary surface changes correlate with surgical difficulty of epiretinal membrane removal. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(692–7):697.e1-2. Kim JS, Chhablani J, Chan CK, Cheng L, Kozak I, Hartmann K, et al. Retinal adherence and fibrillary surface changes correlate with surgical difficulty of epiretinal membrane removal. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(692–7):697.e1-2.
13.
go back to reference Pavlidis M, Georgalas I, Körber N. Determination of a new parameter, elevated epiretinal membrane, by en face OCT as a prognostic factor for pars plana vitrectomy and safer epiretinal membrane peeling. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015: 838646.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pavlidis M, Georgalas I, Körber N. Determination of a new parameter, elevated epiretinal membrane, by en face OCT as a prognostic factor for pars plana vitrectomy and safer epiretinal membrane peeling. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015: 838646.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Charles S. Techniques and tools for dissection of epiretinal membranes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;241:347–52.CrossRefPubMed Charles S. Techniques and tools for dissection of epiretinal membranes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;241:347–52.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Beyhan B, Güler C, Tağa H. An algorithm for maximum inscribed circle based on voronoi diagrams and geometrical properties. J Geogr Syst. 2020;22:391–418.CrossRef Beyhan B, Güler C, Tağa H. An algorithm for maximum inscribed circle based on voronoi diagrams and geometrical properties. J Geogr Syst. 2020;22:391–418.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Matoba R, Morizane Y, Kimura S, Toshima S, Shiraga F. Retinal nerve fiber layer defect and paracentral scotoma after internal limiting membrane peeling with a nitinol loop. Acta Med Okayama. 2017;71:539–42.PubMed Matoba R, Morizane Y, Kimura S, Toshima S, Shiraga F. Retinal nerve fiber layer defect and paracentral scotoma after internal limiting membrane peeling with a nitinol loop. Acta Med Okayama. 2017;71:539–42.PubMed
Metadata
Title
A factor for predicting simultaneous internal limiting membrane peeling during epiretinal membrane removal: swept-source optical coherence tomography-based evaluation of epiretinal membrane adhesion to the retina
Authors
Ryo Matoba
Yuki Kanzaki
Shuhei Kimura
Mio M. Hosokawa
Yusuke Shiode
Tetsuro Morita
Yuki Morizane
Publication date
28-04-2023
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology / Issue 4/2023
Print ISSN: 0021-5155
Electronic ISSN: 1613-2246
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-023-00993-w

Other articles of this Issue 4/2023

Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology 4/2023 Go to the issue