Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 5/2017

01-10-2017 | Original Article

Visibility of Strings After Postplacental Intracesarean Insertion of CuT380A and Cu375 Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: A Randomized Comparative Study

Authors: Kavita Agarwal, Rupali Dewan, Pratima Mittal, Abha Aggarwal

Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the incidence of visible strings after postplacental intracesarean insertion of Cu375 and CuT380A intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUD).

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized comparative study. A total of 100 women fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria underwent postplacental intracesarean insertion of either Cu375 IUD or CuT380A IUD. Women were followed up at 1, 6 weeks and 3 months after IUD insertion and were questioned about IUD expulsion or removal at each visit. The cervix was inspected to visualize the IUD strings. Data were analyzed by Chi-square test.

Results

At 6-week follow-up, 97.9% women in group A versus 41.7% women in group B had strings visible at the cervical os and at 3 months 100% women in group A versus only 47.9% women in group B (p < 0.001) had visible strings of IUD.

Conclusion

Both Cu375 and CuT380A IUD are safe postpartum method of contraception but Cu375 if used for intracesarean IUD insertion increases the incidence of visible IUD strings. Hence, it avoids radiological investigations and invasive procedures at follow-up visits required to locate the IUD when strings are not visible.
CTRI No. CTRI/2015/09/006221.
Literature
1.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. World Health Organization. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
2.
go back to reference Goldstuck ND, Steyn PS. Intrauterine contraception after cesarean section and during lactation: a systematic review. Int J Women Health. 2013;5:811–8.CrossRef Goldstuck ND, Steyn PS. Intrauterine contraception after cesarean section and during lactation: a systematic review. Int J Women Health. 2013;5:811–8.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Levi E, Cantillo E, Ades V, Banks E, et al. Immediate postplacental IUD insertion at cesarean delivery: a prospective cohort study. Contraception. 2012;86:102.CrossRefPubMed Levi E, Cantillo E, Ades V, Banks E, et al. Immediate postplacental IUD insertion at cesarean delivery: a prospective cohort study. Contraception. 2012;86:102.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Fox MC, Oat-Judge J, Severson K, et al. Immediate placement of intraiuterine devices after first and second trimester pregnancy termination. Contraception. 2011;83:34–40.CrossRefPubMed Fox MC, Oat-Judge J, Severson K, et al. Immediate placement of intraiuterine devices after first and second trimester pregnancy termination. Contraception. 2011;83:34–40.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bhutta SZ, Butt IJ, Bano K. Insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device at cesarean section. J Coll Phys Surg Pak. 2011;21(9):527–30. Bhutta SZ, Butt IJ, Bano K. Insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device at cesarean section. J Coll Phys Surg Pak. 2011;21(9):527–30.
6.
go back to reference Singal S, Bharti R, Dewan R, et al. Clinical outcome of post placental Copper T 380A insertion in women delivering by cesarean section. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(9):OC01–4.PubMedPubMedCentral Singal S, Bharti R, Dewan R, et al. Clinical outcome of post placental Copper T 380A insertion in women delivering by cesarean section. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(9):OC01–4.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Gutgutia I, Kumari Usha Rani SP, Renu Arora S. Comparative evaluation of Postpartum versus post MTP insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4(1):23–9. Gutgutia I, Kumari Usha Rani SP, Renu Arora S. Comparative evaluation of Postpartum versus post MTP insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4(1):23–9.
8.
go back to reference Lester F, Kakaire O, Byamugisha J. Intracesarean insertion of CuT380A versus 6 weeks postcesarean: a randomized clinical trial. Contraception. 2015;91:198–203.CrossRefPubMed Lester F, Kakaire O, Byamugisha J. Intracesarean insertion of CuT380A versus 6 weeks postcesarean: a randomized clinical trial. Contraception. 2015;91:198–203.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Dewan R, Dewan A, Singal S, et al. Non-visualisation of strings after postplacental insertion of Copper- T 380A intrauterine device. J Fam Plan Reprod Health Care. 2016;0:1–9. Dewan R, Dewan A, Singal S, et al. Non-visualisation of strings after postplacental insertion of Copper- T 380A intrauterine device. J Fam Plan Reprod Health Care. 2016;0:1–9.
10.
go back to reference Prabhakaran S, Chuang A. In office retrieval of intrauterine contraceptive devices with missing strings. Contraception. 2011;83(2):102–6.CrossRefPubMed Prabhakaran S, Chuang A. In office retrieval of intrauterine contraceptive devices with missing strings. Contraception. 2011;83(2):102–6.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mishra S. Evaluation of safety, efficacy and expulsion of post-placental and Intra cesarean insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2014;64(5):337–43.CrossRef Mishra S. Evaluation of safety, efficacy and expulsion of post-placental and Intra cesarean insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2014;64(5):337–43.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lucksom PG, Kanungo BK, Sebastian N, et al. Comparative study of interval versus postpartum Cu-T insertion in a central referral hospital of North East India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4(1):47–51. Lucksom PG, Kanungo BK, Sebastian N, et al. Comparative study of interval versus postpartum Cu-T insertion in a central referral hospital of North East India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4(1):47–51.
13.
go back to reference Arshad F, Ejaz L, Noreen H, et al. Trans cesarean insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device. JSOGP. 2014;4:73–8. Arshad F, Ejaz L, Noreen H, et al. Trans cesarean insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device. JSOGP. 2014;4:73–8.
Metadata
Title
Visibility of Strings After Postplacental Intracesarean Insertion of CuT380A and Cu375 Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: A Randomized Comparative Study
Authors
Kavita Agarwal
Rupali Dewan
Pratima Mittal
Abha Aggarwal
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Electronic ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-017-0965-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 5/2017 Go to the issue

Invited Review Article

Calcium: A Nutrient in Pregnancy