Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Vestibular Schwannoma | Research

Single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery versus microsurgical resection for the treatment of vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Thomas Jakubeit, Sibylle Sturtz, Dorothea Sow, Wolfram Groß, Christoph Mosch, Mattea Patt, Vera Weingärtner, Jan Boström, Roland Goldbrunner, Martina Markes

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Vestibular schwannomas are benign tumours for which various treatments are available. We performed a systematic review of prospective controlled trials comparing the patient-relevant benefits and harms of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (sfSRS) with microsurgical resection (MR) in patients with vestibular schwannoma.

Methods

We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized prospective controlled trials in MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and study registries (last search: 09/2021) and also screened reference lists of relevant systematic reviews. Manufacturers were asked to provide unpublished data. Eligible studies investigated at least one patient-relevant outcome. We assessed the risk of bias (high or low) at the study and outcome level. If feasible, meta-analyses were performed. We graded the results into different categories (hint, indication, or proof of greater benefit or harm).

Results

We identified three non-randomized prospective controlled trials of generally low quality with evaluable data on 339 patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma. There was an indication of greater benefit of sfSRS compared with MR for facial palsy (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02–0.21, p < 0.001, 2 studies), hearing function (no pooled estimate available, 2 studies), and length of hospital stay (no pooled estimate available, 2 studies). We found no clinically relevant differences for mortality, vertigo, headaches, tinnitus, balance function, work disability, adverse events, and health-related quality of life.

Conclusions

Our systematic review indicates that sfSRS has greater benefits than MR in patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma. However, it is unclear whether this conclusion still holds after 2 years, as long-term studies are lacking. It is also unclear whether the effects of sfSRS are similar in patients with bilateral vestibular schwannomas. Long-term prospective studies including patients with this condition would therefore be useful.

Systematic review registration

The full (German language) protocol and report (Commission No. N20-03) are available on the institute’s website: www.​iqwig.​de/​en/​projects/​n20-03.​html
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
4.
go back to reference Carlson ML, Vivas EX, DJ MC, Sweeney AD, Neff BA, Shepard NT, et al. Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on hearing preservation outcomes in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannomas. Neurosurgery. 2018;82(2):E35–E9.CrossRef Carlson ML, Vivas EX, DJ MC, Sweeney AD, Neff BA, Shepard NT, et al. Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on hearing preservation outcomes in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannomas. Neurosurgery. 2018;82(2):E35–E9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Germano IM, Sheehan J, Parish J, Atkins T, Asher A, Hadjipanayis CG, et al. Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on the role of radiosurgery and radiation therapy in the management of patients with vestibular schwannomas. Neurosurgery. 2018;82(2):E49–51.CrossRef Germano IM, Sheehan J, Parish J, Atkins T, Asher A, Hadjipanayis CG, et al. Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on the role of radiosurgery and radiation therapy in the management of patients with vestibular schwannomas. Neurosurgery. 2018;82(2):E49–51.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Goldbrunner R, Weller M, Regis J, Lund-Johansen M, Stavrinou P, Reuss D, et al. EANO guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of vestibular schwannoma. Neuro Oncol. 2020;22(1):31–45.CrossRef Goldbrunner R, Weller M, Regis J, Lund-Johansen M, Stavrinou P, Reuss D, et al. EANO guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of vestibular schwannoma. Neuro Oncol. 2020;22(1):31–45.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hadjipanayis CG, Carlson ML, Link MJ, Rayan TA, Parish J, Atkins T, et al. Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on surgical resection for the treatment of patients with vestibular schwannomas. Neurosurgery. 2018;82(2):E40–E3.CrossRef Hadjipanayis CG, Carlson ML, Link MJ, Rayan TA, Parish J, Atkins T, et al. Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on surgical resection for the treatment of patients with vestibular schwannomas. Neurosurgery. 2018;82(2):E40–E3.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.CrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Biomarkers Definitions Working Group. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001;69(3):89–95.CrossRef Biomarkers Definitions Working Group. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001;69(3):89–95.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles MP, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328(7454):1490.CrossRef Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles MP, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328(7454):1490.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22(4):719–48. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22(4):719–48.
15.
go back to reference Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-analysis, vol. xxviii. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2009. p. 421.CrossRef Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-analysis, vol. xxviii. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2009. p. 421.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Di Maio S, Akagami R. Prospective comparison of quality of life before and after observation, radiation, or surgery for vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg. 2009;111(4):855–62.CrossRef Di Maio S, Akagami R. Prospective comparison of quality of life before and after observation, radiation, or surgery for vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg. 2009;111(4):855–62.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wagner JN, Glaser M, Wowra B, Muacevic A, Goldbrunner R, Cnyrim C, et al. Vestibular function and quality of life in vestibular schwannoma: does size matter? Front Neurol. 2011;2:55.CrossRef Wagner JN, Glaser M, Wowra B, Muacevic A, Goldbrunner R, Cnyrim C, et al. Vestibular function and quality of life in vestibular schwannoma: does size matter? Front Neurol. 2011;2:55.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Barnes JH, Patel NS, Lohse CM, Tombers NM, Link MJ, Carlson ML. Impact of treatment on vestibular schwannoma-associated symptoms: a prospective study comparing treatment modalities. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;165(3):458–64 194599820986564.CrossRef Barnes JH, Patel NS, Lohse CM, Tombers NM, Link MJ, Carlson ML. Impact of treatment on vestibular schwannoma-associated symptoms: a prospective study comparing treatment modalities. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;165(3):458–64 194599820986564.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Carlson ML, Barnes JH, Nassiri A, Patel NS, Tombers NM, Lohse CM, et al. Prospective study of disease-specific quality-of-life in sporadic vestibular schwannoma comparing observation, radiosurgery, and microsurgery. Otol Neurotol. 2021;42(2):e199–208.CrossRef Carlson ML, Barnes JH, Nassiri A, Patel NS, Tombers NM, Lohse CM, et al. Prospective study of disease-specific quality-of-life in sporadic vestibular schwannoma comparing observation, radiosurgery, and microsurgery. Otol Neurotol. 2021;42(2):e199–208.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Myrseth E, Moller P, Pedersen PH, Lund-Johansen M. Vestibular schwannoma: surgery or gamma knife radiosurgery? A prospective, nonrandomized study. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(4):654–61 discussion 61-3.CrossRef Myrseth E, Moller P, Pedersen PH, Lund-Johansen M. Vestibular schwannoma: surgery or gamma knife radiosurgery? A prospective, nonrandomized study. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(4):654–61 discussion 61-3.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pollock BE, Driscoll CL, Foote RL, Link MJ, Gorman DA, Bauch CD, et al. Patient outcomes after vestibular schwannoma management: a prospective comparison of microsurgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(1):77–85 discussion 77-85. Pollock BE, Driscoll CL, Foote RL, Link MJ, Gorman DA, Bauch CD, et al. Patient outcomes after vestibular schwannoma management: a prospective comparison of microsurgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(1):77–85 discussion 77-85.
22.
go back to reference Liu W, Ni M, Jia W, Zhou D, Zhang Q, Jiang Y, et al. How to address small- and medium-sized acoustic neuromas with hearing: a systematic review and decision analysis. World Neurosurg. 2015;84(2):283–291.e1.CrossRef Liu W, Ni M, Jia W, Zhou D, Zhang Q, Jiang Y, et al. How to address small- and medium-sized acoustic neuromas with hearing: a systematic review and decision analysis. World Neurosurg. 2015;84(2):283–291.e1.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Muzevic D, Legcevic J, Splavski B, Caye-Thomasen P. Stereotactic radiotherapy for vestibular schwannoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;16(12):CD009897. Muzevic D, Legcevic J, Splavski B, Caye-Thomasen P. Stereotactic radiotherapy for vestibular schwannoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;16(12):CD009897.
24.
go back to reference Sabab A, Sandhu J, Bacchi S, Jukes A, Zacest A. Postoperative headache following treatment of vestibular schwannoma: a literature review. J Clin Neurosci. 2018;52:26–31.CrossRef Sabab A, Sandhu J, Bacchi S, Jukes A, Zacest A. Postoperative headache following treatment of vestibular schwannoma: a literature review. J Clin Neurosci. 2018;52:26–31.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wolbers JG, Dallenga AH, Mendez Romero A, van Linge A. What intervention is best practice for vestibular schwannomas? A systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e001345.CrossRef Wolbers JG, Dallenga AH, Mendez Romero A, van Linge A. What intervention is best practice for vestibular schwannomas? A systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e001345.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Han MS, Jung S, Lim SH, Kim IY, Moon KS, Jung TY, et al. What clinicians should consider to determine a more beneficial treatment strategy for small to medium sized vestibular schwannoma with serviceable hearing: a single surgeon's long-term outcome of microsurgery and Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Otol Neurotol. 2020;41(8):1122–30.CrossRef Han MS, Jung S, Lim SH, Kim IY, Moon KS, Jung TY, et al. What clinicians should consider to determine a more beneficial treatment strategy for small to medium sized vestibular schwannoma with serviceable hearing: a single surgeon's long-term outcome of microsurgery and Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Otol Neurotol. 2020;41(8):1122–30.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery versus microsurgical resection for the treatment of vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Thomas Jakubeit
Sibylle Sturtz
Dorothea Sow
Wolfram Groß
Christoph Mosch
Mattea Patt
Vera Weingärtner
Jan Boström
Roland Goldbrunner
Martina Markes
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02118-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Systematic Reviews 1/2022 Go to the issue